2. (12 points) Two poles are 78 feet apart and are 25 feet (the

Factors Contributing to the Capacity of an Emergency Room | Online Assignment Help argumentative essay help

APA format is required. References should be listed immediately after the question that is being answered. Each question lists a minimum number of unique scholarly references; the textbook is considered one unique reference (per question) regardless of how many times it is used. All references should be from the years 2007 to present day.

1. Describe some factors that contribute to the capacity of an emergency room, as measured by the number of patients served per day. Use at least two unique references. Length: 4-5 paragraphs.

2. What are the three steps in designing process layouts? Use at least two unique references. Length: 4-5 paragraphs.

3. What are the characteristics of self-managed teams? Use at least two unique references. Length: 4-5 paragraphs.

4. Describe advantages and disadvantages of periodic review systems. Use at least two unique references. Length: 4-5 paragraphs.

ARP STEP 2: Annotated Bibliography | Online Assignment Help argumentative essay help

2. (12 points) Two poles are 78 feet apart and are 25 feet (the

The annotated bibliography is an important step in the research process. It requires you to think about if a source works well for your project and how you might use it. It is a pretty straightforward assignment: you seek out timely, relevant, credible, useful sources from the library; you create a bibliography using MLA standards; and then you annotate the bibliography entries.

Timely: You want sources that are fairly recent for this project. Sometimes research will lead you to older, more groundbreaking essays, and this is fine. What you want to avoid is, say, magazine articles from the 80s, or outdated research.
Relevant: Chances are you will NOT find a source arguing the same thing that you are. Good! This means you are exploring new territory––and trust me, there is plenty of that in comedy studies. Also, a source that merely agrees with you is less interesting than a source that challenges your arguments or extends your arguments. Imagine a friend who merely says “I agree” whenever you say something. That’s the source you want to avoid (or save for those days that you need a self esteem boost ? ). So, though a source might not be about how “Rick and Morty” uses absurdist humor to parody TV tropes, maybe it is about absurdism in adult animation, or maybe it is about television subverting tropes.
Credible: This is a big one, for this class and beyond. Have you ever seen someone share a blatantly false story on Facebook, but not realize it’s false? Don’t let that be you! You want to know who your author is and any biases they might have, as well as who your publisher is and any biases they might have (think of how differently the same data can be framed by different perspectives). Is the essay/article self-published? Well, that means no one has vetted it, and it can say almost anything––such is the often case with blogs. But what about a blog that cites credible research? Yes, it’s complicated, so navigate wisely, and read critically. The gold standard in research is peer reviewed. That means that the essay/article/book has been read and critiqued by experts in the field. Magazines, newspapers, and similar publications are usually reviewed by an editor, as opposed to a team of experts in the field. These are also good sources, but you can see how one will lend you more credibility in your paper than the other.
Useful: Your sources should yield a lot of material for you. You should have many quotations to choose from––quotations that will allow you to expand your thinking. Things like dictionary definitions or biographical information are interesting, but they are not very useful in rhetorical analysis. Since we are dealing with ideas and culture, it’s a lot more useful to discuss, say, howobesity is represented in comedy, as opposed to statistics about obesity, or tips to lose weight. Studies and stats can yield interesting and thought-provoking information, but they usually lend themselves better to reporting. We are more after the things that inform the stats and studies, and how they are read.

You are fortunate to have a vast library at your fingertips. The OSU library is amazing, and you can easily narrow down your database searches to find peer-reviewed research only, or even electronic sources only (as opposed to physical texts). With the vastness, though, comes a lot of results, most of which are totally irrelevant. So you will want to practice using synonyms and specific search terms. You likely have much experience navigating Google––this is similar. If you type “Family Guy” into the search bar, you are going to get about a thousand hits of random ads or TV guide blips about Family Guy. But if you type something like “Family Guy shock humor,” you might find more specific results.

Occasionally it is easier to use Google/Google Scholar. You can find sources there, and then enter their info in the OSU Library database in order to find the full text.

Expectations of your Annotated Bibliography:

4 timely, relevant, credible, useful sources
At least one peer-reviewed source
Correct MLA style citation (look at the Purdue OWL website for guidance)
4-5 sentence annotations following each entry. Annotations should identify where the source comes from and why it’s a good source. Further, they should briefly state how the source contributes to your project.

EBP Paper | Online Assignment Help argumentative essay help

1)What levels of evidence are present in relation to research and practice and why are they important regardless of the method you use?

2)In addition to the initial question please address the following. This can help you in your participation:

Pick two levels of evidence and develop a table and identify two advantages/disadvantages of each…try and make it relevant to your topic.

3)What factors must be assessed when critically appraising quantitative studies (i.e., validity, reliability, and applicability)? Which is the most important? Why?

Journal Entry about “Christianity” | Online Assignment Help argumentative essay help

Please write this journal entry about “Christianity”.  Please make sure this journal entry has at least 200 words, also make sure it is Original and has excellent grammar.

Organizational Performance Management Paper | Online Assignment Help argumentative essay help

Resource: Organizational Management Performance Table

As a team, discuss and compare your chosen organizations selected in this week’s individual assignment, Organizational Management Performance Table to complete this paper.

As a team, create a 2- to 3-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation (not counting the title or reference slides) with detailed speaker notes of at least 100 words per slide in which you compare and contrast the organizations selected by each learning team member.

Here are the organizations that some of the team has chosen: www.petersonhealthcare.org, www.AHA.org,  www.wellstar.org/foundation/about/pages/default.aspx

Include the following in your presentation:

Determine how compliance with the regulations and development of risk- and quality-management systems for each type of organization contribute to the organization’s overall performance-management system.

Cite at least 3 peer-reviewed, scholarly, or similar references and your textbook to support your assignment.

Format your presentation according to APA guidelines.

The Relationship Between Policy Formation and Implementation | Online Assignment Help argumentative essay help

Instructions

After reflecting on concepts and arguments presented in this week’s readings and video, prepare a memo to a supervisor critically analyzing the relationship between policy formation and implementation on a specific issue. Address the following in your paper:

· Select an issue (economic, political, or social), such as the minimum wage, immigration, environment, or so forth. Then, develop considerations based on “Questions Associated with the Policy Process” listed in the graphic in the primary text (Box, 2015, p. 150). Graphic Attached on Zip Folder

· Next, determine if there are organizational structure considerations that enable or constrain the possible implementation of policy for your selected issue. Explain and support your thoughts with examples where appropriate.

· Justify which public administration model (Madison, Hamilton, or Jefferson) seems most appropriate for developing the policy.

Support your paper with at least 4 scholarly resources.  In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including older articles, may be included.

Length: 5 pages, not including title and reference pages

Your response should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.

Mandatory Scholarly Resources Attached in Zip Folder

Advanced Pollution Prevention | Online Assignment Help argumentative essay help

Read the lecture materials and click here to visit the EPA web page on P2. Discuss what the term “pollution prevention” (P2) means to you, either personally or professionally. Share with your classmates what involvement you have with pollution prevention in your work.

Effects of hurricane Katrina to the city of New Orleans | Online Assignment Help argumentative essay help

What were the effects behind the extensive damage to the city of New Orleans because of hurricane Katrina