These are a couple links provided to help back up my position https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/data_stats/…
https://abortion.procon.org/#pro_con
https://abortion.procon.org/#multimedia
https://abortion.procon.org/#Background
In the scenario assignments, you are asked to reflect on responses to the presented scenario. It should not just be writing down your first reaction or what you already know.
Reflection involves critical thinking, which means rethinking your existing knowledge and previously held opinions in light of what we have learned about theories of ethics, logic, and reasoning. You will need to question your current knowledge and beliefs.
Discuss the main points of the debate, what stance you take, support that stance, and discuss the opposing argument. Also discuss an ethical theory that would apply to defend your view.
To complete each scenario assignment:
Complete the entire scenario.
Compose your reflection in a Word document and be sure to address, at a minimum, the following questions:Why do you feel the way you do about the issue presented?
Of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you think is the most ethical and why?
Support your conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics to defend your stance.
Your reflection must be 1-2 pages in length and follow APA formatting and citation guidelines as appropriate, making sure to cite at least two sources.
Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.
Read Cahn, Exploring Ethics, Chapter 4 – Subjectivism, by Julia Driver
In this Text Analysis try to give an answer to the questions below:
According to subjectivism, what is meant by saying that “lying is wrong”?
Why does Driver reject subjectivism?
In what ways, if any, do moral judgments differ from descriptive ones?
Do you suppose that those who believe moral judgments are a matter of personal preference would say the same about non-moral normative claims, such as “Susan is a good swimmer”?
Note: The article should have 300 words (without quotations of text).
Read Cahn, Exploring Ethics, Chapter 4 – Subjectivism, by Julia Driver
Philosophy Assignment Help In this Text Analysis try to give an answer to the questions below:
According to subjectivism, what is meant by saying that “lying is wrong”?
Why does Driver reject subjectivism?
In what ways, if any, do moral judgments differ from descriptive ones?
Do you suppose that those who believe moral judgments are a matter of personal preference would say the same about non-moral normative claims, such as “Susan is a good swimmer”?
Note: The article should have 300 words (without quotations of text).
Philosophy Question
I have attached the Essay Guidelines and the Paper template to this. Make sure you read the Guidelines first, that includes the essay question. The template will tell you how the essay should look like and what the professor is looking for in the essay. The essay needs a book, I have also attached the book pdf