Submission Instructions:
Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)
All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.
Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.Discussion RubricCriteriaRatingsPointsIdentification of Main Issues, Problems, and ConceptsDistinguished – 5 points Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.Excellent – 4 points Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.Fair – 2 pointsIdentifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.Poor – 1 pointIdentifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.5 pointsUse of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting GuidelinesDistinguished – 3 pointsEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.Excellent – 2 pointsEffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.Fair – 1 pointIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.Poor – 0 pointsIneffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.3 pointsResponse to Posts of PeersDistinguished – 2 pointsStudent constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each.Fair – 1 pointStudent constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal.Poor – 0 pointsStudent provided no response to a peer’s post. 2 pointsTotal Points 10
ssignment: Assessing Research – Write a 5-6 page essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Support your ideas with
ssignment:
Assessing Research – Write a 5-6 page essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Support your ideas with at least three (3) scholarly citations in your essay. Use strict APA guidelines to format the paper. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum page amount and an abstract and table of contents are not necessary and if included are not part of the overall page count. Assessing research and peer-reviewed work is considered a standard for quality and best practice. Describe the importance of peer-review and how to determine if information is peer-reviewed. Choose two other criteria for determining quality information and develop a discussion similar to the peer-review requirement. Be detailed on how the information is assessed and why you chose those criteria.
Assignment Expectations
Length: 5-6 pages
Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA style. These do not count towards the minimal page amount for this assignment.
References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least three (3) scholarly sources to support your claims.
Format: Save your assignment as a Microsoft Word document (.doc or .docx).
File name: Name your saved file according to your first initial, last name, and the module number (for example, “RHall Module 1.docx”)
Pediatric blood transfusion refusal for religious transfusions
Nursing Assignment Help Pediatric blood transfusion refusal for religious transfusionsThe topic is “Pediatric blood transfusion refusal for religious transfusions”
For this assignment, you will examine an ethical dilemma that exists in pediatric settings. You will examine the ethical dilemma from two opposing positions and consider ethical principles, conflict between the principles and the relationship of the ANA Code of Ethic’s provisions in relation to both positions. You will also discuss potential resources, possible outcomes of both positions and develop a plan for resolving the issue (for patient, family and the nurse). You will submit an individual paper grounded in scholarly sources with a reflection on your values. Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes: 1. Provides individualized comprehensive care for children and their families with multiple health problems in institutions and community care settings from birth through adolescence. (PO 1) 4. Utilizes critical thinking skills in clinical decision making in the care of pediatric clients. (PO 4) 6. Utilizes legal, ethical, and professional standards and principles, including those related to child abuse recognition and intervention, as a basis for pediatric clinical decision?making. (PO 6) 8. Utilize research findings as a basis for nursing interventions in pediatric healthcare settings and the development of professional nursing papers. (PO 8
Reasearch one of the following article and summarize the topic following specific instructions.
Activities
For this discussion do the following;
1. Choose one of the articles posted and read thoroughly.
2. Identify the theoretical framework used in the article you chose (post the name of the theory and explain the theory).
3. Go the reference section of the article and Identify/select at least one primary source and one secondary source (articles) that supports the theoretical framework (list only the reference of these articles).
4.
Now, search the SU nursing electronic library database such as Gale-Infotract on LIRN,
CINAHL, or ProQuest to identify the primary and secondary source
articles you selected.
Post a brief review of the abstracts of the primary source and secondary source in the article you chose.
Using in-text referencing and a reference list, submit your initial
discussion post by Wednesday at 1159PM and reply back to your peers by
Friday at 1159PM.