Assignments submitted through email will not be accepted.
Students are advised to make their work clear and well presented, marks may be reduced for poor presentation. This includes filling your information on the cover page.
Students must mention question number clearly in their answer.
Read carefully Grading Rubric below for specific criteria: 0-5 Marks
Late submission will NOT be accepted.
Avoid plagiarism, the work should be in your own words, copying from students or other resources without proper referencing will result in ZERO marks. No exceptions.
All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism).
Submissions without this cover page will NOT be accepted.
research proposal
Results Section – How will you analyze your data? What do you expect the results to look like if your hypothesis is correct? Include a chart to portray your expected results. Approximately one page
Discussion Section – A discussion of three potential threats to the internal validity of your results. Approximately one page
Management Question
Management Assignment Help Avoid plagiarism, the work should be in your own words, copying from students or other resources without proper referencing will result in ZERO marks. No exceptions.
All answers must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism
All other requirements is the attached document.
pharmaceutical sciences
Specifications Table: General Tests
3 PtsMeets all expectations
1.5 PtsMeets some expectations
0 PtsDoes not meet expectations
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeSpecifications Table: Solvents
3 PtsMeets all expectations
1.5 PtsMeets some expectations
0 PtsDoes not meet expectations
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeSpecifications Table: Impurities
5 PtsMeets all expectations
2.5 PtsMeets some expectations
0 PtsDoes not meet expectations
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeSpecifications Table: Metals
3 PtsMeets all expectations
1.5 PtsMeets some expectations
0 PtsDoes not meet expectations
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeSpecifications Table: Aligned with synthesis in paper
3 PtsMeets all expectations
1.5 PtsMeets some expectations
0 PtsDoes not meet expectations
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeLimits Chosen: Supported by chosen MDD
4 PtsMeets all expectations
2 PtsMeets some expectations
0 PtsDoes not meet expectations
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeLimits appropriate
3 PtsMeets all expectations
1.5 PtsMeets some expectations
0 PtsDoes not meet expectations
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeLimits aligned with batch data provided
3 PtsMeets all expectations
1.5 PtsMeets some expectations
0 PtsDoes not meet expectations
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeBatch Data – solvents
3 PtsMeets all expectations
1.5 PtsMeets some expectations
0 PtsDoes not meet expectations
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeBatch Data – metals
3 PtsMeets all expectations
1.5 PtsMeets some expectations
0 PtsDoes not meet expectations
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeBatch Data – impurities
3 PtsMeets all expectations
1.5 PtsMeets some expectations
0 PtsDoes not meet expectations
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeBatch Data – general
3 PtsMeets all expectations
1.5 PtsMeets some expectations
0 PtsDoes not meet expectations
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeJustifications – Calculations using MDD to justify limits
5 PtsMeets all expectations
2.5 PtsMeets some expectations
0 PtsDoes not meet expectations
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeJustification – Impurity Discussion
3 PtsMeets all expectations
1.5 PtsMeets some expectations
0 PtsDoes not meet expectations
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeFormat, language, adherence to requirements
3 PtsMeets all expectations
1.5 PtsMeets some expectations
0 PtsDoes not meet expectations
3 pts
1. Please read the following article. Do you think ryanair has a strategy? Why? If Ryanair does have a
1. Please read the following article. Do you think ryanair has a strategy? Why? If Ryanair does have a strategy, then what positioning does it hold? List a couple of activities that Ryanair did such as non-adjustable seats. What activities would you recommend for O’leary that he would most likely agree to implement?
Use the following link
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:7NDrRvVbjUEJ:https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2006-11-26/wal-mart-with-wings
Math Climate Project
Math Climate Project.
Topic should be chosen from the last page.
Need 3500 words, you may choose the easiest topic to write on.
Please deliver as per request. preliminary, progress, draft and final draft.
The mentioned textbook is attached.
If you choose topic 1, the link to the course is the link to the BOOK.
I only need the preliminary by the mentioned deadline, then will extend for you to work on the remainings.
Entertainment Law case questions
1. In Re Taylor (this is James Taylor who was in Kool
pharmaceutical sciences
CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a learning outcomeData analysisAnalysis of the given data was performed correctly and presented in a clear and accurate manner.
15 PtsFull Marks
15 to >7.5 PtsProficient
Data analysis and/or its presentation have some weaknesses, but overall is generally clear and accurate
7.5 to >0.0 PtsWeak
There are critical flaws in the data analysis and/or its presentation
0 PtsNo Marks
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDiscussion of resultsThe results of the completed data analysis are clear and accurate and thoughtfully relate to course concepts.
15 PtsFull Marks
15 to >7.5 PtsProficient
Analysis has some weaknesses but overall it is clear and accurate
7.5 to >0.0 PtsWeak
There are critical flaws in the analysis
0 PtsNo Marks
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeOverall clarity of reportSpelling, grammar, formatting, citations, and other elements have been edited and refined to produce a report that is easy to read and understand.
10 PtsFull Marks
10 to >5.0 PtsProficient
Overall product has only minor weaknesses and all assignment requirements were met. Clear and easy to follow.
5 to >0.0 PtsWeak
Overall product has multiple weaknesses and/or is missing assignment requirements. Report is unclear and difficult to follow.
0 PtsNo Marks
10 pts
all detail provided in the pictures. lab report rubric, equations, and graph guide are all inside, not sure how Essay
all detail provided in the pictures. lab report rubric, equations, and graph guide are all inside, not sure how many pages this would need, but let me know if you need more pages. I think every questions should be in a few sentences, just need to show the calculation, and the graphs.(equations and graph guide are given in the pictures).
Write a Discussion about 300 words in APA format
n your initial post, answer the following questions about IT Project Management. In addition to your course textbook (chapter 11), utilize the UC library for information and examples.
What is a project, and what are its main attributes? How is a project different from what most people do in their day-to-day jobs? Discuss the importance of top management commitment and the development of standards for successful project management. Provide examples to illustrate the importance of these items based on your experience on any type of project. Discuss the unique challenges that an IT project presents.
In your peer responses, be sure discuss your thoughts on project management, your views on project’s attributes, and your thoughts on successful project management. You can take opposing/differing views than your peers but be sure to provide applicable resources as needed. Properly provide examples in your peer responses as well and any additional challenges you see with IT projects.
Provide extensive additional information on the topic
Explain, define, or analyze the topic in detail
Share an applicable personal experience
Provide an outside source (for example, an article from the UC Library) that applies to the topic, along with additional information about the topic or the source (please cite properly in APA)
Make an argument concerning the topic.
At least one scholarly source should be used in the initial discussion thread. Be sure to use information from your readings and other sources from the UC Library. Use proper citations and references in your post.