Response. Using the relevant sources in the readings mentioned in the current week’s Discussion board, write and submit one 350 word Response to one of the prompts mentioned in that board. Put your name and the prompt number (or chapter number for Weeks 4 and 7) in the subject line of your Response. Unless the prompt instructs otherwise, the Response should use 3-5 sources (of which at least 2 must be text-based), and the sources must be named in the body of the Response. The Response must be split into paragraphs. This is due Sunday at 11:59pm.
Comment. After you have submitted your Response, write and submit one 75 word Comment on one classmate’s Response. Your Comment must present different material from your Response and must add something to what the other student wrote (contributing a new perspective, contrasting their argument, etc.). Content that does not add to the conversation (congratulating, repeating, agreeing, providing feedback on their writing, etc.) will not be considered for scoring. This is due Monday at 11:59pm.
General. Posts must refer to sources by title or author, not by source number. Chapter/book introductions should be read, but cannot be the basis for a post. All submitted content must be included in the post (no links or attachments). Posts must use proper spelling and grammar. Restatements or quotes of the prompt do not contribute to the word count. You may quote from the readings, but the total quoted material must be no more than 20% of the post’s word count. All quotes must appear between quotation marks and must include the page number(s) where the quote is found. Review this website to see some of the actions that constitute plagiarism. No lectures or other sources may be used in writing a post. Posts may not be deleted or substantially edited after submission. Late Responses receive a 1-point penalty (out of 7 possible points), and an additional 1-point penalty is added every two hours. Late Comments receive no points.
1) How do each of the four sources present the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of Republican governments in the southern states? Among other topics, be sure to address what is different about each source’s approach and content, how these governments are described, and the views of carpetbaggers and scalawags.
2) How do each of the four sources view African Americans? Among other topics, be sure to address what is different about each source’s approach and content, any racial assumptions about African Americans, and any arguments about their role in shaping Reconstruction and their own lives.
3) How do each of the four sources view the overturning of Reconstruction? Among other topics, be sure to address what is different about each source’s approach and content, whether the seizure of power by white southerners is viewed as a welcome or regrettable development, and the role of the terrorist organizations like the Ku Klux Klan.
https://books.google.com/books?id=UITaAgAAQBAJ
History Question
Put yourself in the shoes of an Ainu person who lived through the extension of the boundaries of the old Tokugawa regime to include your ancestral homelands. How might your life change on an everyday level? How might you respond, either individually or collectively to this imposition of colonial rule over you?
***As a general rule of thumb, this medium post should be no longer than 500? words.
? ? Please make sure to address the Meiji regime’s nation-building policies as expressed in the readings and lectures? ?
Think about how Ainu people would have experienced the imposition of settler-colonial policies on their lands. What aspects of their lives would have changed immediately? Which would not? The last question about how you might respond to these changes is a speculative one?—?given the options at your disposal and your own proclivities, how might you decide to respond and why? When you reference primary documents like the Meiji era unification documents or the Former Natives Protection Law, please be as specific as possible and use quotes from the texts as much as possible.
When you reference secondary documents like Fujitani or Komori, please make sure to provide attribution in some way: you can either say something like: “As Fujitani argues on p. XX, the imperial progress were designed to establish national unity through the emperor…”
NOTE?
Read: “Collection of Swords, 1588” “Edict on Change of Status, 1591,” “Control of Daimyo, 1595” and “Expulsion of Missionaries, 1587” (Find all under Lu Unification)
Read: “Iwakura Mission of 1871,” Takashi Fujitani, Splendid Monarchy, chapter 2.
Read: “Excerpts from the Document on the Form of Government (Seitaisho), 1868” “Five Notice Boards, April 6 1868,” “Memorial on the Return of Feudal Domains and Census Registers, March 5 1869,” “Opinion on Military Affairs and Conscription, 1872” (Find under Lu, Meiji Restoration)
Read: Komori Yoichi, “Rule in the Name of ‘Protection’: The Vocabulary of Colonialism” and “Hokkaido Former Natives Protection Law (Law ?27, March 1, 1899) both in Reading Colonial Japan. Also read Fukuzawa Yukichi, “Goodbye Asia, 1885”
Discussion post
History Assignment Help
Instructions:
Response. Using the relevant sources in the readings mentioned in the current week’s Discussion board, write and submit one 350 word Response to one of the prompts mentioned in that board. Put your name and the prompt number (or chapter number for Weeks 4 and 7) in the subject line of your Response. Unless the prompt instructs otherwise, the Response should use 3-5 sources (of which at least 2 must be text-based), and the sources must be named in the body of the Response. The Response must be split into paragraphs. This is due Sunday at 11:59pm.
Comment. After you have submitted your Response, write and submit one 75 word Comment on one classmate’s Response. Your Comment must present different material from your Response and must add something to what the other student wrote (contributing a new perspective, contrasting their argument, etc.). Content that does not add to the conversation (congratulating, repeating, agreeing, providing feedback on their writing, etc.) will not be considered for scoring. This is due Monday at 11:59pm.
General. Posts must refer to sources by title or author, not by source number. Chapter/book introductions should be read, but cannot be the basis for a post. All submitted content must be included in the post (no links or attachments). Posts must use proper spelling and grammar. Restatements or quotes of the prompt do not contribute to the word count. You may quote from the readings, but the total quoted material must be no more than 20% of the post’s word count. All quotes must appear between quotation marks and must include the page number(s) where the quote is found. Review this website to see some of the actions that constitute plagiarism. No lectures or other sources may be used in writing a post. Posts may not be deleted or substantially edited after submission. Late Responses receive a 1-point penalty (out of 7 possible points), and an additional 1-point penalty is added every two hours. Late Comments receive no points.
1) How do each of the four sources present the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of Republican governments in the southern states? Among other topics, be sure to address what is different about each source’s approach and content, how these governments are described, and the views of carpetbaggers and scalawags.
2) How do each of the four sources view African Americans? Among other topics, be sure to address what is different about each source’s approach and content, any racial assumptions about African Americans, and any arguments about their role in shaping Reconstruction and their own lives.
3) How do each of the four sources view the overturning of Reconstruction? Among other topics, be sure to address what is different about each source’s approach and content, whether the seizure of power by white southerners is viewed as a welcome or regrettable development, and the role of the terrorist organizations like the Ku Klux Klan.
Imagine this: Early one morning there is a loud banging at your door. You open the door to find
Imagine this:
Early one morning there is a loud banging at your door. You open the door to find armed soldiers who inform you that you have only one hour to pack one suitcase and be ready to leave your country.
1. What would you pack in your suitcase?
2. What do each of these items tell us about your culture and your country of origin?
3. What do these items tell us about what is important to you?
4. In what way would these items be helpful to you in your uncertain future?
5. What sorts of items do you think 19th century immigrants might have packed if they found themselves in this situation?
**Please remember to include details in your posts.
Responses must be at least 200 words.
Please make sure to proofread carefully. I will evaluate your grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Unlike your formal written assignments, I do not require that your discussion question responses adhere to specific formatting requirements but you must have citation in at least each initial discussion board post.