Get help from the best in academic writing.

(1) include a thesis statement in the first paragraph, (2) analyze the argument, evidence, methods or implications of at

(1) include a thesis statement in the first paragraph, (2) analyze the argument, evidence, methods or implications of at least one reading , (3) include a citation of the analyzed piece, and (4) connect the reading with at least one other reading, a current event, or political phenomenon. You may submit the think piece once throughout the quarter for a required reading of your choice. This short assignment should not be a summary of the reading, but it should be clear from your submission that you read the required reading(s) carefully. no more than 500 words
only use the attached source

Download and read the following PDF: Wooldredge et al. 2015 . In a separate Word document, provide a proper

Download and read the following PDF: Wooldredge et al. 2015 . In a separate Word document, provide a proper citation (use APA 7th edition guidelines) followed by a 150-200 word discussion of the main topic and major finding(s). Include in your summary a brief discussion of what you found most interesting about the research conducted.

in the United States failed to block Facebook’s acquisition of Instagram/WhatsApp

Political Science Assignment Help Please use academic studies/papers from reputable sources. The paper must be:
– double-spaced
– times new Roman font
– 12 point font
– 1 inch margins

It is important that you talk about the process that Facebook underwent in trying and ultimately acquiring Instagram and WhatsApp. Then, outline the factors as to why regulators failed to block the acquisition. What happened? What factors led to these decisions? Go very in-depth

I will give you a list of sources you must use. Other than those, you are free to use any number of sources from ACADEMIC papers that are very variable

How can we use the frameworks from our class to better understand domestic policy developments and related political efforts

How can we use the frameworks from our class to better understand domestic policy developments and related political efforts under Obama and Trump?

To explore this question, please pick one example related to Obama and one example related to Trump and connect your examples to at least one of the perspectives from our class.

For instance, are there policy dynamics related to the Affordable Care Act that illustrate Obama’s approach to bargaining and persuasion or going public? Are there ways we can understand Obama or Trump that reflect “political time”? Can Grover’s focus on business power and capitalism help us understand policy developments under either president? Is the idea of an “imperial presidency” (and related use of administrative strategies) relevant here?

Please cite pages and consider using direct quotes from the reading to support your points.
Only Gover Ch.3 is Relevant I think.

These are the frameworks we discussed and used:

Neustadt (bargaining and persuasion), Schlesinger (imperial presidency), Kernell (going public), Skowronek (political time), Grover (political economy / structural theory), Tichenor (social movements).

Please let me know if you need more readings on the frameworks.

error: Content is protected !!