Reflection involves critical thinking, which means rethinking your existing knowledge and previously held opinions in light of what we have learned about theories of ethics, logic, and reasoning. You will need to question your current knowledge and beliefs.
Discuss the main points of the debate, what stance you take, support that stance, and discuss the opposing argument. Also discuss an ethical theory that would apply to defend your view.
To complete each scenario assignment:
Complete the entire scenario.
Compose your reflection in a Word document and be sure to address, at a minimum, the following questions:Why do you feel the way you do about the issue presented?
Of the four responses offered in the scenario, which do you think is the most ethical and why?
Support your conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics to defend your stance.
Your reflection must be 1-2 pages in length and follow APA formatting and citation guidelines as appropriate, making sure to cite at least two sources.
Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.
Points: 50 each
Due Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time) of the assigned week
RubricPHIL_434_OL – Learning Scenario Reflection (7)
PHIL_434_OL – Learning Scenario Reflection (7)
CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Main Issues
20 to >15.8 ptsMeets Expectations
Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the main issues in the scenario.
15.8 to >11.8 ptsApproaches Expectations
Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of some of the issues in the scenario.
11.8 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Does not identify an acceptable understanding of of the issues in the scenario.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLinks to Course Readings and Additional Research
20 to >15.8 ptsMeets Expectations
Makes appropriate and powerful connections between identified issues and the concepts studied in the course readings and presentations; supplements the reflection with relevant and thoughtful research and documents all sources of information, conclusions with evidence and specific examples from the textbook, including a minimum of one theory of ethics to defend points made.
15.8 to >11.8 ptsApproaches Expectations
Makes somewhat vague connections between identified issues and concepts studied in readings and presentations; supplements the reflection with limited research.
11.8 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Makes inappropriate or little connection between issues identified and the concepts studied in the readings; supplements the reflection, if at all, with incomplete research and documentation.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines
10 to >7.9 ptsMeets Expectations
The assignment follows current APA style format consistently and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.
7.9 to >5.9 ptsApproaches Expectations
The assignment follows current APA style format consistently with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly.
5.9 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
The assignment does not follow current APA style format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly or citations and references are missing.
10 pts
Total Points: 50
Attached is the scenario skit. It showcases the different opinions on the right to health care in the United States.
Topic 5 DQ 2 Comment 1
***Make a Comment***
The Framingham Heart Study is a cohort study that sought to find common characteristics that contribute to cardiovascular disease (CVD) over a long period of time. Participants were chosen who had not developed symptoms or experienced a heart attack or stroke to see if they experienced symptoms over time; and characteristics that contributed to the symptoms. To test their hypotheses, researchers conducted extensive physical examinations, collected and analyzed blood samples, and conducted lifestyle interviews that they later analyzed for common patterns related to CVD development.
Topic 5 DQ 1 Comment 2
Nursing Assignment Help ***Make a Comment***Descriptive epidemiology searches for trends in people, places, and times (Shahidi et al., 2019). These characteristics are thoroughly examined when an epidemic spread begins since they reveal the disease’s roots. How illness (or health) differentiates among people based on various personal variables is explained by descriptive epidemiology (Al-Omari et al., 2020). Descriptive epidemiology examines age, education, social position, access to care, nationality, and gender. Personal assessments can also gather information on habits, including substance dependence, employment changes, nutrition, and exercise routines (Shahidi et al., 2019).
300 words. Question: Terri is a 83-year-old widow who has been hospitalized and is being prepared for discharge. Terry
300 words.
Question: Terri is a 83-year-old widow who has been hospitalized and is being prepared for discharge. Terry was hospitalized after suffering a stroke on the right side. She has residual left-sided weakness, difficulty swallowing and communicating, and aspirates easily. The doctor has initiated aspiration precautions and her diet includes pureed foods and nectar thick liquids. While in the hospital, she receives PT, OT, ST, and assistance with her basic hygiene needs. Terri was independent at home, cooked her own meals, drove a car, and did her own laundry and housekeeping. Her closest relative is her 82-year-old brother who suffers from DM and is blind in the right eye. He lives 30 minutes away. How can Terri’s APRN direct and manage, or organize and coordinate, Terri’s discharge and who should be part of this process?