Get help from the best in academic writing.

On Election Day, Oregon made history by being the first state in the nation to decriminalize the possession of

Essay Help / By
On Election Day, Oregon made history by being the first state in the nation to decriminalize the possession of hard drugs. The ballot measure, Measure 110, decriminalizes the possession of small amounts of drugs, such as cocaine, heroin, oxycodone, methamphetamine, and others. According to OPB the measure, which was approved by 58.46% of Oregonians, reclassifies the possession of small amounts of drugs as a civil violation. This reclassification is similar to a traffic violation and would result in a $100 fine or participation in a health assessment. In addition to the reclassification, the Drug Policy Alliance, a non-profit organization, reported that Measure 110 will use excess marijuana tax revenue (estimated to be over $45 million and projected to be up to $129 million by 2027) and savings from the reduction in arrests, incarcerations, and prosecutions to expand the access to drug treatment, peer support, housing, and harm reductions services. Proponents of the measure highlighted the prevalence of drug use and drug-related deaths in the state and argued that the new approach would save lives, save families, reduce convictions and arrests, and lead to a 95% reduction in racial disparities in drug arrests. Opponents, on the other hand, argued that the measure was “reckless” and that its passage would lead to increases in the “acceptability” of the hard drugs. The measure, which does not apply retroactively to past convictions, takes effect 30-days after the election, but the provisions pertaining to the decriminalization of the hard drugs will not take effect until February 1, 2020.

While Oregon was the first state in the nation to decriminalize hard drugs, it was not the only state that made headlines for working towards the decriminalization of drug use on election night. Voters in Arizona, Montana, New Jersey, and South Dakota approved the legalization of recreational marijuana and Mississippi voters approved the legalization of marijuana for medical use. While federal law prohibits marijuana use, the Washington Post reported that about one-third of states have now passed measures that “ease the criminal consequences” associated with its use. Oregon also passed Measure 109, which legalized and approved the use of psilocybin, also referred to as magic mushrooms, for mental health treatment at licensed facilities. And, Washington, D.C. voters approved the decriminalization of psychedelic substances, which would not legalize the substances, but make them a “lower enforcement priority” for police officers. However, the initiative needs to be approved by the D.C Council and then sent to Congress for review.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65GThGSvVOI

Another chapter in the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) legislation sage was written this last week when federal

Another chapter in the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) legislation sage was written this last week when federal district court judge Nicholas Garaufis ruled that the Department of Homeland Security must again start accepting and processing DACA applications. There are nearly 700,000 undocumented immigrants who work, go to school, and have aspirations that are in-line with the most meritocratic vision of success and this adjudication reinforces their protective legal shield against.
deportation and arrest. Beginning in 2012, DACA has been challenged repeatedly and will likely continue to be challenged moving forward. Living in legal limbo has profoundly negative effects on one’s mental, physical, and mental well-being. We examine what is means to be an American today through the eyes of those struggling to obtain citizenship. Specifically, we examine the case of DACA through the lens of social construction of illegality in the United States and social justice movements.

1. Assess pros and cons for creating a pathway to citizenship for the 700,000 DACA recipients in the United States.

2. Practice good critical thinking and thoughtful online responding: Consider which side you agree with and WHY. What was your thought process? Find evidence to support the side of the argument you agree with more (e.g., book chapters, websites, journal articles, TED talks, videos, etc.), but make sure to mention the other side of the argument.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65GThGSvVOI

Referring to this module’s readings, discuss the purpose of codes of ethics in your initial post. Cite any professional

Referring to this module’s readings, discuss the purpose of codes of ethics in your initial post. Cite any professional experiences you have encountered in the workplace and the implications that they have had.

I am a school district superintendent.

Look at https://www.aasa.org/content.aspx?id=1390
https://www.aera.net/About-AERA/AERA-Rules-Policies/Professional-Ethics
https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2011
http://www.fldoe.org/edstandards/code_of_ethics.asp
http://www.nea.org/home/30442.htm

YouTube Videos for Reference
https://youtu.be/xmmfWcR65kI

Provide an example an incorrect perception you have had recently of another person or situation. Explain EVERY step of

Writing Assignment Help Provide an example an incorrect perception you have had recently of another person or situation. Explain EVERY step of the perception process with examples of the situation and identify where the perception went wrong.

Explain how you would target someone using Elaboration Likelihood Theory for a speech on Getting the Covid-19 Vaccine.

A jury on Tuesday, April 20th, found Derek Chauvin, the former Minneapolis Police Officer who knelt on George Floyd’s

A jury on Tuesday, April 20th, found Derek Chauvin, the former Minneapolis Police Officer who knelt on George Floyd’s neck for more than nine minutes until he lost consciousness and died, guilty of all charges in one of the most closely watched and consequential trials in recent history. After more than ten hours of deliberation over a span of two days, the 12-person jury convicted Chauvin, who is 45-years-old, of unintentional second-degree murder, third-degree murder, and second-degree manslaughter. Following the verdict, at the Hennepin County Courthouse in Minneapolis, Judge Peter Cahill revoked Chauvin’s bail and remanded him into custody, per the prosecutor’s request.

According to Minnesota’s sentencing guidelines, a murder charge for a person with no criminal history can carry a presumptive sentence of 12.5-years, whereas the presumptive sentence for a manslaughter conviction is 4-years. The maximum sentences for each count are different. Second-degree unintentional murder can result in a maximum of 40-years behind bars, whereas third-degree murder carries a maximum of 25-years, and second-degree manslaughter carries a maximum of 10-years. It is unclear what Chauvin’s sentence will be, but the prosecution is expected to push for a longer sentence, citing aggravating factors. Judge Cahill is expected to sentence Chauvin in eight weeks, following the completion of a presentence investigation report. On Tuesday night, the Minnesota Department of Corrections announced that Chauvin was transferred to the state’s maximum-security prison in Oak Park Heights due to an arrangement with the Hennepin County Sheriffs. He will remain in custody at that prison until his sentencing hearing.

Across the country, everyday citizens, activists, celebrities, organizations, and elected officials, have all reacted to the jury’s verdict. President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris both addressed. the nation following the verdict, where President Biden stated that the verdict was “a giant step towards justice in America,” before adding that more needed to be done, while Vice President Harris stated that “Today, we feel a sigh of relief. Still, it cannot take away the pain. A measure of justice is not the same as equal justice.” Many others, including Minnesota’s Attorney General, Keith Ellison, are pointing out that the guilty verdicts were accountability, not justice.
Discussion questions:

1. Debate: According to various news sources, the prosecution is expected to ask Judge Peter Cahill to go above the Minnesota sentencing guideline range and impose longer sentences. Do you believe that Derek Chauvin should receive sentences above the minimum?
2. Practice good critical thinking and thoughtful responding: Consider which side you agree with and WHY. What was your thought process? Find evidence to support the side of the argument you agree with more (e.g., book chapters, websites, journal articles, TED talks, videos, etc.), but make sure to mention the other side of the argument.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wdzrSoXC_0

Pick two codes of ethics for educational institutions or professional organizations. (NOTE: You can use two from this module’s

Pick two codes of ethics for educational institutions or professional organizations. (NOTE: You can use two from this module’s readings, or you might want to choose others more relative to your work, such as the code of ethics from your own Department of Education.)

In a minimum of five pages (not including the title or references pages), write a paper using APA citations to assess statements regarding the following, as applicable:

Research
Confidentiality
Integrity

You can use any of these…

I am a school district superintendent. Look at https://www.aasa.org/content.aspx?id=1390 https://www.aera.net/About-AERA/AERA-Rules-Policies/Professional-Ethics https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2011 http://www.fldoe.org/edstandards/code_of_ethics.asp http://www.nea.org/home/30442.htm YouTube Videos for Reference https://youtu.be/xmmfWcR65kI

OR
these 2 are the same – NEA and CTA
https://www.cta.org/about-us/code-of-ethics
https://www.nea.org/resource-library/code-ethics-educators

error: Content is protected !!