Get help from the best in academic writing.

Jasmine Coleman english essay help online

The symptoms of schizophrenia John Nash showed in the beginning of the movie was hallucinations, and delusions. 2. The symptoms he showed at the end of the movie were hallucinations and delusions. 3. John Nash realized that his hallucinaitons were not real was when alicia went to the mailbox and got the top secret documents that Nash had tried to mail. Alicia then confronted him with the documents and that’s when Nash realized. Alicia went to visit John and showed him the letters that he tried to mail off.

Alicia played an important role in dealing with schizophrenia because she stayed by his side and tried to help him get better. Also, a side effect from the pills John was taking was that John’s sexual performance went down frustrating Alicia, but she stayed with him. 5. Yes schizophrenia can be the cause of divorce. The spouse may not be able to be around someone who is always thinking that someone is out to get them. For example, when Alicia was on the phone calling John’s doctor and John thought someone was trying to hurt Alicia so he pushed her out of the way, not realizing that there was no one there.

Yes John Nash is still alive today and is still working on ventures in advanced game theory. He lives in West Windsor Township, New Jersey. 7. There is not one thing that occured in Nash childhood that triggered schizophrenia. He lived a normal childhood and was recognized for his intellegence at a young age by his parents. 8. My favorite scene of “A Beautiful Mind” was when John was giving the baby a bath and left the water running in the tub because he started seeing things. Alicia came int the room and got the baby and John responded by saying, ” Charles is watching him, the baby is fine Charles is watching him”.

Why Antony Lost Against Octavian college essay help near me: college essay help near me

After all, he was in fact the great Julius Caesar’s second in command. Through much of the internal conflict of his time, he did astoundingly maintain at least some support in Rome. However, his failing to acknowledge Octavian’s military and political potential was his first mistake. Octavian learned that as Julius Caesar’s adopted great nephew, he was entitled to be the legal principle heir of all that belonged to Caesar.

Although taking on such a role was a high risk to his own safety, making him a target by association with Caesar and his agenda, he pressed forward with an insatiable ambition. Possibly driven by the Roman cursus honorum, a lust for power and riches, and a desire for avenging the death of his great uncle, Octavian already had an advantage from the beginning. The citizens of Rome were promised a sum of money, but had been refused payment by Antony. The young New Caesar stepped in and raised his own money by selling his land and giving it to the people.

Though only a mere 18 or 19 years of age, had not served in any Roman political capacity, nor had any military achievements under his belt, young Octavian had managed to muster up some support in Rome using only his newly assumed name, Caesar, and his overly liberal donations to the people. He was their connection to their beloved general, Julius Caesar, the “son of a god. ” Octavian began to reinforce his strength with his personal forces with Caesar’s former loyal veterans. Underscoring his status as heir to Caesar and armed with a rising, dedicated military force of his own, he boldly marched to Rome.

It was now that he was a definite political threat to Antony. However, Antony seemingly ignored this fact as he remained away from Rome in the east. Another major reason for losing was his lack of political support from Rome. Generally many viewed him as a brilliant general. He had a reputation of fighting alongside his own comrades at the front line, right in the heat of battle. This fact curried the favor of his legions from the ground up. Conversely, others viewed his personal life as detrimental to his reputation and by extension his ability to be a successful leader.

Even prior to the assassination of Julius Caesar, he was slowly digging his own political grave. Plutarch reports that he was lazy, had a bad temper, and cavorted other men’s wives. His personal lifestyle later led to his lack of support from the general populace and the senate. It is reported that Cicero, an oratory enemy, stated that general members of society who are upright and moral “intensely disliked him, and were disgusted” by his drunkenness, making a showy display of his extravagances, and frolicking other men’s women.

Cicero’s speeches and publication of propaganda against Antony deeply impacted the Senate’s view of him. In fact, an army was sent to defeat him for bullying Lepidus in Cisalpine Gaul, whom Rome viewed as the rightful governor. It was largely Cicero’s oratory speeches that shifted the public opinion to such an extent that the Senate was moved to declare him an enemy of the state, driving him out of Italy. In the end, Antony loses his reputation and support from the state, something every rising, successful commander needs in order to survive and thrive in Roman politics.

If only he would have remained in Rome, he could have at least had the opportunity to defend his position as Caesar’s second in command and repaired his reputation. However, in his absence, it was Octavian and Cicero who was there to slowly demolish his chances at political and military success. The alleged poor choice of habits that governed his personal affairs were generally recognized as a trigger for the increased factional schisms that eventually would prove injurious to his political career and ultimately an desertion from the Senate.

Antony’s dealings with Cleopatra and Egypt proved to further soil his reputation among the Romans. His abandonment of the beloved Octavia, his legal Roman wife, in lieu of Cleopatra, a foreigner, didn’t sit well with the general public opinion in Rome. After having twins and yet another son with Cleopatra, he was deeply indebted to her, possibly both emotionally and politically. Onlookers must have imagined how such attachment must have been negatively viewed as deeds of a traitor in Rome.

To top it all off, although by illegal means by Octavian it was later realized that Antony had secretly recorded in his will that the kingdoms conquered by Egyptian warfare be divvied up to the Egyptians, not Rome. This fact further alienated Antony as what he truly was, an enemy of the state, eliminating any possible assistance from Rome. As Rome hears the news, Octavian is gathering more and more backing from Rome in pursuit of Antony. In what some would say is the deciding battle in the drama with Antony and Octavian, two large forces collide at Actium in western Greece in 31 B.

Controversy on the Mixing of African and Cuban Culture college essay help service: college essay help service

The personal narratives, “Afrocubanismo and Son” by Robin Moore, “Dance and Social Change, “Rumba” by Yvonne Daniel, and “Buena Vista Social Club” by Dir. Wim Wenders offer an extensive look at the Afro-Cuban music and dance. Moore writes his article based on the Son. Son is a mixture of African and Spanish influence. Daniel in both of her articles talks about rumba, which is a dance and music genre that originated in Cuba in the mid 1800s. She talks about the different kinds of rumba, which are the Yambu, the Guaguaco, and the vacunao.

Wenders is providing us with an image of how Cuban musicians play their music, providing us with some the most popular songs from Cuba. Thousands of African slaves were brought to Cuba, and although treated like animals, their music has had a major influence on Cuban that any other type of music from other countries, creating a bond between both cultures. I found all three articles very informative. Moore, Daniel, and Wenders exposed a number of new information into my mind, and maybe into any other individual that didn’t had much knowledge about Cuban music and dance.

As an example, I hadn’t thought about the fact that after much discrimination against Africans, they were going to end up mixing their music and dance with African music and dance. I really like the fact that Cubans ended up accepting part of Africans Culture. Although, we see that the government in many occasion prohibited the people to play the Son and many other influences from African Culture, it was not enough from them to stop the people from mixing both cultures. We also see in “Buena Vista Social Club” a man who brings together a group of mostly aging and forgotten artists.

I don’t like the fact that political events and social issues have played a role in the segregation of these artists. I don’t believe that those people should have been discriminated in such way just because they were mixing both cultures. As the slaves were able to buy their freedom an increased interaction and ethnic mixing among Cubans and Africans was the result. As I was reading that both cultures began to combine, it came to my mind that African people really have a nice heart because by uniting with Cubans they are demonstrating that they had forgiven all the suffering they went through.

An example of they unity is the son, and the different kinds of rumba mentioned by Daniel and Moore. We see that the people that were coming together were mostly from working class Cubans and Africans. I find it shameful that most rich people weren’t accepting African culture, and to make it worse ended up making people like those musicians that we see in Buena Vista to be forgotten. In reading Daniel’s articles, I was able to see how people enjoy dancing rumba and many other kinds of dances. And how people especially among the working class uses dancing and music as a way to blow off steam and have fun.

Now, I can see why African were always dancing and singing, because that way they could forget about the pain and suffering that they were going through. I didn’t like the fact that the government was calling most of the dancing and music from Africa “immortal”. I don’t believe that it was appropriated to call their dancing that way. In conclusion, although there was a lot of controversy on the mixing of both cultures, it wasn’t enough to stop the people from mixing it. It was like a destiny meant by God to mix those cultures, to create not just Afro-Cuban culture, but Cuban Culture.

Interpersonal Conflict in Film easy essay help: easy essay help

There are times when the interpersonal relationships we share with our loved ones, friends, and family do not always meet eye-to-eye. Many times we find ourselves disagreeing with what the other person said. When this happens, it is crucial to pay attention to the way we react and communicate our thoughts without stirring up more conflict. The example presented in this essay is from a 2005 film, Hitch; a scene is shown of the main couple having an argument over one making assumptions and jumping to conclusions.

The conflict was not handled effectively because assumptions were made, the character jumped to conclusion, and because the issue became worse then it should have been. In the film Hitch, the characters, Hitch and Sarah, start arguing because she finds out that he is the “Date Doctor” from someone that was not a reliable source. She then goes over to his place, because they had plans for dinner, and she starts latching out at him because she is upset and feels he played her.

He did not know why she was acting so strange but still tried to continue on with the evening he had planned for the both of them. She finally asks him about what he does, but he does not give her any information since he is already annoyed at the fact that she was acting childish. This made her more upset and she started throwing food at him which then made him throw food at her and she just stormed out of there and went home. She completely assumed he was the one that gave men ways to go around and play with girls.

This was not true and had she confronted him using basic assertion, which is the lowest level of assertion to resolve conflict (Sole, 2011), and would have asked him if what the other man had said was true, the night would have probably ended in better terms. After she assumed Hitch was the “Date Doctor,” she went ahead and jumped to conclusions about him and wrote a negative article saying he was a manipulator and could get any man in bed with any women. Instead of writing that article about him she could have confronted him with the information she had and asked him about it.

There are always two sides to a story and just like she later found out that her source was unreliable, it was hard for her to repair the damaged she had already made. Had she not jumped to conclusion and taken a different approach to the situation, the result would have had a better result. Once the article had been published, things became bad not only between them but also the other characters in the film. It shows that one little mistake came make it worse for many people. The main character lost his job because of it and people were thinking he did sometime terrible, which was not the case.

If she had better communication with him from the beginning when the issue broke out and had she explained to him what she was thinking instead of reacting in a way that only made things worse, the outcome would have been very different. In conclusion, this film had this great example of what happens when we do not communicate effectively. Many times we can make assumptions about the issue or about what the person is trying to say and do not get clear thought as to what is really the issue. We jump to conclusions thinking we know what is going on without first thinking things through.

This will not allow us to communicate right and will keep a barrier between the relationships. Doing these thing can make things worse and only get more people involved when it could be something that could have been avoided from the start.

M&a Case argumentative essay help online: argumentative essay help online

Operations and management were not successfully integrated as “equals” because of the entirely different ways in which the Germans and Americans operated: while Daimler-Benz’s culture stressed a more formal and structured management style, Chrysler favored a more relaxed, freewheeling style (to which it owed a large part of its premerger ? nancial success). In addition, the two units traditionally held entirely different views on important things like pay scales and travel expenses. As a result of these differences and the German unit’s increasing dominance, performance and employee satisfaction at Chrysler took a steep downturn.

There were large numbers of departures among key Chrysler executives and engineers, while the German unit became increasingly dissatis? ed with the performance of the Chrysler division. Chrysler employees, meanwhile, became extremely dissatis? ed with what they perceived as the source of their division’s problems: Daimler’s attempts to take over the entire organization and impose their culture on the whole ? rm. 3 While cultural con? ict often plays a large role in producing merger failure, it is often neglected when the bene? ts of a potential merger are examined.

For instance, following the announcement of the AOLTimeWarner deal, a front-page Wall Street Journal article (Murray et al. 2000) discussed possible determinants of success or failure for the merger (such as synergies, costs, competitor reaction, and so forth). The only clear discussion of possible cultural con? ict is a single paragraph (out of a 60-column-inch article) revealing how the “different personalities” of AOL’s For instance, one joke told at Chrysler is: “How do you pronounce DaimlerChrysler? ‘Daimler’ the ‘Chrysler’ is silent. ”

Steve Case and TimeWarner’s Gerald Levin re? ect cultural differences between the two ? rms. A similar article (Jubak 2000) included a single paragraph entitled “What could go wrong with the synergy strategy. ” Moreover, in these sorts of short, cursory, obligatory discussions of possible cultural con? ict, there is rarely discussion of what steps might be taken if there is dramatic con? ict. While culture may seem like a “small thing” when evaluating mergers, compared to product-market and resource synergies, we think the opposite is true because culture is pervasive.

Essay Writing at Profs Only

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service




Rating:











Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.