Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook: Chapter 5, 6
Lesson
Minimum of 2 scholarly sources (in addition to the course textbook)
InstructionsThis assignment is the first step in a three part project. You only need to focus on part one at this point. Each step will build on earlier steps. However, it is not a matter of providing a rough draft of all or even part of the entire project here in week three. That is, further steps might require completely new and original text. At the same time, completing each step will aid you in completing a future step or future steps. And, you should use the same topic in all steps.
First, select a topic of moral controversy, debate, disagreement, and dispute, Examples of such topics are euthanasia, the death penalty, abortion, cloning, etc. You can pick any such topic. It need not be listed here.
Next, detail the positions of each side of the ethical debate. Note at least two moral reasons each side presents to show their view on the topic is correct.
Now, we want to evaluate these positions using the moral theories we studied this week:
What would an Ethical Egoist say about this topic? What side would the Ethical Egoist take? What would the Ethical Egoist say to justify their moral position? Is there a conflict between loyalty to self and to community relevant to your topic? If so, how so? Note what you feel is the best course of action.
What would a Social Contract Ethicist say about this topic? What side would the Social Contract Ethicist take? What would the Social Contract Ethicist say to justify their moral position? Does your topic involve a collision between personal obligations and national ones? If so, how so? Note what you feel is the best course of action.
Finally, reference and discuss any professional code of ethics relevant to your topic such as the AMA code for doctors, the ANA code for nurses, or any other pertinent professional code. State whether and how your chosen topic involves any conflicts between professional and familial duties.
Cite the textbook and incorporate outside sources, including citations.
Writing Requirements (APA format)
Length: 3-4pages (not including title page or references page)
1-inch margins
Double spaced
12-point Times New Roman font
Title page
References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources in addition to the course textbook)
GradingThis activity will be graded based on the rubric provided.
Course Outcomes (CO): 4, 6
Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday
RubricETHC445 Week 3 Assignment Rubric – 100 pts.
ETHC445 Week 3 Assignment Rubric – 100 pts.
CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDetails positions of ethical debate
20 ptsThoroughly notes two moral reasons each side presents.
17 ptsNotes two moral reasons each side presents
15 ptsThoroughly notes one moral reason each side presents.
12 ptsNotes only one moral reason each side presents.
0 ptsThe student does not note moral reasons.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Content
50 ptsAddresses all aspects of the questions, applying professional knowledge, and research regarding weekly concepts.
42.5 ptsAddresses most aspects of the questions, applying professional knowledge, , and research regarding weekly concepts.
37.5 ptsAddresses some aspects of the questions, applying professional knowledge, and research regarding weekly concepts.
30 ptsMinimally addresses the questions, applying professional knowledge, and research regarding weekly concepts.
0 ptsNo effort
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Communication
10 ptsPresents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).
8.5 ptsPresents information in an organized manner (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).
7.5 ptsPresents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).
6 ptsPresents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).
0 ptsNo effort
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Integration
10 ptsPaper includes reference to 2 scholarly sources and properly integrates the sources.
7 ptsPaper includes reference to 2 scholarly sources but does not properly integrate the sources.
0 ptsPaper does not make reference to a scholarly sources.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format
10 ptsPaper meets all source requirements, and is properly formatted in APA style throughout (i.e. title page, spacing, font, in-text citations and references.)
8.5 ptsPaper meets all source requirements, and is mostly properly formatted in APA style (i.e. title page, spacing, font, in-text citations and references.)
7.5 ptsPaper meets all source requirements, and is somewhat properly formatted in APA style (i.e. title page, spacing, font, in-text citations and references.)
6 ptsPaper fails to meet source requirements and/or is improperly formatted in APA style throughout
0 ptsNo effort
10 pts
Total Points: 100
A few minor changes made to this document
attached is an unofficial report. This is for recreational use only, to show my parents I got good grades. I need to have the following changed:
The date (top right) changed to 1/17/2022
For “fall 2021”:
change the “units earned” category to 3.00 in all four rowschange the “grade” category to 3 B’s and 1 A
Change the “term units earned” to 12.00
Change the “term gpa” to 3.25
change the “cumulative gpa” category to 2.70change the “cumulative units” category to 34.00
please do not white out any part of the “unofficial” background, use the same font type, size and color in order to make it look at real possible.
mangment 282
Assessments 1, 2, 3, 4
NOTE: If you are using a Mac, please follow the instructions for Macs for Assessment 4. Also, please add a comment to the assignment that you are using a Mac.
Submit the following files:
8-NationalLicenses.xlsx
8-NationalLicenses-2.xlsx
8-PreMfgTargets.xlsx
8-HR2021Sales.xlsx
8-HR2021Sales.docx
Python Question
Writing Assignment Help Seattle is one of the rainiest places in the world. Even so, it is worth asking the question ‘will it rain tomorrow.’ Imagine you are headed to sleep at a hotel in downtown Seattle. The next day’s activities are supposed to include walking around outside most of the day. You want to know if it will rain or not (you don’t really care how much rain just a simple yes or no will do), which will greatly impact what you choose to wear and carry around (like an umbrella). Build a heuristic model to predict if it will rain tomorrow.
Required:Continue to work on the heuristic we started in the lecture and see if you can improve the model’s accuracy.
Add at least two additional conditions to the heuristic model and see if they improve accuracy.
Report your highest accuracy at the end of your notebook and turn it into the Learn Platform.
Complete a heuristic model
Add at least two conditions to the heuristic model in order to improve accuracy
Report your highest accuracy at the end of your notebook
questions help
Was the candidate successful in fulfilling their duties, objectives and
responsibilities? If no, please give details.
-What are the candidate’s strengths?
-Which areas would the candidate benefit from improving?
Were there any issues/challenges you are aware of that impacted their job
performance?
How would you describe the candidate as a person? What is their general
reputation among co-workers and supervisor/s?
Which role does the candidate normally take in a team situation (innovator,
coordinator, leader, finisher, organizer)?
How would you rate the candidates ability to motivate, mentor and train others?
others?
How does the candidate handle conflict? How do they handle pressure or highly
stressful situations?
Please rate the candidates communication skills, both written and verbal
communication?
In your opinion, what motivates the candidate?
How would you describe the candidates management / leadership style?
Describe a leadership challenge that the candidate faced and how they met the
challenge.
Research
One of the many reasons social workers conduct needs assessment is to provide support for new programs. Social workers have many methods available to collect necessary data for a needs assessment.
Social workers can use existing data from a wide range of sources, including local and national reports by government and nonprofit agencies, as well as computerized mapping resources. Social workers can gather new data through interviews and surveys with individuals and focus groups. This data can provide the evidence that supports the need for the program.
To prepare for this Assignment, review the needs assessment plans that you and your classmates generated for this week’s Discussion. Also, review the logic models that you created in Week 7 and any literature on needs of caregivers that you used to generate them. Consider the following to stimulate your thinking:
Getting information about the needs of the target population:Who would informants be?
What is your purpose for interacting with them?
What questions would you ask?
What method would you use (interview, focus group, questionnaire)?
Finding potential clients:Who would informants be?
What is your purpose for interacting with them?
What questions would you ask?
What method would you use?
Interacting with the target population:Who would informants be?
What is your purpose for interacting with them?
What questions would you ask?
What method would you use?
Submit a paper outlining a hypothetical needs assessment related to the support group program for caregivers. Include the following:
The resources needed to operate this service
The program activities
The desired outcomes
A plan for gathering information about the population served
Justifications for your plans and decisions
A one-paragraph conclusion describing how you might conduct a follow-up to the needs assessment at the implementation stage of the program evaluation