Post a cohesive response based on your analysis of the Learning Resources and your professional experience. Be sure to analyze the following:
A description of the artifacts within your community.
A description of the espoused values within your community.
A description of shared tacit assumptions, or underlying assumptions within your community.
An analysis of how knowledge of community artifacts, values, and assumptions enable leaders to build their leadership skills.
Be sure to support your ideas by connecting them to the week’s Learning Resources, as well as other credible resources you have read; or what you have observed and experienced.
General Guidance: Your original post, due by Day 3, will typically be 3 or 4 paragraphs in length, as a general expectation/estimate. Refer to the Week 1 Discussion 2 Rubric for grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use the rubric to assess your work.
Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings.
By Day 5
Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ postings in one or more of the following ways:
Share an insight about what you learned from having read your colleagues’ postings and discuss how and why your colleague’s posting resonated with you professionally and personally.
Seek additional clarity or ask your colleague a question, with accompanying context that will help your colleague to think more critically or broadly about levels of culture within an organization.
Offer an example, from your experience or observation, which validates what your colleague discussed.
Offer specific suggestions that will help your colleague build upon his or her leadership skills within an organizational culture.
Offer further assessment from having read your colleague’s post that could impact a leader’s effectiveness within an organizational culture.
Share how something your colleague discussed changed the way you consider your own leadership qualities.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4Fw5H7GWzog
need help with time
Part 1—Your journal entry for this module should address the following:(Will attached the document)
How will you manage your time during your doctoral study?
What information do you feel is important for you to consider and think about as you work through this course?
In addition, reflect on your Time Management Plan in your journal entry and address the following:
What was your reaction when you viewed your schedule at the start of the module?
What surprised you most about your schedule?
Reflect on how you actually spent your time based on the spreadsheet you completed compared to your predicted time.
Part 2—-Using the Journal feature in Blackboard, your dated journal entry for this module should address the following:
Discuss how you have been reviewing rubrics and using Instructor feedback on your Discussions and Assignments to improve your writing and your time management.
Reflect on how efficient and effective you are during the time you dedicate to school.
Explain the ways that you can improve your effectiveness and efficiency in your schoolwork.
In addition, reflect on your Time Management Plan in your journal entry and address the following:
What changes do you need to make to ensure you have adequate study time?
What other steps must be taken to make sure your schedule accommodates your study needs?
Part 3—-After critically reading and reviewing the scholarly papers you selected, write a cohesive paper in which you address the following: (ANtibiotics Resistance) 3 pages
Provide a background of the topic you chose.
Explain the magnitude of the issue.
Summarize the information in the peer-reviewed articles.
Compare and contrast the articles.
Describe the projected future trends in the topic area.
Explain what public health efforts/initiatives are needed to address the issue.
Describe the ethical issues to be considered in addressing the issue.
Your paper should reflect the skills you have gained through this course, including:
Engaging in critical analysis
Writing in a scholarly voice
Citing references using proper APA format
Including a title page at the beginning and a reference list at the end of the paper (these are not counted in the page length)
Conducting appropriate, scholarly research using the Walden Library
Following best practices for writing and submission
please complete microbiology discussion
Political Science Assignment Help CANNOT USE THE FOLLOWING TOPICS: VACCINES, WASHING HANDS, NOTHING IN REFERENCE TO YEAST OR WATER, NOTHING ABOUT MASK EFFECTIVENESS, OR ALLERGIC REACTIONS TO VACCINES.
Research question: What is the research question that is related to microbiology? Summary and resources: Write 3-4 sentences about your topic and include links the at least 2 sources you read Hypothesis: If (whatever is being tested), then (whatever is the expected result) Experiment: Write a step-by-step procedure, including materials and quantities that others could repeat Data Collection and Analysis: Specify how you would collect and interpret your data Discussion: What would you do next? Make certain that your post is well-written, grammatically correct, and provides the bullet points listed.
I have a project in social science that i need help with.
Take some time this week to finalize your comparison template. The following documents will help support your work before you submit it at the end of this module:Advertisement Examples PDF
Project 1 Comparison Template Word Document
Project 1 Comparison Template Submission Checklist Word Document
Project 1 Comparison Template Exemplar PDF
Project 1 Comparison Template Guidelines and Rubric PDF
2-4 Project 1: Comparison Template SubmissionAssignmentFinalize and submit Project 1: Your Comparison Template.
To complete this assignment, review the Project 1 Comparison Template Guidelines and Rubric PDF document.