Get help from the best in academic writing.

Hate Crimes And Hate Crime Laws Write Essay Help

Hate Crimes and the Mitchell V. Wisconsin DecisionEssay Preview: Hate Crimes and the Mitchell V. Wisconsin DecisionReport this essayHate Crimes and The Mitchell v. Wisconsin DecisionThe American Heritage Dictionary defines hate as intense dislike or animosity. However, defining hate as the basis for a crime is not as easy without possibly jeopardizing constitutional rights in the process. Hate crime laws generally add enhanced punishments to existing statues. A hate crime law seeks to treat a crime, if it can be demonstrated that the offense was a hate crime differently from the way it would be treated under ordinary criminal law. Since the 1980s, the problem of hate crimes has attracted increasing research attention, especially from criminologists and law enforcement personnel who have focused primarily on documenting the prevalence of the problem and formulation criminal justice responses to it. Lawmakers have passed legislation to encourage data collection and attach enhanced penalties to hate crimes at both state and federal levels.


When Americans are assaulted merely because of their real or perceived sexual orientation, gender, or disability, the law should be as tough on their assailants as it currently is tough on criminals who attack based on racial, religious, or ethnic bias. Yet only in rare circumstances can the federal government investigate and prosecute hate violence against gays, lesbians, or bisexuals. Attempts have been made to reach a definition of hate crime, including that it is a crime, most commonly violence, motivated by prejudice, bias or hatred towards a particular group of which the victim is rarely significant to the offender and is most commonly a stranger to him or her. The current law (18 U.S.C. 245) permits federal prosecution of a hate crime only if the crime was motivated by bias based on race, religion, national origin, or color, and the assailant intended to prevent the victim from exercising a “federally protected right” (e.g. voting, attending school, etc.) This dual requirement substantially limits the potential for federal assistance in investigating or prosecuting hate crimes, even when the crime is particularly heinous.


Hate crimes demand a priority response because of their special emotional and psychological impact on the victim and the victims community. The damage done by hate crimes cannot be measured solely in terms of physical injury or dollars and cents. Hate crimes may effectively intimidate other members of the victims community, leaving them feeling isolated, vulnerable and unprotected by the law. By making members of minority communities fearful, angry and suspicious of other groups and the power structure that is supposed to protect them. These incidents can damage the fabric of our society and fragment communities. The following three areas are concerns about hate crimes legislation:


protecting the individuals rights of association and speech;determining the boundaries of the law that will reach and change peoples hearts and minds; anddefining people as member of categories or discrete units that are the target of intentional discrimination.Hate Crimes are becoming more and more common in the United States. In a report released February 13, 2001, the FBI said 7,876 hate crimes were reported in the United State in 1999. The latest figures represent an increase over the 7,755 hate crimes reported in 1998, but the difference may not be significant because more agencies were reporting such crimes to the FBI in 1999. The figures are in the FBIs Hate Crime Statistics, an annual publication. Seventeen people were murdered in incidents classified as hate crimes, compared to 13 in 1998. Of the total the 7,876 incidents, racial bias was associated with 54.5 percent of the cases, followed by religious bias at 17.9 percent, sexual bias at 16.7, percent ethnic bias at 10.5 percent and bias against the disabled at .24 percent. Intimidation was the most frequently reported hate crime, accounting for 35.1 percent of the total. Vandalism accounted for 28.5 percent of the total. Assault and aggravated assault comprised 19 percent and 12 percent, respectively, of all reported hate crimes. The report said that 12,122 law enforcement agencies in 48 states and the District of Columbia reported hate crimes.


Texas had no hate crimes law on the books when James Byrd Jr. was dragged to his death behind a pickup truck. Nor did Wyoming when Matthew Shepard was tied to a fence and beaten to death. And that, Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy and others claim, is why a federal hate crime law should be enacted. Crimes that are motivated by hate really are fundamentally different, Clinton said after meeting with Byrds sister and nephew, and I believe should be treated differently under the law. Some examples of crimes that were outside federal jurisdiction but could have been prosecuted under the proposed hate crime legislation: In December 1995, self-identified neo-Nazi skinheads murdered two African American residents of Fayetteville, N.C. The victims were selected solely because of their skin color. In April 1994, two African-American men murdered a white father of three in Lubbock, Texas; the killers later stated that they set out to find a white victim. In January 1996, two men in Houston stabbed a gay man 35 times, killing him. Evidence showed that the assailant s bragged about hating homosexuals and had traveled to Houston in part to commit violence against gay people.


Everybody agrees it was a horrible way to treat a human being and openly gay man beaten senseless on the Wyoming prairie and left alone to die in the frigid night tethered to a fence. But Matthew Shepard death, as disturbing as it is, has only re-ignited a set of questions that have slowed efforts to expand federal hate crimes laws: Just what is a hate crime? Should a crime against gays and lesbians be punished differently from one against other Americans? If hate crimes are punished separately, would it deter such violence or encourage it. Shepard death has given new energy to gay or lesbian activists who say existing laws fail to protect them from random violence. It was clear to most Americans that this was a hate crime. This was a crime committed to send a message.


The ACLU of Northern Iowa has been helping the fight. Its national office is working with the Wyoming Department of Public Safety and the Iowa State Attorney to develop a bill that would allow states to take action against hate crimes, rather than prosecute them. The legislation would make it clear, for instance, that an offense under the Arkansas bill is not considered a hate crime at all, even if it involved a person wearing clothing that shows skin color, but not saying that at all.


There are similar state statutes that make it more difficult for state agencies to take federal hate crimes criminal actions, according to the ACLU’s staff.


“We’re worried about their ability to enforce their hate crimes laws in this country,” said Jennifer Purdy, assistant legal director in the U.S. legal division. “We’re not sure that Wyoming is alone in that way. We are concerned that some jurisdictions have not taken sufficient steps to ensure that the U.S. government does not prosecute the crimes of hate crimes. It looks like, with that in mind, it would very much be a problem at this point for Wyoming.”


Wyoming authorities said in March they had received a report of reports of a young man in his 20s attacking women and children. The man said authorities arrested him and arrested him at gunpoint while in possession of a handgun. He was taken to the Mount Pleasant Health, which police said he was not permitted to enter.


The woman who was assaulted suffered serious head injuries shortly after walking in a group through the front door. Authorities believed that she was the person who attacked the man at the time of the attack. She is to be charged with assault and resisting arrest. Authorities later released a video of the attack that police say appeared to show a 15-year-old male running out of the room and into the front door. The man died from his injuries as a result of a blunt force trauma.


On Jan. 2, Wyoming Attorney General Tom Beyer sent notice to all Wyoming law enforcement and others that he intends to investigate and “take appropriate action if any law enforcement community finds there is merit in issuing arrest warrants,” Arkansas Attorney General Mike DeWine said in a statement. “As we have said for weeks, there is little legal or ethical basis for people to walk into a police officer’s office with guns and guns,” he added.


Attorney General Beyer also wrote to the National Rifle Association, and the Department of Justice. They noted that a local and federal hate crime law allows them to pursue a criminal case against anyone who says an applicant for a permit to carry a firearm violates a person’s right to “individual safety and safety in general.” “We’ve seen this phenomenon before and we expect that we will soon see more examples of this kind,” said Beyer Attorney General Jason Laughlin.


Beyer’s office has been using the Wyoming anti-violence law as something of a deterrent. This past fall it sent out a letter with a note saying that it will take “as many local law enforcement agencies as possible to monitor individuals


The ACLU of Northern Iowa has been helping the fight. Its national office is working with the Wyoming Department of Public Safety and the Iowa State Attorney to develop a bill that would allow states to take action against hate crimes, rather than prosecute them. The legislation would make it clear, for instance, that an offense under the Arkansas bill is not considered a hate crime at all, even if it involved a person wearing clothing that shows skin color, but not saying that at all.


There are similar state statutes that make it more difficult for state agencies to take federal hate crimes criminal actions, according to the ACLU’s staff.


“We’re worried about their ability to enforce their hate crimes laws in this country,” said Jennifer Purdy, assistant legal director in the U.S. legal division. “We’re not sure that Wyoming is alone in that way. We are concerned that some jurisdictions have not taken sufficient steps to ensure that the U.S. government does not prosecute the crimes of hate crimes. It looks like, with that in mind, it would very much be a problem at this point for Wyoming.”


Wyoming authorities said in March they had received a report of reports of a young man in his 20s attacking women and children. The man said authorities arrested him and arrested him at gunpoint while in possession of a handgun. He was taken to the Mount Pleasant Health, which police said he was not permitted to enter.


The woman who was assaulted suffered serious head injuries shortly after walking in a group through the front door. Authorities believed that she was the person who attacked the man at the time of the attack. She is to be charged with assault and resisting arrest. Authorities later released a video of the attack that police say appeared to show a 15-year-old male running out of the room and into the front door. The man died from his injuries as a result of a blunt force trauma.


On Jan. 2, Wyoming Attorney General Tom Beyer sent notice to all Wyoming law enforcement and others that he intends to investigate and “take appropriate action if any law enforcement community finds there is merit in issuing arrest warrants,” Arkansas Attorney General Mike DeWine said in a statement. “As we have said for weeks, there is little legal or ethical basis for people to walk into a police officer’s office with guns and guns,” he added.


Attorney General Beyer also wrote to the National Rifle Association, and the Department of Justice. They noted that a local and federal hate crime law allows them to pursue a criminal case against anyone who says an applicant for a permit to carry a firearm violates a person’s right to “individual safety and safety in general.” “We’ve seen this phenomenon before and we expect that we will soon see more examples of this kind,” said Beyer Attorney General Jason Laughlin.


Beyer’s office has been using the Wyoming anti-violence law as something of a deterrent. This past fall it sent out a letter with a note saying that it will take “as many local law enforcement agencies as possible to monitor individuals


The ACLU of Northern Iowa has been helping the fight. Its national office is working with the Wyoming Department of Public Safety and the Iowa State Attorney to develop a bill that would allow states to take action against hate crimes, rather than prosecute them. The legislation would make it clear, for instance, that an offense under the Arkansas bill is not considered a hate crime at all, even if it involved a person wearing clothing that shows skin color, but not saying that at all.


There are similar state statutes that make it more difficult for state agencies to take federal hate crimes criminal actions, according to the ACLU’s staff.


“We’re worried about their ability to enforce their hate crimes laws in this country,” said Jennifer Purdy, assistant legal director in the U.S. legal division. “We’re not sure that Wyoming is alone in that way. We are concerned that some jurisdictions have not taken sufficient steps to ensure that the U.S. government does not prosecute the crimes of hate crimes. It looks like, with that in mind, it would very much be a problem at this point for Wyoming.”


Wyoming authorities said in March they had received a report of reports of a young man in his 20s attacking women and children. The man said authorities arrested him and arrested him at gunpoint while in possession of a handgun. He was taken to the Mount Pleasant Health, which police said he was not permitted to enter.


The woman who was assaulted suffered serious head injuries shortly after walking in a group through the front door. Authorities believed that she was the person who attacked the man at the time of the attack. She is to be charged with assault and resisting arrest. Authorities later released a video of the attack that police say appeared to show a 15-year-old male running out of the room and into the front door. The man died from his injuries as a result of a blunt force trauma.


On Jan. 2, Wyoming Attorney General Tom Beyer sent notice to all Wyoming law enforcement and others that he intends to investigate and “take appropriate action if any law enforcement community finds there is merit in issuing arrest warrants,” Arkansas Attorney General Mike DeWine said in a statement. “As we have said for weeks, there is little legal or ethical basis for people to walk into a police officer’s office with guns and guns,” he added.


Attorney General Beyer also wrote to the National Rifle Association, and the Department of Justice. They noted that a local and federal hate crime law allows them to pursue a criminal case against anyone who says an applicant for a permit to carry a firearm violates a person’s right to “individual safety and safety in general.” “We’ve seen this phenomenon before and we expect that we will soon see more examples of this kind,” said Beyer Attorney General Jason Laughlin.


Beyer’s office has been using the Wyoming anti-violence law as something of a deterrent. This past fall it sent out a letter with a note saying that it will take “as many local law enforcement agencies as possible to monitor individuals


The Supreme Court has already concluded otherwise. On June 11, 1993, the United State Supreme Court upheld Wisconsins penalty enhancement law, which imposes harsher sentences on criminals who “intentionally select the person against whom the crimeis committed because of the race, religion, color, disability, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry of that person.” Chief Justice Rehnquist delivered the opinion of the unanimous Court. This paper argues against the decision, and will attempt to prove the unconstitutionality of


Video Games And Ethnic Cleansing english essay help: english essay help

Hate Video Games

Essay Preview: Hate Video Games

Report this essay

osted Feb. 25, 2002 — Racist hate groups are now using video games to promote racist beliefs among the young, the Anti-Defamation League warns.

Among the most recent to become available is Ethnic Cleansing, a CD-ROM-based computer game offered by the National Alliance, the largest and most active neo-Nazi organization in the United States, according to the ADL.


The object of the game is to kill “subhumans,” also known as African Americans and Latinos, and their masters, “the Jews.” Jewish people are portrayed as the personification of evil, the ADL said.


“Racists and anti-Semites are clearly trying to spread their hate-filled vision to a wider, computer-savvy, younger audience through the violent, body-strewn world of shoot-em-up computer games while hoping to make some money along the way,” the ADL reported.


The game, in which the player is charged with “saving the White world,” also has a racist rock soundtrack and stereotypical sound effects. For example, when Blacks are killed, ape and monkey sounds are heard. Latinos say “Ill take a siesta now!” or “Ay, carumba!” Jewish characters say “Oy vey” when they are killed.


The National Alliance is promoting Ethnic Cleansing as the first in a series of games that will be released, and the ADL reports that while this is the most sophisticated of racist video games, it is not the only one.


Several free, downloadable games are available on the Internet, while other games promoting anti-Semitic and racist views are for sale.

“Most of these games are much simpler than Ethnic Cleansing, but they serve a similar purpose in that they allow players to interact in a racist environment in which they can indulge their fantasies,” the ADL reported.


Love And Luxurious Material my assignment essay help london

Hatred CaseEssay Preview: Hatred CaseReport this essayThe day Im going to get married I want to look awful, dirty, lousy, unattractive, anything that would repel my groom. I would not bother considering marriage at all. I do not believe in love, much more the existence of it.


Id rather have myself feel worthy by expending luxurious material materialistic needs upon myself, or be successful and have myself swim in money. Thats love for me, because apparently, love does not acknowledge me, or God just coincidentally provided a truck to hit my soul mate.


Love as a feeling is unreal. It can be erased or reversed by changing your point of view. Is that what you call love? Then I dont want it. Love as a motive creates. Ergo the universe in which you play and anything you consider art. If love was real, it is to be desire comes from not being content with the present and oneself. Therefore, love is a second generation removed from dissatisfaction. Love is a fallacy because it expands and expands like hot air in a balloon and then it pops and explodes just as quickly, leaving nothing left of its presence. You could blow up a balloon to show how rapidly it grows and how suddenly it disintegrates. Its a fallacy because it is a feeling and an emotion and nothing else.


The theory of love comes from Kautsky


A very important point that I want to make here: if you’re unhappy and you think you should leave, try to be happy. If you lose interest, think about if you lost your job and if you were a baby, think about if you lost a baby and why you were involved in it. Be happy? Then let’s lose all interest without any regrets as to it. You’ll never be happy and you’re not even really happy or happy that, as far as I’m concerned, is what you think is possible. If it’s always impossible to be happy, in some sense, then it is not to be happy. But if it is always impossible to be happy, like you were able to do in childhood, then it is really not. That is, you’re not going to make a difference and do something you don’t like, you’re not going to learn. You’re not going to have any interest in something, you don’t like it, but it’s there, so go to it, but just be grateful as a human being who goes to it as if something good was about to happen. Your life can be your only kind of life and don’t be afraid to take what belongs.


What does love offer to you as a feeling? You may have become more satisfied with yourself and you’ve been happier. Are you happy at home, you’ve gotten a better understanding of yourself and your situation? I hope you’re glad. You’ve just become human beings. What are you happy about? Well, what matters is that you learn to accept the world around you. Your feelings are not about you. The world around you is not the world you think you’re going to get when you leave, but the world you think you must have been through. You’ve learned to accept the world around you and accept it as a person, as yourself. Even the person you are with is not your own. Your own feelings are not about you. Your feelings are more about yourself. Your emotions are not about you as a person. Your feelings are not about your body, your heart, for you have become a person. Your feelings are not your own, they belong to you. Why is that, you say? Why do you feel differently? Your feeling is yours to choose. If you want to feel happiness in the world, you’ll always feel happy in it. If you want to feel happy in the world, then you’ve chosen what’s best for you and chose it from the beginning. Whatever you want as a person, you’re going to have to choose. Maybe you will want to be happy in whatever way you can go, it doesn’t matter what, and it’s probably not going to be happy even with the


The theory of love comes from Kautsky


A very important point that I want to make here: if you’re unhappy and you think you should leave, try to be happy. If you lose interest, think about if you lost your job and if you were a baby, think about if you lost a baby and why you were involved in it. Be happy? Then let’s lose all interest without any regrets as to it. You’ll never be happy and you’re not even really happy or happy that, as far as I’m concerned, is what you think is possible. If it’s always impossible to be happy, in some sense, then it is not to be happy. But if it is always impossible to be happy, like you were able to do in childhood, then it is really not. That is, you’re not going to make a difference and do something you don’t like, you’re not going to learn. You’re not going to have any interest in something, you don’t like it, but it’s there, so go to it, but just be grateful as a human being who goes to it as if something good was about to happen. Your life can be your only kind of life and don’t be afraid to take what belongs.


What does love offer to you as a feeling? You may have become more satisfied with yourself and you’ve been happier. Are you happy at home, you’ve gotten a better understanding of yourself and your situation? I hope you’re glad. You’ve just become human beings. What are you happy about? Well, what matters is that you learn to accept the world around you. Your feelings are not about you. The world around you is not the world you think you’re going to get when you leave, but the world you think you must have been through. You’ve learned to accept the world around you and accept it as a person, as yourself. Even the person you are with is not your own. Your own feelings are not about you. Your feelings are more about yourself. Your emotions are not about you as a person. Your feelings are not about your body, your heart, for you have become a person. Your feelings are not your own, they belong to you. Why is that, you say? Why do you feel differently? Your feeling is yours to choose. If you want to feel happiness in the world, you’ll always feel happy in it. If you want to feel happy in the world, then you’ve chosen what’s best for you and chose it from the beginning. Whatever you want as a person, you’re going to have to choose. Maybe you will want to be happy in whatever way you can go, it doesn’t matter what, and it’s probably not going to be happy even with the


The theory of love comes from Kautsky


A very important point that I want to make here: if you’re unhappy and you think you should leave, try to be happy. If you lose interest, think about if you lost your job and if you were a baby, think about if you lost a baby and why you were involved in it. Be happy? Then let’s lose all interest without any regrets as to it. You’ll never be happy and you’re not even really happy or happy that, as far as I’m concerned, is what you think is possible. If it’s always impossible to be happy, in some sense, then it is not to be happy. But if it is always impossible to be happy, like you were able to do in childhood, then it is really not. That is, you’re not going to make a difference and do something you don’t like, you’re not going to learn. You’re not going to have any interest in something, you don’t like it, but it’s there, so go to it, but just be grateful as a human being who goes to it as if something good was about to happen. Your life can be your only kind of life and don’t be afraid to take what belongs.


What does love offer to you as a feeling? You may have become more satisfied with yourself and you’ve been happier. Are you happy at home, you’ve gotten a better understanding of yourself and your situation? I hope you’re glad. You’ve just become human beings. What are you happy about? Well, what matters is that you learn to accept the world around you. Your feelings are not about you. The world around you is not the world you think you’re going to get when you leave, but the world you think you must have been through. You’ve learned to accept the world around you and accept it as a person, as yourself. Even the person you are with is not your own. Your own feelings are not about you. Your feelings are more about yourself. Your emotions are not about you as a person. Your feelings are not about your body, your heart, for you have become a person. Your feelings are not your own, they belong to you. Why is that, you say? Why do you feel differently? Your feeling is yours to choose. If you want to feel happiness in the world, you’ll always feel happy in it. If you want to feel happy in the world, then you’ve chosen what’s best for you and chose it from the beginning. Whatever you want as a person, you’re going to have to choose. Maybe you will want to be happy in whatever way you can go, it doesn’t matter what, and it’s probably not going to be happy even with the


Consider love as lust, because man erects and woman gets wet. Love is to feel nothing but pleasure.


Hate Speech Codes And College Campuses narrative essay help: narrative essay help

Hate Speech Codes: Ineffective and UnconstitutionalEssay Preview: Hate Speech Codes: Ineffective and UnconstitutionalReport this essayHate Speech Codes: Ineffective and UnconstitutionalEven though there has been a large increase in the number of hate speech codes in colleges and universities, the increase in the amount of hate speech incidents across the nation shows that these guidelines are ineffective. While hate speech codes attempt to create a safer more politically correct environment on college campuses by establishing principles and guidelines for students to follow, they are inherently ineffective because they are only attempting to cover up hate speech and are not addressing the root of the problem-hate. Also, they contradict the First Amendment of the United States constitution which entitles everyone to freedom of speech. Hate speech codes are merely guidelines and principles. In order to make a real difference in the atmosphere of todays increasingly multicultural college campuses, college administrators and student leaders must work together to combat ignorance and create a respectful more tolerant environment by changing the mindset of students.


Hate speech refers to any expression that intends to degrade, intimidate, or incite violence or prejudicial action against a group of people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or disability(wikipedia) . Hate speech comes in many forms and can range from blatant words and expressions intending to demean and humiliate a group of people to unintentional yet insensitive jokes and comments and everything in between.


As college campuses grew increasingly diverse in the 1980s and civil rights battles continued to be fought, studies showed that instances of racial hatred and harassment directed at racial minorities were rampant on college campuses across the country. In response, many public colleges and universities under pressure to respond to these concerns, immediately adopted policies that banned such expressions that offended any group based on race, gender, ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation. In 1987, the University of Michigan adopted the first college hate speech code, and by 1992 over three hundred colleges and universities has adopted their own. Despite these efforts, incidents of hate speech increased by 400 percent between 1985 and 1990, and the U.S. Department of Education documented an increase in reported hate crimes on American campuses from a total of 1,312 in 1997 to 2,067 in 2001(www.adl.org). These alarming statistics lead to the question, when it comes to positive social change on college campuses, why are these codes not only ineffective and often counterproductive?


There are three main reasons that hate speech codes on college campuses should be abolished. First, they go against the principles that form the foundation of freedom of speech in the United States and the Supreme Court makes it clear that such hate speech codes are unconstitutional. Second, hate speech codes are simply ineffective and in some cases counterproductive; statistics show that there has been a rise in incidents of hate speech. Since the codes are merely principles and guidelines, students do not follow them. It would be more effective, if there was an official law or amendment that addressed the issue of hate speech on college campuses, and that the rule was the same for all colleges and universities. Third and most importantly, hate speech codes do not address the central motives that drive hate speech, which are hate and ignorance.


[…]



The second reason that the hate speech rules should be abolished is not ideological. It is actually an ideological attack against a right that is based on bigotry and against women in particular. Hate speech codes are about protecting the most marginalized. They are about promoting equality, acceptance of diverse viewpoints, and of building a culture that gives students and students alike a safe campus. Hate speech does not represent the views of a certain group of people, and it is extremely inappropriate to be able to impose that ideological view on a whole group of people.


[…]



The third reason that hate speech codes should be abolished is not academic! Hate speech codes are about promoting equality, acceptance of diverse viewpoints, and of building a culture that gives students and students alike a safe campus. Hate speech does not represent the views of a certain group of people, and it is extremely inappropriate to be able to impose that ideology on a whole group of people.


[…]





We Offer Fast, Confidential Academic Writing Services

Get assignment help from the best academic help website. We have professors and expert writers ready to help you beat deadlines and score A+ grades.

What services do you provide?

We write all kinds of assignments. We offer high-quality online academic writing services on any subject.
·     Essay Writing Help
·     Assignment Help      
·     Homework Help
·     Case Study writing help
· Research Paper help
· Research Proposal writing help
·     Online Exam and quiz assistance
·     Dissertation Writing Service
·     Thesis Writing Help

Need other services? Contact us for a quote.

We cover all subjects, including
·     Computer science
·     Information technology
·     Social sciences
·     Physical sciences
·     Programming
·     Humanities
·     Engineering

Do you include assignment solutions and explanations in the order?

Yes. Expect high-quality assignment solutions along with their detailed explanations as part of your order. In line with our plagiarism-free policy, your completed order will include a free copy of the Turnitin report to verify that the content is original and custom-written for you.
·     We provide correctly completed papers that meet all the criteria and instructions.
·     Properly researched content that meets the expectations of your instructors.
·     You get to work with a highly dedicated professional that can guarantee your success from the word go.

Can you complete urgent orders with short deadlines?

Yes. We ensure timely delivery of all custom papers you order to ensure that you never miss your deadlines.

How can I get in touch?

Contact us any time via WhatsApp, live chat, or email. We have a dedicated round-the-clock customer support service with a highly experienced team specially trained to answer all your queries.
Communicate directly with your writer and get frequent updates on your order.

Who will write my paper?

We have top-notch experts to help you achieve top grades: – All our assignment writers are native English speakers; have PhDs or Masters; possess in-depth knowledge of appropriate writing and formatting styles such as APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, AMA and more; and adhere to the highest standards to deliver well-written A+ assignments.
• Native writers
• Subject-matter experts
• Academic veterans
o Ex-lecturers
o Former students
• Industry professionals

How much does it cost?

The most affordable pricing for high-quality assignment help services: from just $7 per page.
·    Get the best assignment help at the best prices in the market!
·    Get any revisions free of charge.

Why choose us?

Get high-quality custom papers at affordable prices from our expert writers.

Free Extras:

  • Free revision
  • Free plagiarism check
  • Free title page
  • Free formatting
  • Free bibliography
  • Free simple outline (on request)

We Guarantee:

  • 100% confidentiality
  • BA, MA, and PhD degree writers
  • No Plagiarism
  • 24/7/365 Customer Support
  • Quality research and writing
  • No hidden charges
  • Never resold works
  • 100% authenticity
  • Secure payment processing

Essay Writing at Profs Only

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service


Rating:

error: Content is protected !!