Get help from the best in academic writing.

• Analyze multiple works of American literature through a specific historical lens. • Construct an essay that critically evaluates Essay

• Analyze multiple works of American literature through a specific historical lens.
• Construct an essay that critically evaluates works of American literature.

Essay requirements:
o Roughly four to five pages
o MLA format and citations
o The effective application of at least three academic sources
o The effective analysis of at least two course texts

• This is not a comparative analysis. You will use multiple texts from a
given period to make an argument about American literature.

whey want more of a breakdown of the resource that you used in this paper overview: Now they you

whey want more of a breakdown of the resource that you used in this paper overview: Now they you to break down the resource and making sure its a good reliably source

Now that we’ve discussed the importance of using credible secondary sources for your project, let’s start annotating! Don’t worry—we’re going to
walk through the process one step at a time. This week, you’ll be guided through the writing-plan process with specific questions. In this section, we’ll first focus
on finding sources. Then we’ll help you summarize those sources, evaluate their credibility, and explain how they will help support your argument. If you found a
source that passed the C.R.A.A.P.O. test earlier in this module, feel free to use that as one of your sources. If you decided to alter your keywords and you’d like to
start your research from scratch, that’s totally fine too!
Prompt: In this activity, you’ll create an annotated bibliography by following the steps below and answering the questions as thoroughly as possible. The
questions will prompt you to engage in a conversation with your sources. You will need to follow the steps below three times (for your three different sources).
Before you begin, make sure you have:
? Selected sources from the library databases
? At least one of your three sources should present a counterargument, a position that an opponent of your argument might make.
? Applied the C.R.A.A.P.O test to the sources to determine if they are credible and reliable (You can download a copy of The C.R.A.A.P.O. Test Worksheet in
MindEdge. Remember that credible sources should score 35 points or more on the test.)
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
1. Identify your sources, including author, title, and the database information or website.
2. Summarize your source. (Use the template below.)
? It seems this source is arguing ____________________. This source is using the following evidence to support the argument:
____________________.
? A counterargument for one of the provided sources could be: _________________________________________________________.
3. Credibility and Relevance
? Explain the rationale for the credibility of the source by providing supporting evidence. (Use the template below.)
o Personally, I believe the source is doing a (good job / bad job) of supporting its arguments because ____________________.
? Explain the relevance of the source to your argument. (Use the template below.)
o I think this source will be very helpful in supporting my argument because ________

Bayefsky, M. J., Bartz, D.,

Compose a full, rich, detailed paragraph discussing your research goals. The “Sample Week 3 Assignment” document will guide you.

English Assignment Help Compose a full, rich, detailed paragraph discussing your research goals. The “Sample Week 3 Assignment” document will guide you.
Compose a full, rich, detailed paragraph discussing your research goals. The “Sample Week 3 Assignment” document will guide you.
Compose full APA References for six scholarly sources, ideally three that support your points and three that oppose them, but no fewer than two opposing sources.

Write a rich annotation for each source, according to best practices studied in your readings and as demonstrated in the “Sample Week 3 Assignment” document.

This paragraph of approach and purpose must answer all of the following questions in good depth and detail in this single rich paragraph:

What has been your approach to finding your sources?
What have you been looking for?
How successful have you been?
Do you plan to change strategies, and/or do you have additional specific sources or search strategies in mind?
Keep in mind that your purpose is analytical. You will very briefly summarize the source in a single sentence, then move into the source’s credibility, relevance, timeliness, and usefulness, followed by detailing specific connections to your argument and points and to other sources, if applicable. By the time you have finished this assignment, you should have a very clear idea of how your argument and the conversation between your voice and your sources will play out. This assignment will also provide your instructor with a solid preview of the quality of your argument as a whole.
Before submission, proofread and edit carefully for APA, spelling, punctuation, and grammar. While you are strongly encouraged to utilize electronic proofreading and APA tools, that is just your first line of offense. You should then always perform your own careful proofreading, silently and aloud, asking others to proofread if possible.
Writing Requirements (APA format)

Length: 3-4 pages (not including the title page)
1-inch margins
Double spaced
12-point Times New Roman font
Title page

More of a breakdown of Why women should avoid having an Abortion. All so you have you the same

More of a breakdown of Why women should avoid having an Abortion. All so you have you the same resources

Let’s revisit those sources and put them to the C.R.A.A.P.O.* test! This will help you determine which sources are credible and, consequently, which are the best choices for your essay. Using the provided worksheet, determine whether or not one of the sources you found passes the test.

By the end of this assignment, you should have at least one source that can be used for your persuasive essay.
References
Bayefsky, M. J., Bartz, D.,

error: Content is protected !!