Probation and Parole – Project

There are 3 test questions -please answer questions 1 and 2 The doc labelled “final take-home quiz” has all

There are 3 test questions -please answer questions 1 and 2

The doc labelled “final take-home quiz” has all the details of what is needed for the questions.

EACH question needs to be 4 pages and EACH one needs to reference at least 4 sources.

I have all the sources. PLEASE NO OUTSIDE SOURCES. I have all the sources labelled with the name of the author that the question is asking about. Please note that this doesn’t mean you can’t use any of the gotell readings in the Maurutto and Hannah-Moffat question or other way around, no please go ahead and use them if you wish. I just thought this was an easier way to let you know which reading is more specific to which question.

finally, just make sure to do both; explain the quote presented before the question and also answer the question presented at the end of the paragraph.

question 1 is gotell
question 2 is Maurutto and Hannah-Moffat

[APA] European Law Task

Law Assignment Help Request: There are two law scenarios which need to be approached. Make sure you use adequate grammar and academic law vocabulary. It is also essential to support your statements with academic references relevant to this field. Make sure you clearly indicate the scenario and the question number ( DO NOT COPY PASTE the question in your file as that will show as plagiarism):
Scenario A: You are the legal counsel for Inzo BV headquartered in the Netherlands. Inzo is a manufacturer of mobile telephones and supplies its products throughout the EuropeanUnion. Inzo supplies more than 80% of the mobiles sold in the EU. Inzo offers hugediscounts to customers of competitors only if they agree to switch to Inzo’s mobile. Yourboss, the CEO, does not know very much about EU Law, whether it is important and howit affects Inzo. Before expanding the product line further, she feels she needs to obtainmore information which she can share with the management.
She has requested a consultation with you. You are tasked to:
1. What are the legal impacts as far as consumers in the EU are concerned and how these could potentially impact the business to ensure that the company is well equipped and not vulnerable to any legal actions? (300-400 words)
2. Advise the CEO, which in your view are the two most important EU institutions and provide three reasons for your choices and also explain how these institutions indirectly or directly affect the operations of the business. (300-400 words)
3. Present to the CEO which judicial options there are for competitors to question your business model. Take into consideration for this the national legal process as well as the European one. (300-400 words)

Scenario B: You are the legal counsel for Brighton United head-quartered in the Netherlands. Brighton United is a football club that is competing in the Dutch second tier. Four of the clubs players (including the captain) will be out of contract starting from 1st of January. They already started negotiating contract offers with other clubs. They want to be at their new clubs starting from 2nd of January. The owner of the club doesn’t want to let them go without financial compensation, no matter that their contract is expiring. The owner of the club, and club CEO does not know very much about EU Law, whether it is important and how it affects Brighton United.
She has requested a consultation with you.You are tasked to:
4. What are the two most important of the four freedoms of EU Law for the company in question? In your answer, please provide relevant examples and case law to show why you believe they are important (300-400 words)
5. Can the club keep them or request financial compensation since the club has invested in the players for the last several years (300-400 words)

Structure Requirement
Formal Academic Writing structure.
Words Limit between minimum of 1500-2000 maximum excluding references, cover page and table of content.
Provide a total of more than 5 References with Harvard Style.
Important Notes:
In your outline, you must include an overview of approximately 400 words where you summarize your entire work. This is important to prove that you work is original and that you understood the assignment.

Wk2 Discussion

Answer initial question 250 words. Respond to 3 classmates 250 words each.

Initial Question: State of Florida v. Casey Marie AnthonyIn October 2008, Casey Anthony was arrested and charged with the disappearance and murder of her two year old daughter, Caylee. She was originally charged with giving false statements, child neglect, and obstruction of a criminal investigation – this was later expanded to include first degree murder, aggravated child abuse, aggravated manslaughter of a child, and four counts of providing false information to police. In December 2008, Caylee’s skeletal remains were discovered.After a long contentious trial, on July 5 2011, the jury found Anthony not guilty of first-degree murder, aggravated manslaughter, and aggravated child abuse, and guilty on four misdemeanor counts of providing false information to a law enforcement officer. Jurors cited lack of evidence directly linking Anthony to the murder.
On July 7, 2011 Anthony was sentenced to one year in jail and $1,000 in fines for each of the four counts of providing false information to a law enforcement officer, with the sentences to be served consecutively. Anthony received three years credit for time served plus additional credit for good behavior, resulting in her release date being set for July 13, 2011.
Questions: Emotions aside, do you believe the prosecution overcharged the case? Why or why not? Was there enough evidence to convict Anthony as she was charged? Why or why not? What are you thoughts on the evidence presented by the defense?

Classmate 1 Michael Wise: 1. Caylee Anthony deserved better. I believe the prosecution overcharged. I agree with criminologist Dr. Scott Bonn. He wrote an opinion piece (Bonn, 2019) where he opinedthat trying to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt in a death penalty case leaves the prosecution with a huge task on their hands. In such a case, the prosecution is asking people to execute someone and most of us are going to demand the prosecution give us significant proof before we will cross that line. You may be able to find a miniscule number of death penalty cases where circumstantial evidence convicted (such as Scott Peterson’s case), but that is not the norm.
The prosecution’s inability to prove motive was equally disastrous for them. Although they were able to prove she was an accomplished liar and avid party goer, they could not show she did not love or care for her daughter.
Nobody knows for sure how the jury would have responded if all they were doing was deciding guilt on a nonnegligent manslaughter or second-degree murder charge. But since both require far less criminal behavior than first-degree murder, there is a chance the jury would have convicted.
Dr. Bonn mentioned the theory of “collective efficacy.” That theory says that people who live in a community typically have a greater sense of moral responsibility and connection to that community. This trial was held in a city on the other side of Florida from where the crime happened so perhaps the jury took a more demanding rational approach to their deliberations and not as emotional as folks in Caylee’s own community would have. Dr. Bonn concluded, “ That’s pretty much why Anthony was found not guilty of murdering her daughter by a jury of 12 reasonable people in Orlando while an outraged world watched. However, finding her not guilty is not the same as finding her innocent. The prosecution failed to convince the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that Anthony was guilty of premeditated murder. As a result, Anthony, a probable murderer, is free, while little Caylee cries out for justice from her grave.”
Bonn, S. (2019, January 13). Casey Anthony Trial was a case of overzealous prosecution: Death Penalty was a bar too high. nydailynews.com. Retrieved January 11, 2022, from https://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/casey-anthony-…
2. There seemed to be more than enough circumstantial evidence to convict Casey Anthony. Unfortunately, there was not enough direct evidence. The prosecution was not even able to provide a cause of death (Hare, 2018).
The indictment against Casey Anthony alleged a violation of Florida law ,Title XLVI, Chapter 782, Section 4, Paragraph (1)(a)1 (CNN, 2008). That statute says it is first degree murder to “unlawfully kill” a human, “when perpetrated from a premeditated design to effect the death of the person killed”. This meant the prosecution would have to prove premeditation, and aside from some computer word search activity, they had nothing.
CNN. (2008). Casey Anthony Indictment. CNN. Retrieved January 11, 2022, from http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2008/images/10/15/cay…
Florida Criminal Code, Title XLVI, Chapter 782.4(1)(a)1 (2021) Retrieved January 12, 2022, from http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute