Get help from the best in academic writing.

ENG315: Professional Communications

Week 3 Assignment – Professional Experience: FAQ Answer
Overview
The Professional Experience assignments
in this course are designed to help prepare you for communicating in a
professional work setting. When you are writing in the workplace, it is
essential to:
Follow any specific directions you receive.
Consider who it is you are communicating with.
Consider what your overall purpose in communication is.
To earn full credit, make sure you
complete all assignment requirements and follow the instructions exactly
as written. See the scoring guide rubric for specific grading criteria.
If you submit your Professional
Experience assignment before the due date and you are not satisfied with
your grade, you may resubmit one time for an opportunity for full
credit points. Check with your professor for the resubmission deadline.
Instructions
In this Professional Experience assignment, you will write a 20–50 word fully researched answer to one of the frequently asked questions (FAQ)s in the Week3_FAQ document below. Do not answer all the FAQs.
Download the Week 3 FAQ [DOCX].
Save the file to your desktop using the following file name format:
LastName_PE2_DOC.docx
Example: Smith_PE2_DOC.docx

Watch the following original trailer for the movie, “Sleepless in Seattle,” and then watch the fan-made “spoof” of the

Watch the following original trailer for the movie, “Sleepless in Seattle,” and then watch the fan-made “spoof” of the trailer. In a word post, discuss how the rhetorical situation changes by specifically addressing one major change that you saw and how that change affected the tone, audience, and genre of the film. Some examples of what you could mention include: shots used, light filters, music, editing, etc.
Sleepless In Seattle: Recut as a horror movie
https://youtu.be/-Lj2U-cmyek
Sleepless In Seattle – Trailer
https://youtu.be/frUPnZMxr08

declining birth rate, lack of work-life balance faced by Singaporeans. How can this problem be solved?

English Assignment Help Like many developed nations, Singapore faces a declining birth rate. One of the major reasons that has been blamed for this is the lack of work-life balance faced by Singaporeans. How can this problem be solved?
In about 750 words, write a synthesis essay on solving the declining birth rate in Singapore. You will need to narrow this broad topic. You must formulate a thesis about this issue and provide evidence that will support your thesis. The thesis for this essay is a viewpoint that does not have to be persuasive – that is, the thesis is the conclusion you arrive at based on summarising and synthesising the information you have researched on this topic.
Refer to at least two research sources. You might want to make use of the SIM Library One Search Databases (url: https://primo-direct-apac.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/search?vid=65SIM

HIS 101 History

I need someone help me this question
Please read the following primary sources and then answer the questions below:
Excerpts from The Book of Genesis (1-3, 6-8, 22) Genesis, from The Hebrew Bible (professorcampbell.org)
“The Flood Story” from The Epic of Gilgamesh” The Great Flood: Gilgameš – Livius (archive.org)

Compare the assigned primary sources and write a discussion post answering the following questions:
What specific similarities between the two stories were you able to find?
What might account for these similarities?
Make sure that your post begins with a sentence which clearly states your main argument, and that it refers to specific evidence from the sources in order to support that argument. Then provide a substantial response to at least one of your classmates’ posts. When you have completed your response, please respond to another classmate’s post with a substantial response.Note: You will not be able to view your classmates’ posts until you make your first post. Your initial post should be at least 250 words in length, but not exceed 500 words. Your response to your classmate’s post should be at least 2-3 substantive sentences

GradingThis discussion board assignment is worth 100 points.
Students are only required to complete FOUR of the Discussion Boards for their grades. The Module 1 Introduction and Module 2 Final Project Brainstorm are required. However, students may choose to complete ANY four of the remaining seven Discussion Boards to complete this requirement. Additionally, students may choose to complete a fifth Discussion Board for extra credit.
Discussions are worth 25% of the overall grade.

RubricOutstandingVery GoodAveragePoorWriting
40 Points
Demonstrates outstanding critical thinking and analytical skills in written responses.Demonstrates critical thinking and analytical skills in written responses.Demonstrates decent critical thinking and analytical skills in written responses, but lacks a thorough interpretation.Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analytical skills in written responses. The effort is lacking. There appears to be little understanding of the purpose of the assignment.Analysis
40 Points
Displays outstanding knowledge and understanding of historical subject matter.Displays knowledge and understanding of historical subject matter.Displays fair knowledge and understanding of historical subject matter, but lacks a deep understanding.Does not display consistent knowledge and understanding of historical subject matter.
The effort is lacking. There appears to be insufficient understanding of the meaning of the assigned reading(s).
Participation
20 Points
Writes thoughtful and analytical comments on other classmates’ posts. Is polite and encouraging in comments, even when questioning the classmate’s opinions and/or findings.Writes comments on other classmates’ posts that shows very good analysis and thoughtfulness. Is mostly polite and encouraging in comments, even when questioning the classmate’s opinions and/or findings.Writes comments on other classmates’ posts that shows fair good analysis and thoughtfulness, but does not always display a deep understanding of the original post. Is not always polite and encouraging in comments. The questions and comments are sometimes rude, though likely not on purpose. Writes comments on other classmates’ posts that fail to display any meaningful analysis or thoughtfulness. It is not clear if the student understands the meaning or purpose of the original post.
The student is rude and not helpful at all in their comments.

error: Content is protected !!