This assignment has 2 parts:
PART 1: ( PLEASE USE REFERENCES AND USING COURSE MATERIALS),
– Identify two change management strategies Kaplan used to increase the probability that the Lean transformation at VMMC would be a success. Name one feature of healthcare in Canada (or in your country) that may make it challenging to implement Kaplan’s approach.
PART 2:
I`ll ask you to write a comments or feedbacks to support other student (please provide references)
Laboratory and Pathology Tests and Procedures/(Metabolic panel (glucose, potassium, Sodium) Laboratory and diagnostic tests are an integral component o
Laboratory and Pathology Tests and Procedures/(Metabolic panel (glucose, potassium, Sodium)
Laboratory and diagnostic tests are an integral component o to diagnose conditions and diseases.
1. Research and evaluate the laboratory or pathology test(s) or procedure(s) assigned to you by your instructor WHICH IS:
METABOLIC PANEL (GLUCOSE, POTATSSIUM, SODIUM)
METABOLIC PANEL (GLUCOSE, POTASSIUM, SODIUM)
2. Your initial discussion post should thoroughly cover the laboratory or pathology test or procedure that you have been assigned: METABOLIC PANEL (GLUCOSE, POTASSIUM, SODIUM) and include the following information:
3. Test name
Specimen needed for the test (blood, urine, etc.)
Normal range by patient age
Panic level
Factors that affect results
Typical conditions or monitoring for which the diagnostic test
is ordered.
4. A minimum of four (4) conditions or diseases that utilize the test for diagnostic purposes.
5. All references used must be cited in correct APA style as outlined.
6. Your post must contain a minimum of 200-250 words.
PLEASE READ INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY
PLEASE USE CITATIONS AND REFERENCE PAGE
PLEASE LABEL EACH PARAGRAPH
ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ME THANK YOU!
In a word document, using 12-point Times New Roman font, write three to five paragraphs explaining the main topics Essay
Religion and Theology Assignment Help In a word document, using 12-point Times New Roman font, write three to five paragraphs
explaining the main topics
Introduction
1.Understanding Anatomy
2.Specific Concentrations of Anatomy
3.Understanding Physiology
4.Combining Anatomy
Free Market Reproduction Scenario and Reflection
In the scenario assignments, you are asked to reflect on responses to the presented scenario. It should not just be writing down your first reaction or what you already know.
Reflection involves critical thinking, which means rethinking your existing knowledge and previously held opinions in light of what we have learned about theories of ethics, logic, and reasoning. You will need to question your current knowledge and beliefs.
Discuss the main points of the debate, what stance you take, support that stance, and discuss the opposing argument. Also discuss an ethical theory that would apply to defend your view.
To complete each scenario assignment:
Complete the entire scenario.
Compose your reflection in a Word document and be sure to address, at a minimum, the following questions:Why do you feel the way you do about the issue presented?
Of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you think is the most ethical and why?
Support your conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics to defend your stance.
Your reflection must be 1-2 pages in length and follow APA formatting and citation guidelines as appropriate, making sure to cite at least two sources.
Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.
Points: 50 each
Due Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time) of the assigned week
RubricPHIL_434_OL – Learning Scenario Reflection (8)
PHIL_434_OL – Learning Scenario Reflection (8)
CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Main Issues
20 to >15.8 ptsMeets Expectations
Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the main issues in the scenario.
15.8 to >11.8 ptsApproaches Expectations
Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of some of the issues in the scenario.
11.8 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Does not identify an acceptable understanding of of the issues in the scenario.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLinks to Course Readings and Additional Research
20 to >15.8 ptsMeets Expectations
Makes appropriate and powerful connections between identified issues and the concepts studied in the course readings and presentations; supplements the reflection with relevant and thoughtful research and documents all sources of information, conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics to defend points made.
15.8 to >11.8 ptsApproaches Expectations
Makes somewhat vague connections between identified issues and concepts studied in readings and presentations; supplements the reflection with limited research.
11.8 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Makes inappropriate or little connection between issues identified and the concepts studied in the readings; supplements the reflection, if at all, with incomplete research and documentation.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines
10 to >7.9 ptsMeets Expectations
The assignment follows current APA style format consistently and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.
7.9 to >5.9 ptsApproaches Expectations
The assignment follows current APA style format consistently with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly.
5.9 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
The assignment does not follow current APA style format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly or citations and references are missing.
10 pts