Your response MUST reflect familiarity with the assigned reading Chapter 3 chapters. PLEASE SEE ALL THE ATTACHMENTS. Answer the
Your response MUST reflect familiarity with the assigned reading Chapter 3 chapters. PLEASE SEE ALL THE ATTACHMENTS.
Answer the question (no citation needed):
The most common viewpoint adopted by college students today is ethical relativism, and this is probably because it seems to be the most tolerant and fair-minded position, in that it respects diversity and individuality. However, Rosenstand points to a number of problems with ethical relativism. Where do you place yourself on this spectrum of moral stances? Are you a moral skeptic or a moral subjectivist? an ethical relativist? a moral absolutist? If you have never thought about this before, now is the time to do so. Explain why you hold the viewpoint you do, and defend that view from what might be seen as at least one major difficulty with adopting that ethical stance.
Write about 4 pages/1,400 words (double-spaced, 12pt font) on the following topic: In Problema I and II of Fear
Philosophy Assignment Help Write about 4 pages/1,400 words (double-spaced, 12pt font) on the following topic:
In Problema I and II of Fear and Trembling, Kierkegaard argues that our ethical duties
may be suspended in the pursuit of “absolute” (religious) duties. Explain how he arrives
at this conclusion through his analysis of Abraham as a knight of faith, and then offer
commentary on whether you think Abraham was justified in so acting.
Your essay should offer an accurate and nuanced analysis of Abraham’s faith and trial (by,
e.g., analyzing the righteous and ethical interpretations, and/or explaining Abraham’s
paradox of will); your essay should explain why Abraham is not a tragic hero, nor an
aesthetic individual, and should explain and contrast the aesthetic, ethical, and religious
ways of life. Finally, do you agree that there exist “higher” non-ethical duties (religious or
otherwise) that warrant suspending our ethical duties? You may answer this question
through an analysis of Abraham’s sacrifice of Isaac or through another example. In any
case, you should provide an argument (pro or con) whether you think Abraham (or
persons generally) are ever justified in suspending their ethical duties to satisfy non-
ethical commitments. In other words, your thesis should address the following question:
Is the highest goal or purpose of human life to live ethically?
“The family that walks on all fours” (2006) Watch this BBC documentary from neuropsychologist Nicholas Humprey channel. Youtube link
“The family that walks on all fours” (2006)
Watch this BBC documentary from neuropsychologist Nicholas Humprey channel.
Youtube link (without CC): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jwiz-yhLpT0
With CC: https://smartplayer.captionsync.com/play.php?vid=1545162960ssumner_acd3e45673c0
Answer the following questions:
1. Identify the analytic approach: who takes this approach? (Identify the scientist) What does it consist of?
2. Identify the structural approach : who takes this approach? (Identify the scientist) What does it consist of?
3. What do you think is the best approach in this case? Why?
4. What factors do you think are going to affect our decision to go for an analytical or a structural approach?
5. Do you think we always need to choose between one approach or the other? Can we combine them? Can you think of a case where the two approaches complement each other?
Your report needs to be between 300 and 600 words.
Focus on answering the questions.