Chemical Neurotransmission

Comprehensive Case escenario

Comprehensive case scenario
Description
This assignment will cover diverse topics of relevance for the advanced practice. You will select and interesting case from your practicum experience, that could be from adult care, pediatrics or women health, as you wish.
Directions
Please include:
Demographic information.
Chief complain.
History of present illness. Fallowing the mnemonic old chart: Onset/Location/Duration/Character/Alleviating-Aggravating factors/Temporal pattern/Severity. Additional symptoms and previous treatment if known.
Medical history: PMH, FMH, SMH.
Social history, employment, habits, physical activity, allergies and medications taken. For these six elements include a concise statement about the impact of such findings for potential outcomes with in-text citations as required.
Review of systems
As part the objective component include: Vital signs, body measurements.
Physical examination with pertinent normal findings, normal variations and abnormalities. Characterization of pain or discomfort (if present) and psychological status.
Completed or known diagnostic tests with results supporting or ruling outa medical diagnosis.
Diagnosis. Include a rationale and in-text citation supporting your diagnosis. Are there possible etiologies? What’s the reasoning behind it?(Include citations as required).
Differential diagnosis. Include three ruled out diagnoses with in-text citations supporting your ideas.
Treatment with rationales per therapeutic option. Describe the goals, priorities and education provided. Include a citation per therapeutic option and education.
New orders for diagnostic testing. Include rationale and one citation per order.
Follow ups and referrals if required.
Finish the case with a paragraph justifying a theoretical perspective supporting your management approach.
Assignment Requirements
Include at least 4 reliable sources as in-text citations.
Follow APA format
Include a presentation page and a complete list of references separately.

Nursing Question

Nursing Assignment Help Assessment Description
The field of nursing has changed over time. In a 750?1,000 word paper, discuss nursing practice today by addressing the following:
Explain how nursing practice has changed over time and how this evolution has changed the scope of practice and the approach to treating the individual.
Compare and contrast the differentiated practice competencies between an associate and baccalaureate education in nursing. Explain how scope of practice changes between an associate and baccalaureate nurse.
Identify a patient care situation and describe how nursing care, or approaches to decision?making, differ between the BSN?prepared nurse and the ADN nurse.
Discuss the significance of applying evidence?based practice to nursing care and explain how the academic preparation of the RN?BSN nurse supports its application.
Discuss how nurses today communicate and collaborate with interdisciplinary teams and how this supports safer and more effective patient outcomes.
You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be appropriate for the assignment and relevant to nursing practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Contemporary Nursing Practice – Rubric
Evolution of Nursing Practice Over Time and Resulting Change 15 points
Criteria Description
Evolution of Nursing Practice Over Time and Resulting Changes to Scope of Practice and Approach to Patient Care
5. Excellent
15 points
A thorough explanation of how nursing practice has changed over time is presented. How scope of practice and approach to treating the individual have changed over time is discussed in detail. An insightful account of the evolution of nursing practice and its influence on scope of practice and patient care is presented.
4. Good
13.35 points
An explanation of how nursing practice has changed over time is presented. How scope of practice and approach to treating the individual have changed over time is discussed. Minor detail is needed for clarity. The explanation is accurate and captures all significant aspects.
3. Satisfactory
11.85 points
A general explanation of how nursing practice has changed over time is presented. How scope of practice and approach to treating the individual have changed over time is summarized. There are some minor inaccuracies. Some information is needed for clarity.
2. Less than Satisfactory
11.25 points
Explanation of how nursing practice has changed over time is incomplete. A partial summary of how scope of practice and approach to treating the individual have changed over time is presented. There are major inaccuracies. More information is needed.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Explanation of how nursing practice has changed over time and how this evolution has changed the scope of practice and the approach to treating the individual is not presented.

Comparison of Differentiated Practice Competencies of ADN and BSN 22.5 points
Criteria Description
Comparison of Differentiated Practice Competencies of ADN and BSN
5. Excellent
22.5 points
A comparison of the differentiated practice competencies of the ADN and BSN is clearly presented. Differences between ADN and BSN scope of practice are described in detail. The narrative demonstrates a strong understanding of differentiated competencies and scope of practice for the ADN and BSN.
4. Good
20.03 points
A comparison of the differentiated practice competencies of the ADN and BSN is nursing is presented. Differences between ADN and BSN scope of practice are described. Minor detail or rationale is needed for clarity or support.
3. Satisfactory
17.78 points
A general comparison of the differentiated practice competencies of the ADN and BSN is presented. Differences between ADN and BSN scope of practice are summarized. Some information is needed for clarity or support.
2. Less than Satisfactory
16.88 points
An incomplete comparison of the differentiated practice competencies of the ADN and BSN is presented. Differences between ADN and BSN scope of practice is unclear. There are significant inaccuracies. More information is needed.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The differentiated practice competencies of the ADN and BSN are not compared.

Use of Patient Care Situation to Describe Differences in Approach to Nursing Care
30 points
Criteria Description
Use of Patient Care Situation to Describe Differences in Approach to Nursing Care Based Upon ADN and BSN Education
5. Excellent
30 points
Relevant patient care situation is thoroughly described. The differences in approach to nursing care and scope of practice based upon ADN and BSN education are described in detail. Narrative demonstrates insight into patient care, decision making, and differing approaches between ADN and BSN.
4. Good
26.7 points
Relevant patient care situation is described, including differences in decision making and approach to nursing care based upon ADN and BSN education. Difference between ADN and BSN scope of practice is described. Minor detail is needed for clarity.
3. Satisfactory
23.7 points
Summary of relevant patient care situation is presented. Differences in decision making and approach to nursing care based upon ADN and BSN education are generally described. Difference between ADN and BSN scope of practice is summarized. More detail is needed for clarity and support.
2. Less than Satisfactory
22.5 points
Summary of patient care situation is incomplete or is not relevant to illustrating the differences in decision making or approach to nursing care based upon ADN and BSN education.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A patient care situation illustrating the difference between ADN and BSN in decision making and approaches to patient care is not presented.

Application of Evidence-Based Practice and RN-BSN Education in Nursing Care
30 points
Criteria Description
Application of Evidence-Based Practice and RN-BSN Education in Nursing Care
5. Excellent
30 points
A discussion of the significance of evidence-based practice to nursing care and how the BSN supports the application of evidence-based practice is thoroughly presented. Strong evidence and rationale is provided to support claims.
4. Good
26.7 points
A discussion on the significance of evidence-based practice to nursing care and how the BSN supports the application of evidence-based practice is presented. Some evidence or rationale is needed to support claims.
3. Satisfactory
23.7 points
A summary of the significance of evidence-based practice to nursing care and how the BSN supports the application of evidence-based practice is presented. The discussion contains minor inaccuracies; or, more evidence or rationale is needed to support claims.
2. Less than Satisfactory
22.5 points
The significance of evidence-based practice to nursing care and how the BSN supports the application of evidence-based practice is partially discussed. The discussion contains significant inaccuracies.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Significance of evidence-based practice to nursing care and how the BSN supports its application is not discussed.

Communication and Collaboration With Interdisciplinary Teams to Support Patient Outcomes
22.5 points
Criteria Description
Communication and Collaboration With Interdisciplinary Teams to Support Patient Outcomes
5. Excellent
22.5 points
A detailed discussion of how nurses today communicate and collaborate with interdisciplinary teams, and how this supports safer and more effective patient outcomes, is clearly presented. The discussion is well supported and strongly illustrates the importance of working with interdisciplinary teams.
4. Good
20.03 points
A discussion of how nurses today communicate and collaborate with interdisciplinary teams, and how this supports safer and more effective patient outcomes, is presented. Overall, the discussion illustrates the importance of working with interdisciplinary teams.
3. Satisfactory
17.78 points
A summary of how nurses today communicate and collaborate with interdisciplinary teams, and how this supports safer and more effective patient outcomes, is presented. The summary generally illustrates the importance of working with interdisciplinary teams. Some information is needed for accuracy or to support claims.
2. Less than Satisfactory
16.88 points
An incomplete discussion of how nurses today communicate and collaborate with interdisciplinary teams, and how this supports safer and more effective patient outcomes, is presented. The discussion contains inaccuracies and fails to demonstrate the importance of working with interdisciplinary teams.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A discussion of how nurses today communicate and collaborate with interdisciplinary teams, and how this supports safer and more effective patient outcomes, is not presented.

Thesis Development and Purpose
7.5 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. Excellent
7.5 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. Good
6.68 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. Satisfactory
5.93 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. Less than Satisfactory
5.63 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction
7.5 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. Excellent
7.5 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. Good
6.68 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3. Satisfactory
5.93 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. Less than Satisfactory
5.63 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
7.5 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. Excellent
7.5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. Good
6.68 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
3. Satisfactory
5.93 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
2. Less than Satisfactory
5.63 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
3 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. Excellent
3 points
All format elements are correct.
4. Good
2.67 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. Satisfactory
2.37 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2. Less than Satisfactory
2.25 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources
4.5 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5. Excellent
4.5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. Good
4.01 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. Satisfactory
3.56 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. Less than Satisfactory
3.38 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.

Module 02 Content Purpose Professional nurses in the 21st century should have an understanding of current

Global Heath Module 02 Content AssignmentPurposeProfessional nurses in the 21st century should have an understanding of current global health issues and the implications of the issues.
Course CompetencyAnalyze the incidence, distribution, and control of emerging healthcare concerns in global populations.
Project Part 1As your final course project, you will be preparing a poster presentation for an upcoming global health conference. Your poster will be about a disease affecting a global population. You plan to present the incidence and prevalence of the disease within the population, and discuss efforts to control, eliminate, and eradicate the disease. Before you can complete the poster, you need to do some research. For the first part of the project, you will choose a significant global health issue and complete a paper as per the instructions below. You may choose a specific disease, population, nation, etc. For example, you might choose Ebola in Africa, diabetes in American Indians, etc.InstructionsContent: In essay format, do the following:Explain the global health issue
Describe the population affected by the disease, including demographics
Present the incidence and prevalence of the disease within the population
Discuss the implications of the global health issue
FormatYour final essay should be 3-4 pages.
Standard American English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.)
Logical, original, and insightful
Professional organization, style, and mechanics in APA format
Submit document through Grammarly