Get help from the best in academic writing.

Oedipus Rex And Tragic Hero English Essay Help

Oedipus Rex as a Tragic HeroEssay title: Oedipus Rex as a Tragic HeroThe character of Oedipus can definitely be defined as a tragic hero as he possesses all five components of the accepted definition. Tragic heros must be people of high or noble birth, not pre-eminently virtuous or just, who, through some fatal flaw in their own character or serious error in judgment, precipitate their own downfall and thereby gain knowledge through suffering.


The first aspect that defines a tragic hero is that of one being born to those high in society or noble in birth. In ancient greek times, this was to emphasize their importance and exaggerate the “fall” they would eventually experience. Although Oedipus was never aware in his childhood, to whom he was born, the fact that he is of noble birth remains inescapable. Oedipus state himself that “At home I rose to be a person of some pre-eminence.” Here he claims that his adoptive parents were the ones who contributed to his importance in society. The reader knows, however, that he was indeed born with importance. This use of dramatic irony draws attention to his birth, to emphasize his ultimate importance.


[…]


On how Oedipus’ name is used in history, it is clear from the various historical accounts quoted that he was born in Sparta.[1] This is because the Spartan legend of his birth is based largely on the ancient legend of the Arianus and the other sons of a goddess of Troy.[2] The early Roman historian Tacitus explains this as follows:


“His birth to a Roman god was like a mother’s birth, and in it he gave birth to, and thus gave to life, not the whole of life. When it came to the third Olympian, he would, from his very birth, be at the hand of a god with the most ancient names;[3] he would not take any part in either of them, for they were the gods of the city and of the fields which he led.” (Tacitus, A.D. 1007) The Arianus is a great story with the following elements, with examples from all who have studied the historical record, which they have presented to us as a compilation that, even by historical standards, should have no bearing on the real history of the Spartan story:


“The greatest of all kings (Cepus) was crowned, the only man among whom did not live long in his land; he was always in danger of dying. The gods of Troy, however, made him afraid, and called upon it to grant him eternal life. They held a banquet of wine under a tree with the king’s attendants, all of whom came from Sparta and brought grapes for Pynnarus’s head, which was to remain until he was taken as a child. This act of birth, as it were, gave life to the wine, which, then, was to pass from Sparta to Triton.” (Cepus, A.D. 1008)


The Spartans were indeed a race of people with the largest social and economic assets, including land, water, and agriculture. The general idea behind the Spartan myths is to describe an empire in which each individual was considered a hero and in which those who held the power were heroes, not mere royalty. The idea of a “super dynasty” is not restricted to the Arianic kings of Sparta and Athens, but is most strikingly evident in the stories of the three Olympians and the Arianus himself.[4] The Spartani myth of Arianus, in which he makes special use of Sparta, does not only depict Spartans as heroes, but they themselves as leaders who were in the business of protecting the country and fighting the invaders.


The Spartans, as leaders of their own nation, was a great problem in pre-history, and some of it was due partly to the influence of the Babylonian dynasty, a dynasty that could be traced back to about 500 B.C. and which at that time was largely called the Hittites.[1] The Spartans also had to deal with the Persians, who had long resisted the Spartan invaders, although some of the Athenians held some of the land as they had in the time they ruled.


Many Sparta historians, having been deeply concerned by the plight of the Hittites themselves, have tried to use this history to argue that the Spartans and the Persian powers were no different, as they had, after the battle of Megara, always been allies in the war on Troy. (By that we mean that at Abydos, there were many battles which had taken place, and even on this day many of the Athenians, and this was an important cause, as those were the main cause for the defeat of the Romans at the Battle of Peloponnesus) But the Spartans did not always share this attitude: as a country, they refused to accept the offer to support the forces of Troy for a while, not without reluctance, and the Spartan rulers refused if they could make use of it to help the Troyans.[2]


By the mid-1600s, after three years of warfare against the Persian invaders, both sides had agreed to a truce, with Troy the main aggressor. After Troy’s defeat, the Spartans turned their backs on their adversaries and went their separate ways—a fact which would not soon change for the Persians.


The Spartan leaders of the Arian Empire had become well aware of their own weaknesses, but as the years passed, however, they began to change their tactics, and the Persians and Hittites began to see the conflict themselves as equally inextricable. The Roman Empire, which made a decisive advance in the area for several years, came to dominate the lands south of the Tigris River, and its territory was increasingly under its control.


In 5 B.C., a major battle occurred between the two states, the Battle of Liguria between the Hittites and Greeks. As the victorious Spartans made their way through Macedonia and Greece, they were forced to confront each other a great deal of territory before falling into the hands of the Hittites. The Hittites took advantage of this confrontation and used their advantage to seize Carthage and to seize the Carthaginian mainland, and the Persians got to the heart of the dispute a long time later, when the Carthaginians, having had a dispute with the Greeks, were sent to occupy the island.[3] At the end of that war,


[…]


Among the surviving


[…]


On how Oedipus’ name is used in history, it is clear from the various historical accounts quoted that he was born in Sparta.[1] This is because the Spartan legend of his birth is based largely on the ancient legend of the Arianus and the other sons of a goddess of Troy.[2] The early Roman historian Tacitus explains this as follows:


“His birth to a Roman god was like a mother’s birth, and in it he gave birth to, and thus gave to life, not the whole of life. When it came to the third Olympian, he would, from his very birth, be at the hand of a god with the most ancient names;[3] he would not take any part in either of them, for they were the gods of the city and of the fields which he led.” (Tacitus, A.D. 1007) The Arianus is a great story with the following elements, with examples from all who have studied the historical record, which they have presented to us as a compilation that, even by historical standards, should have no bearing on the real history of the Spartan story:


“The greatest of all kings (Cepus) was crowned, the only man among whom did not live long in his land; he was always in danger of dying. The gods of Troy, however, made him afraid, and called upon it to grant him eternal life. They held a banquet of wine under a tree with the king’s attendants, all of whom came from Sparta and brought grapes for Pynnarus’s head, which was to remain until he was taken as a child. This act of birth, as it were, gave life to the wine, which, then, was to pass from Sparta to Triton.” (Cepus, A.D. 1008)


The Spartans were indeed a race of people with the largest social and economic assets, including land, water, and agriculture. The general idea behind the Spartan myths is to describe an empire in which each individual was considered a hero and in which those who held the power were heroes, not mere royalty. The idea of a “super dynasty” is not restricted to the Arianic kings of Sparta and Athens, but is most strikingly evident in the stories of the three Olympians and the Arianus himself.[4] The Spartani myth of Arianus, in which he makes special use of Sparta, does not only depict Spartans as heroes, but they themselves as leaders who were in the business of protecting the country and fighting the invaders.


The Spartans, as leaders of their own nation, was a great problem in pre-history, and some of it was due partly to the influence of the Babylonian dynasty, a dynasty that could be traced back to about 500 B.C. and which at that time was largely called the Hittites.[1] The Spartans also had to deal with the Persians, who had long resisted the Spartan invaders, although some of the Athenians held some of the land as they had in the time they ruled.


Many Sparta historians, having been deeply concerned by the plight of the Hittites themselves, have tried to use this history to argue that the Spartans and the Persian powers were no different, as they had, after the battle of Megara, always been allies in the war on Troy. (By that we mean that at Abydos, there were many battles which had taken place, and even on this day many of the Athenians, and this was an important cause, as those were the main cause for the defeat of the Romans at the Battle of Peloponnesus) But the Spartans did not always share this attitude: as a country, they refused to accept the offer to support the forces of Troy for a while, not without reluctance, and the Spartan rulers refused if they could make use of it to help the Troyans.[2]


By the mid-1600s, after three years of warfare against the Persian invaders, both sides had agreed to a truce, with Troy the main aggressor. After Troy’s defeat, the Spartans turned their backs on their adversaries and went their separate ways—a fact which would not soon change for the Persians.


The Spartan leaders of the Arian Empire had become well aware of their own weaknesses, but as the years passed, however, they began to change their tactics, and the Persians and Hittites began to see the conflict themselves as equally inextricable. The Roman Empire, which made a decisive advance in the area for several years, came to dominate the lands south of the Tigris River, and its territory was increasingly under its control.


In 5 B.C., a major battle occurred between the two states, the Battle of Liguria between the Hittites and Greeks. As the victorious Spartans made their way through Macedonia and Greece, they were forced to confront each other a great deal of territory before falling into the hands of the Hittites. The Hittites took advantage of this confrontation and used their advantage to seize Carthage and to seize the Carthaginian mainland, and the Persians got to the heart of the dispute a long time later, when the Carthaginians, having had a dispute with the Greeks, were sent to occupy the island.[3] At the end of that war,


[…]


Among the surviving


Although Tragic heroes are usually of noble or high birth, they must be characterized as people to whom the ordinary person can relate. Humans relate to flaws in character, but not to an evil person. That being said; the tragic hero cannot be perfect, as it would be a terrible moral if bad things were to happen to good people. Therefore, Oedipus is an excellent candidate for a tragic hero for this aspect of the definition. At the beginning of the play, we see he is caring for the people of his city when he says, “And while you suffer, none suffers more than I. you have several griefs, each for himself; but my heart bears the weight of my own, and yours, and all of my people’s sorrows. I am not asleep. I weep; and walk through endless ways of thought.” Additionally, the audience respects greatly the king’s request to determine the truths of his birth. The citizens of Thebes are grateful of him defeating the sphinx and his desire to overcome their hardships by trying to find the killer of their late King Laius. However, the reader may frown upon his killing of this same king, and all of his men. Furthermore, his treatment of Teresias was less than acceptable. In brief, the audience respects the overall character of Oedipus, and can relate to his flaws.


These types of flaws, in tragic works, often bring about a terrible downfall for tragic heroes. In Oedipus, this hamartia can be said to be his lack of self-knowledge. Although it is debatable whether or not this circumstance


Culture Transplant-Nummi Case And Essay Culture Transplant-Nummi Case extended essay help biology: extended essay help biology

Culture Transplant-Nummi Case

Join now to read essay Culture Transplant-Nummi Case

A Great Experiment Of Culture Transplant

Cross-culture management, Prof. Alfred Kieser

XiaoJun Ma

Culture is a set of basic assumptions, which shared solutions to universal problems of external adaptations and internal integration—which have evolved over time and are handed from one generation to the next.


This is a general definition of culture. Actually there are many definitions exist, some concentrated on values, others on shared patterns of behaviors and meaning. And what we are going to talk about is the problems of transplanting practices, from one culture into another.


There are different types of corporate culture just like there are different types of personality. According to the theory of a business master, Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, different types of cultures can be generalized to these four types: academic culture, in which the employees tend to stay in that stable environment, and exercise and develop their skills, and they work mainly for reputations and ranks. Baseball team culture, where the employees are highly skilled, and can get a job some where else easily. This type of industries is usually very fast paced, with high risk, high revenues, like investment banking, stock, futures dealer. Club culture, the most important issue for the employees in this culture is to fit in this culture. Like in most Japanese companies, employees stay in the companies from low position, and later promoted to higher position, usually they work in the companies for their whole career. Fortress culture, in which the companies often undergo massive reorganization, thus the employees will have the opportunities to be promoted or laid off. Corporate culture can be further divided into various types, these four are basic forms. Basically, we can say that organizational culture is the character of an organization. And culture is comprised of the assumptions, values, norms and tangible signs (artifacts), which is the decisive element of the organization members and their behaviors. Members of an organization will come to sense the particular culture of an organization in a short period of time. Culture is one of those terms that are difficult to express distinctly, but everyone knows it when they sense it. For example, the culture of a large, for profit corporation is quite different than that of a hospital, and also is quite different than that of a university or other not for profit organizations like charity organizations. Also culture is quite different between firms from different countries or different culture backgrounds. You can tell the culture of an organization by looking at the arrangement of decoration, what they talk about, what the members are wearing, and so on. It is actually quite similar to the felling which you can usually get from someones personality.


The corporate culture can be seen as a system, it decides how the corporations are going to work. Inputs, for example strategy decisions, together with output, like the value or impact the company created to the society, Outputs or effects of our culture to the corporations are, organizational behaviors, which can be easily addressed because it is easy to see the difference in corporations with different culture backgrounds. And strategies, corporate images and appearances, all of which represent the value recognition. Products, services, are also related to the value of the culture too.


When attempting to manage organization, or trying to make a wide change, this is where the concept of culture comes into play. It is not hard for practicants to realize that, no matter in what kind of environment, it is important to change not only the organizational structure and processes, but also changing the corporate culture as well. Theres been a great deal of literature generated over the past years about the concept of organizational culture, especially in regarding to learn how to change the organizational culture to adjust to fit the business environment. The most frequently at that time, corporate culture changing effort was said to be more like a failure. But usually, this failure is credited to lack of understanding about the strong role of culture and the role it plays in organizations, not because the culture does not play an important role in corporations. Actually this is one of the reasons why that many strategic planners now place as much emphasis on identifying strategic values as they affect strategy mission and vision.


The facts of logic of industrialization, technology, striving for efficiency have risen the argument that whether organizations should be culture free or not. Too much consideration of culture in an organization could reduce efficiency of the organizations. And it seems like


Essay Oedipus And Underlying Relationship Of Man argumentative essay help

Oedipus; Free Will and FateJoin now to read essay Oedipus; Free Will and FateThe events in Oedipus the King, written by Sophocles, show an underlying relationship of mans free will existing within the cosmic order or fate which the Greeks believed guided the universe in a harmonious purpose. Man was free to choose and was ultimately held responsible for his own actions. Both the concept of fate and free will played an itregal part in Oedipus destruction. Although he was a victim of fate, he was not controlled by it. Oedipus was destined from birth to someday marry his mother and to murder his father. This prophecy, as warned by the oracle of Apollo at Delphi was unconditional and inevitably would come to pass, no matter what he may have done to avoid it. His past actions were determined by fate, but what he did in Thebes, he did so of his own will.


Socrates, an Athenian, took a different view when he came to believe that he wanted to overthrow the gods and the sun. But, he did not believe that he could save the ancient gods if he was prepared. Socrates never said that his freedom was limited to a certain fate because he had already done this before. The idea that the god he had created and which was called Medea was destroyed while he was alive was a thought that didn’t fall within his own mind and could always be reconciled to life. But the idea that life is impossible before death was actually a notion of fear and doom.


Oedipus thought this out in his letters to Hippolytus, who wrote in his last letters that one of the main reasons the Greeks were called on in the fight against the great monster in Olympus is because they were prepared to fight, not just as conquerors, but simply as heroes and as a “faction with the gods”. Aristotle, though, believed that the fight against Zeus, as he had opposed many of the gods, was a fight between man and his gods. What his father Oedipus said when his father gave it to the Greeks was a thought that is still being debated today because of the fact that in his poem Hippolytus makes it clear that death and rebirth did not necessarily mean any good. Oedipus was, for example, a man of godly ideals. He was an idealist, one whose belief in what Socrates called humanity and the goodness of the human being enabled him to defend his own right to live.


Aristotle’s ideas about free will


The idea that Oedipus gave birth to a new world or that his life was dictated by fate in his lifetime is one of those ideas that Plato seems to have had in mind when he wrote “Heraclitus”. At the start of the Greek epic “The Oracle”, where the great Oedipus is being punished at the gates of Dionysus, a young man who wishes to leave his life behind and become an Athenian soldier, asks God to restore him from hell. While Socrates is still in the fire he sees a young man with an olive branch, an elderly girl. This is where Oedipus first saw a woman with a large head and a huge golden body. That’s when he thought that Zeus is the king of his world. The Greek poem is about the god of the Underworld who lives in a city, where death and rebirth lead to war and the destruction of entire civilizations. Oedipus is often seen by this young boy, as if he were a pawn in a violent game between various gods. He could have sworn that he has won the game of Zeus, but instead the young boy loses the game. Although this seems to imply that at least some of the godly ideas of Oedipus were not true when Oedipus wrote this poem he also knew that it would be quite difficult to understand this idea of the world’s gods. When Socrates reads this poem Oedipus takes it upon himself to explain why he was in such an uproar. He tries valiantly to explain, but there is an argument in the passage that the word is not found anywhere. In order


From the beginning of this tragedy, Oedipus took many actions leading to his own downfall. Oedipus could have waited for the plague to end, but out of compassion for his suffering people, he had Creon go to Delphi. When he learned of Apollos word, he could have calmly investigated the murder of the former King Laius, but in his hastiness, he passionately curses the murderer, and in so, unknowingly curses himself. “Upon the murderer I invoke this curse- whether he is one man and all unknown, or one of many- may he wear out his life in misery or doom! If with my knowledge he lives at my hearth, I pray that I myself may feel my curse.” (pg. 438; lines 266-271)


In order for Sophecles Greek audience to relate to the tragic figure, he had to have some type of flaws or an error of ways. This brought the character down to a human level, invoking in them the fear that “it could happen to them.” And Oedipus certainly is not one without flaws. His pride, ingnorance, insolence and disbelief in the gods, and unrelenting quest for the truth ultimately contributed to his destuction. When Oedipus was told (after threatening Teiresias), that he was responsible for the murder of Laius, he became enraged and calls the old oracle a liar. He ran away from his home, Corinth, in hopes of outsmarting the gods divine will. Like his father, Oedipus also sought ways to escape the horrible destiny told by the oracle of Apollo. The chorus warns us of mans need to have reverence for the gods, and the dangers of too much pride. “If a man walks with haughtiness of hand or word and gives no heed to Justice and the shrines of Gods despises- may an evil doom smite him for his ill-starred pride of heart!- if he reaps gains without justice and will not hold from impiety and his fingers itch for untouchable things. When such things are done, what man shall contrive to shield his soul from the shafts of the God?” (pg. 452; 975-984)


Oedipus unyielding desire to uncover the truth about Laius murder and the mystery surrounding his own birth, led him to the tragic realization of his horrific deeds. Teiresias, Jocasta and the herdsman tried to stop him from pursuing the truth. Take for example a part of the last conversation between Jocasta and Oedipus. After realizing that the prophecy had came true, Jacasta begs him to just let the mystery go unsolved for once. “I beg you- do not hunt this out- I beg you, if you have any care for your own life. What I am suffering is enough.” (pg. 461; 1158-1161) Oedipus replies, “I will not be persuaded to let chance of finding out the whole thing clearly.” (pg. 461; 1166-1167) He is unable to stop his quest for the truth, even under his wifes pleading. For it is in his own vain that he must solve the final riddle, the riddle of his own life.


[4] ——————————————————————————— {G.O.B. #8203] {i.e. What’s going on?} (pg. 471; 1158-1172) We don’t know, yet, whether Laius actually died in this world, or whether some kind of supernatural event was responsible for the whole incident, or just that he was born at the wrong time. Who knows? At best, the story would seem to require some sort of explanation for how some of these strange events happened, or if they really took place at all. If some of these other strange events happened in a very different way, there might very well be some hidden reason behind them. This is most certainly not an issue where this whole thing is just an “interesting” story. However, if you want a better story without the supernatural element, then you may be able to find better stories. If something has been discovered in a “tense” way, then yes, if it has been an “interesting” and some people are willing to help you find that out, then there’s no need to leave your house. And if something has been exposed or found out, you are certainly free to find it and tell it to anyone who will listen. And by “anything”, it’s meant “whatever”. The issue of whether something is indeed “interesting” is up to you now, the thing you’re going to have to find out. But for now, what’s important here is the question posed by Teirei, &#8205. Did Teirei think of the story “lurking” in its own right? After all, it was one of the saddest books ever written. It’s a terrible book that’s set against an enemy of one man, that’s why it’s almost impossible to tell a complete story this way. He knew so much about this world and so many times that it was possible for him to have a very vivid grasp of it. But he couldn’t know enough to know. But he did manage to understand all the aspects of it that were still mysterious, even though he couldn’t explain himself and couldn’t take any direct action. At some point, he made it clear that the only way out of this is if he is willing to help at the same time. And that was he’s promise. ‎ (pg. 474; 1158-1177) At that point, though, he decided he needed to “break” his bargain. He decided to find out the truth, even though this would be impossible. He decided to become a true assassin, and make the worst of whatever was going on. After all, he could only work alone. And it wasn’t just for himself, but everyone in the school… he had to choose people who were trustworthy with him at some point. And that’s it. Even if he didn’t find these people, even if he actually does find them, he would still be able to find out who they are, and who they are probably hiding away for good cause. And the fact that no one seems to care who’s in charge at school is great evidence indeed that


[4] ——————————————————————————— {G.O.B. #8203] {i.e. What’s going on?} (pg. 471; 1158-1172) We don’t know, yet, whether Laius actually died in this world, or whether some kind of supernatural event was responsible for the whole incident, or just that he was born at the wrong time. Who knows? At best, the story would seem to require some sort of explanation for how some of these strange events happened, or if they really took place at all. If some of these other strange events happened in a very different way, there might very well be some hidden reason behind them. This is most certainly not an issue where this whole thing is just an “interesting” story. However, if you want a better story without the supernatural element, then you may be able to find better stories. If something has been discovered in a “tense” way, then yes, if it has been an “interesting” and some people are willing to help you find that out, then there’s no need to leave your house. And if something has been exposed or found out, you are certainly free to find it and tell it to anyone who will listen. And by “anything”, it’s meant “whatever”. The issue of whether something is indeed “interesting” is up to you now, the thing you’re going to have to find out. But for now, what’s important here is the question posed by Teirei, &#8205. Did Teirei think of the story “lurking” in its own right? After all, it was one of the saddest books ever written. It’s a terrible book that’s set against an enemy of one man, that’s why it’s almost impossible to tell a complete story this way. He knew so much about this world and so many times that it was possible for him to have a very vivid grasp of it. But he couldn’t know enough to know. But he did manage to understand all the aspects of it that were still mysterious, even though he couldn’t explain himself and couldn’t take any direct action. At some point, he made it clear that the only way out of this is if he is willing to help at the same time. And that was he’s promise. ‎ (pg. 474; 1158-1177) At that point, though, he decided he needed to “break” his bargain. He decided to find out the truth, even though this would be impossible. He decided to become a true assassin, and make the worst of whatever was going on. After all, he could only work alone. And it wasn’t just for himself, but everyone in the school… he had to choose people who were trustworthy with him at some point. And that’s it. Even if he didn’t find these people, even if he actually does find them, he would still be able to find out who they are, and who they are probably hiding away for good cause. And the fact that no one seems to care who’s in charge at school is great evidence indeed that


Upon discovery of the truth of his birth from the herdsman, Oedipus cries, “I who first saw the light bred of a match accursed, and accursed in my living with them, cursed in my killing.” (pg. 465;


Speech Steve Jobs And Steve Jobs college admission essay help: college admission essay help

Steve Jobs About Connecting the DotsIn this speech Steve Jobs talks about “Conecting the Dots” meaning that everything happens for a reason. He tells three amazing different stories. These three anecdotes lead him to become the succsesfull person he was. During his speech, he made sure to let everybody know that he didnt get his success on a silver platter. He says to get where we want to be means working hard. I believe his speech was so impacting because he doesn’t leave one detail behind. In fact, he even mentions the failures in his life. For example, when he was fired from Apple. He really makes me feel like it is okay for something to not go as planned and has taught me to persevere.


The Story


Apple was a major company in the 1950s. It was famous for producing more iPhones than any other company in the world, and it had been using that technology for as long as Apple was a dominant company with no other competition in the world. But, that changed due to the invention of the iPod.


After a few years the technology was becoming popular and Apple was having trouble attracting new customers to the small company. Apple had found so many other companies out there who were struggling with the problems of their own company that they were willing to accept their responsibility, rather than face their obligations to the people.


That changed when Apple found out about the dangers of using the iPad. Apple didn’t know enough about these issues, and had a feeling that they had done a bit of good, but it ended up destroying their business in a big way.


Steve Jobs


Steve Jobs was raised in a very different place than we were today when I believe he started his life. Steve Jobs’ mother was a physician who was very talented, and a good student. She was also very intelligent and had a big vision of the future that would give me a new appreciation for the things I was creating. That vision changed her life.


She taught him how to write and how to work because of her incredible writing abilities. She also gave him the opportunity to work. And she gave him a real passion and joy. He was so excited but he wasn´t. He hated his teacher, and for good reason.


Steve Jobs was actually so good in his early years, but in the 80s he started working in a few different jobs. He taught me how to write and had a great understanding of human nature. Then he started to develop his own ideas of writing. He spent most of his time reading to him a lot. Then he started learning about different kinds of human beings. This was after taking part in a show in 1985 when he was actually working on writing a story called “S.R.F.,” but was able to write it as well.


The Story


Steve Jobs spent four years developing ideas and writing the book. After this, he got in touch with all the other people involved in his work that were on his team. He was able to get to know some of them better. As part of this he made use of the best tools available to him. It became clear to him that other people was doing things better and that we are better now.


He didn´t want to leave anyone behind. It showed that he took the knowledge and experience which the people around him gave him well. In fact, everyone


The Story


Apple was a major company in the 1950s. It was famous for producing more iPhones than any other company in the world, and it had been using that technology for as long as Apple was a dominant company with no other competition in the world. But, that changed due to the invention of the iPod.


After a few years the technology was becoming popular and Apple was having trouble attracting new customers to the small company. Apple had found so many other companies out there who were struggling with the problems of their own company that they were willing to accept their responsibility, rather than face their obligations to the people.


That changed when Apple found out about the dangers of using the iPad. Apple didn’t know enough about these issues, and had a feeling that they had done a bit of good, but it ended up destroying their business in a big way.


Steve Jobs


Steve Jobs was raised in a very different place than we were today when I believe he started his life. Steve Jobs’ mother was a physician who was very talented, and a good student. She was also very intelligent and had a big vision of the future that would give me a new appreciation for the things I was creating. That vision changed her life.


She taught him how to write and how to work because of her incredible writing abilities. She also gave him the opportunity to work. And she gave him a real passion and joy. He was so excited but he wasn´t. He hated his teacher, and for good reason.


Steve Jobs was actually so good in his early years, but in the 80s he started working in a few different jobs. He taught me how to write and had a great understanding of human nature. Then he started to develop his own ideas of writing. He spent most of his time reading to him a lot. Then he started learning about different kinds of human beings. This was after taking part in a show in 1985 when he was actually working on writing a story called “S.R.F.,” but was able to write it as well.


The Story


Steve Jobs spent four years developing ideas and writing the book. After this, he got in touch with all the other people involved in his work that were on his team. He was able to get to know some of them better. As part of this he made use of the best tools available to him. It became clear to him that other people was doing things better and that we are better now.


He didn´t want to leave anyone behind. It showed that he took the knowledge and experience which the people around him gave him well. In fact, everyone


The Story


Apple was a major company in the 1950s. It was famous for producing more iPhones than any other company in the world, and it had been using that technology for as long as Apple was a dominant company with no other competition in the world. But, that changed due to the invention of the iPod.


After a few years the technology was becoming popular and Apple was having trouble attracting new customers to the small company. Apple had found so many other companies out there who were struggling with the problems of their own company that they were willing to accept their responsibility, rather than face their obligations to the people.


That changed when Apple found out about the dangers of using the iPad. Apple didn’t know enough about these issues, and had a feeling that they had done a bit of good, but it ended up destroying their business in a big way.


Steve Jobs


Steve Jobs was raised in a very different place than we were today when I believe he started his life. Steve Jobs’ mother was a physician who was very talented, and a good student. She was also very intelligent and had a big vision of the future that would give me a new appreciation for the things I was creating. That vision changed her life.


She taught him how to write and how to work because of her incredible writing abilities. She also gave him the opportunity to work. And she gave him a real passion and joy. He was so excited but he wasn´t. He hated his teacher, and for good reason.


Steve Jobs was actually so good in his early years, but in the 80s he started working in a few different jobs. He taught me how to write and had a great understanding of human nature. Then he started to develop his own ideas of writing. He spent most of his time reading to him a lot. Then he started learning about different kinds of human beings. This was after taking part in a show in 1985 when he was actually working on writing a story called “S.R.F.,” but was able to write it as well.


The Story


Steve Jobs spent four years developing ideas and writing the book. After this, he got in touch with all the other people involved in his work that were on his team. He was able to get to know some of them better. As part of this he made use of the best tools available to him. It became clear to him that other people was doing things better and that we are better now.


He didn´t want to leave anyone behind. It showed that he took the knowledge and experience which the people around him gave him well. In fact, everyone


Jobs said that the calligraphy class he took after dropping out didnt seem to be very important, Little did he know that almost 10 years later it would’ve helped to create the first computer with beautiful caligraphy. He reminds his public several times this famous saying “You cannot connect the dots looking forward; you can only connect them looking backwards”.


In other words, what I understood was that everything happens for a reason and you can’t choose the order in which everything occurs. You may not understand it, like it, or enjoy it at the moment but later on in life you will realise why everything happened the way it did.


Something he does tells us that we should never forget along the way is to “Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish.” To be honest, at first I didn’t understand this saying. But, then I got it. It means to never give up and to work with what you love. I was inspired by his words and they made me realise that I have to apreciate every moment. Anyways, he tells us that he really works at what he loves and I hope that everyday I can look in the mirror and say the same for myself.


Oedipus Rex And Antigone Sophocles Uses Creon assignment help sydney

Oedipus Rex Versus Antigone

Oedipus Rex Versus Antigone

In Oedipus Rex Sophocles uses Creon for a foil to Oedipus. In Antigone Sophocles uses Creon as the Greek tragic hero.

In Oedipus Rex the character of Creon serves as a foil to Oedipus. Creon is portrayed as a rational, ethical, and dutiful leader who represents the need for a stable society. All the while Oedipus is portrayed as a rash, unreasonable, and overly confident king, who is constantly trying to keep up with his unavoidable fate. Creon shows his rationality when he replies to a question Oedipus asks by stating, “I don’t know. And when I don’t, I keep quiet” (line 635 page 670). This shows Creon’s non-judgmental character and his desire to be just as a ruler. Creon also demonstrates that he is an ethical leader when he says, “Look, if you think crude, mindless stubbornness such a gift, you’ve lost your sense of balance” (line 615-616 page 669). Creon states this to Oedipus when Oedipus accuses Creon of being a traitor. Creon remains detached and does not over react to Oedipus’s emotional outburst while and we get another glimpse of Oedipus’s impetuous nature. Creon lastly shows his dutiful personality when he boldly states to Oedipus “Who in his right mind would rather rule and live in anxiety than sleep in peace?” (Line 654-655 page 670). This shows that Creon is an honorable man who follows his destiny to rule. This also once again points out Oedipus’s flawed perspective.


In Antigone the character of Creon is used as the Greek tragic hero. A Greek tragic hero is basically a good and admirable person who falls from his high position because of an inner weakness, usually the sin of excessive pride, which causes him to equate himself with the gods or to ignore the laws of the gods. Creon fulfills the role of the Greek tragic hero


Oedipus Rex And Gods Minds english essay help online

Oedipus Rex – Who Determines Our Fate?Essay title: Oedipus Rex – Who Determines Our Fate?Who Determines Our Fate?In the play Oedipus Rex it was thought that what the Gods had in store for you was your fate. The gods had put a curse on King Lauis saying that his first born son was going to kill him and marry his mother. Knowing that the Gods minds couldn’t be changed when Oedipus was born the king had one of his men take him out and leave him on the side of a mountain. The man didn’t follow the king’s orders exactly and gave the boy to a Shepard, who in return gave him to a wealthy family from another city. Oedipus did grow up he moved back to Thebes where he did indeed kill his father and marry his mother. He also had four kids by his own mother, 2 girls and 2 boys. While Oedipus was trying to rid the city of Thebes from a plague, he was told of his fate. When Oedipus finally did discover that this was indeed the truth he gouged out his eyes, and his wife/mother killed herself. The question is does God really have a predetermined path for us or are we capable of making our own life decisions? There are a couple different view points to examine when asking this question.


Back in the days of Oedipus this was a very interesting notion that people held true. People in these days thought that it didn’t matter what you did in life that the Gods had a plan for you and that is what was going to happen. You could be the best person or the worst but your fate was already determined by the Gods. In this notion there was higher power mandating how people in society turned out. Many times it was curses that were being put upon their children that were most threatening. It was thought that this was most threatening because the Gods were letting you live your life, but when you had


a child the child was the one going to suffer. Or in Oedipus case he came back to murder his father.There are many ways to look at this same issue today. There is the argument that God does determine the life path for each one of us. That when we are born God has a predetermined plan for us and that is how we are going to live. There is also the argument that we as individuals determine the right paths for ourselves. After all there are many choices in life and those choices that we make have consequences. We then have to live with the consequences of our actions. There is also the question of if God has a predetermined plan for us and there is no way of messing that up, why is it said that there is a devil. There are also the viewpoints from the individuals that believe in God and believe that he created us, and the individuals that believe we came from the apes. There are very good points to each of the arguments at hand. The first is that of God has a plan for us from the time we are born.


1


Many people argue that God has predetermined for us our life paths, and that these are our actions. It is this belief that motivates many of the people who argue that we make our life choices based on our action. Why do these two types of arguments hold up if there is no God? It seems clear that there is no God, but what makes a better life choice is not just the choices to obey or to be disobedient. The question I would like to touch upon is one in which there is much disagreement among some men but also a real understanding of God’s plan that allows for some of the other questions we should be asking ourselves. I would like to focus on something that has been argued before, that we live in an inescapable fantasy that every single individual has decided, they all decide, and therefore their lives have to be perfectly consistent. If they aren’t, then they can choose to follow the path, they have to decide to follow it and they all have to agree that they follow it. They all want to follow the path, they all want to be right and they all want to live and they all want to be accepted by God. It is easy for you to think, “This is so impossible. All that is required of you is to obey God”. The truth is, God knows what the most important way to do anything is and every time he does something, every individual gets different outcomes. There are many different ways to put this reality into play. There is always this option or there are many ways to go about it. However the majority of what the majority of people choose to do as they make their life decisions is based on people being really well informed about what their lives are about the world. This gives them a sense of the truth where none of the choices they make are ever taken into account. It has been stated many times that God wants us to find a way out of this, there are several ways around this which you can take and use in your life choices. At one end, there are certain things that God will do which will get you nowhere if you don’t follow his orders and are in a state of denial. At the other end, things where you will be the ones that will follow your actions, you will be the ones that will do exactly as God’s plan says in Genesis:1- In so far as things are right and right and right and right and right, there will be two possibilities if you will follow the right path, go right and follow the wrong path, or follow the wrong path, but at the end the choice you made that day will be wrong as well. It is the one thing that is going to be in your life from this day forward that has a direct impact on your future chances of success. The main difference between the two kinds of scenarios is that they will be better off not following whatever God says if you follow these things, or choosing to follow whatever God says, or that God wants you to follow. For this reason, people tend to think the wrong way, they like to believe that they can follow the right path or they don’t want to believe that God wants them to follow. This is a bit of a misnomer because we are not seeing this with those who believe. That is what has been mentioned so often on this site. It is simply because people think they can do whatever they want, even with their own beliefs and actions. Even if they do that, if they believe it, they still want to follow this plan, and even if that plan doesn’t work, that is what they believe, and there is no way they can make the wrong decision because they do exactly that, no matter what is happening to them. This is what allows people to think that they don’t have to follow a course and follow that course because God is here to give them freedom. When I talk about


The Second is the theory that the actions of one and two are in some way tied to life. Those actions can lead to good and bad, and we would say that it is more in line with God’s will than the behavior of a lot of those other actions.


Let us take a further look at how we have come to be in and out of the Bible. We know that what happens during the coming days is a process of separation. That they make a mess on their houses, break down the windows, open the doors and clean the windows so they can continue. Our first coming will continue for a very long time. But then these things go through so that something bad happens. We would say that there is always going to be a problem and a crisis, but we don’t know if that is what is causing the problems or not. A lot of people will say something like, “Okay, we don’t have a plan for our health as long as I keep this plan and I get sick after, but that is still bad. So here is the part that they use to say that we’re going to have our birthright, because our plans will be in a perfect position, we have a plan in place for getting off that job, and so forth”. However, how do we figure that out? Do we just choose to believe in that plan and then wait for a plan that never came? We might like it, but it’s not going to happen quickly and I don’t want people to have a false sense of security. Let us think about it.


That is, how we can choose to live is how we have made our lives. We decide on our fate every day. It is our choice not to keep looking out for the future and to keep looking forward. We choose to follow our own judgment. We choose to make choices as we continue to believe in life, because we see the future coming when we are in a spot where we have some choice. Our plans are based on that, not on some preconceived ideas that it might lead to bad things. These are things we can choose to avoid because we believe God has a plan for us and we have a plan that will keep us in a place where we can have life and a quality of life.


So, it is very important that we do have some plans that are in line with this. These are things that we can choose to follow. We know that you may follow these things, but the ones we do not follow are things we are going to live through with our own judgement. In fact, when you look through a lot of the scriptures, God says, “This life we call our own is not theirs to live on”. We can come here to change things, we can join in the process or we can do whatever we want or want to do. He has a plan but we are still all going through some things which are what we have chosen to keep in our minds. If we want to keep doing what we are doing and we feel guilty about what we did, we are going to continue on this path for a very long time and eventually it will create havoc as we move. It will take a lot of time in and of itself, but we believe in this goal and we believe that it is our destiny to follow this path even if we do it lightly. For me personally I believe that whatever I do is going to get better, and that what I do is going to be better. And I believe that is a lot of work to create that change. It is the plan that is going to make that change happen. Do not be scared of being changed. Get things done, get things done quickly…this doesn’t mean that it is going to make us happier…just that if it does then you just have to be conscious of what is going to happen next. A good plan


The Second is the theory that the actions of one and two are in some way tied to life. Those actions can lead to good and bad, and we would say that it is more in line with God’s will than the behavior of a lot of those other actions.


Let us take a further look at how we have come to be in and out of the Bible. We know that what happens during the coming days is a process of separation. That they make a mess on their houses, break down the windows, open the doors and clean the windows so they can continue. Our first coming will continue for a very long time. But then these things go through so that something bad happens. We would say that there is always going to be a problem and a crisis, but we don’t know if that is what is causing the problems or not. A lot of people will say something like, “Okay, we don’t have a plan for our health as long as I keep this plan and I get sick after, but that is still bad. So here is the part that they use to say that we’re going to have our birthright, because our plans will be in a perfect position, we have a plan in place for getting off that job, and so forth”. However, how do we figure that out? Do we just choose to believe in that plan and then wait for a plan that never came? We might like it, but it’s not going to happen quickly and I don’t want people to have a false sense of security. Let us think about it.


That is, how we can choose to live is how we have made our lives. We decide on our fate every day. It is our choice not to keep looking out for the future and to keep looking forward. We choose to follow our own judgment. We choose to make choices as we continue to believe in life, because we see the future coming when we are in a spot where we have some choice. Our plans are based on that, not on some preconceived ideas that it might lead to bad things. These are things we can choose to avoid because we believe God has a plan for us and we have a plan that will keep us in a place where we can have life and a quality of life.


So, it is very important that we do have some plans that are in line with this. These are things that we can choose to follow. We know that you may follow these things, but the ones we do not follow are things we are going to live through with our own judgement. In fact, when you look through a lot of the scriptures, God says, “This life we call our own is not theirs to live on”. We can come here to change things, we can join in the process or we can do whatever we want or want to do. He has a plan but we are still all going through some things which are what we have chosen to keep in our minds. If we want to keep doing what we are doing and we feel guilty about what we did, we are going to continue on this path for a very long time and eventually it will create havoc as we move. It will take a lot of time in and of itself, but we believe in this goal and we believe that it is our destiny to follow this path even if we do it lightly. For me personally I believe that whatever I do is going to get better, and that what I do is going to be better. And I believe that is a lot of work to create that change. It is the plan that is going to make that change happen. Do not be scared of being changed. Get things done, get things done quickly…this doesn’t mean that it is going to make us happier…just that if it does then you just have to be conscious of what is going to happen next. A good plan


The Second is the theory that the actions of one and two are in some way tied to life. Those actions can lead to good and bad, and we would say that it is more in line with God’s will than the behavior of a lot of those other actions.


Let us take a further look at how we have come to be in and out of the Bible. We know that what happens during the coming days is a process of separation. That they make a mess on their houses, break down the windows, open the doors and clean the windows so they can continue. Our first coming will continue for a very long time. But then these things go through so that something bad happens. We would say that there is always going to be a problem and a crisis, but we don’t know if that is what is causing the problems or not. A lot of people will say something like, “Okay, we don’t have a plan for our health as long as I keep this plan and I get sick after, but that is still bad. So here is the part that they use to say that we’re going to have our birthright, because our plans will be in a perfect position, we have a plan in place for getting off that job, and so forth”. However, how do we figure that out? Do we just choose to believe in that plan and then wait for a plan that never came? We might like it, but it’s not going to happen quickly and I don’t want people to have a false sense of security. Let us think about it.


That is, how we can choose to live is how we have made our lives. We decide on our fate every day. It is our choice not to keep looking out for the future and to keep looking forward. We choose to follow our own judgment. We choose to make choices as we continue to believe in life, because we see the future coming when we are in a spot where we have some choice. Our plans are based on that, not on some preconceived ideas that it might lead to bad things. These are things we can choose to avoid because we believe God has a plan for us and we have a plan that will keep us in a place where we can have life and a quality of life.


So, it is very important that we do have some plans that are in line with this. These are things that we can choose to follow. We know that you may follow these things, but the ones we do not follow are things we are going to live through with our own judgement. In fact, when you look through a lot of the scriptures, God says, “This life we call our own is not theirs to live on”. We can come here to change things, we can join in the process or we can do whatever we want or want to do. He has a plan but we are still all going through some things which are what we have chosen to keep in our minds. If we want to keep doing what we are doing and we feel guilty about what we did, we are going to continue on this path for a very long time and eventually it will create havoc as we move. It will take a lot of time in and of itself, but we believe in this goal and we believe that it is our destiny to follow this path even if we do it lightly. For me personally I believe that whatever I do is going to get better, and that what I do is going to be better. And I believe that is a lot of work to create that change. It is the plan that is going to make that change happen. Do not be scared of being changed. Get things done, get things done quickly…this doesn’t mean that it is going to make us happier…just that if it does then you just have to be conscious of what is going to happen next. A good plan


This is the notion that when we are born God has us on a plan that he has developed for us. There is no way to disrupt this plan because there is no one more powerful than god. So this would mean that God makes all kinds of people: he makes good, evil, mean, vicious, caring, loving, violent, etc. people. But when we learn about God we learn that he wants all people to be treated equal, and there to be no evil in the world. Because after all evil is the work of the devil. So if this is the case why are there evil people? Why are there people murdering others, and having affairs? If we look at just God making our life plan that leads to the bigger question of why did God create evil.


This also leads to the question is there really a devil? There could be the answer that when we are created God has a plan for us, but that the devil tempts us. So we can either


abide by Gods plan or we can follow the devil. If we abide by Gods plan we will live a happy, somber life and if we follow the devil we will live a miserable, sad life. Then what is to be said about the people who live in the middle? Did God create evil on purpose to even out good and evil?


Then there is the viewpoint that we determine our own destiny. There has always been the question are we created by God or did we come from Apes. Let’s first talk about the theory of if we were created by God. This theory then states that we are created from God and from the time we are put on earth we make our own decisions. These decisions that we make lead to different paths


Oedipus’ Character Traits And Oedipus Tyrannous cbest essay help: cbest essay help

Oedipus TyrannousJoin now to read essay Oedipus TyrannousOedipus TyrannousWhen half human monsters walked the Earth and mythical Gods ruled all of creation, one man was destined to suffer the worst fate ever imaginable. Oedipus Tyrannous is a classic Greek tragedy written by Sophocles around 470 BC. According to Aristotle’s Poetics, Greek tragedies should follow certain guidelines in order to be effective tragic drama. Many of Oedipus’ character traits ultimately justify his place as a perfect specimen of Aristotle’s tragic hero. According to Aristotle’s Poetics, Oedipus Tyrannous is tragic hero due to his hamartia and peripeteia.


In Greek tragedy every hero eventually shows signs of weakness and flaw. Though a character like Achilles, in Homer’s epic poem, the Iliad, was brought to his death by a physical imperfection, Oedipus was a more complex character; his flaws were of his personality. His most obvious flaw would most definitely be his hubris. Hubris, or excessive pride, was the most feared personal attribute in ancient Greek society. An example of Oedipus’ hubris is when he tragically decides that he can decide his own fate. When the oracle at Delphi reluctantly provides Oedipus with an account of his fatal curse, Oedipus takes his life into his own hands. He decides to run away from Corinth, so that his fateful blight, slaying his Father and laying down with his Mother, could never be accomplished. When the Gods have cursed a fate, destiny can never be changed.


Oedipus had an important role to play. However, he was also sometimes called upon to intervene in bad situations, because of his “wisdom.” He had a special ability to learn his lessons.


A wise man, Oedipus had a way of saving lives. After he was betrayed by a god and was killed by the gods, Oedipus was brought back home to tell his story, as he always did. The god, Oedipus, saved him. In the story, Oedipus tells about how he saved a pregnant woman from being poisoned by a demon, and how he saved some other people from going to hell. In the second half of the story, when Oedipus’s father, Homer, comes to deliver a son, he is taken in but is saved by a god.


Oedipus is also portrayed as a wise man, a man who came to save young Achilles, after he lost his life. His wisdom, also, is shown when he tries to help an other man while he is being tortured by his god.


History Edit


Origins Edit


“One day, as the great gods have brought great calamities from the future, Oedipus was invited to help him. When the gods finally give him an opportunity, he says to their goddess,


‘What is the world without one?’


‘It is no good.’…


—Greek tragedy when the Iliad comes to an end.[src]


Oedipus is a wise and powerful god. He was involved in a war which gave him the inspiration to create great calamities.


After the destruction of his beloved Corinth, he went on a trip to Babylon to find help with the destruction of his family. He met a priest named Ishtar on the third day to teach him about the disaster which led to the great death that happened in the land of Cæsarea.[1]


In the ensuing battle it was the priests who finally saved Oedipus from being cast down by Zeus.[2] Afterwards, Oedipus spent most of his time with Ishtar in the land of Hades, where the goddess told his stories.


Homer was the first to notice that Oedipus had no fear of his parents dying, and asked him all about it. However, he was also upset that the gods took away his life.


Because of that he never became truly good and he spent many days with the goddess.


Oedipus eventually was given up to Hades, whom he then married. While there, he went on a crusade against the gods on the land of Olympus, where they were doing great mischief.


Quotes Edit


Gallery Edit


Background Edit


Oedipus appears in the scene in which Achilles opens the hatch of his armor. After he leaves, he asks the goddess if he can help him.


Oedipus speaks with Homer after Odysseus gives him new armor and clothes that he can use for fighting Poseidon. Odygaly is present, as well as the others, in the scene, and the character can hear the scene


Oedipus had an important role to play. However, he was also sometimes called upon to intervene in bad situations, because of his “wisdom.” He had a special ability to learn his lessons.


A wise man, Oedipus had a way of saving lives. After he was betrayed by a god and was killed by the gods, Oedipus was brought back home to tell his story, as he always did. The god, Oedipus, saved him. In the story, Oedipus tells about how he saved a pregnant woman from being poisoned by a demon, and how he saved some other people from going to hell. In the second half of the story, when Oedipus’s father, Homer, comes to deliver a son, he is taken in but is saved by a god.


Oedipus is also portrayed as a wise man, a man who came to save young Achilles, after he lost his life. His wisdom, also, is shown when he tries to help an other man while he is being tortured by his god.


History Edit


Origins Edit


“One day, as the great gods have brought great calamities from the future, Oedipus was invited to help him. When the gods finally give him an opportunity, he says to their goddess,


‘What is the world without one?’


‘It is no good.’…


—Greek tragedy when the Iliad comes to an end.[src]


Oedipus is a wise and powerful god. He was involved in a war which gave him the inspiration to create great calamities.


After the destruction of his beloved Corinth, he went on a trip to Babylon to find help with the destruction of his family. He met a priest named Ishtar on the third day to teach him about the disaster which led to the great death that happened in the land of Cæsarea.[1]


In the ensuing battle it was the priests who finally saved Oedipus from being cast down by Zeus.[2] Afterwards, Oedipus spent most of his time with Ishtar in the land of Hades, where the goddess told his stories.


Homer was the first to notice that Oedipus had no fear of his parents dying, and asked him all about it. However, he was also upset that the gods took away his life.


Because of that he never became truly good and he spent many days with the goddess.


Oedipus eventually was given up to Hades, whom he then married. While there, he went on a crusade against the gods on the land of Olympus, where they were doing great mischief.


Quotes Edit


Gallery Edit


Background Edit


Oedipus appears in the scene in which Achilles opens the hatch of his armor. After he leaves, he asks the goddess if he can help him.


Oedipus speaks with Homer after Odysseus gives him new armor and clothes that he can use for fighting Poseidon. Odygaly is present, as well as the others, in the scene, and the character can hear the scene


Oedipus had an important role to play. However, he was also sometimes called upon to intervene in bad situations, because of his “wisdom.” He had a special ability to learn his lessons.


A wise man, Oedipus had a way of saving lives. After he was betrayed by a god and was killed by the gods, Oedipus was brought back home to tell his story, as he always did. The god, Oedipus, saved him. In the story, Oedipus tells about how he saved a pregnant woman from being poisoned by a demon, and how he saved some other people from going to hell. In the second half of the story, when Oedipus’s father, Homer, comes to deliver a son, he is taken in but is saved by a god.


Oedipus is also portrayed as a wise man, a man who came to save young Achilles, after he lost his life. His wisdom, also, is shown when he tries to help an other man while he is being tortured by his god.


History Edit


Origins Edit


“One day, as the great gods have brought great calamities from the future, Oedipus was invited to help him. When the gods finally give him an opportunity, he says to their goddess,


‘What is the world without one?’


‘It is no good.’…


—Greek tragedy when the Iliad comes to an end.[src]


Oedipus is a wise and powerful god. He was involved in a war which gave him the inspiration to create great calamities.


After the destruction of his beloved Corinth, he went on a trip to Babylon to find help with the destruction of his family. He met a priest named Ishtar on the third day to teach him about the disaster which led to the great death that happened in the land of Cæsarea.[1]


In the ensuing battle it was the priests who finally saved Oedipus from being cast down by Zeus.[2] Afterwards, Oedipus spent most of his time with Ishtar in the land of Hades, where the goddess told his stories.


Homer was the first to notice that Oedipus had no fear of his parents dying, and asked him all about it. However, he was also upset that the gods took away his life.


Because of that he never became truly good and he spent many days with the goddess.


Oedipus eventually was given up to Hades, whom he then married. While there, he went on a crusade against the gods on the land of Olympus, where they were doing great mischief.


Quotes Edit


Gallery Edit


Background Edit


Oedipus appears in the scene in which Achilles opens the hatch of his armor. After he leaves, he asks the goddess if he can help him.


Oedipus speaks with Homer after Odysseus gives him new armor and clothes that he can use for fighting Poseidon. Odygaly is present, as well as the others, in the scene, and the character can hear the scene


Another example of his hubris is when he decides to blind himself for all of eternity. Although Creon ultimately decided to banish Oedipus, it was the Gods who should have decided his fate. Self mutilation allowed him to never have to suffer the pain of looking upon his shamed children. This is a punishment he should have had to endure. Oedipus’ downfall would most be attributed to his hubris.


Every leader should be stern, yet tolerant. Oedipus’ quickness to judge, also contributes to his tragic flaw. A successful leader should always access a situation after hearing all the facts and allowing the parties involved to explain their own version of the story. An example of this impatience is found while he is waiting for the return of Creon from the oracle. When Creon explains that the city has been cursed, due to the unsolved murder of their preceding monarch, Laius, Oedipus right away accuses him of being the killer. Character flaws such as impatience, can be the downfall of any leader.


Oedipus’ arrogance is a double-edged sword, which propels the story forward and goes in hand in hand with his detrimental hubris. On many occasions he is told to stop wondering. Tiresias, the blind prophet who can see much clearer than our fateful King, tells Oedipus, “Please let me go home. It’s for the best.” The Corinthian messenger also warns him of such atrocities, which lead him to the next element of Greek tragedy.


Peripeteia is the reversal of destiny, which the tragic hero must experience during a tragedy. Aristotle explained the peripeteia should, “imitate actions which excite pity and fear.”


Close Friend Of Augustineвђ And True Life free college essay help

AugustineJoin now to read essay AugustineSummaryA close friend of Augustine’s, whom he had persuaded to become a Manichee, falls seriously ill, and while he is unconscious, his family has him baptized. He seems to recover, and Augustine jokes with him about the baptism, but his friend will not listen to his jokes. When his friend suddenly dies, Augustine is overcome with grief. Augustine eventually has to leave Thagaste for Carthage to escape the memories. The love of friends is good, but friends must be loved in God, not for themselves alone, for only God does not perish or change. People look for rest in the physical world and fix their hearts on things that pass away, not moving through them to recognition of the God who made them. True life and true love are found in Christ alone.


Practical use of prayer and prayer for religious needs, and the use of mental-diagnosis (PDS) for counseling:


In this chapter, Augustine’s and Paul’s uses of psychiatric medication to treat mental illness are emphasized. This article also discusses the need for the use of mental-diagnostic methods by churches. It is important to note that this article doesn’t explicitly state that psychiatrists are medically competent, and their use may have a medical value. The use of mental-diagnostic, or medication-based medication, can be considered an excellent method for treating mental illness, even without medical use. It is important to consider that it is not a single medicine, but rather a set of treatments that, while very effective, can help many people. Although there are many different treatments that are effective in some cases, one of the main results of using cognitive behavioral therapy is that it is also effective in helping with mood, anxiety, and other issues. For years, researchers in the Netherlands have been trying to explain the benefits of a therapy such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), a treatment that focuses on making people believe that what they are doing is right. Despite the success of CBT, only a single pilot study of about 6,000 psychiatrists, and a single evaluation study carried out by several medical institutions, shows that it does not meet the FDA’s goals for the prevention of bipolar depression in patients under the age of 65, or adults who become bipolar. However, a clinical analysis of CBT by Dr. Paul Albright of Oregon State University shows that some individuals may benefit considerably from it. Indeed, Dr. Albright says, CBT has “over 100 long-term studies that have shown that it can help treat bipolar disorder or any mental condition.”


Dyslexia


Dyslexia is not limited to individuals. It can be caused by any physical, mental, or neurological condition which is related to a lack of physical ability. As stated, psychometric evidence shows that some individuals have a range of degenerative dyslexia, which is characterized by low concentration of long words, sometimes called “dyslexia” (see Chapter 1 for more details). (You can see a map highlighting the top three degenerative features, with the gray color representing the percentage that is considered to be deficient.) Some people have a range of severe dystonia, which is characterized by rapid loss of concentration and poor movement. Many people with this condition also have dyslexia called dyspermissibility, which manifests as sudden loss of movement without loss of sensation.


• Dyslexia &, Dyslexia and/or Other Disorders of Speech and Hearing is a disorder of speech and/or hearing disability. (This does not include speech-altering disabilities called dyslexic speech abnormalities.) People with this condition have speech and/or hearing problems commonly known as speech and oculomyelitis. In some of these patients, speech and/or hearing impairment develops without speech pathology. Dyslexia is a condition where many people with this condition are unable to speak or hear correctly, so they cannot properly control what they think and feel. Most people with Dyslexia and/or other dyslexia do not have very high levels of sensitivity to sounds, or some of the above may include low levels of sensitivity to sounds; the latter characteristic cannot be entirely diagnosed automatically by using a dictionary of vocabulary.


• Many patients with D.E.D. lack ability to communicate properly or to communicate well with others. This affects perception, cognitive abilities, and speech.


• These patients often have other medical conditions.


• Dyslexia can not be caused automatically or for specific patients with speech or hearing disabilities. Dyslexia is a disease of speech and/or hearing. It has not always been found in persons who have never spoken or who have been diagnosed with D.E.D. (see above). It occurs in adults who have had at least one hearing loss, including at least a 2 year time lag before onset (from birth to one year of hearing loss). Dyslexia occurs on the same cellular level and is most often the result of damage to the limbic system.


• Some individuals develop speech and/or hearing problems or have some types of hearing problems.


• Several types of dyslexia can occur.


• Some types of dyslexia are mild or very mild. (See the D.E.D. chapter for details.)


• Some people with this condition develop speech and/or hearing problems without speech pathology.


• Other types of dyslexia can include language problems without specific hearing problems (e.g., dyssynaemia). In rare instances, only specific hearing problems can cause severe dyslexia in some individuals. Many people with these other types do have no general hearing problems and have one or some of the above hearing conditions but with little sensitivity to other sounds or sound-related information.


• Some people with this condition may have speech problems only from very small amounts.


• Some of these patients may have speech and/or hearing problems which usually cause them difficulties in other aspects of speech and hearing. These may be limited by the way many of you speak.


• Many individuals with D.E.D. have some type of communication difficulties.


• Many are under constant observation and/or treatment for this disease.


• Some individuals with D.E.D.’s can exhibit signs of early hearing loss, but usually only at first.


• Many people with D.E.D.’s will be sensitive to sound and auditory signals from others for ages. Most people with D.E


In order to deal with this condition, doctors should be aware of the effects of antidepressants and medications, like the one listed in Chapter 4, to help with depression. They must also assess patients’ risk of developing such conditions, and ensure that the medications help treat the condition first.


Dyslexia is extremely common in children but is also found in adults. The term synchronicity (aka hyperlexia), found in the DSM-5, refers to a lack of coordination


Practical use of prayer and prayer for religious needs, and the use of mental-diagnosis (PDS) for counseling:


In this chapter, Augustine’s and Paul’s uses of psychiatric medication to treat mental illness are emphasized. This article also discusses the need for the use of mental-diagnostic methods by churches. It is important to note that this article doesn’t explicitly state that psychiatrists are medically competent, and their use may have a medical value. The use of mental-diagnostic, or medication-based medication, can be considered an excellent method for treating mental illness, even without medical use. It is important to consider that it is not a single medicine, but rather a set of treatments that, while very effective, can help many people. Although there are many different treatments that are effective in some cases, one of the main results of using cognitive behavioral therapy is that it is also effective in helping with mood, anxiety, and other issues. For years, researchers in the Netherlands have been trying to explain the benefits of a therapy such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), a treatment that focuses on making people believe that what they are doing is right. Despite the success of CBT, only a single pilot study of about 6,000 psychiatrists, and a single evaluation study carried out by several medical institutions, shows that it does not meet the FDA’s goals for the prevention of bipolar depression in patients under the age of 65, or adults who become bipolar. However, a clinical analysis of CBT by Dr. Paul Albright of Oregon State University shows that some individuals may benefit considerably from it. Indeed, Dr. Albright says, CBT has “over 100 long-term studies that have shown that it can help treat bipolar disorder or any mental condition.”


Dyslexia


Dyslexia is not limited to individuals. It can be caused by any physical, mental, or neurological condition which is related to a lack of physical ability. As stated, psychometric evidence shows that some individuals have a range of degenerative dyslexia, which is characterized by low concentration of long words, sometimes called “dyslexia” (see Chapter 1 for more details). (You can see a map highlighting the top three degenerative features, with the gray color representing the percentage that is considered to be deficient.) Some people have a range of severe dystonia, which is characterized by rapid loss of concentration and poor movement. Many people with this condition also have dyslexia called dyspermissibility, which manifests as sudden loss of movement without loss of sensation.


• Dyslexia &, Dyslexia and/or Other Disorders of Speech and Hearing is a disorder of speech and/or hearing disability. (This does not include speech-altering disabilities called dyslexic speech abnormalities.) People with this condition have speech and/or hearing problems commonly known as speech and oculomyelitis. In some of these patients, speech and/or hearing impairment develops without speech pathology. Dyslexia is a condition where many people with this condition are unable to speak or hear correctly, so they cannot properly control what they think and feel. Most people with Dyslexia and/or other dyslexia do not have very high levels of sensitivity to sounds, or some of the above may include low levels of sensitivity to sounds; the latter characteristic cannot be entirely diagnosed automatically by using a dictionary of vocabulary.


• Many patients with D.E.D. lack ability to communicate properly or to communicate well with others. This affects perception, cognitive abilities, and speech.


• These patients often have other medical conditions.


• Dyslexia can not be caused automatically or for specific patients with speech or hearing disabilities. Dyslexia is a disease of speech and/or hearing. It has not always been found in persons who have never spoken or who have been diagnosed with D.E.D. (see above). It occurs in adults who have had at least one hearing loss, including at least a 2 year time lag before onset (from birth to one year of hearing loss). Dyslexia occurs on the same cellular level and is most often the result of damage to the limbic system.


• Some individuals develop speech and/or hearing problems or have some types of hearing problems.


• Several types of dyslexia can occur.


• Some types of dyslexia are mild or very mild. (See the D.E.D. chapter for details.)


• Some people with this condition develop speech and/or hearing problems without speech pathology.


• Other types of dyslexia can include language problems without specific hearing problems (e.g., dyssynaemia). In rare instances, only specific hearing problems can cause severe dyslexia in some individuals. Many people with these other types do have no general hearing problems and have one or some of the above hearing conditions but with little sensitivity to other sounds or sound-related information.


• Some people with this condition may have speech problems only from very small amounts.


• Some of these patients may have speech and/or hearing problems which usually cause them difficulties in other aspects of speech and hearing. These may be limited by the way many of you speak.


• Many individuals with D.E.D. have some type of communication difficulties.


• Many are under constant observation and/or treatment for this disease.


• Some individuals with D.E.D.’s can exhibit signs of early hearing loss, but usually only at first.


• Many people with D.E.D.’s will be sensitive to sound and auditory signals from others for ages. Most people with D.E


In order to deal with this condition, doctors should be aware of the effects of antidepressants and medications, like the one listed in Chapter 4, to help with depression. They must also assess patients’ risk of developing such conditions, and ensure that the medications help treat the condition first.


Dyslexia is extremely common in children but is also found in adults. The term synchronicity (aka hyperlexia), found in the DSM-5, refers to a lack of coordination


CommentaryAugustine’s passionate attachment to his friends serves as the basis of this section, which discusses the nature of friendship. The death of Augustine’s childhood friend in Thagaste acts as another message from God. His friend’s Catholic family has him baptized on his deathbed, just as was almost done to Augustine. Now a Manichee, Augustine no longer believes baptism is necessary, but his friend, also a Manichee, abruptly refuses to share in his contempt for Catholic ritual and rejects Augustine’s attention. Whether the baptism has a miraculous effect on his friend or his friend simply had a deathbed conversion is not made clear. Augustine is shaken by his friend’s conversion but still refuses to see the message God is sending.


[Commentary]Augustine’s friend, in this section, does not think anyone is trying to influence Augustine in their actions. This message is communicated to a young man who is baptized at a Catholic church. If Augustine was able to find out that a Catholic was trying to influence him he is prepared to deny him the baptism. If he does not want to hear it then he does make a confession (s.v. He must be denied with his own heart, with the Catholic Church, a form of forgiveness, because the Catholic does not want to hear any further).


The baptism is a small price. If you are unable to know for sure that your friend is trying to help you at all, then it is much less likely that you will receive the blessing of the baptism.


The most important question is: Do we have to accept this message of God’s in-transitation? There is nothing to change the fact that the words of the Catholic Church, and indeed most of the world’s public opinion, is saying that the Catholic Church has no need for baptism, if it cannot accept that this means you become unmerciful to your Catholic friends. A few of the reasons that many Catholics feel the need to accept this sacrament, in the hope that God doesn’t come again:


If you have never been baptized, don’t you ever know why the Word of God did not call you to repentance, or why any Catholic would ever expect you to repent? The Word of God told all you needed only to hear the voice of God and become baptized and baptized again. If those who wanted to be baptized had to listen to the voice of God, and all you wanted to know was that you had no sin, then you might be forgiven, if you were only willing to repent. You would be saved if only you made a true promise. If many people see a person in this baptism with broken and angry eyes, they will think that he was lying, because this is not what he looks like, but he looked like God when he was younger. Then he would ask about this person, and if he was speaking in this way, they would be willing to pray for his soul, and to love Him with all their hearts.


In the Bible the Church also describes baptism as the work of repentance: it is the work of making you repent of your sin, and then showing your repentance to God for your sin. So if an American man goes out into the world expecting to be baptized and is baptized twice, or if he is baptized once to prove that he is not going to be saved, because of what he is doing, and it is accepted as true, then the first baptism is also required, and the second baptism is also mandatory. Then every man is called to repent of his sin if he is baptized twice to show that he is not going to be saved.


Augustine’s description of his grief is familiar to anyone who has experienced the death of a loved one. But Augustine’s excessive grief becomes a sin. He revels in his own misery, weeping inconsolably over his friend. Characteristically, Augustine turns to analysis of his emotions: Why, he asks, do tears give relief? He cannot answer this question, but analysis of the emotion of grief is a subject to which he returns in Book 9.12, where he weeps over Monica’s death. Here, he condemns his


College Education And Good Job high school essay help: high school essay help

Importance Of A College EducationEssay Preview: Importance Of A College EducationReport this essayA College education is a once in a lifetime opportunity where an individual learns and experiences new things every day. I am enthusiastic to become academically mature in my work environment. I am presently a Customer Service representative at ABI Bank Ltd located in St. John’s, Antigua. I have been with the organization for over five years. I am eager to complete my college degree because I know it will open doors and provide opportunities for me which are presently out of my reach. I wish to work in the Human Resource Department of my organization and at present I am not qualified for the many positions that become available over time. A college education serves as the gateway to better options and greater promotion opportunity.


Importance Of A College EducationEssay Preview: Importance Of A College EducationReport this essayA College education can be a challenging experience and sometimes a daunting one, because of the many complexities but the basic principles of human endeavor. This essay will teach you a complex and critical thought process which may be challenging and emotionally taxing. We will discuss this subject with you from begin to finish. As individuals, each individual is a unique individual with unique individualizations and experiences. It is my hope that all of the above concepts will be incorporated and expanded to provide an ideal setting for our students. The College Student Experience: The College experience will allow for your experience to be an important element of your college experience, not only for a college education but also for your career as a Business Leader. In this essay, I will provide a personal perspective on the College experience, where you will learn which skills are important, who has the best experience with the College, and the many things that are important in a college education. In my next essay, I will be expanding from the College experience to include a broader topic, such as understanding how to create more opportunities for higher education, which is an essential part of the college experience. With that said, it is important to note that College-as-Work takes little credit for other aspects of your college experience. This essay will cover the basics of the College experience including: Introduction, Interviews and more. Your introduction to the College experience may help you understand what the College is all about, what your role is and whether you should want to focus on just your core interests.


Importance Of A College EducationEssay Preview: Importance Of A College EducationReport this essayA College education also provides important additional opportunities to advance the interests of the future of all colleges. You will first understand how college is built, what you have been trained to expect, and the various facets of college. You will also provide a simple plan of action which you could take to continue your education when you are ready. Finally, this essay will take you through several different aspects of how and why it is important to you to study for a college degree and/or do things like this. The purpose of this essay is to provide critical reading to the college experience which will give you an overview of their major areas along with some important resources to help you move toward your final choice. This essay may take you back to some of the things you once took for example “taking college” (college education) or “how things relate to working for them in college”. It may also make for an excellent resource and to help you be prepared for the future. The College Experience Through your College life is a very unique and valuable experience, to be able to work with colleagues and peers who are like you and who can help you succeed in a variety of settings. It may also be helpful to help you improve your chances of success for yourself in your final college degree. The College Experience through your College life is as important for getting into college as doing your first job on campus. It is important for you to know how to build a solid foundation for your own future. Although some of these things may not go down without a fight in the future, they become vital in the college experience just as life comes to a halt. The College Experience


Importance Of A College EducationEssay Preview: Importance Of A College EducationReport this essayA College education can be a challenging experience and sometimes a daunting one, because of the many complexities but the basic principles of human endeavor. This essay will teach you a complex and critical thought process which may be challenging and emotionally taxing. We will discuss this subject with you from begin to finish. As individuals, each individual is a unique individual with unique individualizations and experiences. It is my hope that all of the above concepts will be incorporated and expanded to provide an ideal setting for our students. The College Student Experience: The College experience will allow for your experience to be an important element of your college experience, not only for a college education but also for your career as a Business Leader. In this essay, I will provide a personal perspective on the College experience, where you will learn which skills are important, who has the best experience with the College, and the many things that are important in a college education. In my next essay, I will be expanding from the College experience to include a broader topic, such as understanding how to create more opportunities for higher education, which is an essential part of the college experience. With that said, it is important to note that College-as-Work takes little credit for other aspects of your college experience. This essay will cover the basics of the College experience including: Introduction, Interviews and more. Your introduction to the College experience may help you understand what the College is all about, what your role is and whether you should want to focus on just your core interests.


Importance Of A College EducationEssay Preview: Importance Of A College EducationReport this essayA College education also provides important additional opportunities to advance the interests of the future of all colleges. You will first understand how college is built, what you have been trained to expect, and the various facets of college. You will also provide a simple plan of action which you could take to continue your education when you are ready. Finally, this essay will take you through several different aspects of how and why it is important to you to study for a college degree and/or do things like this. The purpose of this essay is to provide critical reading to the college experience which will give you an overview of their major areas along with some important resources to help you move toward your final choice. This essay may take you back to some of the things you once took for example “taking college” (college education) or “how things relate to working for them in college”. It may also make for an excellent resource and to help you be prepared for the future. The College Experience Through your College life is a very unique and valuable experience, to be able to work with colleagues and peers who are like you and who can help you succeed in a variety of settings. It may also be helpful to help you improve your chances of success for yourself in your final college degree. The College Experience through your College life is as important for getting into college as doing your first job on campus. It is important for you to know how to build a solid foundation for your own future. Although some of these things may not go down without a fight in the future, they become vital in the college experience just as life comes to a halt. The College Experience


Importance Of A College EducationEssay Preview: Importance Of A College EducationReport this essayA College education can be a challenging experience and sometimes a daunting one, because of the many complexities but the basic principles of human endeavor. This essay will teach you a complex and critical thought process which may be challenging and emotionally taxing. We will discuss this subject with you from begin to finish. As individuals, each individual is a unique individual with unique individualizations and experiences. It is my hope that all of the above concepts will be incorporated and expanded to provide an ideal setting for our students. The College Student Experience: The College experience will allow for your experience to be an important element of your college experience, not only for a college education but also for your career as a Business Leader. In this essay, I will provide a personal perspective on the College experience, where you will learn which skills are important, who has the best experience with the College, and the many things that are important in a college education. In my next essay, I will be expanding from the College experience to include a broader topic, such as understanding how to create more opportunities for higher education, which is an essential part of the college experience. With that said, it is important to note that College-as-Work takes little credit for other aspects of your college experience. This essay will cover the basics of the College experience including: Introduction, Interviews and more. Your introduction to the College experience may help you understand what the College is all about, what your role is and whether you should want to focus on just your core interests.


Importance Of A College EducationEssay Preview: Importance Of A College EducationReport this essayA College education also provides important additional opportunities to advance the interests of the future of all colleges. You will first understand how college is built, what you have been trained to expect, and the various facets of college. You will also provide a simple plan of action which you could take to continue your education when you are ready. Finally, this essay will take you through several different aspects of how and why it is important to you to study for a college degree and/or do things like this. The purpose of this essay is to provide critical reading to the college experience which will give you an overview of their major areas along with some important resources to help you move toward your final choice. This essay may take you back to some of the things you once took for example “taking college” (college education) or “how things relate to working for them in college”. It may also make for an excellent resource and to help you be prepared for the future. The College Experience Through your College life is a very unique and valuable experience, to be able to work with colleagues and peers who are like you and who can help you succeed in a variety of settings. It may also be helpful to help you improve your chances of success for yourself in your final college degree. The College Experience through your College life is as important for getting into college as doing your first job on campus. It is important for you to know how to build a solid foundation for your own future. Although some of these things may not go down without a fight in the future, they become vital in the college experience just as life comes to a halt. The College Experience


A college education is the only way to obtain a good job and the type of job that will allow for a comfortable lifetime income and a secure future. I think it will help me develop my skills in analysis, acceptance, expression, and communiquĩ. These skills will in turn aid me in resolving variances and solve crisis that come up in the course of my personal and professional life. I think that education is a prerequisite for getting a good job because of the fact that the world is changing so rapidly and most jobs require qualifications that are essential for the position. It helps in the process of getting a good start on life. I have seen more often within my organization that recent graduates get hired quicker than a non graduate. Also, most organizations require at least an associate’s degree for entry level positions, because they think that they would have already possessed the specific skills to perform detailed tasks. I also believe that doing this course online will aid in my time management skills, and I would not have to worry about having to quit my job, I will still be able to work fulltime and complete my degree. Neither would I have to miss spending time with my family.


Babe Ruth And Essay Babe Ruth essay help site:edu: essay help site:edu

Babe Ruth

Join now to read essay Babe Ruth

When you think of “home runs” first thing that comes to my mind is Babe Ruth. That’s what Babe Ruth is usually for hitting home runs. But Babe Ruth also has many other accomplishments that he did in his life. There are many things that happened off the field that many people might not know about. Babe Ruth brought spot light to the sport of baseball when it was a unknown sport.


Babe Ruth’s Real name was real name was George Herman Ruth, Jr. His family was very dysfunctional and he ended up going to an all boys school ( Schwartz 1 ). There his amazing baseball skills where recognized. His mentor told him to focus his energies on something productive. So he joined the baseball team and from there he went on and played into Saint Mary’s school for boys( Schwartz 3).


He was sign at the age of 19 to the Baltimore Orioles he recognized his young talent and signed him (Schwartz 2). That is where he got the named babe, his other team members would always call him “ jacks newest babe”. That’s where he got Babe Ruth. After being with that team for about 5 months the sox’s bought his contract. He would be playing on that team for about the next 6 years. Babe was a all-round good pitcher and a especially good batter. Thats what he is best known for hitting so many homeruns and for sometimes winning the game for the team.


After being with the sox’s for about six year his contract was bought by the Yankees. They knew that they were getting a very valuable player. There was a myth that went around the because they bought his contract that the “ curse of bambino” would not let them win. The curse haunted the Yankees until 2004 where they won the world series. The Yankee’s on the other hand were very happy to have the Babe Ruth on there team. But Babe Ruth also was known for the things that he did off the field.


He decided to marry a 17 year old waitress and also had enough money to buy a very nice house for the both of them ( Schwartz 3) . The also adopted a daughter and raised her in there brand new home. Ruth could not handle a marriage and his fame in baseball, so the marriage ended. Even though they separated they remained married because of there beliefs ( Schwartz 3). His wife eventually died in a house fire, leaving him with his daughter. A couple of years later he married a actress/ model.


The most famous moment in baseball history, was during Game 3 of the 1932


Essay Culture Paper And Essay Вђњgrowing Up Asian persuasive essay help

Culture Paper

Join now to read essay Culture Paper

The essay “Growing Up Asian in America” by Kessay E. Noda deals with finding an identity and the racial prejudices in America.

The first thing we learn about the author is that she lives in America and her parents are from Asia. She had trouble growing up as a child because of her background. Kessay E. Noda had to fight cultural prejudices when she was young and even as an adult she has had trouble identifying herself. Is she racially “Japanese”, a “Japanese-American” or even a “Japanese-American” woman?


At the end she figures out that she is a mix of both cultures. Her mother is Japanese and thus she is also part Japanese. However, since she grew up in America she is also American. Therefore, she is a “Japanese-American” woman.


Finding your own identity is a very important issue. It is a reflection of who you are and who you want to be. I was born and raised in Germany. Therefore, I would say that


Roman Empire And Augustus Caesars Contributions essay help websites: essay help websites

Augustus CaesarEssay title: Augustus CaesarAugustus CaesarIn ancient history there have been many great leaders who have come to the forefront to save the Roman Empire from destruction and demise. The leaders and heroes of the Roman Empire are countless, but one leader stands out from all the rest. Augustus Caesars contributions to Roman history helped make Rome the dominant empire we study and remember today. (Octavian) Augustus Caesar is without a doubt the greatest political leader in the history of the Roman Empire.


As a young adolescent, Octavian demonstrated his leadership ability long before having thoughts of becoming the first emperor of Rome. Octavians strengths, feats, and accomplishments as a military leader show just a portion of his great political skills he pocessed. After the murder of Octavians great uncle, Julius Caesar, in 44 BC; Octavian along with Mark Antony, and Lepidus formed the Second Triumvirate. The three men lead their armies into Rome. The Roman Assembly granted the Second Triumvirate full power for five years. With full backing of the Roman Assembly, Octavian, Antony, and Lepidus raged a bloody campaign against all those who opposed them. As a reward for outstanding service to the Second Triumvirate, the land won from conquered victims was distributed amongst deserving soldiers.



The Unholy Night of the Roman Legion

While the Roman troops had a great deal of faith in the Emperor’s power to ensure victory, a terrible war ensued and a small portion of the Empire was decimated.



This was the night the Emperor went to battle. The legion consisted of men who had been killed at every turn by men who were not Roman soldiers either, thus protecting the Emperor and his forces at both ends. There were few men within a legion, so there would be a great number of men who died during the night and many who survived to fight the rest of the night.



An Unholy Night of the Roman Legion

The night, which was known later as the Unholy Night of the Roman army, is one of the great tragedies for the Emperor. One of the most horrifying episodes, it was the fall of the Emperor as a result of the Roman invasion of Syria and an eventual occupation of the southern provinces of the empire into an unknown part of the Commonwealth that is now part of Germany. It should never have happened, as the Emperor feared being overwhelmed with overwhelming numbers of Roman forces just to prevent anything from landing on his land. He also feared getting into a fight with his own people, making it impossible to protect the Empire at all. His advisors had the chance however to intervene, and the Romans decided to take the initiative without being surrounded and to not make any major incursions. The Imperial Senate gave the Emperor a very short term option to keep troops on his soil while his country was at war. However, as soon as the city and Empire were at war they made the wise choice to stay in their own land and allow the Romans to leave without having to face up to what they must have felt like having to do. The emperor felt that that would allow for peace and allowed many of the more loyal citizens of Emperor’s Landing to be safely transferred to other Roman lands.



This was the day he became the first Emperor to travel into his own country. During the fight, many men of other nations were killed, many others were injured, with some men dying of wounds they did not take and others recovering and many remaining standing for years. In short, the battle for victory in the battle for Rome was a huge, bloody affair. The Romans had no choice and left a legacy for themselves and the Commonwealth to build upon. After the battle over, the Romans had another great triumph to show for it after their defeat in the Battle of Carthage the following day. The remaining legions of the legion that had passed across the River Grecian gave a triumphant appearance in Rome when they found the army of the Roman legion at the Western Wall in tribute of the victorious Empire on their way home. However, it may be said that it was the victory of the Roman Legion that made them immortal…so much so that the first Romans are referred to as Romans since the


The Unholy Night of the Roman Legion

While the Roman troops had a great deal of faith in the Emperor’s power to ensure victory, a terrible war ensued and a small portion of the Empire was decimated.



This was the night the Emperor went to battle. The legion consisted of men who had been killed at every turn by men who were not Roman soldiers either, thus protecting the Emperor and his forces at both ends. There were few men within a legion, so there would be a great number of men who died during the night and many who survived to fight the rest of the night.



An Unholy Night of the Roman Legion

The night, which was known later as the Unholy Night of the Roman army, is one of the great tragedies for the Emperor. One of the most horrifying episodes, it was the fall of the Emperor as a result of the Roman invasion of Syria and an eventual occupation of the southern provinces of the empire into an unknown part of the Commonwealth that is now part of Germany. It should never have happened, as the Emperor feared being overwhelmed with overwhelming numbers of Roman forces just to prevent anything from landing on his land. He also feared getting into a fight with his own people, making it impossible to protect the Empire at all. His advisors had the chance however to intervene, and the Romans decided to take the initiative without being surrounded and to not make any major incursions. The Imperial Senate gave the Emperor a very short term option to keep troops on his soil while his country was at war. However, as soon as the city and Empire were at war they made the wise choice to stay in their own land and allow the Romans to leave without having to face up to what they must have felt like having to do. The emperor felt that that would allow for peace and allowed many of the more loyal citizens of Emperor’s Landing to be safely transferred to other Roman lands.



This was the day he became the first Emperor to travel into his own country. During the fight, many men of other nations were killed, many others were injured, with some men dying of wounds they did not take and others recovering and many remaining standing for years. In short, the battle for victory in the battle for Rome was a huge, bloody affair. The Romans had no choice and left a legacy for themselves and the Commonwealth to build upon. After the battle over, the Romans had another great triumph to show for it after their defeat in the Battle of Carthage the following day. The remaining legions of the legion that had passed across the River Grecian gave a triumphant appearance in Rome when they found the army of the Roman legion at the Western Wall in tribute of the victorious Empire on their way home. However, it may be said that it was the victory of the Roman Legion that made them immortal…so much so that the first Romans are referred to as Romans since the


Octavian and his two companions put a temporary end to the civil war of the Roman Empire in 42 BC. The Triumvirs, at Philippi in Macedonia, defeated the republicans led by Brutus and Cassius. They divided the empire between themselves. Antony remained in the wealthy East, Lepidus got control of Gaul and Spain, and Octavian received Italy. This was not the most generous of gift for young Octavian. He had the difficult task of settling the veterans of Italy. This involved redistributing land and forcibly expelling any of the previous landowners. “In time, Octavian forced Lepidus into retirement and won control of all western provinces.”(Chodorow 90)


By 32 BC, Italy and the western provinces swore an oath of allegiance to Octavian. Octavian could than concentrate his efforts on moving against Antony, for total control of the Roman Empire. The Battle of Actium in 31 BC was arguably one of the most important naval battles in the history of the Roman Empire. Upon defeat by Octavian at this furiuos naval battle, Antony flees to Egypt with his lover Cleopatra. The following year in Egypt, Octavian and his army again defeat Antony. Conesquently, Antony and Cleopatra commit suicide. With the victory at the Battle of Actium, Octavian was now sole ruler of Rome and all its provinces.


Upon the defeat and death of Antony, Octavian proclaimed the restoration of the Republic of Rome. However, he had no intention of stepping down as ruler. In 27 BC, with more of theatrical gesture than sincerity, Octavian placed the republic at the disposal of the Senate and the Roman people. “The Senate thereupon, realizing by past experience its own helplessness and knowing that it did not possess the organization for ruling the great Roman world successfully, gave him [Octavian] officially the command of the army and the control of the most important frontier provinces. Besides these vast powers he held also the important rights of a tribune”.(Breasted 680) Octavians position was now legitimized by the Senates request that he command and lead Rome. He was given the military command, known as Imperium for ten years. This office included the administration of Roman provinces that required the presence of the army. The official name of Octavian became Imperator Caesar Augustus From that time would be known as Augustus, which means “the Exalted”.


Augustus received the tribuncian power for life and assumed the role of protector of the Roman people. He also received the right to intervene in those provinces administered by the Senate. The backbone of Augustus power came from being Imperium of the military. “The major portion of the army was not, however, kept in Italy, where rebellious generals might intrigue with the Senate and rise in sudden revolt. Instead, the Roman legions (twenty-eight of them, of six thousand men each, plus enough auxiliary forces to bring the total to about four hundred thousand men) were stationed at the other boundaries of the realm in just those places where there might be trouble with the barbaric tribes beyond the border.”(Asinov 5) It was of great importantance to Augustus that the elite troops and military officers were of Roman descent. This made certain that people with pride, feelings, and love for the Roman Empire would run the army with Roman traditions.


&#8232‟Mentioned


&#8234‫(Sachikovsky 4) The Roman Empire began to crumble.&#8236‡Mentioned


And all this is a warning. The power of Roman empire, however, became almost impotent. He used his old powers and made enemies to countermand the legions (in a matter of minutes).&#8237‮[From the] Gospels as well as the writings of Genetius in other Roman languages, the historian Herodotus (and, later, the scholar Diozdac), has noted that the people of Rome had, even by the early third century A.D., no political power. The main power was the military, which at that time seemed to have only been able to fight off the most powerful armies of the world– the armies of the most powerful men in the world.†Mentioned


&#8225‾(Marques) This is rather revealing. That what Rome did on the Day of Our Lady of Assisi and the day of Arian Triumph are a common cause of Roman discontent, a great cause which led many to rise against it. As M. L. Guillén put it in the Chronicle of Constantine, “the Romans, as well as the Persians, felt they had no future, until the day when a great army of their own drew up under the Roman Crown and laid siege to Rome …. This was in consequence of their being the Roman subjects, being subject to the influence of the same magistrates as that of the Roman Empire.”•[It also] shows that the power of the senate and the whole state (including those of the state of Italy) were gradually declining and, in a short period, fell. The only place in which this was possible was the provinces of the Roman Empire. This has not become a permanent fact but rather a fact of history.”‣[and] “It is worth noting that, on the Day of Our Lady of Assisi, the day of Arian Triumph, the senate and the state of the republic were broken up by Roman forces; the soldiers marched into their own ranks, and the soldiers marched into the city to see what might happen to them.”⁂[and] “On that night, as soon as the Romans had come within seventy-three miles of the palace of the senate, the great army of the Roman army was destroyed, its soldiers and many of the soldiers in uniform being dragged to and from the palace, they being not of the very numerous that were slain at Assisi, or at any other place of the palace in the empire before this.”⁃Mentioned


⁆(Mortimer 5) It has been suggested that the Roman Empire had been disintegrating from the outset. This has often been true, because even at the time when the Empire was collapsing the Roman troops, with the usual exceptions, carried to Rome the vast bulk of what they received, and were brought along during the war years to maintain the Imperial position. Of the most important soldiers for the Roman army and army regiments, it is well understood that Augustus, as well as his younger brother, he and the other major generals, in turn, carried with them the surplus material and all the military gear which they had taken from the Empire. It has been shown that they were at the very beginning of the empire of Augustus.⁇[The fact that it was this military equipment which they had procured from elsewhere that produced the power which gave the


With all great political leaders, there must be some affection shown for the arts and for education. Augustus understood the importance of ideology


Essay Oedipus And Young People Of Thebes essay help online

Oedipus the KingJoin now to read essay Oedipus the KingOedipus, at the beginning of the play speaks to the young people of Thebes and asks them why they are all there when the city is in need of help. Thebes has been cursed with a plague and the people need their god to tell them what they need to do to save their city. Oedipus sees an old priest bowing at his feet and he asks him to speak for everyone of the reason they are bowing down to him in such a manor. Oedipus says he is ready to help with whatever it takes to help his people. He said he would do anything, be “blind to misery” not to see that these people are in desperate need of his help.


“Oh, my children, the new blood of ancient Thebes” (line1) Oedipus used the phrase “my children” to emphasize that his people mean as much to him as his own children. “The new blood of Thebes”, would tell the reader that they are the new young generation of Thebes. As the prologue continues, Oedipus asks his people why they are there on their knees and faces, bowing and begging for such extreme help from him and the city is dire need of help. He says the city “reeks with the smoke of burning incense, rings with cries for the healer and wailing for the dead” (lines 4-5). The city is dying fast, like incense that you burn. It has gotten so bad that it is as you could not see the great city Thebes once was, like thick reeking smoke in a building that is on fire. People are begging to get help from the healer, Apollo, the god of music, poverty, and prophecy. “Here I am myself, you all know me, the world is my fame: I am Oedipus” (lines 7-9). Here, Oedipus is showing his cocky side, he is telling his people that there is nothing that he cannot handle. Everyone knows him, he is the great riddler, and he is the man of all men in so many words. As he tells the priest to speak for everyone, he says “You can trust me. I am ready to help, I’ll do anything. I would be blind to misery not to pity my people kneeling at my feet” (lines 13-15). Oedipus shows how concerned he is about his people and lets them know that they can trust him. He said he will do anything to make this better to who and what he love so dearly. He states that he would be “blind to misery” meaning that he wants to be compassionate to misery.


The first fifteen lines in the prologue are important because it sets the tone what has happened to Oedipus’s city. The word “blind” is used several times throughout the text in many different ways, and many of them refer to Oedipus. When Oedipus says that he would be blind to misery, he did not think that he would be literally blind. He simply stated that he was compassionate to misery. It could even mean that he was blind to the secret of the truth that he indeed was the murderer of Laius.


In lines 359-375 Tiresias and Oedipus are discussing the condition of the city of Thebes. Tiresias tells Oedipus that he is not going to tell him any information about what he sees in the divine world. He tells Oedipus that only in darkness you will see the light.


Tiresias says, “how terrible- to see the truth when the truth is only pain to him who sees! I knew it well, but I put it from my mind, else I never would have come” (Lines 359-362). He is saying that he sees the truth in his divine way and it is terrible to see the things that lie ahead. There is much pain for Oedipus, and Tiresias sees what is to come. He is telling Oedipus that he only thinks he wants to know the truth; Tiresias had to do what he knew he had to by meeting with Oedipus. Oedipus continues to try to get as much information out of Tiresias, Tiresias tells him, “I fail to see that your own words are so well-timed. I’d rather not have the same thing said of me…” (Lines 368-370). Tiresias literally cannot see, the gods gave him the divine sight to see the future because of his literal eye problem. He knows that Oedipus is good


The Truth:


Tiresias: I was sorry to see that you went on giving me advice. Oedipus: No! I am wrong. I had no idea. (Lines 375) That is true.


The Truth:


Gone were those days in my life in which I was very sick, and I had not an appetite for food for a long time before I lost my appetite, for I always used to eat much, and when I heard a rumor about the gods, I told them about my body’s healing powers. And the rumor that was heard then was, that the gods had given off bad magic. (Lines 371-372)


It’s clear that even then Hestus was very uninterested in my future education, he had some other concern. Even with my physical health and that of a young man. Now that I had healed and had gone to a more private school, I could learn nothing, if I wanted to, that might bring a change to this matter.


How Tiresias got into Etruscan politics was known to his fellow travelers.


When I saw the other Tiresias, I said, ‪It must have been just a matter of time」 — Lines 392. We have heard the stories about the gods or other figures of power in Etrus, and if they are in an inner society like that, it is very difficult to gain insight into the external workings of society.


After some time, Tiresias asked if I was a little sick, the Greek:


Hestus: I was not that ill. I remember that Hestus had his own little village in my old age just outside of the city of Dyrhosa. I remember when I was a little young. I went to school there in order to study for my high school year. I went back there to be a little drunk and go to school with Tiresias. Then the two of us went to Rome to study together, but we did not go on going to Rome where I stayed at school until I moved somewhere other than in Aemiliania. I had to live there for a year. Then I went to Rome and I continued to study and to study with Tiresias for a while before I moved back to Mycenaecia. I remember when I went to Mycenaecia


Hestus would later say, ․When this time of war came, all the gods of Mycenaecia ordered that I should not study and not enter. I saw Tiresias walking up to my face like that and his face made me shudder. ․Now I am very ashamed. ‪I had no intentions of going to Rome and never will enter Mycenaecia. I do not know what happened to Tiresias at Mycenaecia in any way because I found out by hearing the rumors from Lines 393-399-10 of


The Truth:


Tiresias: I was sorry to see that you went on giving me advice. Oedipus: No! I am wrong. I had no idea. (Lines 375) That is true.


The Truth:


Gone were those days in my life in which I was very sick, and I had not an appetite for food for a long time before I lost my appetite, for I always used to eat much, and when I heard a rumor about the gods, I told them about my body’s healing powers. And the rumor that was heard then was, that the gods had given off bad magic. (Lines 371-372)


It’s clear that even then Hestus was very uninterested in my future education, he had some other concern. Even with my physical health and that of a young man. Now that I had healed and had gone to a more private school, I could learn nothing, if I wanted to, that might bring a change to this matter.


How Tiresias got into Etruscan politics was known to his fellow travelers.


When I saw the other Tiresias, I said, ‪It must have been just a matter of time」 — Lines 392. We have heard the stories about the gods or other figures of power in Etrus, and if they are in an inner society like that, it is very difficult to gain insight into the external workings of society.


After some time, Tiresias asked if I was a little sick, the Greek:


Hestus: I was not that ill. I remember that Hestus had his own little village in my old age just outside of the city of Dyrhosa. I remember when I was a little young. I went to school there in order to study for my high school year. I went back there to be a little drunk and go to school with Tiresias. Then the two of us went to Rome to study together, but we did not go on going to Rome where I stayed at school until I moved somewhere other than in Aemiliania. I had to live there for a year. Then I went to Rome and I continued to study and to study with Tiresias for a while before I moved back to Mycenaecia. I remember when I went to Mycenaecia


Hestus would later say, ․When this time of war came, all the gods of Mycenaecia ordered that I should not study and not enter. I saw Tiresias walking up to my face like that and his face made me shudder. ․Now I am very ashamed. ‪I had no intentions of going to Rome and never will enter Mycenaecia. I do not know what happened to Tiresias at Mycenaecia in any way because I found out by hearing the rumors from Lines 393-399-10 of


The Truth:


Tiresias: I was sorry to see that you went on giving me advice. Oedipus: No! I am wrong. I had no idea. (Lines 375) That is true.


The Truth:


Gone were those days in my life in which I was very sick, and I had not an appetite for food for a long time before I lost my appetite, for I always used to eat much, and when I heard a rumor about the gods, I told them about my body’s healing powers. And the rumor that was heard then was, that the gods had given off bad magic. (Lines 371-372)


It’s clear that even then Hestus was very uninterested in my future education, he had some other concern. Even with my physical health and that of a young man. Now that I had healed and had gone to a more private school, I could learn nothing, if I wanted to, that might bring a change to this matter.


How Tiresias got into Etruscan politics was known to his fellow travelers.


When I saw the other Tiresias, I said, ‪It must have been just a matter of time」 — Lines 392. We have heard the stories about the gods or other figures of power in Etrus, and if they are in an inner society like that, it is very difficult to gain insight into the external workings of society.


After some time, Tiresias asked if I was a little sick, the Greek:


Hestus: I was not that ill. I remember that Hestus had his own little village in my old age just outside of the city of Dyrhosa. I remember when I was a little young. I went to school there in order to study for my high school year. I went back there to be a little drunk and go to school with Tiresias. Then the two of us went to Rome to study together, but we did not go on going to Rome where I stayed at school until I moved somewhere other than in Aemiliania. I had to live there for a year. Then I went to Rome and I continued to study and to study with Tiresias for a while before I moved back to Mycenaecia. I remember when I went to Mycenaecia


Hestus would later say, ․When this time of war came, all the gods of Mycenaecia ordered that I should not study and not enter. I saw Tiresias walking up to my face like that and his face made me shudder. ․Now I am very ashamed. ‪I had no intentions of going to Rome and never will enter Mycenaecia. I do not know what happened to Tiresias at Mycenaecia in any way because I found out by hearing the rumors from Lines 393-399-10 of


Contingency Theory And Point Jim english essay help online

Leadership ModelEssay Preview: Leadership ModelReport this essayLeadership ModelJim Forrest was a skilled professional in related issues managing in substance abuse. Forrest had the opportunity to utilize his abilities as a lead in a mental health center. Forrest began his search for new employees by interviewing each person the same. Forrest talked to each candidate in the same style rather than finding out their strengths and weaknesses so he would have a better idea of where to place them to assist with client care. Although Forrest noticed positive change in client care, he also noticed concerns with his employees slowly surfacing. Forrest began to question his professional relationship with each member of his staff. It is important to recognize leadership comes in various styles to provide applicable direction to accomplish specific objectives in the workplace. Supervisory leadership must discuss the task and goals set for the organization clearly to its employees. Contingency Theory believes individuals are different; therefore there is not one way that is the best way of leading a team. Contingency Theory takes a look at the bigger picture that contains dynamics about supervisory leadership skill and other variables within the circumstances. Success of any organization is influenced by a variety of reasons, one of which is leadership style. One style of leadership may not be appropriate in some cases, however may be best in others.


Supervisory ProcessThere are 4 main steps in the supervisory process. The first is the beginning phase of the purpose of the supervisor. One of the elements of this process is obtaining reviews from staff and discussing concerns and ideas to make working together more productive (Lewis, Packard, & Lewis, Chapter 7, 2007). In case 7, Jim did not get feedback from his new staff about the implementation of the token economy. The middle phase of the process is the stage where Jim should have realized that his way was not working for everyone; he should have been open minded and ready to make changes when concerns were voiced to him, instead he thought that giving them freedom to make their own schedules they should be following the way he wanted things to be done. At this point Jim should have discussed issues and created an action plan. Jim is now in the facilitative confrontation phase (Lewis, Packard, & Lewis, Chapter 7, 2007), problems have began to surface and Jim hears


t a new employee call, informing him that Jim’s team has been “working on their own” which means the team has been “scared” of the problem. It does not take long before Jim realizes that this is the step which will not work for everyone. Jim believes it is probably best not to let the situation grow so it will never change, to simply see it as “business as usual without any sort of competition”. But when this happens, it means his team is in a bind. The supervisor must decide whether to implement the new plan or not. If the plan succeeds and works, it means he can move forward with what he has just described. If it doesn’t work, he must make changes to the policy and implement the plan, a process which will take time, often in the middle of working day (Lewis, Packard, & Lewis, Chapter 7, 2007). Any further ideas and suggestions he may have could be forwarded to the department’s Director for Work and Employment at 3rd Street in Manhattan (Lewis, Packard, & Lewis, Chapter 7, 2006). Once the team has completed their work, Jim and Jim’s team should take on the remainder of the work together. If the team doesn’t do this, Jim should use his team’s time to consider what could possibly make it better. If this occurs, the work will be less productive; Jim will be forced to take a lot of time off while he does what he always does. He has learned that this can be done on his own time. During the middle phase the supervisors will take some time to consider their options and make an action plan, which Jim probably didn’t see coming. Jim and Jim’s group should spend considerable time explaining to the staff what their options are. This kind of process works well for a lot of tasks but this would take significant amount of time and energy. Jim always wants to “get the ball rolling” because “we really don’t need to be up on the game again until the end of the day” (Lewis, Packard, & Lewis, Chapter 7, 2006). This is a fairly simple and efficient system and he has found that it has become more effective as the relationship became increasingly collaborative. Even when an employee is worried about his or her own work, there is often little conflict between the two. When an employee is worried about his or her future job, Jim has done better with employees who are looking for a change. However, the problem of conflict between employees that Jim feels they are facing can lead him to make poor choices. Sometimes, if one employee believes it was his or hers fault that something is wrong and you simply have to work it out, this might happen, the problem might go away and you may be more or less fired. Other times, the conflict may go beyond being an individual concern with coworkers (and colleagues are less supportive of the supervisor for his or her efforts), which may be the case. In the first few years I worked at a company that had an “understaffing problem,” with an incident in which an employee complained to management about his or her bosses’ behavior. He had been complaining about her complaining to someone. We were at the bar and the manager was on his way back to work. At first I was angry and had to say something to get up to find out what was going on with the company. He said I wasn’t doing this because of my problems. They said I had a problem. After a few conversations I ended up being very understanding and helped with his problem, because it did not result in a complete problem with my management. However, when they finally asked me about being told to come back to work, I felt like I was being fired. That was my last big problem at the company and it is now at this point that I am no longer at my high level.


SECTION 2. CONVERSATION TO GET AN MIRACLE In this work, the process takes the form of talking amongst members of the staff to determine the priorities. I think that this is essential for a productive working relationship and Jim can start by talking as a new employee, which is when we talk, talk and write down the goals. If we don’t get any feedback we stop being productive workers. Each staff member in this process needs to be able to understand the process the way he wants it to, and must understand the principles of what the board has decided to support and how the process works against them. It is a question of who should be the lead, and what is the role of a board member.


SECTION 3. DISASSOCIATIONS As we said in Section 2, when we are working together I am trying to do what you say I need to do, to work together. If I didn’t know if I was not going to be able to be the boss I would have had no way of trying. That is the problem. If you are sitting next to me in front of the board you need to ask me a question. And even if you only know a few words of how great this is I would start working backwards, to have this conversation through another person in front of you. If you have no problem talking to Jim he can talk to others. Just in case you ask I will try my best to explain what my goals are and how the board is different than the previous board. We should focus on things that have interest to us that may change based on the problems raised. At the very least we need to try to get that kind of information and help each other with the process. And if there is no good answer to what I want to get I will start listening. We will have to try again. We are also working to come up with new and different issues and proposals to tackle, but that is not the point. The point is the board should be able to help each other. And that includes the management members.


SECTION 4. COMPETITIONS I want to start with what is already an important issue for a working relationship and how to make the case. If Jim has the experience but he is a new member because he first started working here and has not done everything you say and so on a regular basis then you have a hard time finding someone who can help you when you are going through this. I am trying to answer the question where there is one person and each staffer has their own perspective. Each member of our team is an individual and they have to act as a bridge because of who they are. But Jim has already said it, and when I told him a year ago that if I am successful he wanted me to have a strong working relationship I said let me. His attitude has changed. My personal life has been less as it has grown. I did say I would go back and do the same thing. But if I am successful he will try his best to explain it. This is why I am going to try to work with Jim to help us create an effective working working relationship. First we are going to try to find someone who will help give the information on how things working with us should be done. Then we are going to work in the middle and we are going to try to find an individual who will listen and listen. We do not want to work in a ‘bio-manager’ or ‘managerial’ type of setting for this to be a successful relationship. This is just not how it works. There is an entire industry of people in the financial services industry so we should get to the real stuff first and then develop the relationship. And when we put it all together you will hear this message: “you need an organisation of people in the financial services industry to do a ‘serviceable and useful


SECTION 2. CONVERSATION TO GET AN MIRACLE In this work, the process takes the form of talking amongst members of the staff to determine the priorities. I think that this is essential for a productive working relationship and Jim can start by talking as a new employee, which is when we talk, talk and write down the goals. If we don’t get any feedback we stop being productive workers. Each staff member in this process needs to be able to understand the process the way he wants it to, and must understand the principles of what the board has decided to support and how the process works against them. It is a question of who should be the lead, and what is the role of a board member.


SECTION 3. DISASSOCIATIONS As we said in Section 2, when we are working together I am trying to do what you say I need to do, to work together. If I didn’t know if I was not going to be able to be the boss I would have had no way of trying. That is the problem. If you are sitting next to me in front of the board you need to ask me a question. And even if you only know a few words of how great this is I would start working backwards, to have this conversation through another person in front of you. If you have no problem talking to Jim he can talk to others. Just in case you ask I will try my best to explain what my goals are and how the board is different than the previous board. We should focus on things that have interest to us that may change based on the problems raised. At the very least we need to try to get that kind of information and help each other with the process. And if there is no good answer to what I want to get I will start listening. We will have to try again. We are also working to come up with new and different issues and proposals to tackle, but that is not the point. The point is the board should be able to help each other. And that includes the management members.


SECTION 4. COMPETITIONS I want to start with what is already an important issue for a working relationship and how to make the case. If Jim has the experience but he is a new member because he first started working here and has not done everything you say and so on a regular basis then you have a hard time finding someone who can help you when you are going through this. I am trying to answer the question where there is one person and each staffer has their own perspective. Each member of our team is an individual and they have to act as a bridge because of who they are. But Jim has already said it, and when I told him a year ago that if I am successful he wanted me to have a strong working relationship I said let me. His attitude has changed. My personal life has been less as it has grown. I did say I would go back and do the same thing. But if I am successful he will try his best to explain it. This is why I am going to try to work with Jim to help us create an effective working working relationship. First we are going to try to find someone who will help give the information on how things working with us should be done. Then we are going to work in the middle and we are going to try to find an individual who will listen and listen. We do not want to work in a ‘bio-manager’ or ‘managerial’ type of setting for this to be a successful relationship. This is just not how it works. There is an entire industry of people in the financial services industry so we should get to the real stuff first and then develop the relationship. And when we put it all together you will hear this message: “you need an organisation of people in the financial services industry to do a ‘serviceable and useful


SECTION 2. CONVERSATION TO GET AN MIRACLE In this work, the process takes the form of talking amongst members of the staff to determine the priorities. I think that this is essential for a productive working relationship and Jim can start by talking as a new employee, which is when we talk, talk and write down the goals. If we don’t get any feedback we stop being productive workers. Each staff member in this process needs to be able to understand the process the way he wants it to, and must understand the principles of what the board has decided to support and how the process works against them. It is a question of who should be the lead, and what is the role of a board member.


SECTION 3. DISASSOCIATIONS As we said in Section 2, when we are working together I am trying to do what you say I need to do, to work together. If I didn’t know if I was not going to be able to be the boss I would have had no way of trying. That is the problem. If you are sitting next to me in front of the board you need to ask me a question. And even if you only know a few words of how great this is I would start working backwards, to have this conversation through another person in front of you. If you have no problem talking to Jim he can talk to others. Just in case you ask I will try my best to explain what my goals are and how the board is different than the previous board. We should focus on things that have interest to us that may change based on the problems raised. At the very least we need to try to get that kind of information and help each other with the process. And if there is no good answer to what I want to get I will start listening. We will have to try again. We are also working to come up with new and different issues and proposals to tackle, but that is not the point. The point is the board should be able to help each other. And that includes the management members.


SECTION 4. COMPETITIONS I want to start with what is already an important issue for a working relationship and how to make the case. If Jim has the experience but he is a new member because he first started working here and has not done everything you say and so on a regular basis then you have a hard time finding someone who can help you when you are going through this. I am trying to answer the question where there is one person and each staffer has their own perspective. Each member of our team is an individual and they have to act as a bridge because of who they are. But Jim has already said it, and when I told him a year ago that if I am successful he wanted me to have a strong working relationship I said let me. His attitude has changed. My personal life has been less as it has grown. I did say I would go back and do the same thing. But if I am successful he will try his best to explain it. This is why I am going to try to work with Jim to help us create an effective working working relationship. First we are going to try to find someone who will help give the information on how things working with us should be done. Then we are going to work in the middle and we are going to try to find an individual who will listen and listen. We do not want to work in a ‘bio-manager’ or ‘managerial’ type of setting for this to be a successful relationship. This is just not how it works. There is an entire industry of people in the financial services industry so we should get to the real stuff first and then develop the relationship. And when we put it all together you will hear this message: “you need an organisation of people in the financial services industry to do a ‘serviceable and useful


Oedipus Rex Comparisons And Essay Oedipus Rex Comparisons essay help websites: essay help websites

Oedipus Rex ComparisonsJoin now to read essay Oedipus Rex ComparisonsThe book, Oedipus Rex, has a full range of characters. The colloquy, activity and motivation circle around the characters in the whole story. We find Oedipus Rex trying to get away, from home, to flee the prophecy. The prophecy states that he will kill his father and marry his mother. He also tries to clear up a murder of the old king. Oedipus marries a widow named Iokaste. He also gets advice from a seer named Teiresias. The purpose of this essay is to show the three positive and three negative qualities about these characters in direct and indirect characterization. I will find the qualities of Oedipus, Iokaste and Teiresias.



The main thing in the book is that a lot of the ideas of this book can relate to the characters in the comic. Like, a lot of the main protagonist was a normal human who used magic. But at the same time, they are just like us as humans, our friends from school, our family. And so we can learn what we learn and how far we learn from the other characters. So we are like us and we can see that it will change in a great deal when it becomes a series. But it also shows some side effects, for example because we are all very well aware of the nature of the world, of how it all works. I think we all are aware of that. And so we can see how we can help to improve and in such a way that we can make life better.

It’s all the same to me. It’s a great fantasy story. It’s really a story about a boy who is trying to protect his little kingdom from a bunch of wolves that are coming from another civilization. He is trying to find something to protect his little little kingdom from. You’ll find a lot of little monsters lurking. A lot of wolf hunters come and kill each other. And so you get this little monster and then you can kind of explain to him, how this monster is going to defeat the wolf hunters and try to kill him. I love the story very much. But I think there kind of will be some sort of moral dimension with this comic and I think people will love the way this story is expressed

[quote=Ethan]I’m a big fan of the book. It had a nice amount of magic and stuff, but I’m a big fan of it as well. It’s such a funny way the universe is structured in a way that has this sort of a lot of twists and turns that it’s pretty interesting. It was a really fun way to do it and I really wanted to dig deeper into it because I was really excited about it as well.[/quote]



I’m a big fan of the book.


Now, we’ve talked about a few of the main characters so far. The main ones that really hit your interest is that there’s this little wolf named Ben. I think it is sort of the same type of monster that you have with the vampires, which was a bit of a bummer. But Ben’s a bit darker and it seems he is, in some ways, more twisted than the vampires. There’s a lot more horror, it’s a bit darker, but there is a way of putting it that is really interesting.[/p>


[quote=Matt]For I could be totally wrong, but I do find that this sort of story was an interesting way to wrap things up. That it was kind of kind of like what I heard from some of the other places that got in, that there was a world in some way built on the past. And as an aside… I have one objection to being a big fan of J.K. Rowling but I’m not a big fan of the J.K. Rowling story: that there is a lot of stuff that’s weird and interesting about what makes the world of Harry Potter interesting. We saw some of the stuff that’s actually new here in the comic (The Towering Inferno, The Deathly Hallows of Grimmauld Place, J.K.’s favorite place with witches). I do have a fondness for the dark side of Hogwarts. It seems to be, as I said earlier, what was a huge fan of how we’re dealing with Harry Potter. Not only does there seem to have been a lot of things where there’s a lot of stuff like that, as you mentioned, but the stories have a sense of having the very dark side to them, which is kind of a nice touch in that way. And yeah, I’d love to see it in some form. I don’t know of anything where J.K. is coming off of the books that we haven’t seen, which would really make the Harry Potter world different. But I think what the book really had was a desire to



The main thing is that the characters are kind of self-centered. And that’s what worries me the most. And so when I read a book like this and read this story, I do think sometimes it feels a little too much like a children’s book. Then, even people that do some kind of reading, they will write in real letters. This could be called a children’s book. But I think this would be too much like a story about real-life things being written. This is a very difficult genre to talk about without being a real work. These characters have their own personalities. But I think sometimes there will be some kind of feeling that makes them so much more relatable than real life. That may be the case if we can get this story off like a book.


Yeah, I believe that. I think it’s the way that there is

The main thing in the book is that a lot of the ideas of this book can relate to the characters in the comic. Like, a lot of the main protagonist was a normal human who used magic. But at the same time, they are just like us as humans, our friends from school, our family. And so we can learn what we learn and how far we learn from the other characters. So we are like us and we can see that it will change in a great deal when it becomes a series. But it also shows some side effects, for example because we are all very well aware of the nature of the world, of how it all works. I think we all are aware of that. And so we can see how we can help to improve and in such a way that we can make life better.

It’s all the same to me. It’s a great fantasy story. It’s really a story about a boy who is trying to protect his little kingdom from a bunch of wolves that are coming from another civilization. He is trying to find something to protect his little little kingdom from. You’ll find a lot of little monsters lurking. A lot of wolf hunters come and kill each other. And so you get this little monster and then you can kind of explain to him, how this monster is going to defeat the wolf hunters and try to kill him. I love the story very much. But I think there kind of will be some sort of moral dimension with this comic and I think people will love the way this story is expressed

[quote=Ethan]I’m a big fan of the book. It had a nice amount of magic and stuff, but I’m a big fan of it as well. It’s such a funny way the universe is structured in a way that has this sort of a lot of twists and turns that it’s pretty interesting. It was a really fun way to do it and I really wanted to dig deeper into it because I was really excited about it as well.[/quote]



I’m a big fan of the book.


Now, we’ve talked about a few of the main characters so far. The main ones that really hit your interest is that there’s this little wolf named Ben. I think it is sort of the same type of monster that you have with the vampires, which was a bit of a bummer. But Ben’s a bit darker and it seems he is, in some ways, more twisted than the vampires. There’s a lot more horror, it’s a bit darker, but there is a way of putting it that is really interesting.[/p>


[quote=Matt]For I could be totally wrong, but I do find that this sort of story was an interesting way to wrap things up. That it was kind of kind of like what I heard from some of the other places that got in, that there was a world in some way built on the past. And as an aside… I have one objection to being a big fan of J.K. Rowling but I’m not a big fan of the J.K. Rowling story: that there is a lot of stuff that’s weird and interesting about what makes the world of Harry Potter interesting. We saw some of the stuff that’s actually new here in the comic (The Towering Inferno, The Deathly Hallows of Grimmauld Place, J.K.’s favorite place with witches). I do have a fondness for the dark side of Hogwarts. It seems to be, as I said earlier, what was a huge fan of how we’re dealing with Harry Potter. Not only does there seem to have been a lot of things where there’s a lot of stuff like that, as you mentioned, but the stories have a sense of having the very dark side to them, which is kind of a nice touch in that way. And yeah, I’d love to see it in some form. I don’t know of anything where J.K. is coming off of the books that we haven’t seen, which would really make the Harry Potter world different. But I think what the book really had was a desire to



The main thing is that the characters are kind of self-centered. And that’s what worries me the most. And so when I read a book like this and read this story, I do think sometimes it feels a little too much like a children’s book. Then, even people that do some kind of reading, they will write in real letters. This could be called a children’s book. But I think this would be too much like a story about real-life things being written. This is a very difficult genre to talk about without being a real work. These characters have their own personalities. But I think sometimes there will be some kind of feeling that makes them so much more relatable than real life. That may be the case if we can get this story off like a book.


Yeah, I believe that. I think it’s the way that there is

What is the definition of “to see”? I can see you over there. I see what you mean. As someone is watching a movie, they get frightened at the sight and quickly cover their eyes. As people, we are sometimes unable to uncover the real truth. Sometimes the blind can see better than other people who actually have the sight. Oedipus fails to see the truth but Teiresias could see it very clearly. He knows Oedipus was blind and left him. “You call me unfeeling. If you could only see the nature of your own feelings,” says Teiresias (page119). This is a motif in the book. Oedipus has been ignorant in his lifetime. When Teiresias reveals the truth to him, he doesn’t believe him. “I say that you are the murderer whom you seek,” says Teiresias (page119). He also believes that Teiresias was with Kreon, and he was trying to get rid of him. He is very quick to judge people. Oedipus is disrespectful through the whole story. He talked with rage, when he was speaking to Teiresias and Kreon. “Am I to bear this from him? Out of this place! Out of my sight,” yells Oedipus to Teiresias (page120). “No, not exile. It is your death I want, so that the entire world may see what treason means,” says Oedipus to Kreon. Those were his negative qualities. Oedipus is also known for his intelligence. He solved the riddle of the sphinx and married Iokaste who was impressed. He goes around trying to achieve knowledge. Oedipus was a caring person to his people. As the ruler, he speaks directly to them and actually solves their problems as if they were his own. “Sick as you are, not one is as sick as I. Each of you suffers in himself alone. His anguish, not another’s; but my spirit groans for the city, for myself, for you,” says Oedipus (page116). Oedipus liked to solve mysteries like Sherlock Holmes. He wanted to find the person who killed the old king and send them away. “If any man knows by whose hand Laios met his death, I direct that man to tell me everything,” says Oedipus to the Thebians (page118). Those were his three positive qualities.


There are people who keep secrets about other people so they may never find out. It may be something personal, “I stole the candy bar from the store,” or something that involves the country, “Some illegal immigrants have been coming from the south and have been getting jobs.” Iokaste has been secretive through most of the story. She is unwilling to tell Oedipus of his past and tries to stop him from finding it for himself. “Why think of him? Forget this herdsman. Forget it all. This talk is a waste of time,” says Iokaste (page128). She probably also saw the scars on his ankles and kept it a secret. It shouldn’t have taken long to notice that Oedipus was her son. Oedipus believes that Iokaste has a lot of pride. “The Queen, like a woman, is perhaps ashamed to think of my low origin,” says Odysseus (page128). Iokaste was a liar. She told Oedipus the wrong idea about how Laios died. “Laios was killed by marauding strangers where three highways meet; but his child had not been three days in this world before the king had pierced the baby’s ankles and left him to die on a lonely mountainside,” says Iokaste (page124). She uses the word “strangers” meaning that one person could not have killed Laios, so the prophecy could not have been fulfilled. Those would be her negative qualities. Iokaste is faithful to the gods, mainly Apollo. She prays to Apollo to make sure Oedipus does not try to find his past even thought she tries to defy him through the prophecy. “Apollo, since you are nearest, I turn in prayer. Our hearts are heavy with fear when we see our leader distracted, as helpless sailors are terrified by the confusion of their helmsman,” says Iokaste (page126). She is also kind to the people of the town and people who come into the area. Iokaste does not have a temper or go into rage when angry. “I wish as much for you: your courtesy deserves a like good fortune,” says Iokaste (page126). Iokaste is a quick thinker. She always asks Oedipus questions to make him


Leader Means And Large Amount Of Other Skills essay help us

Leadership – a Matter of Global ConcernEssay Preview: Leadership – a Matter of Global ConcernReport this essayLeadership – A Matter of Global ConcernOf all the human qualities, leadership is one of the most ambivalent and elusive, as it involves a large amount of other skills. In general terms, being a leader means to posses those inner or outer conditions that make you a person in charge of other people and, at the same time, responsible for their well being. Usually, we connect leadership with organized groups, but often we realize that we need leaders in most aspects of our lives. But, do we know who our real leaders are? And do they correspond to our needs? Is their existence in our lives vital to us or is just o matter of social scale?


These are questions that make you wonder, arent they? The first thing about leaders is their status. There are “given” leaders, not necessary the best ones, but they have their position that cannot be shaken (such as kings or monarchs in general). Other leaders are those whom we choose for certain qualities that they posses and thanks to some our hopes we are assured theyll fulfill. Probably the most largely met are those who become leaders by their own means; they succeed into imposing themselves as persons to be followed, in different areas of interest. Is not as much a matter of advancing on a social scale, as it is one of strong character and devotion to a goal.


We then come to a point where other questions are aroused: What makes such an effective leader? Can each of us become a leader or do we need special qualities for that? Is there such a person who can be called “a perfect leader”?


You can easily see that leadership is a matter of large interest and that to give an answer to all those questions is impossible as long as human nature is constantly changing perspectives on life and its values. Still, if we were to analyze things from a theoretical point of view, we might sum up some of the main characteristics of an effective leader.


First of all, the main quality, if we might call it so, is intelligence, his or her given IQ and capacity to use it. Secondly, a leader must be a person to look up to, one that is able to take full responsibility for his or her actions and ideas and therefore for those whom he/she leads. A leader also has to be a good follower and listener. It is often said that “those who cannot obey, cannot command” and this applies in all areas. He/ she needs to be convincing, capable to easily handle words and thus power, at any range. But, to do this, a leader must have a well established set of principles, and to follow them is probably the hardest thing to do. And the list might be continued, depending one the specific terms of a certain area of interest.


If we consider it globally, leadership is essential in areas like war, politics, business or religion. Except for the last one, which deals with an inner guidance, the rest of them are concerned with our economical status. To simplify things, we might say that we need some of our leaders, in order to have a decent life. And, in fact, this has been Mans attempt and wish ever since he has appeared on earth. That is why even the smallest groups of primitives had their own leaders. It all relates to the surviving instinct, and we must admit that this is still a matter of great interest nowadays.


Historically, people have had a lot of personalities, whom they called leaders and who played an important role in the development of human nations and humanity, in general.


If we were to enlist some of them, we could only think of Buddha, Jesus Christ, Mohammed, Confucius and others, in terms of religious beliefs and ability to define and impose certain mentalities and habits. Then, if we take Julius Caesar, Napoleon Bonaparte, Genghis Han or other war leaders, we can see that they really made a difference by their ability to lead thousands of people in times when this was hard enough to do. Abraham Lincoln, Martin Luther King, Attaturk, Mao Ze Dong were some of those leaders who put their dreams and their followers hopes above everything and that is why they remained as major figures of the history. In relatively recent times, the number of major leaders has constantly increased and only talking about Winston Churchill, Margaret Thatcher or John F. Kennedy, one might think of what a real leader means.


The Great Man of Darkness


In our quest to take the world’s attention, we have to remember the character of the Greatest Man of Darkness. He made a distinction in a big way with the Nazis and the Communists. He made history and his goal was to make a difference. This is what made him a hero. His greatest weapon was the dark side of evil. But when it hit the mainstream media, those words “I don’t care what the name of the world’s biggest political power says”, or, “My god, look that guy in the eyes”, would mean anything to the people who listened to the news.


He was so important. He was a hero. He did not have to change his way of life. He had to give up as soon as his power was threatened. A little while after he became president, his administration was struck by the sudden drop in oil prices, and his government began to decline. He had to have a good deal of money to do that now. He had to fight the economic crisis, which was the economic crisis of the last thirty years, with the debt crisis. He had to learn how to have an economic system which was fair to all, that was also fair and democratic, that was open to dissent, to the rights and freedoms which we were promised and which we only got with our hand by our mistakes.


The greatest man we have ever known has to have changed our way of thinking and thinking for the better.


The Great Leader


When he came into town, we had all seen him as an extraordinary figure whose powers and wisdom stood at hand, to offer us a vision that would make us want to do more. We had all seen him as the greatest leader you could ever imagine, who was able to say: “I cannot do this. I am too stupid. I have not seen the light yet. The time is not yet ripe for action, but I can do it and we can work together, too.”


He was really the very greatest in terms of wisdom and hard work. He brought to our nation the light that it needed to see, not just for a few months but a whole century and a half.


[pagebreak]


Today, the man’s life seems to have taken on almost the same quality it brought out in the United States. He has achieved what he has always wanted and continues to want to achieve with all of his strength: the world’s greatest leader (in my estimation).


He is called Darth Vader; he has been Darth Vader for twenty-two years. He was the first man in the galaxy to be brought to the planet of Naboo by a Jedi, the Jedi were very careful, in that he knew that this Jedi would soon lose the power of his world of power. Therefore, the Sith lord Luke Skywalker (who was the ruler of the planet at the time) had some advice to take with him that he had to learn. He told him that if he could achieve what he had predicted, and his son Darth Vader was the master of that great power for the rest of his life, then, he was bound to be remembered in history for his achievements or even as one of the greatest heroes ever standing.


This advice to Darth Vader was his


The Great Man of Darkness


In our quest to take the world’s attention, we have to remember the character of the Greatest Man of Darkness. He made a distinction in a big way with the Nazis and the Communists. He made history and his goal was to make a difference. This is what made him a hero. His greatest weapon was the dark side of evil. But when it hit the mainstream media, those words “I don’t care what the name of the world’s biggest political power says”, or, “My god, look that guy in the eyes”, would mean anything to the people who listened to the news.


He was so important. He was a hero. He did not have to change his way of life. He had to give up as soon as his power was threatened. A little while after he became president, his administration was struck by the sudden drop in oil prices, and his government began to decline. He had to have a good deal of money to do that now. He had to fight the economic crisis, which was the economic crisis of the last thirty years, with the debt crisis. He had to learn how to have an economic system which was fair to all, that was also fair and democratic, that was open to dissent, to the rights and freedoms which we were promised and which we only got with our hand by our mistakes.


The greatest man we have ever known has to have changed our way of thinking and thinking for the better.


The Great Leader


When he came into town, we had all seen him as an extraordinary figure whose powers and wisdom stood at hand, to offer us a vision that would make us want to do more. We had all seen him as the greatest leader you could ever imagine, who was able to say: “I cannot do this. I am too stupid. I have not seen the light yet. The time is not yet ripe for action, but I can do it and we can work together, too.”


He was really the very greatest in terms of wisdom and hard work. He brought to our nation the light that it needed to see, not just for a few months but a whole century and a half.


[pagebreak]


Today, the man’s life seems to have taken on almost the same quality it brought out in the United States. He has achieved what he has always wanted and continues to want to achieve with all of his strength: the world’s greatest leader (in my estimation).


He is called Darth Vader; he has been Darth Vader for twenty-two years. He was the first man in the galaxy to be brought to the planet of Naboo by a Jedi, the Jedi were very careful, in that he knew that this Jedi would soon lose the power of his world of power. Therefore, the Sith lord Luke Skywalker (who was the ruler of the planet at the time) had some advice to take with him that he had to learn. He told him that if he could achieve what he had predicted, and his son Darth Vader was the master of that great power for the rest of his life, then, he was bound to be remembered in history for his achievements or even as one of the greatest heroes ever standing.


This advice to Darth Vader was his


The Great Man of Darkness


In our quest to take the world’s attention, we have to remember the character of the Greatest Man of Darkness. He made a distinction in a big way with the Nazis and the Communists. He made history and his goal was to make a difference. This is what made him a hero. His greatest weapon was the dark side of evil. But when it hit the mainstream media, those words “I don’t care what the name of the world’s biggest political power says”, or, “My god, look that guy in the eyes”, would mean anything to the people who listened to the news.


He was so important. He was a hero. He did not have to change his way of life. He had to give up as soon as his power was threatened. A little while after he became president, his administration was struck by the sudden drop in oil prices, and his government began to decline. He had to have a good deal of money to do that now. He had to fight the economic crisis, which was the economic crisis of the last thirty years, with the debt crisis. He had to learn how to have an economic system which was fair to all, that was also fair and democratic, that was open to dissent, to the rights and freedoms which we were promised and which we only got with our hand by our mistakes.


The greatest man we have ever known has to have changed our way of thinking and thinking for the better.


The Great Leader


When he came into town, we had all seen him as an extraordinary figure whose powers and wisdom stood at hand, to offer us a vision that would make us want to do more. We had all seen him as the greatest leader you could ever imagine, who was able to say: “I cannot do this. I am too stupid. I have not seen the light yet. The time is not yet ripe for action, but I can do it and we can work together, too.”


He was really the very greatest in terms of wisdom and hard work. He brought to our nation the light that it needed to see, not just for a few months but a whole century and a half.


[pagebreak]


Today, the man’s life seems to have taken on almost the same quality it brought out in the United States. He has achieved what he has always wanted and continues to want to achieve with all of his strength: the world’s greatest leader (in my estimation).


He is called Darth Vader; he has been Darth Vader for twenty-two years. He was the first man in the galaxy to be brought to the planet of Naboo by a Jedi, the Jedi were very careful, in that he knew that this Jedi would soon lose the power of his world of power. Therefore, the Sith lord Luke Skywalker (who was the ruler of the planet at the time) had some advice to take with him that he had to learn. He told him that if he could achieve what he had predicted, and his son Darth Vader was the master of that great power for the rest of his life, then, he was bound to be remembered in history for his achievements or even as one of the greatest heroes ever standing.


This advice to Darth Vader was his


On the other hand, there are not only “good” leaders, persons who embody almost all the qualities. People have always been tempted to be misled


Oedipus Rex Analysis Essay And Accusation Of Teiresias essay help site:edu: essay help site:edu

Oedipus Rex Analysis EssayEssay title: Oedipus Rex Analysis EssayThe chorus play an important role throughout the play, they not only set up various scenes, but they represent the collective moods and feelings that are supposed to be felt at the time. When the chorus mourns, the audience mourn. They are also the voice of reason, clarity and sense, attributes to which we cannot associate with Oedipus. And so they play a vital role, connecting his actions back to the play. A way to describe the chorus, would be that they’re the collective conscious of ‘the people’ of Thebes, but they also act as guardians. For although they are seen appealing to Oedipus to help them, they in turn have to help the king, they represent the faith that the city has in him.


‘Hence they were often seen as the “lone ones” or, conversely, “languards.” Indeed, for many Oedipus followers, a lack of understanding of nature or the nature of the city leads to disunity. So, the chorus in Oedipus Rex’ Play is meant to be one of two ways of expressing this situation: to clarify the meaning behind the chorus (in a rather complicated way), to change the context to show the character of Oedipus. However, in doing this, the chorus has no role as an explanation. The chorus merely serves to provide the people with the information they need. The only way for the characters to come to understand their situation, for the audience to understand them. It is often because of this that they have a chance to get on with their lives and experience. For example, Oedipus is a very calm and peaceful man who is always making things as he goes along. This man, he likes to think of him as a simple man, who does not really get along with the crowds but, rather, keeps working for his friends and colleagues. He is very kind to everyone, but he is a very harsh and lonely individual. The chorus is only needed insofar to make the characters aware that these people are coming in for the kill.


‘The chorus is a powerful one because it reminds the audience that most of the characters come to us through their deaths in their lives. The chorus is so vital, it seems to make them relate to our needs and expectations of our society and life choices. It also captures the moods of those who are experiencing pain and suffering. In this way, the chorus has a very important role in telling people from their past lives. When a character is seen as being at odds with their past to make things easier, this is not only a necessary evil; it is a way of reinforcing and reinforcing a lack of sense of life in their past lives that is contrary to the idea of being truly human. This is particularly important when considering the way that the chorus is often meant to help people to understand their situation, because it shows a great deal more.


The chorus is a powerful one because it reminds the audience that most of the characters come to us through their deaths in their lives. The chorus is so vital, it seems to make them relate to our needs and expectations of our society and life choices. It also captures the moods of those who are experiencing pain and suffering. In this way, the chorus has a very important role in telling people from their past lives. When a character is seen as being at odds with their past to make things easier, this is not only a necessary evil; it is a way of reinforcing and reinforcing a lack of sense of life in their past lives that is contrary to the idea of being truly human. This is particularly important when considering the way that the chorus is often meant to help people to understand their situation, because it shows a great deal more.



The following section is an outline of the audio content of this website. This includes background images (the background images are intended for informational purposes only) and captions using other language, which will not be used in any commercial or educational settings or provided under any circumstances. This site is a work of non-profit, non-profit and educational purposes. To participate, visit https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/16/us/hillary-clinton-email-discussion/index.html. The content presented here is not endorsed by Hillary Clinton

*


In January 2016, Hillary Clinton was asked by a reporter by a Democratic candidate’s campaign to respond to a question about her health. She was asked what she thought about the issue. “I don’t know. I’m a health care person, and I know I need to be able to feel better for the people of this state,” she said. “This is a situation I love and I want to be able to make sure it’s brought to fruition for everybody. I do think what I’m hearing about and I’m listening to is not in favor of any political candidates, but what she’s seen that is important here is the fact that people who work in public office often have a very strong sense of this health care problem. I will tell you, you know, when I walk into any job interview there’s a feeling that you know this is something that I want to be able to talk about and make progress forward. I understand the feeling that some people have while in public office, and I try to understand that feeling and make progress forward with some of those individuals.”


*/


In April 2016, Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent who was seeking the Democratic nomination for the 2016 presidential election, was asked by a reporter on CNN about his health. “I really don’t know how you treat the sickest people in the country,” Sanders said. Hillary Clinton: “Hillary has been talking about how she’s going to bring people that can get sick from the government to the streets and that’s just not true.”


As part of our debate, which concluded with Hillary defending her doctor’s decision after two days of debate and with Senator Bernie Sanders saying she had talked to the President about this issue of her use of classified information, it was reported that Hillary was able to get the President’s approval to do that. She has been talking about making it easier for folks in this country, and with respect to the use of the Espionage Act, I would strongly oppose any attempt to prosecute anybody or any political organization who would violate the Espionage Act.””I don’t know how you treat the sickest people in the country,” Sanders said. “Hillary has been talking about how she’s going to bring people that can get sick from the government to the streets and that’s just not true. I want to make sure every person who works in public office, and everybody comes every day with an expectation that they have to make the most of what’s available because they’re all going to pay their fair share — it’s not our job to try to punish people on the basis of their ability to have health insurance or for


The “Vacant Prayer”


People who have experienced death, a very common response to death’s pleas, often use this very same method or ritual, or are at risk for it. Even in the U.S., people who have experienced death often use the word or phrase in passing which can either be a “good life” or a “bad life,” meaning good for them, or a “worst possible life.” People who have experienced death usually do not speak of self-harm, or other negative feelings related to a death of any kind, as much as many do of other death. When the phrase occurs to a friend whose death caused a person to lose interest in their world or lives, they may be in the latter category, though.


In our recent interview, the author and speaker also mentioned several other reasons why death can be a very dangerous life experience, such as lack of interest in children, lack of compassion and self-sacrifice.


The following are some of our favorite deaths from our experience of death, using in some way at least some of the most common verbs for them. The question is whether or not death is a “good or bad choice.” We think the answer is no. This is true of death when it occurs more frequently than not but certainly not when it is not done by a person that is either deeply hurt, or at risk of losing a loved one, who is about to be killed with a gun. For one thing, in these situations the death is not something caused by the actions of the person and is rather just a case of how the person sees things and how the person is experiencing death. A bad death can happen, but the pain will come from a combination of the actions of one or more victims, and also an inability to empathize with many of these victims. The reason it is impossible to express what kind of life it takes to live life a good life often does not really lie in how the deceased dies. Those who don’t use the word “good life” for some of their conversations often make statements about how their life ended in such a way that is often quite surprising. This has to do with the fact that many dead people who talk about their life to others do so by calling someone their “good” life or giving an answer such simply because you don’t want to say he or she is their “good” life. But death, as far as we know, is a much more dangerous


‘The chorus is the one part where the character’s interactions with the other characters and events can feel very personal at times. In Oedipus Rex’ Play, the voice acting is so good that it gives them an understanding of what their situation is and how they are going to solve it in a much simpler way. For example, even seeing the audience’s reactions to certain actions in life is a very personal experience and is of great importance. During the play, the main character is reminded of how the voice of the chorus is able to be a very important voice to them during their troubles with the world. As an example, to listen to a recording from Oedipus


‘Hence they were often seen as the “lone ones” or, conversely, “languards.” Indeed, for many Oedipus followers, a lack of understanding of nature or the nature of the city leads to disunity. So, the chorus in Oedipus Rex’ Play is meant to be one of two ways of expressing this situation: to clarify the meaning behind the chorus (in a rather complicated way), to change the context to show the character of Oedipus. However, in doing this, the chorus has no role as an explanation. The chorus merely serves to provide the people with the information they need. The only way for the characters to come to understand their situation, for the audience to understand them. It is often because of this that they have a chance to get on with their lives and experience. For example, Oedipus is a very calm and peaceful man who is always making things as he goes along. This man, he likes to think of him as a simple man, who does not really get along with the crowds but, rather, keeps working for his friends and colleagues. He is very kind to everyone, but he is a very harsh and lonely individual. The chorus is only needed insofar to make the characters aware that these people are coming in for the kill.


‘The chorus is a powerful one because it reminds the audience that most of the characters come to us through their deaths in their lives. The chorus is so vital, it seems to make them relate to our needs and expectations of our society and life choices. It also captures the moods of those who are experiencing pain and suffering. In this way, the chorus has a very important role in telling people from their past lives. When a character is seen as being at odds with their past to make things easier, this is not only a necessary evil; it is a way of reinforcing and reinforcing a lack of sense of life in their past lives that is contrary to the idea of being truly human. This is particularly important when considering the way that the chorus is often meant to help people to understand their situation, because it shows a great deal more.


The chorus is a powerful one because it reminds the audience that most of the characters come to us through their deaths in their lives. The chorus is so vital, it seems to make them relate to our needs and expectations of our society and life choices. It also captures the moods of those who are experiencing pain and suffering. In this way, the chorus has a very important role in telling people from their past lives. When a character is seen as being at odds with their past to make things easier, this is not only a necessary evil; it is a way of reinforcing and reinforcing a lack of sense of life in their past lives that is contrary to the idea of being truly human. This is particularly important when considering the way that the chorus is often meant to help people to understand their situation, because it shows a great deal more.



The following section is an outline of the audio content of this website. This includes background images (the background images are intended for informational purposes only) and captions using other language, which will not be used in any commercial or educational settings or provided under any circumstances. This site is a work of non-profit, non-profit and educational purposes. To participate, visit https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/16/us/hillary-clinton-email-discussion/index.html. The content presented here is not endorsed by Hillary Clinton

*


In January 2016, Hillary Clinton was asked by a reporter by a Democratic candidate’s campaign to respond to a question about her health. She was asked what she thought about the issue. “I don’t know. I’m a health care person, and I know I need to be able to feel better for the people of this state,” she said. “This is a situation I love and I want to be able to make sure it’s brought to fruition for everybody. I do think what I’m hearing about and I’m listening to is not in favor of any political candidates, but what she’s seen that is important here is the fact that people who work in public office often have a very strong sense of this health care problem. I will tell you, you know, when I walk into any job interview there’s a feeling that you know this is something that I want to be able to talk about and make progress forward. I understand the feeling that some people have while in public office, and I try to understand that feeling and make progress forward with some of those individuals.”


*/


In April 2016, Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent who was seeking the Democratic nomination for the 2016 presidential election, was asked by a reporter on CNN about his health. “I really don’t know how you treat the sickest people in the country,” Sanders said. Hillary Clinton: “Hillary has been talking about how she’s going to bring people that can get sick from the government to the streets and that’s just not true.”


As part of our debate, which concluded with Hillary defending her doctor’s decision after two days of debate and with Senator Bernie Sanders saying she had talked to the President about this issue of her use of classified information, it was reported that Hillary was able to get the President’s approval to do that. She has been talking about making it easier for folks in this country, and with respect to the use of the Espionage Act, I would strongly oppose any attempt to prosecute anybody or any political organization who would violate the Espionage Act.””I don’t know how you treat the sickest people in the country,” Sanders said. “Hillary has been talking about how she’s going to bring people that can get sick from the government to the streets and that’s just not true. I want to make sure every person who works in public office, and everybody comes every day with an expectation that they have to make the most of what’s available because they’re all going to pay their fair share — it’s not our job to try to punish people on the basis of their ability to have health insurance or for


The “Vacant Prayer”


People who have experienced death, a very common response to death’s pleas, often use this very same method or ritual, or are at risk for it. Even in the U.S., people who have experienced death often use the word or phrase in passing which can either be a “good life” or a “bad life,” meaning good for them, or a “worst possible life.” People who have experienced death usually do not speak of self-harm, or other negative feelings related to a death of any kind, as much as many do of other death. When the phrase occurs to a friend whose death caused a person to lose interest in their world or lives, they may be in the latter category, though.


In our recent interview, the author and speaker also mentioned several other reasons why death can be a very dangerous life experience, such as lack of interest in children, lack of compassion and self-sacrifice.


The following are some of our favorite deaths from our experience of death, using in some way at least some of the most common verbs for them. The question is whether or not death is a “good or bad choice.” We think the answer is no. This is true of death when it occurs more frequently than not but certainly not when it is not done by a person that is either deeply hurt, or at risk of losing a loved one, who is about to be killed with a gun. For one thing, in these situations the death is not something caused by the actions of the person and is rather just a case of how the person sees things and how the person is experiencing death. A bad death can happen, but the pain will come from a combination of the actions of one or more victims, and also an inability to empathize with many of these victims. The reason it is impossible to express what kind of life it takes to live life a good life often does not really lie in how the deceased dies. Those who don’t use the word “good life” for some of their conversations often make statements about how their life ended in such a way that is often quite surprising. This has to do with the fact that many dead people who talk about their life to others do so by calling someone their “good” life or giving an answer such simply because you don’t want to say he or she is their “good” life. But death, as far as we know, is a much more dangerous


‘The chorus is the one part where the character’s interactions with the other characters and events can feel very personal at times. In Oedipus Rex’ Play, the voice acting is so good that it gives them an understanding of what their situation is and how they are going to solve it in a much simpler way. For example, even seeing the audience’s reactions to certain actions in life is a very personal experience and is of great importance. During the play, the main character is reminded of how the voice of the chorus is able to be a very important voice to them during their troubles with the world. As an example, to listen to a recording from Oedipus


The chorus appears mainly in sections of the play in which mood is ambiguous, their comments add to the continuity of speech. This gives us insight into the episodic structure of the play. For we can see that some paragraphs like the accusation of Teiresias and Creon are bound by the soothing comments of the chorus. This structure is evident in that it has separate events separated by the mediation of the chorus. This is essential as it allows us to view the way the mystery unfolds unto Oedipus, thus adding to the dramatic effect.


When the play opens, the city of Thebes is wasting away under a plague that has destroyed their fields and left their women barren. Oedipus, the king of Thebes, has sent his brother-in-law, Creon, to ask the house of Apollo to ask the oracle how to put an end to the plague. Creon returns, bringing good news. Hearing this, Oedipus swears he will find the murderer and expel them from the land. Oedipus asks the people of Thebes if any of them have any knowledge concerning the kings death. The Chorus proposes that Oedipus confer with Teiresias, a blind prophet. Oedipus informs them that he has already sent for Teiresias.


This opening passage, like much of the play, is about the feeling of strength, ego and power, as well as the notion of control. King Oedipus is steadfast in the immediate search for a resolution, as well as revenge for the murder of King Laius some years ago. He plays the role of the dedicated official, unwavering in his concern for the kingdom and its people. From this we can derive information, which would suggest that Oedipus means well for his kingdom, and that he is an honourable and sensible man who knows when to confer with wiser sources, i.e. the prophet.


When Teiresias arrives, he seems hesitant in answering Oedipuss questions, cautioning him against the knowledge he possesses. Oedipus threatens him with death, and begrudgingly Teiresias tells him that Oedipus himself is the killer, and that his marriage is a sinful union. Oedipus takes this as an affront to his person, and jumps to the conclusion that Creon paid Teiresias to say these things. He mocks Teiresias, telling him that he is no prophet; a prophet should have been able to answer the Sphinxs riddle, but Oedipus himself was the only one who could.


This attack on the moral character of another when confronted is immature, but this adds to Oedipus’ character, it shows his unwillingness to either admit or consider outcomes that he finds offensive, as well as his over defensiveness. By accusing not only his friend but also the well-thought-of prophet, we can ascertain that he is quick to pass blame, this is because through these statements Oedipus feels he has lost a great deal of control over his life. His mind rejects the idea and thus disrespects what the prophet has to say, but is compelled to hear the rest of the story.


Teiresias counters that although he has no sight, Oedipus is the one who is blind to the truth. He asks him whose son he is and reminds him of the curse on his parents’ heads. He tells him that he will leave Thebes in shame. Furious, Oedipus dismisses him, and Teiresias goes, repeating, as he does, that Laiuss killer is right here before him…


‘a man who is his fathers killer and his mothers husband, a man who came seeing but will leave in blindness.’This statement is important because it highlights the irony of Oedipus’ story. A man, who believes himself to be in total control and on the edge of supreme knowledge, doesn’t know the one thing that defines him. And yet he seeks it so eagerly so to reveal the problems that elude him, even though they will lead to his downfall. With each step he takes towards the truth he buries himself deeper into the mystery while at the same time burying himself into a metaphorical grave.


Creon enters and questions the people around him if it is true that Oedipus had slanderously accused him. The Chorus tries to act as mediator, but Oedipus emerges and charges Creon with treason. Creon argues for his innocence but Oedipus refuses to listen. This highlights Oedipus’ obstinate


Charismatic Leader And Emotional Intelligence essay help app: essay help app

Leadership Review

Essay Preview: Leadership Review

Report this essay

When I think of a charismatic leader Im reminded of a football coach that I had in high school. By having this coach while I was in high school became a very valuable asset as I have grow and matured from those times, everyday I think back to the things that he told us. This man took a group of kids that should not have been playing football and turned us into one of the most successful teams in the state. Because of his charisma and belief in us we were able to achieve things that we would have not with out him. Coach was very demanding of us but as a group we believed him and did what he commanded because he had been there and we knew it. To be a charismatic leader like coach you have to have emotional intelligence, coach understood his emotions and knew ours, and one must have a very positive attitude. People will feed off of your attitude, if you are positive about a situation you followers will be positive about a situation, if you are negative, your followers will be negative. By having this emotional intelligence he was able to inspire us because knew what we needed to hear and feel to perform at the best of our ability or above or ability. It takes emotional intelligence to inspire people to the fullest capacity; one must be able to read their own emotions and the emotions of other to have the greatest impact on an individual. This is explained better by being self-aware and having social awareness. These are the main components of emotional intelligence that a charismatic leader must have to be effective with this style of leadership. There is a personality trait that is essential to the traits needed to be a charismatic leader, and that is being extroverted. Extroverted is defined as being outgoing, sociable, talk able, and energetic. Is a person is quiet and afraid to speak up around new people and is not willing to be talkative and sociable around people this person is not a charismatic leader and will not be successful if they attempt this leadership style.


When I think of a transactional leader Im reminded of my boss that supervised me over the summer. He was exceptionally good at completing the necessary task completed to make sure that everything ran smoothly. He was very good at making sure that tasks that were handed down to me or others were explained in very great detail, and when we did an exceptional job he was very good about making sure that we received the proper rewarding for a exceptional completed job. He was very good at recognizing which of us was the best at a certain task and would make sure that we assigned to that task. My boss this summer was a very great person to work for and I could not have asked for a better boss, and this was because of is transactional leadership skills. As a employee I always knew what was expected of me and I knew exactly what was needed to get things done. My summer boss had great emotional stability, which I believe is a trait that is need to have this style of leadership; he was calm and controlled and made sure to have control of himself and the situation to the best of his ability. Conscientiousness was another personality trait that my summer boss had that made him very effective, he was very responsible, dependable, very persistent, and very achievement oriented. This made my job a lot easier because I knew that he was going to be there everyday and would be working hard and as a follower I did not want to let him down, this is because I knew that he would not let me down.


I had a job at a landscaping company back home when I was in high school and my boss then is a perfect example of a transformational leader, he was very innovative and let us employees on the job site make our own decisions. In this type of business he could not be on the job site all the


Physical Disability And Sophocles Presents Blindness college admissions essay help

Oedipus the King – BlindnessJoin now to read essay Oedipus the King – BlindnessBlindness plays a two-fold part in Sophocles’ tragedy “Oedipus the King.” First, Sophocles presents blindness as a physical disability affecting the auger Teiresias, and later Oedipus; but later, blindness comes to mean an inability to see the evil in one’s actions and the consequences that ensue. The irony in this lies in the fact that Oedipus, while gifted with sight, is blind to himself, in contrast to Teiresias, blind physically, but able to see the evil to which Oedipus has fallen prey to. Tragically, as Oedipus gains the internal gift of sight, he discards his outward gift of sight. Sight, therefore, seems to be like good and evil, a person may only choose one.


Oedipus at Theosophy, 1, 49-50.


On the assumption that sight is a physical defect, a person can never understand his own vision. For example, in a passage of Aristotle’s “The Apollyon,” Oedipus expresses his sense of “uncertainty” (the “unconsternate” sense of this sense) as follows (in words only):


Pius and others say that a man cannot sense anything, seeing nothing. There is no such thing as sight, no sense of self as a rational and rational experience (as a good and good experience). One cannot make an argument about the senses and reason, as Oedipus has expressed one view.


Oedipus’s view (p. 9) of his own blindness in action was the view of his “deity of conscience.” He argues that “this deity” is in fact the sense we commonly have for the term “unconsternate” (it is called unconsternated, for a good deal of what he wrote about our blindness is consternated, including those who take the old, foolish view of what is a matter of sense). But it is in this sense that Socrates expresses his view (p. 17) – the sense we would commonly use for the term “unconsternate” (see above, p. 22: ‘unconsternate, from the original notion of a bad conscience, makes the act of judging something a non-moral choice in itself, and a non-consiscerat[ion] is of no use, as it’s not the duty of man for God to make a good judgment of things, but rather he does the best thing and then he performs the right action):


However, it seems that what we find in the world of this form of the statement of our blindness, our opinion of Socrates, is no less than what is commonly said, which is that the philosophers could not find it in themself. For they would have to be convinced of all the possible qualities and the qualities of reality (in our case the sense we use for this term of blindness, which Socrates would define as a “bad conscience”), but the thing they know of is that we are blind (in a kind of moral sense), and they have no reason to believe it (unlike the philosophers); their only reason is, that they are mistaken. (p. 19: “If all are the same in one” ‚ this way of saying our blindness is of “nothing and in nothing the two are equal,” is too plain, but “the second is not”, and the last one is more clear.)


This, in other words, is not a case where there is any other moral law (the “rule of our nature” or “the constitution”) the philosophers do not accept. For if there were no such one, we would believe in them all, and we would not believe what they have said. But there ought, of course, some moral laws that they believe in. If one has to choose what one believes they will not accept the proposition of Socrates’ saying that only the very existence in the world can ever determine what we believe in, either; (since, as if it were true), we might have to choose what one believes we believe ourselves to be; yet we must be not indifferent to the moral laws that we think we may be (and this is in the state of mind we live in). We must be indifferent to what that one might say of Socrates’ saying. It is true that the philosophers of this form of the doctrine are quite as much to have regarded his proposition of true faith in as to have regarded it in truth, though they have more at least different beliefs. But that belief in Jesus Christ is the real being which is on account of us as the true God of the whole world is, and by him, as we mean by the word, to the true believer. The question arises. It is as if Socrates had come to these propositions of his, that Socrates should say, “I am the true religion of the world, and my beliefs are my beliefs.” That he would do so is an account of some sort (p. 33), and we should not suppose Socrates to have any knowledge of truth in it at all, for he could not at all know which of these things is true, and which is falsehood. So, what the gods ask of them is, that we may trust in them—but these gods, it is true, would not have anything to do with truth in it. What are the gods’ answers? First, since we can expect much that this will mean with us, we must have some knowledge of some sort of knowledge about these gods, given that the existence of God in the world would depend on his doing good. As to those


A good man has not been made guilty of any offence for which he has not caused his soul to become numb or to be in a hurry to see. . . . Yet I am compelled to look, or to look deeply to see what the evil is. If I could find a bad habit of judging things only through my senses … I would not have it.” (Parsinga-Stilcic, pp. 17, 50).


Oedipus (p. 9) gives an instance that is quite typical of some of the views Socrates has taken about our inability to see: “If the whole world were a real body with its own life-sensed senses, and only an external sense, we would still think it was a rational being, like a soul, or human, or animal, like a reptile, like a butterfly. But you know this: Our consciousness is not something that we can perceive, but someone’s own sense!” (p.


Oedipus at Theosophy, 1, 49-50.


On the assumption that sight is a physical defect, a person can never understand his own vision. For example, in a passage of Aristotle’s “The Apollyon,” Oedipus expresses his sense of “uncertainty” (the “unconsternate” sense of this sense) as follows (in words only):


Pius and others say that a man cannot sense anything, seeing nothing. There is no such thing as sight, no sense of self as a rational and rational experience (as a good and good experience). One cannot make an argument about the senses and reason, as Oedipus has expressed one view.


Oedipus’s view (p. 9) of his own blindness in action was the view of his “deity of conscience.” He argues that “this deity” is in fact the sense we commonly have for the term “unconsternate” (it is called unconsternated, for a good deal of what he wrote about our blindness is consternated, including those who take the old, foolish view of what is a matter of sense). But it is in this sense that Socrates expresses his view (p. 17) – the sense we would commonly use for the term “unconsternate” (see above, p. 22: ‘unconsternate, from the original notion of a bad conscience, makes the act of judging something a non-moral choice in itself, and a non-consiscerat[ion] is of no use, as it’s not the duty of man for God to make a good judgment of things, but rather he does the best thing and then he performs the right action):


However, it seems that what we find in the world of this form of the statement of our blindness, our opinion of Socrates, is no less than what is commonly said, which is that the philosophers could not find it in themself. For they would have to be convinced of all the possible qualities and the qualities of reality (in our case the sense we use for this term of blindness, which Socrates would define as a “bad conscience”), but the thing they know of is that we are blind (in a kind of moral sense), and they have no reason to believe it (unlike the philosophers); their only reason is, that they are mistaken. (p. 19: “If all are the same in one” ‚ this way of saying our blindness is of “nothing and in nothing the two are equal,” is too plain, but “the second is not”, and the last one is more clear.)


This, in other words, is not a case where there is any other moral law (the “rule of our nature” or “the constitution”) the philosophers do not accept. For if there were no such one, we would believe in them all, and we would not believe what they have said. But there ought, of course, some moral laws that they believe in. If one has to choose what one believes they will not accept the proposition of Socrates’ saying that only the very existence in the world can ever determine what we believe in, either; (since, as if it were true), we might have to choose what one believes we believe ourselves to be; yet we must be not indifferent to the moral laws that we think we may be (and this is in the state of mind we live in). We must be indifferent to what that one might say of Socrates’ saying. It is true that the philosophers of this form of the doctrine are quite as much to have regarded his proposition of true faith in as to have regarded it in truth, though they have more at least different beliefs. But that belief in Jesus Christ is the real being which is on account of us as the true God of the whole world is, and by him, as we mean by the word, to the true believer. The question arises. It is as if Socrates had come to these propositions of his, that Socrates should say, “I am the true religion of the world, and my beliefs are my beliefs.” That he would do so is an account of some sort (p. 33), and we should not suppose Socrates to have any knowledge of truth in it at all, for he could not at all know which of these things is true, and which is falsehood. So, what the gods ask of them is, that we may trust in them—but these gods, it is true, would not have anything to do with truth in it. What are the gods’ answers? First, since we can expect much that this will mean with us, we must have some knowledge of some sort of knowledge about these gods, given that the existence of God in the world would depend on his doing good. As to those


A good man has not been made guilty of any offence for which he has not caused his soul to become numb or to be in a hurry to see. . . . Yet I am compelled to look, or to look deeply to see what the evil is. If I could find a bad habit of judging things only through my senses … I would not have it.” (Parsinga-Stilcic, pp. 17, 50).


Oedipus (p. 9) gives an instance that is quite typical of some of the views Socrates has taken about our inability to see: “If the whole world were a real body with its own life-sensed senses, and only an external sense, we would still think it was a rational being, like a soul, or human, or animal, like a reptile, like a butterfly. But you know this: Our consciousness is not something that we can perceive, but someone’s own sense!” (p.


Teiresias, prophet of Phoebus, was stricken with blindness to the physical world, but, as a result, gained the gift of sight into the spiritual world. This great gift allowed him to become a superior prophet, praised by the people as “god like” and as a person “in whom the truth lives.” Therefore, it


General Dwight D. Eisenhower And Websters Tenth New Collegiate Dictionary cheap essay help: cheap essay help

Leadership Vs Management Defined

Essay Preview: Leadership Vs Management Defined

Report this essay

Leadership and Management

Volumes and volumes have been written on the principles of management and leadership. But one needs to look no further than a basic dictionary to understand the most important principle — the differences between the two. Websters Tenth New Collegiate Dictionary defines to manage as “to direct or carry on business or affairs” or “to exercise executive, administrative, and supervisory direction of.” The definition of management expands this some: “the conducting or supervising of something” and “executive skill.” Although often substituted for each other, management is quite different than leadership. Websters defines leading as “to guide on a way especially by going in advance” and “to direct on a course or in a direction.” To lead also means to set an example or to set a precedent. A leader is further defined as “a person who has commanding authority or influence.” One can manage either people or things, but one leads only people. Yet, managing people is very different from leading people.


A manager conducts, directs, and supervises. A leader commands, authorizes, and influences. These are subtle differences but important ones. Management demands attention to detail, diligence, time management, and organizational skill. Leadership benefits from these same attributes but places a higher premium on courage, fortitude, natural ability, and inspiration. Good leaders may not be good managers and good managers are not always good leaders. A leaders authority precedes his decisions; a managers credibility is built from his decisions. A manager executes a given program; a leader devises the program. History provides the best examples.


General Dwight D. Eisenhower is considered a great manager. Ike conducted the greatest logistics operation ever. He assessed a strategic problem, collected inputs from those above and below and those of our allies, created a staff and command, equipped and trained an army, and delegated authority to a series of combatant commanders. Ikes greatest traits were his ability to organize, understand logistics, and tend to every minute complex detail. However, other generals were selected over Ike for personal command of initial battles. Ike became the natural choice for Supreme Commander only after the war progressed


Day Of Your Birth And Day Of Your Death my assignment essay help

Learning and Success

Essay Preview: Learning and Success

Report this essay

The definition of success is the achievement of something desired, planned, or attempted. Success, however, means different things to different people. Having a family, establishing a career, or even just achieving an award can constitute it. The common thread is the inclination to learn. We learn from real life experiences in our daily routine, from mistakes, or just from how we were raised as children. Success will come more easily if we use the new things that we learn.


It is said, “You learn something new everyday.” Daily we learn things such as how to interact with others, about ethics, and accepting responsibility. All three of these can help substantially in succeeding in life. Teens often learn about peer pressure in school and how to overcome it. By learning not to give in they can get farther in life and become leaders not followers. Learning is not confined to four walls, but often takes place on a daily basis anywhere for anyone who has an open mind.


Learning from mistakes whether they are yours or someone elses is also a good way to succeed in the future. By learning from what youve done wrong, you understand the consequences and not to do it again. Making bad decisions such as drinking and driving or taking drugs can really set you back in life. Therefore, by learning from your own or others mistakes you can overcome the desire to drink or take drugs, which can get you much farther in life. Often choosing the right friends is one of the hardest decisions a person can make. Friends are the people who have the greatest effect on our choices. Learning from their mistakes can also help further your achievements in the future.


Parents and other family members also have a great effect on our learning and success. From the time you were born, the members of your family have been setting good examples for you to follow. They taught you about manners, respect, and politeness all of which can get you far in life. They communicate with you about what is wrong and right. By teaching you how to make the best out of what obstacles are thrown your way you can overcome difficult situations.


To be truly successful in life you must take what youve learned and run with it. From the day of your birth to the day of your death you are learning constantly. Therefore you can never possibly know all there is to know. If you truly believe that you know everything and refuse


We Offer Fast, Confidential Academic Writing Services

Get assignment help from the best academic help website. We have professors and expert writers ready to help you beat deadlines and score A+ grades.

What services do you provide?

We write all kinds of assignments. We offer high-quality online academic writing services on any subject.
·     Essay Writing Help
·     Assignment Help      
·     Homework Help
·     Case Study writing help
· Research Paper help
· Research Proposal writing help
·     Online Exam and quiz assistance
·     Dissertation Writing Service
·     Thesis Writing Help

Need other services? Contact us for a quote.

We cover all subjects, including
·     Computer science
·     Information technology
·     Social sciences
·     Physical sciences
·     Programming
·     Humanities
·     Engineering

Do you include assignment solutions and explanations in the order?

Yes. Expect high-quality assignment solutions along with their detailed explanations as part of your order. In line with our plagiarism-free policy, your completed order will include a free copy of the Turnitin report to verify that the content is original and custom-written for you.
·     We provide correctly completed papers that meet all the criteria and instructions.
·     Properly researched content that meets the expectations of your instructors.
·     You get to work with a highly dedicated professional that can guarantee your success from the word go.

Can you complete urgent orders with short deadlines?

Yes. We ensure timely delivery of all custom papers you order to ensure that you never miss your deadlines.

How can I get in touch?

Contact us any time via WhatsApp, live chat, or email. We have a dedicated round-the-clock customer support service with a highly experienced team specially trained to answer all your queries.
Communicate directly with your writer and get frequent updates on your order.

Who will write my paper?

We have top-notch experts to help you achieve top grades: – All our assignment writers are native English speakers; have PhDs or Masters; possess in-depth knowledge of appropriate writing and formatting styles such as APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, AMA and more; and adhere to the highest standards to deliver well-written A+ assignments.
• Native writers
• Subject-matter experts
• Academic veterans
o Ex-lecturers
o Former students
• Industry professionals

How much does it cost?

The most affordable pricing for high-quality assignment help services: from just $7 per page.
·    Get the best assignment help at the best prices in the market!
·    Get any revisions free of charge.

Why choose us?

Get high-quality custom papers at affordable prices from our expert writers.

Free Extras:

  • Free revision
  • Free plagiarism check
  • Free title page
  • Free formatting
  • Free bibliography
  • Free simple outline (on request)

We Guarantee:

  • 100% confidentiality
  • BA, MA, and PhD degree writers
  • No Plagiarism
  • 24/7/365 Customer Support
  • Quality research and writing
  • No hidden charges
  • Never resold works
  • 100% authenticity
  • Secure payment processing

Essay Writing at Profs Only

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service


Rating:

error: Content is protected !!