This assignment is very easy, and it will not take more than half an hour to complete it. So please try your best to do it.
The instructions are a bit long because I wanted to explain each one on it and to know what you have to do for this assignment. I provide all the instructions for this assignment, and I think all of them are very clear and simple to understand.
I just made 1 to 3 parts for this assignment. So please each part makes sure you read the instructions carefully to do it and I’ll make it easy for you if you don’t understand the instructions.
1-Modernity and Modern Art (Modernism)
Modern Art (part of a larger philosophical movement called “Modernism”) dates from the late 19th Century. . .the very end of the period in which “modernity” is born. How does modern art follow from modernity? Can you pick one aspect of modern art or one work of art which you can then connect to “modernity”? As a reminder, we discussed 4 categories of modernity: epistemology (science and reason); politics (democracy and the modern “nation state); economics (capitalism and global trade); and identity. Provide at least one example of how modern art follows from the transformation that was the Enlightenment?
GRADING – It’s composed of two parts: PART 1: You must post a response to the above questions. Your response must be at least 50 words, and the word count must be stated at the end of your response in parentheses; e.g., (53). Once you’ve posted your initial response, all other student responses will be visible, and you may proceed to Part 2.
PART 2: You must post a response to another student’s post. Your response must be at least 50 words, and the word count must be stated at the end of your response in parentheses; e.g., (64).
While multiple responses are highly encouraged, only these two responses are necessary to receive full credit for a discussion.
There are 2 mandatory discussions ((1)what is modernity, and (2) race, ethnicity and class) and 12 other discussions during the course, and your top 10 of the remaining 12 will count toward your participation grade.
Once you’ve posted your “graded” comments with word counts, you are free to make comments of any length and don’t need to post word counts; however, all your comments must be professional and respectful of your fellow students.
2- What is Modernity?
Now that you have listened to the slideshow on modernity, we will have three discussion threads (below) to discuss these ideas. Your participation in these discussions and completing the short assignment will contribute to your overall participation grade in the class.
Please attempt to participate in each discussion board, and to engage in responsive discussion in at least one thread.
NOTE: THIS DISCUSSION IS ONE OF THE TWO MANDATORY DISCUSSIONS AND HAS A HIGHER MINIMUM WORD COUNT.
GRADING – It’s composed of two parts:
PART 1: You must post a response to the above questions. Your first responses must be at least 150 words (because there are three separate threads, and you are required to respond with at least 50 words to each thread questions), and the word count must be stated at the end of your response to each thread in parentheses; e.g., (53). Once you’ve posted your initial response, all other student response will be visible, and you may proceed to Part 2.
PART 2: You must post a second response to another student’s post. Your response must be at least 50 words, and the word count must be stated at the end of your response in parentheses; e.g., (64).
While multiple responses are highly encouraged, only these two responses are necessary to receive full credit for a discussion.
There are 2 mandatory discussions ((1)what is modernity, and (2) race, ethnicity and class) and 12 other discussions during the course, and your top 10 of the remaining 12 will count toward your participation grade.
Once you’ve posted your “graded” comments with word counts, you are free to make comments of any length and don’t need to post word counts; however, all your comments must be professional and respectful of your fellow students.
3- In 300 words or less, tell us who you are. What defines your identity? What are the most important aspects of your identity? How is your identity a reflection of societal power structure? What would your life be like if you removed one important aspect of your identity? Can you imagine being in the world as someone different from who you are?
One level outline and three level outline
Hi. I need help with two assignements. The topic is the the pros of using technology when it comes to psychology. The first assignment is a One level outline using two sources from no more than 5 years ago and must be 2 pages (APA Format).
The second is a three level outline using at least 5 academic sources from no more than 5 years ago and must also be 2 pages (APA Format as well) I will send templates and detailed instructions.
Overview: We are enveloped by discourse communities. They shape what we value, what we fear, what we hope to
English Assignment Help Overview: We are enveloped by discourse communities. They shape what we value, what we fear, what we hope to achieve. They help to define our short-term goals and long-term plans. They even give us a sense of mission—to score a basket; to win the cookoff; to major in a given field; to find a cure; to get/stay physically, mentally, emotionally healthy, and more. Some of these communities are less defined, less discernible, than others. Regardless of their direct appeal, or presence, in our thinking, they provide the interpretive and discursive stuff of our lives. For this project, investigate a discourse community from your own life—one that has shaped or is beginning to shape your identity.
Discourse Selection: Consider the following to select one discourse community you are a member/participant of: your major, college you attend, music you listen to, sports you watch or play, religious/spiritual
communities, clubs/organizations, friendship circle, personal relationship.
Try to understand how that one discourse community works: how it establishes, maintains, and knows itself.
Document Specifics: Once you select a specific discourse community, open a Word document as your journal entry and format and cite (both articles) as in-text (within the journal entry) and works cited (on the last page) per MLA style.
Use this doc to respond to the questions below using complete sentences composed in paragraph form. Page maximum – 2 (no minimum) This is your journal entry; there is no right or wrong answer. Your perspective is just that, yours. Upon completion, upload your doc to this dropbox.
Guided Questions: Be sure to apply Swales’ and Dixson’s readings as you respond to the questions below.
• Briefly describe one discourse community you are a participant in.
• How would you describe the discourse community using some of the six criteria Swale proposes?
• Does the community have an expressed identity? How would you describe it?
• If applicable, what is the means of communication among members (e.g., email, phone, meetings)?
• What is the shared lexis? (terms that members know and use)
• Is there a diverse range of expertise, from novices to experts of any kind in this community? Tell us more.
• How would you identify any interesting features of your discourse community that do not meet any of Swales’ six criteria as he describes in the article? These might include: a. Sources of conflict or tension within the discourse community b. Internal/external challenges to the discourse community c. How someone could join the discourse community d. How the discourse community has changed over time
• Lastly, theorize: What does your discourse community reveal about the nature of communities (or ideology or discourse)? What does your focus in responses above suggest about the function of language for an expressed and shared identity? As you consider this, return to our class readings for this week and draw on any relevant passages or claims as you explain your response.
My discourse community is the soccer community.
Puzzles
Socrates’ doctrine of recollection is largely accepted as un-insightful today.
Group of answer choicesTrueFalse
2.Thomson considers which of the following reasons to deny that ALFRED and CLAY are identical?
Group of answer choicesALFRED comes into existence later than CLAYALFRED could go out of existence before CLAY
ALFRED can survive loss of its parts, whereas CLAY cannot.
If you cut off ALFRED’s arm, and drop it on the floor, ALFRED remains wholly on the table, but part of CLAY is on the table and part of CLAY is on the floor
CLAY is in some way more fundamental, or basic, than ALFRED
3.The underlying presumption of many of Thomson’s arguments that ALFRED and CLAY are distinct is that if, at any given time, x has a feature y lacks, or y has a feature x lacks, then x and y are distinct.
Group of answer choicesTrueFalse
4.Thomson considers a variety of reasons for denying that ALFRED and CLAY are distinct, among them:
Group of answer choicesIf CLAY is a statue at any time when ALFRED exists, then there are two statues in the same place at the same time. This clashes with ordinary descriptions of what is going on.When a woman gets married, a wife doesn’t come into existence, the woman gains a new property (being a wife). Likewise, when CLAY is shaped in a certain way, by certain intentions, a statue doesn’t come into existence, CLAY property (being a statue)
They have different names
She never considers any reasons.
5.Select all of the following things Thomson thinks exist:
Group of answer choicesThere are atoms.There are sets of atoms.
There are entities that all-fuse the set of atoms.
There are portions of stuff
There are sets of portions of stuff
There are entities that all-fuse the sets of portions of stuff: these are the kinds of things that are puddles of water or mounds of clay are all-fusions of the sets of the relevant portions of stuff
There are objects
There are sets of objectt
There are entities that all-fuse the sets of objects. These are the kinds of things that are bunches of flowers or stacks of paper are all-fusions of the sets of relevant objects
6.In order to give an account of what it is for X (eg CLAY) to constitute Y (eg ALFRED), Thomson thinks we must give an account of how many changes artifacts like statues, ships, and Buicks, can undergo before ceasing to be statues, ships, and Buicks.
Group of answer choicesTrueFalse