There is a breakdown of what must be included in the presentation slides, along with several questions to consider. The one in bold must be answered (as attached – brief).
Please provide information on slides, as well as the scriipt/speaker notes for presentation.
Thank you.
Business Question
You are responsible for writing and submitting a paper that advocates either the shareholder-value perspective or stakeholder-theory perspective on corporate responsibility, as discussed in the video, book, and classroom discussions. Only those sources may be used in fulfillment of the assignment—the use of any outside sources without citation (which will not be accepted) constitutes plagiarism.
Begin by clearly stating that one position is morally superior to the other, then develop a carefully structured argument to support your position. You should NOT use your very limited word count to explain the perspective to the instructor. Take for granted that your reader is an expert in your source material, and add value by convincing the reader that the perspective you have chosen is more moral than the alternative.
If you have kept up with the corporate responsibility course content, absorbing the readings, videos, and class discussions, you will be able to write the paper effectively and efficiently. If you have not, you will need to become well versed in the both corporate responsibility positions before writing (without the benefit of class discussions), which will reduce the amount of time that you have available to craft an excellent paper.
The paper must be between 275 and 300 words (absolutely no more); place your name and word count in the upper right-hand corner of your paper. As you did with your Business Ethics News Item paper, you should think in terms of writing a 350-400 word paper, and then paring it down and crafting it into a very tight, brief paper that fits into the required word range. Do not write a “short” paper and then engage in puffery. The paper must be double spaced in Times New Roman 12-point font, and attached to this assignment as a Microsoft Word document by the date and time listed in the course schedule.
Activity 2
Business Assignment Help Suppose you receive an e-mail from a stock broker who claims to be able to accurately predict whether any given stock will rise or fall in price during the subsequent month. To “prove” her claim, she makes a prediction about performance (higher price or lower price) for ten stocks over the next month. You are skeptical of the broker’s claim, and assume she simply guesses which stocks will improve or worsen in price over any given month. Put another way, you assume she has a 50% chance of being correct in her prediction for any given stock. Based on this assumption, you derive the following probabilities concerning her ten picks:
Number of correct picks
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Probability
0.001
0.01
0.044
0.117
0.205
0.246
0.205
0.117
0.044
0.01
0.001
What is the empirically testable conclusion resulting from your deductive reasoning?
How could you test your empirically testable conclusion using a data sample?
Outline the inductive and deductive reasoning you could use to evaluate whether or not the broker is simply guessing in her stock picks.
Business Question
I attached the works I do it before for you have an idea and I paste the feedback here
thank you for submitting the deliverables for the week 4 capstone milestone assignment. The assignment requirements are partially met as the text describing each deliverable and some analysis as to each deliverable’s importance to your project are not included per the assignment requirements. The deliverables should be in the appendices of the document after the week 2 and week 4 content is merged into a single document.
This is different, but same direction. from the last two.
Please note the feedback and act on them.
Please PICK ONLY ONE
Important! Read First
Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission.
OPTION #1:
Using the feedback from your Week 2 4 – Portfolio Project Milestone, you must ensure you have a fully approved project for your Final Capstone Project. Then, building on your work in Modules 2 4 Portfolio Project Milestones and with a specific focus on your service project at the company you selected, develop the following newly required draft subsections of your project:
Communications Plan – which should include the elements of the communications management plan as found in section 10.1.3.1 in Chapter 10 in A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge.
Stakeholder Analysis – which should include at least the elements of the stakeholder analysis as found in section 13.1.2.3 in A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge.
Your well-written paper must meet the following requirements:
2-4 pages in length, not including cover, references page, and appendices (only the current 2-4 pages are required now. You do not need to provide the Module 2 nor 4 draft revisions. Only include the newly required Module 6 draft subsections.).
Supporting documents must appear in appendices.
For this milestone, include 2 new sources which must be current, scholarly sources from peer reviewed journal articles published within the most recent 3 years and accessed from the library databases or other academic sources. Textbooks will not count toward peer reviewed requirements but may be used as quality sources if published within the most recent 3 years. The use of the PMBOK ® Guide as a quality source is strongly suggested. The PMBOK ® Guide is not a scholarly resource. You must have at least 1 current, scholarly source.
Formatted according to the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.).
OPTION #2:
Using the feedback from your Week 2 4 – Portfolio Project Milestone, you must ensure you have a fully approved project for your Final Capstone Project. Then, building on your work in Modules 2 4 Portfolio Project Milestones and with a specific focus on your international manufacturing project at the company you selected, develop the following newly required draft subsections of your project:
Communications Plan – which should include the elements of the communications management plan as found in section 10.1.3.1 in Chapter 10 in A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge.
Stakeholder Analysis – which should include at least the elements of the stakeholder analysis as found in section 13.1.2.3 in A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge.
Your well-written paper must meet the following requirements:
2-4 pages in length, not including cover, references page, and appendices (only the current 2-4 pages are required now. You do not need to provide the Module 2 nor 4 draft revisions. Only include the newly required Module 6 draft subsections.).
Supporting documents must appear in appendices.
For this milestone, include 2 new sources which must be current, scholarly sources from peer reviewed journal articles published within the most recent 3 years and accessed from the library databases or other academic sources. Textbooks will not count toward peer reviewed requirements but may be used as quality sources if published within the most recent 3 years. The use of the PMBOK ® Guide as a quality source is strongly suggested. The PMBOK ® Guide is not a scholarly resource. You must have at least 1 current, scholarly source.
Formatted according to the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.).
Requirements: 2-4 pages