Barossa, Amanda and Anna Brown. “Gender Pay Gap in U.S. Held Steady in 2020.” Pew Research Center. 25 May 2021. pewresearch.org. Accessed 16 Aug. 20201.
Write a formal critique of the essay “Gender Pay Gap in U.S. Held Steady in 2020.”
The critique should explain your SINGLE, UNIFIED OPINION about the essay itself –NOT your opinion on the subject of gender pay inequities.
Use the following sample to guide your own critique:
SAMPLE THESIS: The article “Gender Pay Gap in U.S. Held Steady in 2020” does a great job of compressing a lot of statistics and analysis in a concise, readable format.
SUBJECT: the article “Gender Pay Gap in U.S. Held Steady in 2020”
FOCUS: presents information well
REASONS: statistics, analysis, and concise, readable writing
NOTE: THIS THESIS DOES NOT EXPRESS HOW THE STUDENT FEELS ABOUT THE SUBJECT–only about the ESSAY!
Your Critique MUST:
Be word processed, double spaced.
Follow all MLA format rules for margins, font, indentations, heading, page numbers and general appearance.
Follow the five-paragraph critique format outlined in class.
Subjectively critique the work, creating a COMPLETE critique thesis centered on the work’s use of ONE ELEMENT of rhetoric.
Use complete topic sentences and clinchers to define the beginnings and ends of paragraphs.
Use specific text quotes or paraphrases to support your personal opinion of the work.
Be largely free of errors in English spelling, grammar, punctuation and usage.
The link for the essay to be read: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/05/25/gender-pay-gap-facts/
Use 33 words fit in the sentence
Use those 33 words fit in the sentence? Incongruous, discordant, incompatible, inharmonious, discrepant, contradictory, consonant, consistent, invariable, unfailing, harmonious, lackadaisical, languid, spiritless, apathetic, enervated, phlegmatic, vivacious, spirited, brisk, ardent, animated, sagacious, discerning, wise, judicious, perspicacious, acute, ignorant, nescient, benighted, primitive, unenlightened.
When the first coronavirus shutdown was introduced in California, many people seemed to lack vigor. They seemed ( )and ( ). This wasn’t just specific to their work ethic but to their awareness of social distancing protocol. At first, many of us could likely be described as ( )and ( ), we were( ). However, once people’s knowledge of mask-wearing and hand-sanitizing became more ( ) and ( ). some states, like Rhode Island, saw their numbers decrease. Unfortunately, for much of the USA. mask-wearing was not ( ). In fact, it was ( ). While some people considered Dr. Fauci ( ), others argued that he was “fake news” and, thus, his recommendations were ( ). This further emboldened the division between the “two Americas”. while New Zealand, South Korea, and Japan seemed unfailing and ( )in their adherence to mask-wearing, the USA remained ( ).
Ideology is important. Opinions are essential. However, contrary to the popular bumper sticker, ignorance is not bliss. we need to help one another become more( ).
Formatting of mini-papers: – Please put the prompt to which you are responding at the top of the paper.
English Assignment Help Formatting of mini-papers:
– Please put the prompt to which you are responding at the top of the paper. It will not count against
your word limit.
– Please make sure your paper is 12 point font, times new roman, single spaced.
– We encourage you not to put your name on the document. We use Carmen’s anonymous grading
feature; therefore, including names defeats this goal.
– Cite the readings to which you are referring – either by referencing the author or using end-citations
(Zakaria p. 24).
Writing advice for mini-papers:
– It is important to not just repeat the information from the readings. Ideally, the prompts encourage
you to make an argument, and you then use information from the readings to support your case.
With the word limit, we would rather you spend most of the time explaining your argument in detail.
Strong papers not only explain their argument, but briefly consider counter-arguments.
– While it is not a requirement to go to 400 words – most Check ’s tend to be in the 300-400 range. It
is difficult to sufficiently address a prompt in less than 250-300 words.
– Please do not be overly reliant on quotes. The general rule is that it’s better to use your own words
– There is no need for “introductions”, feel free to jump right into the prompt.
Mini-papers have three purposes. They provide a way for me to give credit for careful class preparation;
they give you the opportunity to clarify your thinking by practicing analytic writing; and they prepare
you for the quizzes. Mini-papers are typed and are not longer than half a page, single-spaced, using
standard margins and a font size of 12 (400 words max). If a mini-paper is not handed in on time, or if
you hand in a mini-paper from the wrong block, you will receive no credit for it. Please note that all
submissions will be screened for potential plagiarism.
The mini-papers ask you a question about the assigned reading(s) and you will write a short composition
that supports your answer to the question. To do this successfully, you must be able to support your
answer with textual evidence, and guard against the tendency to ignore textual evidence that might
undermine your thesis. The main objectives of this assignment are to develop your skills at a) thinking
through complex texts that do not always provide simple answers, and b) writing a focused argument.
There will be more than one persuasive answer to the question I ask. Thus the criteria for a mini-paper
are: (1) Clarity: do you make your supporting points clear? (2) Precision and accuracy: do you draw
your supporting points from specific places in the text, using quotation marks and page numbers
appropriately, and do you make correct assertions about the text? (3) Comprehensiveness and balance:
have you identified the textual passages important to this question? (4) Organization: do you present
your arguments in a coherent order with smooth transitions and grammatical sentences?
Prompt: Discuss some of the pros and cons of different approaches to explain democratization. Which approach do you find most convincing and why?
I have attached the two reading from which this should be written on
Write a 250-word post in which you name a current issue that interests you. This should be an issue
Write a 250-word post in which you name a current issue that interests you. This should be an issue you are considering as your semester topic. Write full sentences and add thoughtful details as you address the following questions:
What is the issue that interests you?
Why does it interest you?
What stake (or personal interest) do you have in the issue?
What do you already know about this issue?
What is your position on this issue?
What are opponents’ positions?
Is there common ground on the issue? What would it be?