Your TasksTASK 1- RESEARCH
Review this list of community health centers (Links to an external site.) in San Diego that you would like to do more research on. This is not an exhaustive list and you are welcome to choose one that is not on the list.
TASK 2- ORIGINAL POST
Answer the following questions about the health center in an original post:
Name of the health center, location, contact information, and web URL. 3 points
Does this organization target a certain population (e.g., children, elderly, young families, homeless, Native Americans, etc.)? 2 points
What health services do they provide? Describe in detail at least two of their services. 10 points
How does billing and insurance work at this health center? 3 points
The post must be at least 250 words. 2 points
Include at least 1 outside reference, cited in APA format. This reference needs to be cited both in-text and at the end of the post in a reference list. 2 points
TASK 3- PEER RESPONSE
Respond to at least 2 classmate’s posts. Discuss whether or not you had heard of the health center, and things that you learned about the health center through their post. 10 point
Part Three
Your TasksTASK 1
Watch the following 5 minute video about minority health and community advisory boards. TASK 2
Answer the following questions: What is a community advisory board? (3 points)
What are the benefits of having community advisory boards? (7 points)
Briefly describe how community advisory boards are related to community organizing. (10 points)
wksx fin prooo
IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING WORD LIMIT REQUIREMENTS:
Please note that each assignment has its own word limit its very important that you follow the word limit and the RUBRIC for WEEK 16.
For Week 16, you will submit your final, completed project. Your project should include REVISED sections of the parts submitted in WEEKS 5, 8, and 12 that I’m with the feedbacks that needs to be included and include new elements that you have NOT previously submitted for review: The Abstract/Summary, and a complete list of References from WEEKS 5, 8, and 12. So from I to XI.
General Requirements
Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the discussion question criteria and public health content.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
PLEASE make sure APA citation and permalink for articles are complete and correct.
PLEASE ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS IN PARAGRAPHS AND MAKE IT COHESIVE AND TRY TO INCORPORATE THE READINGS BELOW
PLEASE add the links/sites below to the reference list if you use any of these readings and make sure everything is in proper APA format.
To get maximum points you need to follow the requirements listed for this assignments 1) look at the word/page limits 2) review and follow APA rules 3) create subheadings to identify the key sections you are presenting and 4) Free from typographical and sentence construction errors.
REMEMBER IN APA FORMAT JOURNAL TITLES AND VOLUME NUMBERS ARE ITALICIZED.
References
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Fink, A. (2013). Evidence-based public health practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. ISBN-13: 9781412997447
Jacobsen, K. H. (2017). Introduction to health research methods: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett. ISBN-13: 9781284094381- Custom (Available as a custom eBook – includes only Chapters 26 and 27)
PUB-690 Capstone Guide
Option 1 – Grant Proposal
Description
A grant proposal is an organized, persuasive request for funding for an intervention to address a specific issue or problem. In public health, this request for funding can be directed to foundations, nonprofit organizations, or government agencies, such as local/state health departments or federal health agencies. A grant proposal is also a means by which an organization can engage a funder as a partner in impacting change within communities to improve health outcomes. In PUB-620, you explored and practiced preparing some of the elements of a grant proposal, including goals and objectives, an implementation plan, and a budget.
A completed grant proposal, in practice, will vary depending on the requirements of the funder. For the purposes of this course, your final grant proposal should include the following components:
Abstract/Summary – A one-page summary of the overall intervention – placed at the beginning of your final proposal (before the Background/Review of Literature) for submission at the end of Week 16.
Background and Review of Literature – A summary of the previous research and history relevant to a proposed intervention.
Statement of Need – Facts and evidence to support the need for a proposed intervention. This should also describe and establish the requesting organization’s ability to address the need.
Description of Proposed Intervention – Description of what you intend to do. It answers the questions, “What is your proposed intervention?” and “Why is it important?” and builds a case for why you should be funded.
Goals and Objectives – Goals are the overall statements of what the proposed intervention intends to accomplish. Objectives reflect the steps toward achieving the goals. Objectives should be developed using S.M.A.R.T. criteria (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Time-Oriented).
Methodology and Design – Description of the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses to be used to accomplish the stated goals and objectives; answers the question “How will you accomplish your stated objectives?” as well as “Why is this the best approach?”
Implementation Plan – A description and timeline of the specific planned activities related to the proposed intervention, data collection tools, identification of who will complete the activities, and what outcomes will be achieved. The implementation plan should be presented in a table format.
Evaluation Framework and Plan – Outlines the plan for determining the success of the project during implementation (process evaluation) and at the end of implementing the project (outcome evaluation). Process and outcome measures should be described, including what data are needed and how data will be collected to determine success.
Dissemination of Intervention Outcomes – Description of your communication strategy to stakeholders regarding the results of this intervention. Answers the questions, “Who will you target?” and “How will you communicate results?”
Budget and Budget Narrative – Outlines the funding requested for the proposed intervention. Budget narrative should provide justification for the requested funds and indicate how the proposed intervention will be sustainable after funding ends. Present the budget in a table format, followed by the budget narrative.
References
Deliverables
The deliverables for your grant proposal will be submitted in WEEKS 5, 8, 12, and 16. For WEEKS 5, 8, and 12, you will work on three separate parts of your project, according to the deliverable schedule provided below. In Week 16, you will submit your final, completed project, including all revisions or suggested edits made by your instructor.
For each of the four deliverables (Parts 1-3 and Final Project), include a copy of the appropriate rubric (provided in this Capstone Guide) at the end of the deliverable. Your instructor will use this rubric when reviewing and grading the deliverable.
Deliverable
Due Date
Components Due
Part 1
Topic 5
II, III
Part 2
Topic 8
IV, V, VI, VII
Part 3
Topic 12
VIII, IX, X
Final Project
Topic 16
I-XI
Descriptions of the four deliverables, including criteria, requirements, and instructions for completion are provided below:
MPH Capstone Project Part 1 (Week 5)
The Background and Review of Literature section synthesizes the literature related to your health issue. This section should be structured so that it summarizes previous research and history relevant to your health issue and proposed intervention, as well as how your proposed intervention, program/project, service, or initiative will help to address the health issue. You will also describe the problem this intervention addresses and the need for the proposed intervention. A helpful resource, “PUB-690: Literature Review Summary Table” (ATTACHED), has been provided to assist you with organizing and preparing your literature review. This template can be used to summarize 10-15 scholarly sources related to your chosen health issue. The table allows you to summarize the research studies you will use as evidence for your capstone option. The essential components of each study, such as research design, study characteristics, data collection methods, and key findings, are to be added in each section of the template to help you evaluate each study’s scientific merit, strengths, and limitations. The deliverable should be between 1,500 and 1,750 words, and will include these parts of your capstone project:
Background and Review of Literature – A summary of the previous research and history relevant to a proposed intervention.
Description of Proposed Intervention – Description of what you intend to do. It answers the questions, “What is your proposed intervention?” and “Why is it important?” and builds a case for why you should be funded.
Goals and Objectives – Goals are the overall statements of what the proposed intervention intends to accomplish. Objectives reflect the steps toward achieving the goals. Objectives should be developed using S.M.A.R.T. criteria (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Time-Oriented).
Methodology and Design – Description of the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses to be used to accomplish the stated goals and objectives; answers the question “How will you accomplish your stated objectives?” as well as “Why is this the best approach?”
Implementation Plan – A description and timeline of the specific planned activities related to the proposed intervention, data collection tools, identification of who will complete the activities, and what outcomes will be achieved. The implementation plan should be presented in a table format.
Evaluation Framework and Plan – Outlines the plan for determining the success of the project during implementation (process evaluation) and at the end of implementing the project (outcome evaluation); process and outcome measures should be described, including what data are needed and how data will be collected to determine success.
Dissemination of Intervention Outcomes – Description of your communication strategy to stakeholders regarding the results of this intervention; answers the questions: “Who will you target?” “How will you communicate results?”
Budget and Budget Narrative – Outlines the funding requested for the proposed intervention; budget narrative should provide justification for the requested funds; indicates how the proposed intervention will be sustainable after funding ends. Present the budget in a table format, followed by the budget narrative.
MPH Capstone Project Part 2 (Week 8)
The deliverable for Topic 8 will focus on describing your proposed intervention goals and objectives; a description of the proposed intervention; the methodology for your proposed intervention; and an implementation plan. The deliverable should be between 1,000 and 1,250 words, not including tables, and will include the following components of your project:
MPH Capstone Project Part 3 (Week 12)
The deliverable for Topic 12 will focus on the evaluation framework and plan for the proposed intervention, a plan for dissemination of outcomes, and a budget and budget narrative. The deliverable should be between 750-1,000 words, not including the budget table, and include the following parts of your project:
MPH Capstone Project – Final Project (Week 16) In Week 16, you will submit your final, completed project. Your project should include revised sections of the parts submitted in WEEKS 5, 8, and 12, and include new elements that you have not previously submitted for review: The Abstract/Summary, and a complete list of References.
The final project will include the following final components in the order listed:
Abstract/Summary
Background and Review of Literature
Statement of Need
Description of Proposed Intervention
Goals and Objectives
Methodology and Design
Implementation Plan
Evaluation Framework and Plan
Dissemination of Intervention Outcomes
Budget and Budget Narrative
References
Advanced Clinical Learning
Religion and Theology Assignment Help Structure of the assignment
The 3,000 words assignment explores the theory underpinning taking a clinical history. Using evidence-based resources the student is required to demonstrate their understanding of the influence of Human Factors, cognitive bias and the importance of identifying red flags to inform patient assessment and caseload management.
The trigger for the assignment is a video of a clinician taking a clinical history. Students should view and refer to the field specific video in their discussion.
Unit outcomes addressed in this Assignment: Discuss and apply an analysis model to determine health economic principles as they
Unit outcomes addressed in this Assignment:
Discuss and apply an analysis model to determine health economic principles as they apply to healthcare policymaking.
Demonstrate a proficiency in analysis and offer recommendations to a policymaker regarding the course to follow for health care policymaking.
Course Outcomes assessed/addressed in this Assignment:
HA415-5: Examine policy issues that surround public and private healthcare.
Imagine that you are a hospital administrator speaking to a stakeholder group of people in your community including local policymakers, leaders, and concerned citizens about market failures and the role of government and address complex healthcare policies so they will understand how healthcare policy is created and helps them. You wish to address how your hospital would like to help the community address the opioid crisis affecting the community and region and explain how the community could help. Government intervention is based on the special interest or public interest theories. The public interest theory focuses on efficiency in the market and the special interest theory levels the playing field in the legislative marketplace.
Instructions
In your speech to stakeholders in the community you provide a policy analysis and provide informed advice that relates to a public policy decision and include a recommended course of action/inaction and should be framed by the client’s powers and values. In your speech to stakeholders you explain some examples of the aspects of the problem that a policy analyst may consider. In your speech to stakeholders you provide 3–5 options for a community to consider. You also explain some potential criteria for evaluating your policy options. The paper should be written in APA format, include at least four (4) references, and should be 3-4 pages in length, not including the title page and reference page.
Requirements
Writer explains that a policy analysis is an analysis that provides informed advice to a client that relates to a public policy decision and includes a recommended course of action/inaction and is framed by the client’s powers and values.
Writer explains some examples of the aspects of a problem that a policy analyst may consider.
Writer explain the policy analysis should provide 3–5 options for a client to consider.
Writer explains some potential criteria for evaluating your policy options.
Please be sure to review the various Academic Tools to assist you with meeting APA expectations for written Assignments.