Get help from the best in academic writing.

A ten-year-old patient presents in the clinic with soft-tissue swelling around the left eye. The parent reports that the

A ten-year-old patient presents in the clinic with soft-tissue swelling around the left eye. The parent reports that the child has had a cold with copious amounts of nasal drainage for approximately a week. The parent thought the child was getting better, but this morning the child awoke with a red eye and a fever of 102.1°F. The child has no complaint of headache, vomiting or visual disturbances.

Describe how the provider would clinically manage and follow up this patient. List the pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. Describe how the treatment plan might be different for a 35-year-old patient as well as a 65 year old patient.

Writer’s Choice Essay

The purpose of this assignment is to help students develop competency in locating quality, high-
level research about a chosen topic as well as analyze and compare two research studies.
Identify a research topic in the field of nursing that is of interest to you. Keep the topic
straightforward and something easily addressed by research studies. An example would be how
well diabetics adhere to a diabetic diet. Perform a literature search to locate articles published in
the last 3 – 5 years that will address the topic. Use at least 2 appropriate databases (CINAHL,
MEDLINE, PubMed, etc.) to find pertinent articles. Limit your search to scholarly, peer
reviewed journals. Narrow your search down to two articles that provide the best evidence for
the chosen topic. These articles must be about a research study, not opinion or practice example
type articles. To assist with your search, the Jerry Falwell Library (JFL) has various tutorials
available as well a nursing research guide. Be sure to take the time to explore the JFL and its
various resources as you will be using them throughout the program. There are also links to
various resources in the readings section of this module. Feel free as well to consult an
undergraduate level nursing research text or other sources as needed. Be sure to cite and provide
a reference for any sources used.
1. Please describe the search process for the research articles. What search engines did you
use? What terms did you use in the search? How did you narrow your search and decide
on the two articles?
2. Provide a brief analysis of each article, addressing the following:
a. Identify the type of study and provide rationale for your answer. Be specific as to
the type of study. You must identify the type of study beyond the broad category of
quantitative research. There are many types of research and it’s important to
understand the differences. Common types of research in nursing include:
o Qualitative (case study, grounded theory, phenomenology, ethnography)
o Quantitative (experimental, quasi-experimental, descriptive, correlational)
o Mixed Methods (qualitative and quantitative)
o Systematic Review
o Meta-Analysis
Note: You will generally not use qualitative studies as evidence for a practice change
but it’s important to know the difference between qualitative vs. quantitative research
when reviewing articles.
b. Refer to the Melnyk levels of evidence to determine level of evidence. If you’ve
correctly identified the type of research, this can be easily determined. Please indicate
the level of evidence and provide rationale.
c. Describe:
NURS 700
Page 2 of 2
o The sample (number of subjects, general characteristics)
o Research methods (instruments used, number of groups, information collected,
analysis, etc.)
o Results of the research (statistical significance, overall results, implications)
3. Compare and contrast the two articles to include:
a. Quality of research methods
b. Strengths and weaknesses
c. Usefulness to inform practice
Keep in mind that the level of evidence (Melnyk) does not necessarily correspond with the
usefulness of a research study to inform practice. A highly controlled study may not mirror “real
life” patient situations. A descriptive study is not well controlled but may better describe what
happens in the clinical arena.
? This assignment must be at least 4 pages, adhere to current APA format and utilize at
least five scholarly sources (including the articles themselves). Refer to the LU graduate
level template and sample paper if needed for formatting.
? Please write this as a formal paper in narrative format.
? Use headings to separate sections of the paper.
? Include a title page but not an abstract or table of contents.
? Provide citations for all sources as you use them in the paper and include a reference
? When referring to each article analyzed, you can list the title initially but then cite by
author and year in APA format. Do not refer to articles with language such as “article
one” or “the first article”.
? Do not use first person or excessive quotations.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool

ASSIGNMENT: Choose a construct that is of interest to you. Find two measures of that construct in the research

Religion and Theology Assignment Help ASSIGNMENT:
Choose a construct that is of interest to you. Find two measures of that construct in the research literature. Tell us a little about both and then determine, if you were conducting your own study, which one (if either) you would use and why? Remember to link your reasoning to this week’s resources.


Chapter 6
Defining and Measuring Concepts
Measurement, Conceptualization, and Operationalization
In this chapter we’ll discuss measurement, conceptualization, and operationalization. If you’re not quite sure what any of those words mean, or even how to pronounce them, no need to worry. By the end of the chapter, you should be able to wow your friends and family with your newfound knowledge of these three difficult to pronounce, but relatively simple to grasp, terms.

6.1 Measurement
Define measurement.
Describe Kaplan’s three categories of the things that social scientists measure.
Identify the stages at which measurement is important.
Measurement is important. Recognizing that fact, and respecting it, will be of great benefit to you—both in research methods and in other areas of life as well. If, for example, you have ever baked a cake, you know well the importance of measurement. As someone who much prefers rebelling against precise rules over following them, I once learned the hard way that measurement matters. A couple of years ago I attempted to bake my husband a birthday cake without the help of any measuring utensils. I’d baked before, I reasoned, and I had a pretty good sense of the difference between a cup and a tablespoon. How hard could it be? As it turns out, it’s not easy guesstimating precise measures. That cake was the lumpiest, most lopsided cake I’ve ever seen. And it tasted kind of like Play-Doh. Figure 6.1 depicts the monstrosity I created, all because I did not respect the value of measurement.

Figure 6.1

Measurement is important in baking and in research.

Just as measurement is critical to successful baking, it is as important to successfully pulling off a social scientific research project. In sociology, when we use the term measurement we mean the process by which we describe and ascribe meaning to the key facts, concepts, or other phenomena that we are investigating. At its core, measurement is about defining one’s terms in as clear and precise a way as possible. Of course, measurement in social science isn’t quite as simple as using some predetermined or universally agreed-on tool, such as a measuring cup or spoon, but there are some basic tenants on which most social scientists agree when it comes to measurement. We’ll explore those as well as some of the ways that measurement might vary depending on your unique approach to the study of your topic.

What Do Social Scientists Measure?
The question of what social scientists measure can be answered by asking oneself what social scientists study. Think about the topics you’ve learned about in other sociology classes you’ve taken or the topics you’ve considered investigating yourself. Or think about the many examples of research you’ve read about in this text. In Chapter 2 “Linking Methods With Theory” we learned about Melissa Milkie and Catharine Warner’s study (2011)Milkie, M. A.,

Hi, You previously worked on my order (Order # 356185771) for the similar course last semester. Please remember my Essay

You previously worked on my order (Order # 356185771) for the similar course last semester. Please remember my ID as I`ll ask you to work on the series of the similar works (These are the primary steps of the major assignment).
Each week I`ll ask you to write the answer for the main questions (about 250-300 words) and then, you need to continue writing 2 response (about 100 words) as a comments based on the requested on the instruction to 2 other students (BASED ON THE ATTACHED COURSE MATERIALS). Then, you need to revise the RESEARCH QUESTION BASED ON THE STUDENT`S FEEDBACK.

*Here is the this week questions:

“1. Using the course content and your readings, write a PICOC research question, share it with your peers. Please post your question by Thursday at midnight. Note: Write a question that holds interest for you personally because you will be using this PICOC question to guide your future assignments and as part of some learning activities in subsequent weeks in this course.

2. Provide feedback to TWO peers on their posted question. As you read and respond, assess whether the PICOC elements are clearly stated. Ask questions and provide constructive feedback. When possible, please post your feedback by Saturday evening so that your peer will have time on Sunday to consider your feedback and revise their research question.

3. Refine your individual question based on the feedback you receive and post your final question by the end of the week (Sunday 10 pm EST).

4. Conduct a preliminary literature search on Ovid MEDLINE to see if there is evidence you can use in your assignments. Review the tutorials on the Health Science Library website to guide your search. Where possible, you should be able to identify a randomized control trial (RCT) or systematic review (SR) that answers your PICOC question.

How will this week’s discussion be assessed?

The posting of your research question and PICOC will be viewed as your initial post, and since there is only one question this week (the design of your research and PICOC question, we require you to provide feedback to the draft PICOC questions posted by TWO your peers. Please provide feedback to your peers, and offer suggested edits or comments/questions to help them further develop their research question and PICOC. The feedback can be 3-4 sentences. We then expect you to make a “final” post with your revised research question, in response to the feedback from your peer.

In addition, we recommend that you conduct a preliminary literature search on Ovid MEDLINE and CINAHL to see if there is evidence you can use in your assignment. Review the tutorials on the Health Science Library website to guide your search. Where possible, you should identify a randomized control trial (RCT) or systematic review (SR) that addresses your research question.”

1) Picking your Topic is Research created by North Carolina State University. (This helps explain iterative process you’re about to undertake.)

2)Watch the shortened (7 min.) or full length (2 hrs) lecture by the MHM librarians about searching the MHM literature

error: Content is protected !!