an expanded review (1500 words) in which you should engage the text both synchronically and
historiographically. Your essay should be a discussion of the work at hand that engages the
following questions: To whom is the author writing? What are the keywords that characterize
the work? What is the structure of the argument? What work is s/he revising? What are the
arguments and authors that have come before? This essay requires you to do some additional
readings to situate the author’s interventions.
We have covered a number of different trade policies or tariffs (some moving in a protectionist direction, some moving
We have covered a number of different trade policies or tariffs (some moving in a protectionist
direction, some moving towards freer trade) in the class so far. Drawing on three separate
tariffs or trade policies covered in the either the readings or lecture or both, how important
were domestic political institutions in shaping the tariffs or, more generally, the trade policies?
In discussing the importance of domestic political institutions, make sure that you also discuss
other factors that could have influenced the adoption of the tariffs or trade policies.
Footnotes (if you have any) should be placed at the bottom of the page, references in the
main body of the text. Use the following format for references: (Author Year, p. #).
Response Needed
Political Science Assignment Help Please respond to rachael with 200 words
here is the original post:
Chapter 1 Discussion: Should Dr. Speedy have been issued a citation?Dr. Speedy, a medical doctor, was recently telephoned to perform emergency surgery on a patient who was just involved in a serious auto accident. Dr. Speedy was told that the patient may not survive if Dr. Speedy does not arrive at the hospital as soon as possible.
Dr. Speedy ignores the local speed limit and drives excessively to arrive at the hospital ASAP. Officer Friendly radars Dr. Speedy driving 75 m.p.h. in a 15 m.p.h. school zone. This occurred at 2:00 a.m., and no children were seen in the area. Nevertheless, Officer Friendly issues a speeding citation to Dr. Speedy.
In your initial post, explain if you believe Dr. Speedy should have been issued the citation.
d
dd
here is Rachael’s post:
From my view, I would say Dr. Speedy had a very good reason to be speeding at the time he was in a rush to save a life of someones family member. But at the same time, he could have hurt or killed someone in the process. From a legal standpoint, I would say Officer Friendly had every right to give Dr. Speedy a citation as in ppt lecture it says that “Substantive Laws: rules of conduct for behavior that is called for or prohibited-these rules tell us how to act.” This gives Officer friendly every right to give Dr. Speedy the citation but Officer Friendly could help get Dr. Speedy to get to the hospital faster by taking him or letting him follow him in order to save the life of the person.
A critical analysis is NOT a book report, or a summary of the readings. It’s a CRITICAL analysis of
A critical analysis is NOT a book report, or a summary of the readings. It’s a CRITICAL analysis of the core arguments made by the author. I need to see what YOU think about the readings, and NOT what the author is thinking when he/she wrote it. DO NOT SUMMARIZE THE READING.
Critical Analysis are DUE prior to the seminar class of the readings that you’ve attempted to do the analysis on. For instance, if you’re attempting the readings of Week 3, you need to submit the analysis BEFORE the class on Thursday of Week 3. Each of the two critical analyses are worth 10% of your final grade. The page limit for the critical analysis is minimum 2 and maximum 3.
I will upload the readings for you to analyze