Get help from the best in academic writing.

Meeting My Nutritional Needs

Keep a 24-hour food diary one day this week, recording everything you consume from each food group (with quantities) in that period and the physical activity that you engage in (what and how long).
Calculate your BMR:
Determine your daily calorie needs: Multiply your weight in pounds by 18 -this equals the number of calories required daily to maintain your current weight (of course you would consume fewer when trying to loose weight), the average calorie need for most adult women is around 2,000 calories per day.Find out your precise daily calorie need by doing the math. Weight in Pounds X 18 = Daily Calorie Need

Use this information (food diary, your BMR and Daily Calorie Needs based on weight) to write a brief reflection (less than two pages) responding to the following questions in essay format:
What are the strengths and weaknesses of your current diet?
Which nutrients may have be missing?
How many calories do you think you consumed?
How does your BMR/Daily Calorie need relate to what you consume each day?
What would you like to change and why?

Religion and Health Care persuasive essay help Theatre essay help

The Hippocratic Oath is an oath taken by all doctors following the completion of their studies; its principles are considered to be the “expression of ideal conduct for the physician” (Tyson, 2001). With the changes to modern healthcare and the requirement of individuals to adhere to the requests of their patients, the oath presents something of a conflict in today’s day and age, as it requires the physician to do no harm and help where able, while ethics practices require physicians to uphold the requests of the patients themselves (Tyson, 2001). There are instances when these practices are not in mutual agreement, and it is from these occurrences of differentiation that issues, such as the one presented in the case study, arise. In cases such as the situation between Dr. Z and Rory, wherein the doctor completed the task necessary to ensure the survival of the patient, going against the patient’s wishes in the process, the concept of ethical decision making comes into play. Ethical decision making occurs in situations when a conflict between conflicting values must be addressed, as in the case of Rory’s religious request versus Dr. Z’s desire to ensure that the patient did not die (ACHE, 2011).

Rory, being a Jehovah’s Witness, believes that the acceptance of a blood transfusion goes against the Bible, and thus goes against his religion (Winslow, n.d.); he has stated that he refuses all blood transfusions prior to undergoing surgery. Dr. Z, during the course of surgery, has to make the call as to whether to let Rory die or whether to give him a blood transfusion, thus saving his life; for Dr. Z, there is no question and he gives the transfusion, thus going against the patient’s wishes, but saving his life. Alas, though it goes against the personal ethics of Dr. Z, he should not have ordered the transfusion, as this went against the requests of the patient.

While not all Jehovah’s Witnesses abstain from accepting blood transfusions, those who do are of the stricter faith, believing that it should not be done, regardless of whether or not a lack thereof will lead to death (Karkowsky, 2013). In this type of situation, however, to prevent possible expulsion from their community and going against their faith, the patient has the option of appointing someone else to make their healthcare decisions for them; if that person opts to allow the transfusion, they do not take penalty for the action (Karkowsky, 2013). If Rory was this serious about his religion, he could have taken this additional step, or he could have donated his own blood, in case such an action was needed (Karkowsky, 2013).

Alas, the case of Rory and Dr. Z is one of poor choices on both sides; Rory did not exercise all of the options at his disposal, and Dr. Z did not adhere to the patient’s wishes, opting to follow his own ethical code instead of the ethical code of the hospital. As a result, Dr. Z was terminated from his position, and though it was not solely his fault, he was not blameless, resulting in this being the only possible course of action left open to the hospital in this situation. The ungratefulness of Rory’s wife is perhaps the only surprising thing present within the case study, for as a new mother, her first response should not have been to sue the hospital, but to discuss the situation in a rational manner, as it ensured that her husband would be there to see their child grow up.


  • ACHE. (2011). Ethical Policy Statement: Ethical Decision Making for Healthcare Executives. Retrieved 14 July 2014, from
  • Karkowsky, C. (2013). Jehovah’s Witnesses Won’t Take Blood Transfusions. They Need a Shabbes Goy. Slate Magazine. Retrieved 14 July 2014, from
  • Tyson, P. (2001). The Hippocratic Oath Today. Retrieved 14 July 2014, from
  • Winslow, G. (n.d.). Health Care and Religious Beliefs. Loma Linda University. Retrieved 13 July 2014, from

English Assignment Help

Just A Discussion Question Leg100

Homework Assistance

Unit III Research Article Analysis (Total of 3 pages not including cover and reference page) For this assignment, review at least five articles according to the following instructions: ¢ Using the criteria for ?Judging a Research Study evaluate at least five or more research articles. ¢ Answer Questions 1 and 2 for all five articles. ¢ Answer two questions from each of the remaining sections of the criteria questions for all five sources (14 questions for a total of 16 questions per source). ¢ Include an APA references list for all five (or more) sources. Responses to all questions should be given using complete sentences. (For the Unit IV Assignment you will be asked to put the information from the articles you evaluated in this assignment into a literature review.) Judging a research study Review at least five articles according to the following instructions: ¢ Using the criteria for “Judging a Research Study”, evaluate at least five or more research articles. ¢ Answer the below questions ¢ Include an APA references list for all five (or more) sources. Responses to all questions should be given using complete sentences. Review of Previous Research 1. How closely is the literature reviewed in the study related to previous literature? 2. Is the review recent? Problem and Purpose 3. Can you understand the statement of the problem? 4. Is the purpose clearly stated? Hypotheses 5. Are the research hypotheses clearly stated? 6. Are the hypotheses testable? Method 7. Are the independent and dependent variables clearly defined? 8. Is it clear how the study was conducted? Sample 9. Was the sample selected in such a way that you think it is representative of the population? 10. Is it clear where the sample came from and how it was selected? Results and Discussion 11. Does the author relate the results to the review of the literature? 12. Are the results related to the hypotheses? Unit IV Literature Review (Total of 3 pages not including cover and reference page) For the Unit IV assignment, students are to complete the literature review for the Research Proposal. A minimum of five relevant references are to be analyzed for the Literature Review. The references used are to be cited in the Literature Review of the Research Proposal. They are also to be included in the references page and in APA format. Review of the Relevant Literature/Related Research/Literature Review: Provide a minimum of five research studies that address the same topic chosen for the proposal. What are the similar areas of study or studies that lead up to the current research? Identify the importance of the questions being asked. ï?· Report on the current status of the topic. ï?· Analyze the relationship between the literature reviewed and the problem statement. Include a summary, along with a restatement of the relationships between the variables under consideration and how these relationships are important to the proposed hypothesis. (Estimated length – two to three pages) Unit V Assignment (Total of 6 pages not including cover and reference page) For the Unit V Assignment, students are to complete the following areas of the Methods section for the Research Proposal: 1. Method, Participants, Research Design, Instrumentation, and Data Collection Plans. (Estimated length – two pages) ï?· Method/Research Procedure/Methodology: Determine the method of research for the proposal. Examples could be: qualitative, quantitative, and case study. NOTE: Be sure that you write in future tense for the proposal. (Estimated length – two paragraphs) ï?· Participants: Provide specific identification for the proposed participants for the study. Include a description, the possible number within the population, the proposed location, and the selection procedure. Be specific when identifying the selection process. Then identify how a representative sample will be drawn from the population. (Estimated length – half a page) ï?· Research Design: Determine how to conduct the data collection and the proposed analysis. See page 15 of your textbook. (Estimated length – half a page) ï?· Instrumentation and Data Collection Plans: State the sources and/or instrument(s) proposed to be used to record the data (surveys, interview protocols). Identify the procedure. For a mailed survey, identify steps to be taken in administering and following up the survey to obtain a high response rate. Determine how to specifically conduct the research based on the proposed sample. See page 149 of the textbook. (Estimated length – half a page) 2. Proposed Analysis of the Data. (Estimated length – one to two pages) Identify what results are expected from the sample. Identify how the categories of responses will be determined and analyzed. Address specifically what the proposed results could infer back to the population. Answer the following questions: ï?· What variables will be included in the analyses? ï?· Identify the dependent and independent variables if such a relationship exists. ï?· What is the decision making criteria (e.g., the critical alpha level)? ï?· Will computer software be used in the analysis? If so, identify what will be used. ï?· Explain how to assess the validity of the measurement. ï?· Explain how to measure the reliability of the variables. Unit VI Implications and Limitations (Total of 1 page not including cover and reference page) Identify and label a minimum of two (2) implications and a minimum of two (2) limitations for the proposed study. At a minimum, answer the following questions: What implications and limitations are being made regarding the proposed sample and how it represents the proposed population? 2. What implications are you making regarding the instrument’s validity and its ability to measure the desired variables? 3. What implications are being made in having respondents truthfully answer a survey, questionnaire, or interview questions? 4. Identify the limitations of the research proposal, such as the limited population for the study. (Estimated length – one page)

Final Journal Assignment

Hi , Can you complete this assignment: due date 06/23/2017 (Tomorrow) Final Journal Assignment: due date 06/23/2017 Repeat the stress measures again. Are your stress measures higher or lower than in Week 1? To what do you attribute any change in score? What plan will you make for yourself in response to these scores? Submit additional Mindfulness Worksheets with your Final Journal Entry. This Journal is due by the end of the course, according to date provided in Activities and Assignments Guide. Student Stress Scale(1).pdf Perceived Stress Scale(1).docx Complete the Perceived Stress Scale again and submit into Journal area provided and answer the following: ¢ Is your score higher or lower than it was in Week 1? ¢ To what do you attribute this change in score? ¢ What plan will you make for yourself in response to this change in score? Write an entry (word document) APA format and share your results (2-3 pages). Interpret your results using the instructions provided. THE STRESS MEASURES Student Stress Scale test My results: 14. (See attachment) Increased Perceived Stress Scale test: My results: 66 (see attachment) increased · Lower grade than expected (29):I suspended the last exam due to not enough study, poor time management and working extra times and weekends . · Increase workload at the school (37): I’m in the last weeks of this semester with 2 classes and with a lot of assignments, test, and clinical practices Attached is the first assignment completed to compared with this new assignment

Understanding The Research Process

Understanding The Research Process. Resources: Ch. 1, 2, and & 7 of Psychology This required Portfolio assignment will provide you with the opportunity to practice and hone your research skills. It has been designed to help you think scientifically about real world problems and issues and to apply your knowledge of the research process to various topics in Psychology. This assignment accomplishes that goal by challenging you to: · Differentiate between the common use of the word research and the use of the word research in the social and behavioral sciences · Identify the major steps in the research process using a classic study in Psychology as an example. Part I: Defining Research The word research is used in many different ways. Consider the following examples: · Your friend tells you that he intends to research different hair products before deciding on one to buy. · A real estate agent advises you to research home values in your neighborhood before putting your house on the market. · A police officer reports that she is doing ?some research’ on possible motives for a crime that was committed. · A writer states that he does ?extensive research’ before beginning his fictional works. Answer the questions below: 1. How is research defined in the social and behavioral sciences? 2. What makes scientific research different from the examples provided above? In your response, be sure to address the characteristics of ?good’ psychological research. Part II: Understanding the research process Researchers in Psychology follow a systematic process of investigation. Carefully read Chapter 2 of your textbook, paying special attention to the section on Experimental Research. Then go to Chapter 7 in your textbook and read the following section: Research In-Depth: Counterfactuals and ?If Only¦ Thinking. Answer the questions below, using Medvec & colleagues’ first study as an example: 1. What hypothesis did Medvec & colleagues set out to test in their first study of the ?near miss’ phenomenon? Describe the theory associated with this hypothesis. 2. Identify the variables in the study and describe how they were measured. How did the researchers operationalize (test or measure) affective response upon winning a bronze or silver medal? 3. Who were the participants in the study and what did they do? 4. Describe the data that was collected and analyzed. 5. Describe the results of the study. What did the researchers conclude? 6. If you were to design a follow-up experiment on this subject, what might it be? There is not a specific word count…just make sure that you have adequately addressed each question.
Understanding The Research Process

Human Service Final Paper

I need help with my final paper please. I have attached my final paper for you to review , revise, add on, simple make better. I need a A or B on this Final paper. I need someone thats excellent on proof reading and writing skills. All my past draft papers, teacher always comments I am not addressing the questions completely and using brief answers. I need make sure the entire assignment is completed as teacher requires. Thanks The final project is a creation of a organizational change project proposal in the form of written report . you will model the role of a program manger at a small non profit human service will demonstrate your ability how to craft a proposal that will influence the organization programattc services and cultures, workforce structure and funding while maintaining legal and ethical standards for human services professionals. If written it must be 5 to 7 pages double spaced one inch margins and 12 pt times new roman font HERES YOUR QUESTIONS U MUST ADDRESS.. ON TOPIC OF AFRIGO AGENCY Introduction: Current State of the Agency– details include how the agency’s culture impacts human services programs. Describes the agency in terms of current workforce structure, budget, and funding and their impact on its culture. Introduction: Impact Justifies the Proposal– details include the potential impact on programs offered by the agency. Justifies the proposal using previous description of workforce structure, budget, and funding’s impact on the agency’s culture. Introduction: Agency Mission– includes how the current state might impact the mission if concerns are not addressed. Describes how the agency’s mission was considered when creating the proposal, including the relationship between the mission and the community. Introduction: Trends in Human Service Delivery– details include the effect on the community. Describes how current trends in human service delivery influenced the creation of the proposal, including the costs and quality of services. Introduction: State of the Agency– details include historical and current trends in human services delivery. Identifies how the proposal will alter the state of the agency, including impacts to present and future program service delivery. Workforce Structure: Structure and Culture– details include relationships between the agency’s workforce culture and its ability to provide comprehensive service delivery. Explains how the agency’s workforce structure and culture were considered when creating the proposal. Workforce Structure: Personnel and Retention- includes how the retention of personnel might alter the state of the agency and the quality of service delivery. Recommends changes to personnel that address retention and program delivery and how to help personnel become more valuable to the agency and community. Workforce Structure: Personnel and Recruitment– includes how the recruitment of personnel might alter the state of the agency and the quality of service delivery.Recommends changes to personnel, addressing recruitment and program delivery, including ideas for hiring new personnel. Workforce Structure: Current Trends– details address how current models might positively impact the agency’s culture. Budget and Funding: Delivery of Services– cites relevant ethical standards in human services to support claims. Explains the need for maintaining a budget based on ethical standards in human services using examples of decisions that will improve service to the community. Budget and Funding: Quality of Services– cites relevant ethical standards in human services to support claims. Describes how decisions regarding personnel changes and the agency’s budget influence the quality of program services. Budget and Funding: Grant Funding- cites appropriate laws and regulations in relation to grant compliance. Analyzes the relationships between grant funding and the delivery of services, including how grant funding helps address gaps in agency budgets. Budget and Funding: Future Funding Sources- includes historical and current trends in human services programming, workforce structure, and funding. Describes how the proposal may impact future funding sources. Conclusion: Future Program Service Delivery– details include relevant ethical standards in human services to support claims. Summarizes how the proposal may positively impact future program delivery and its connection with the culture and future programming of the agency. Conclusion: Trends and Benefits to the Community– details include real-world examples. Summarizes how the proposal aligns with current trends in human service delivery and the benefits to community.

HU 245 Unit 4 Assignment

Your task is to write a paragraph (maximum length of one page double spaced) that analyzes one specific bioethical issue. You choose which bioethical issue to write about; in this Assignment, reflect deeply on a topic that matters to you. If you need help selecting a topic, consult with your instructor. Complete your position paragraph. You should write about a bioethical issue that strikes you as interesting, important, and relevant. For example, if, when reading the assigned chapter in the text, you recalled a personal situation involving bioethics that you thought was unethical, you might write a position paragraph about how that situation relates to your reading. The point of the Assignment is for you to reflect deeply on one concept and its relevance to your own life. If you find it difficult to select a topic to write about or have any questions about how your paper should be organized, please consult your instructor. You must apply at least one ethical theory to support your position and explain how a different theory compares when applied to this issue. It is not enough to name a theory; you must explain the theory and demonstrate how your position reflects the logic and reasoning of that theory. You must also show how your position supported by ethical theory is stronger than another position supported by another theory. Remember that theory is the ?why behind your beliefs.


By day 4 (Thursday) post a descriptive comparison between the following epidemiological study designs: cohort studies and case control studies. Your post must be written in APA format.

Information Technology Importance In Strategy Planning

Develop a Computer/Internet Security Policy You have been hired as the CSO (Chief Security Officer) for an organization. Your job is to develop a computer and internet security policy for the organization that covers the following areas: Computer and email acceptable use policy Internet acceptable use policy Password protection policy Make sure you are sufficiently specific in addressing each area. There are plenty of security policy and guideline templates available online for you to use as a reference or for guidance. Your plan should reflect the business model and corporate culture of a specific organization that you select. Include at least 3 scholarly references in addition to the course textbook. At least two of the references cited need to be peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles from the library. Your paper should meet the following requirements: ¢ Be approximately four to six pages in length, not including the required cover page and reference page. ¢ Follow APA6 guidelines. Your paper should include an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a conclusion. ¢ Support your answers with the readings from the course and at least three scholarly journal articles to support your positions, claims, and observations, in addition to your textbook. ¢ Be clearly and well-written, concise, and logical, using excellent grammar and style techniques. You are being graded in part on the quality of your writing.

Week 3

Question 1: Let’s discuss the difference between positive association and negative association when describing the relationship between two variables. What do we mean by the least-square criterion? Give a general description of how the least-square criterion is involve in the construction of the least-square line. Why do we say the least-squares line is the best-fitting line for the data set? Use the Internet and find a magazine or journal article in your field of major interest wherein the content of this chapter (Correlation and Regression – chapter 6) could be applied. List the variables used, method of data collection, and the general type of information and conclusion drawn. Note: Your initial post will be your answer to the Question and is to be 600 words with at least two references. Initial post will be graded on length, content, grammar and use of references. References should always be below each question as they are a different topic and not related in any way. References: Exploring Statistics: Tales of Distributions by Chris Spatz


Every claim for workers’ compensation can result in litigation. However, in a vast majority of cases the employer and the insurance carrier will pay the claim voluntarily. However, if the work-related nature of a claim is in dispute it will require a claim be filed with the tribunal that will hear the dispute. Preparation for this eventuality must be meticulous. As a paralegal, ask yourself the following questions: Why would such a claim be denied in the first place? What do you think an employee should do to assure that such a claim is valid? How long should an employee allow the work related stress to continue before filing a claim for workers’ compensation? Nancy Jones, who previously suffered from anxiety, sought compensation for stress-related occupational disease. She claimed that the anxiety and stress were due to an oppressive working environment, personality conflicts with her supervisor, and job duties that required her to be spread too thin. The workers’ compensation carrier denies coverage for the claim. Your attorney asks you to draft a memorandum of law in support of your client’s case. Using case law and other legal authority to support your position, draft a memorandum of law for submission to the workers’ compensation tribunal in the state of New Jersey. Based on the above information, answer the following questions: Does Nancy have a cause of action for workplace induced stress? Why or why not? What evidence should Nancy and you present to prove her claims? What remedies does Nancy have against her employer, if any? Provide your analysis, and draft a legal brief on whether Nancy has a cause of action against her employer, her employer’s liabilities, and the remedies available to her. Also include references to case law and statutes where appropriate. Click here to download the legal brief template. On a separate page, cite all sources using the Bluebook style.


I need help with a physics essay I attached the outline and prompt I my topic it is the one below Ido not want anyone woh is not knowing physics I will look at ratings and profile also I do not want plagarism before I got plagarism and failed 🙁 >> NEEDD IN NEXT 10 HOURS Electric signals from the body- heart, head, muscles

Just A Discussion Question Leg100

Review the news headline regarding exploding air bags and why legal personnel are saying this recall is different than most. Video Report Based on the news headline, outline and explain two (2) other types of torts a business may be liable for and explain why. (Do not use the video example as one of your own suggestions.) Then, explore some of the steps a company may take to avoid liability for the torts you discussed. Be sure to provide legal support for your analysis. If you need help with completing discussions please click here for more information.

Essay Writing at Profs Only

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service