Guidelines: 1. Your paper should describe in detail the cryptographic system used (substitution and/or permutation), or the use of Essay
Guidelines:
1. Your paper should describe in detail the cryptographic system used (substitution and/or
permutation), or the use of block ciphers and their encryption modes to provide the most adequate
security properties.
2. How does the technology address “indistinguishability under chosen-plaintext attack (IND-CPA) AKA
CPA-secure of deterministic encryption”?
3. Describe the security properties of cryptographic primitives like RSA of Diffie-Hellman
This assignment should not contain more than 20% of its content quoted from another source.
Structure of the Paper:
1. Title
2. Table of Contents
3. Executive Summary: one or two paragraphs on a page by itself that provide a rapid overview of the
issue and any conclusions or results you have obtained. Write this section after you have finished the
entire paper, then insert it at the beginning of the paper.
4. Introduction: one or two paragraphs to introduce the issue and explain what will be covered in this
report.
5. (Main body): Your section names may vary in the body, but you should be covering all of these
essential areas:
• What is the issue?
• What are the threats, risks, and/or vulnerabilities?
• what encryption mechanism is used and wow implementing encryption mitigates the risks?
• Must reference industry standards used as guidelines or reference, i.e., ISO, NIST, etc.
5. Must reference how chosen-plaintext attack (IND-CPA) AKA CPA-secure of deterministic encryption
helps protecting sensitive information.
6. Conclusion: summarize your research.
7. References: List all research references in APA style on a separate page. Include web links to articles
where appropriate.
Submission Requirements:
• Citation Style: Follow APA style guide
• Length: 20 pages (A few pages more or less is acceptable and double spacing is allowed.)
• Font type: Arial
• Font size: 12 pts
• Body of the report should be about 20 pages (more or less and double-spaced). Title page, table of
contents, references page, and any graphics used will count toward the required 20 pages.
• Excessive spacing between sections will not count toward the page count. Use 1-inch margins on all
sides. Font for non-headings may not exceed size 12.
• Must have at least 5 separate references for research sources. Sources must be reputable journals and
information sources (No biogs, forum posts, Wikipedia, about.com, howstuffworks.com, Yahoo answers,
wikiAnswers, or similar). Multiple pages from the same website count as only one source.
• No direct quotes may be used. Cite your sources for the ideas you are using but write everything in
your own words.
• Photos, charts, graphs count toward the page count but should be used where appropriate.
• Include a page header in the body with the topic title and page number (title page should not have a
header)
Please see discussion board rubric below for grading. You must use 2 peer reviewed journal references per initial post.
Please see discussion board rubric below for grading. You must use 2 peer reviewed journal references per initial post. References should be current, meaning within the last 5 years. Be sure you are not reiterating information taught in the textbook or lecture, rather you should be bringing in new content, stances, or evidenced based research. (Please use US articles, NIH, ABOG, or Pubmed
Please see discussion board rubric below for grading. You must use 2 peer reviewed journal references per initial post.
Writing Assignment Help Please see discussion board rubric below for grading. You must use 2 peer reviewed journal references per initial post. References should be current, meaning within the last 5 years. Be sure you are not reiterating information taught in the textbook or lecture, rather you should be bringing in new content, stances, or evidenced based research. (Please use US articles, NIH, ABOG, or Pubmed (APA 7th edition only).
ABSTRACT for the paper : For patients who suffer from end-stage renal disease (ESRD), transplantation is the recommended treatment
ABSTRACT for the paper : For patients who suffer from end-stage renal disease (ESRD), transplantation is the recommended treatment modality. However, transplantation does not come without a price. In order to ensure the longevity of the graft, renal transplant recipients are highly encouraged to adhere to a very meticulous health care plan including attending all pre and post follow-up clinic appointments, developing lifestyle modifications, and committing to a life-long medication regime.
OBJECTIVE to identify self-care management strategies to decrease patient-reported barriers to treatment adherence among renal transplant patients.
GUIDELINES FOR THE PAPER:
The scholarly paper should be a concept paper, a clinical paper, or a paper on administration or teaching strategies that demonstrates the knowledge synthesized from the MSN program. The topic must reflect a graduate level of nursing knowledge using literature reviews and research critiques as a basis.
B. The format of the paper will follow the journal guidelines to which the paper will be submitted.
C. General guidelines for paper format:
1. Title.
2. Abstract.
3. Introduction. 4. Topic/Issue.
a. Thorough review of current literature.
b. Thorough synthesis of recent research.
c. Citations should be not more than five years old except for the seminal works.
5. Discussion.
a. Professional issues involved.
b. Strategies to address the issues.
6. Summary/Conclusion.
** These guidelines may be modified with consent of the Faculty Director, according to the format of the journal selected or the particular topic being addressed.
** Page limit should be approximately 15 to 25 pages, not including appendices, references, and title page. Although many journals may limit the submission to 12 to 15 pages, this may not be sufficient to meet the requirements for passing the comprehensive exam.
Thread: After reading the textbook readings for Module 1, write a rhetorical analysis of the reading selection provided for
Thread: After reading the textbook readings for Module 1, write a rhetorical analysis of the reading selection provided for this assignment: Kurt Vonnegut’s letter to the Chairman of the Drake School: Kurt Vonnegut Jr., A Letter to the Chairman of the Drake School Board
Your thread must reflect an understanding of the rhetorical argument considering the following: Rhetorical Rhombus (purpose, audience, subject, writer/speaker) Aristotelian Appeals (ethos, pathos, logos) Cite your source and format your citations according to your documentation style (APA, MLA, or Turabian).
PLEASE READ KURT’S LETTER BELOW
I am very real In October of 1973, Bruce Severy — a 26-year-old English teacher at Drake High School, North Dakota — decided to use Kurt Vonnegut‘s novel, Slaughterhouse-Five, as a teaching aid in his classroom. The next month, on November 7th, the head of the school board, Charles McCarthy, demanded that all 32 copies be burned in the school’s furnace as a result of its “obscene language.” Other books soon met with the same fate. On the 16th of November, Kurt Vonnegut sent McCarthy the following letter. He didn’t receive a reply. (To regularly receive letters like this in your inbox, sign up for the Letters of Note newsletter. This particular letter can also be found in the bestselling Letters of Note book.) The Letter November 16, 1973 Dear Mr. McCarthy: I am writing to you in your capacity as chairman of the Drake School Board. I am among those American writers whose books have been destroyed in the now famous furnace of your school. Certain members of your community have suggested that my work is evil. This is extraordinarily insulting to me. The news from Drake indicates to me that books and writers are very unreal to you people. I am writing this letter to let you know how real I am. I want you to know, too, that my publisher and I have done absolutely nothing to exploit the disgusting news from Drake. We are not clapping each other on the back, crowing about all the books we will sell because of the news. We have declined to go on television, have written no fiery letters to editorial pages, have granted no lengthy interviews. We are angered and sickened and saddened. And no copies of this letter have been sent to anybody else. You now hold the only copy in your hands. It is a strictly private letter from me to the people of Drake, who have done so much to damage my reputation in the eyes of their children and then in the eyes of the world. Do you have the courage and ordinary decency to show this letter to the people, or will it, too, be consigned to the fires of your furnace? I gather from what I read in the papers and hear on television that you imagine me, and some other writers, too, as being sort of ratlike people who enjoy making money from poisoning the minds of young people. I am in fact a large, strong person, fifty-one years old, who did a lot of farm work as a boy, who is good with tools. I have raised six children, three my own and three adopted. They have all turned out well. Two of them are farmers. I am a combat infantry veteran from World War II, and hold a Purple Heart. I have earned whatever I own by hard work. I have never been arrested or sued for anything. I am so much trusted with young people and by young people that I have served on the faculties of the University of Iowa, Harvard, and the City College of New York. Every year I receive at least a dozen invitations to be commencement speaker at colleges and high schools. My books are probably more widely used in schools than those of any other living American fiction writer. If you were to bother to read my books, to behave as educated persons would, you would learn that they are not sexy, and do not argue in favor of wildness of any kind. They beg that people be kinder and more responsible than they often are. It is true that some of the characters speak coarsely. That is because people speak coarsely in real life. Especially soldiers and hardworking men speak coarsely, and even our most sheltered children know that. And we all know, too, that those words really don’t damage children much. They didn’t damage us when we were young. It was evil deeds and lying that hurt us. After I have said all this, I am sure you are still ready to respond, in effect, “Yes, yes–but it still remains our right and our responsibility to decide what books our children are going to be made to read in our community.” This is surely so. But it is also true that if you exercise that right and fulfill that responsibility in an ignorant, harsh, un-American manner, then people are entitled to call you bad citizens and fools. Even your own children are entitled to call you that. I read in the newspaper that your community is mystified by the outcry from all over the country about what you have done. Well, you have discovered that Drake is a part of American civilization, and your fellow Americans can’t stand it that you have behaved in such an uncivilized way. Perhaps you will learn from this that books are sacred to free men for very good reasons, and that wars have been fought against nations which hate books and burn them. If you are an American, you must allow all ideas to circulate freely in your community, not merely your own. If you and your board are now determined to show that you in fact have wisdom and maturity when you exercise your powers over the eduction of your young, then you should acknowledge that it was a rotten lesson you taught young people in a free society when you denounced and then burned books–books you hadn’t even read. You should also resolve to expose your children to all sorts of opinions and information, in order that they will be better equipped to make decisions and to survive. Again: you have insulted me, and I am a good citizen, and I am very real.
Kurt Vonnegut