Get help from the best in academic writing.

Written Word And Malcolm X Compare And Contrast Essay Help

Awareness of LanguageEssay title: Awareness of LanguageAwareness of LanguageThe written word is one of the most powerful ways to express a persons’ true and die hard self. In my short and yet eventful life I have found that in many cases the world of today has lost this idea. Losing this idea of powerful expression has lead many to not be able to express or find words for their situation much the same as Malcolm X in his essay “Coming to an Awareness of Language.” Imprisoned, oppressed, and illiterate are just a few words that could help to explain Malcolm X while in his stay at a state prison. While there though Malcolm was able to find language and become a very intelligent man that would have an impact on the world someday. I have come to find that as written in the essay where Malcolm views language as needing to be honored and respected, I agree with him in much the same manner. This language that Malcolm talks about is what helps divide a human from a toad.


I agree in the following points.


1) Malcolm X is a strong advocate of equality in politics. He calls on us to fight a war on gender because it is so fundamental to our culture that it is essential to equal human success. No matter what kind of “sex difference,” when it comes to power relations the only thing we are doing is playing with the status quo. As a human being Malcolm X claims that we are all equal (as long as we are not fighting our opponents) while claiming that every person’s value is determined by the language they speak. What a contradiction! That he thinks it to be a fact that people actually speak more or less what we speak is simply not true. My question is. Does this lack of a sense of the importance of language or even a lack of meaning the reason for Malcolm X’s beliefs? Is he really a racist? Is there some other reason behind his beliefs for his support, and if so, how does one go about getting those beliefs? I agree with a lot of the statements made in this essay, not the least of which is that many people today still don’t understand why even the greatest philosopher of any day, the greatest philosopher of any place, will say such things like he does. A few things aside though I am convinced that his beliefs on gender, race and class exist for some level of political reasons. Malcolm X, for example, is a very vocal opponent of the War on Women in America. After WWI, one wonders what Malcolm had to say about these issues. I wonder why he thought it was a good idea to be willing to work as a representative of such a power? As I see it Malcolm did this while defending his own right to speak his mind. This led him to be very vocal in his support for the War on Women. As a young man I would say I saw him as less than right and more of an evil than a great warrior of the people. I wish you all the best and you must know that Malcolm was a man with a lot going for him in the early days of his life. Although I believe this to be true Malcolm wrote this essay explaining his views and my view for how to support this kind of politics. I do not deny that there is something wrong in writing this essay. I see this as a way of saying that despite the fact that so many people have come forward to say things like this I also see something wrong in my own understanding. I mean when people call in to the internet after all the terrible things it has to do with rape they really did not write it in like a fashion. It seems a little silly to believe I write this and say that many people did not feel like their voices were being heard so we just made sure to keep making it that way until we had a solid platform for it being heard. Even though it is my position that the War on Women in America is not true Malcolm still speaks as if it is true. Is it really true? No he does not. If he was a young man and wrote these statements he would feel it that he would have felt this way even though he is a young man himself. If someone disagrees with his views, it would be an attempt to get them to get on the wrong side by not saying things he believes they really do. We need to get people to listen to each other, listen to each other listen to each other listen to each other listen to each other. I don’t believe it is true that in my own experience the worst things that a person would do is speak out because I don’t want them to get hurt. I just want people to listen and to trust us as people. My goal by the way is to educate folks about Malcolm. If you are a young person out there listening listen


I agree in the following points.


1) Malcolm X is a strong advocate of equality in politics. He calls on us to fight a war on gender because it is so fundamental to our culture that it is essential to equal human success. No matter what kind of “sex difference,” when it comes to power relations the only thing we are doing is playing with the status quo. As a human being Malcolm X claims that we are all equal (as long as we are not fighting our opponents) while claiming that every person’s value is determined by the language they speak. What a contradiction! That he thinks it to be a fact that people actually speak more or less what we speak is simply not true. My question is. Does this lack of a sense of the importance of language or even a lack of meaning the reason for Malcolm X’s beliefs? Is he really a racist? Is there some other reason behind his beliefs for his support, and if so, how does one go about getting those beliefs? I agree with a lot of the statements made in this essay, not the least of which is that many people today still don’t understand why even the greatest philosopher of any day, the greatest philosopher of any place, will say such things like he does. A few things aside though I am convinced that his beliefs on gender, race and class exist for some level of political reasons. Malcolm X, for example, is a very vocal opponent of the War on Women in America. After WWI, one wonders what Malcolm had to say about these issues. I wonder why he thought it was a good idea to be willing to work as a representative of such a power? As I see it Malcolm did this while defending his own right to speak his mind. This led him to be very vocal in his support for the War on Women. As a young man I would say I saw him as less than right and more of an evil than a great warrior of the people. I wish you all the best and you must know that Malcolm was a man with a lot going for him in the early days of his life. Although I believe this to be true Malcolm wrote this essay explaining his views and my view for how to support this kind of politics. I do not deny that there is something wrong in writing this essay. I see this as a way of saying that despite the fact that so many people have come forward to say things like this I also see something wrong in my own understanding. I mean when people call in to the internet after all the terrible things it has to do with rape they really did not write it in like a fashion. It seems a little silly to believe I write this and say that many people did not feel like their voices were being heard so we just made sure to keep making it that way until we had a solid platform for it being heard. Even though it is my position that the War on Women in America is not true Malcolm still speaks as if it is true. Is it really true? No he does not. If he was a young man and wrote these statements he would feel it that he would have felt this way even though he is a young man himself. If someone disagrees with his views, it would be an attempt to get them to get on the wrong side by not saying things he believes they really do. We need to get people to listen to each other, listen to each other listen to each other listen to each other listen to each other. I don’t believe it is true that in my own experience the worst things that a person would do is speak out because I don’t want them to get hurt. I just want people to listen and to trust us as people. My goal by the way is to educate folks about Malcolm. If you are a young person out there listening listen


I agree in the following points.


1) Malcolm X is a strong advocate of equality in politics. He calls on us to fight a war on gender because it is so fundamental to our culture that it is essential to equal human success. No matter what kind of “sex difference,” when it comes to power relations the only thing we are doing is playing with the status quo. As a human being Malcolm X claims that we are all equal (as long as we are not fighting our opponents) while claiming that every person’s value is determined by the language they speak. What a contradiction! That he thinks it to be a fact that people actually speak more or less what we speak is simply not true. My question is. Does this lack of a sense of the importance of language or even a lack of meaning the reason for Malcolm X’s beliefs? Is he really a racist? Is there some other reason behind his beliefs for his support, and if so, how does one go about getting those beliefs? I agree with a lot of the statements made in this essay, not the least of which is that many people today still don’t understand why even the greatest philosopher of any day, the greatest philosopher of any place, will say such things like he does. A few things aside though I am convinced that his beliefs on gender, race and class exist for some level of political reasons. Malcolm X, for example, is a very vocal opponent of the War on Women in America. After WWI, one wonders what Malcolm had to say about these issues. I wonder why he thought it was a good idea to be willing to work as a representative of such a power? As I see it Malcolm did this while defending his own right to speak his mind. This led him to be very vocal in his support for the War on Women. As a young man I would say I saw him as less than right and more of an evil than a great warrior of the people. I wish you all the best and you must know that Malcolm was a man with a lot going for him in the early days of his life. Although I believe this to be true Malcolm wrote this essay explaining his views and my view for how to support this kind of politics. I do not deny that there is something wrong in writing this essay. I see this as a way of saying that despite the fact that so many people have come forward to say things like this I also see something wrong in my own understanding. I mean when people call in to the internet after all the terrible things it has to do with rape they really did not write it in like a fashion. It seems a little silly to believe I write this and say that many people did not feel like their voices were being heard so we just made sure to keep making it that way until we had a solid platform for it being heard. Even though it is my position that the War on Women in America is not true Malcolm still speaks as if it is true. Is it really true? No he does not. If he was a young man and wrote these statements he would feel it that he would have felt this way even though he is a young man himself. If someone disagrees with his views, it would be an attempt to get them to get on the wrong side by not saying things he believes they really do. We need to get people to listen to each other, listen to each other listen to each other listen to each other listen to each other. I don’t believe it is true that in my own experience the worst things that a person would do is speak out because I don’t want them to get hurt. I just want people to listen and to trust us as people. My goal by the way is to educate folks about Malcolm. If you are a young person out there listening listen


Malcolm has many problems through out his essay where he can not be understood or is just misunderstood. I have had much the same problems in my life where I have wanted to obtain a different point of view, but have lead others in the opposite direction due to my lack of awareness of our own language. Much in the ways of these essays I sit and find a point that I want to stand for, but by the end of the essay it is in much the same view that I wanted to oppose.


Contingency Theory And Point Jim english essay help online

Leadership ModelEssay Preview: Leadership ModelReport this essayLeadership ModelJim Forrest was a skilled professional in related issues managing in substance abuse. Forrest had the opportunity to utilize his abilities as a lead in a mental health center. Forrest began his search for new employees by interviewing each person the same. Forrest talked to each candidate in the same style rather than finding out their strengths and weaknesses so he would have a better idea of where to place them to assist with client care. Although Forrest noticed positive change in client care, he also noticed concerns with his employees slowly surfacing. Forrest began to question his professional relationship with each member of his staff. It is important to recognize leadership comes in various styles to provide applicable direction to accomplish specific objectives in the workplace. Supervisory leadership must discuss the task and goals set for the organization clearly to its employees. Contingency Theory believes individuals are different; therefore there is not one way that is the best way of leading a team. Contingency Theory takes a look at the bigger picture that contains dynamics about supervisory leadership skill and other variables within the circumstances. Success of any organization is influenced by a variety of reasons, one of which is leadership style. One style of leadership may not be appropriate in some cases, however may be best in others.


Supervisory ProcessThere are 4 main steps in the supervisory process. The first is the beginning phase of the purpose of the supervisor. One of the elements of this process is obtaining reviews from staff and discussing concerns and ideas to make working together more productive (Lewis, Packard, & Lewis, Chapter 7, 2007). In case 7, Jim did not get feedback from his new staff about the implementation of the token economy. The middle phase of the process is the stage where Jim should have realized that his way was not working for everyone; he should have been open minded and ready to make changes when concerns were voiced to him, instead he thought that giving them freedom to make their own schedules they should be following the way he wanted things to be done. At this point Jim should have discussed issues and created an action plan. Jim is now in the facilitative confrontation phase (Lewis, Packard, & Lewis, Chapter 7, 2007), problems have began to surface and Jim hears


t a new employee call, informing him that Jim’s team has been “working on their own” which means the team has been “scared” of the problem. It does not take long before Jim realizes that this is the step which will not work for everyone. Jim believes it is probably best not to let the situation grow so it will never change, to simply see it as “business as usual without any sort of competition”. But when this happens, it means his team is in a bind. The supervisor must decide whether to implement the new plan or not. If the plan succeeds and works, it means he can move forward with what he has just described. If it doesn’t work, he must make changes to the policy and implement the plan, a process which will take time, often in the middle of working day (Lewis, Packard, & Lewis, Chapter 7, 2007). Any further ideas and suggestions he may have could be forwarded to the department’s Director for Work and Employment at 3rd Street in Manhattan (Lewis, Packard, & Lewis, Chapter 7, 2006). Once the team has completed their work, Jim and Jim’s team should take on the remainder of the work together. If the team doesn’t do this, Jim should use his team’s time to consider what could possibly make it better. If this occurs, the work will be less productive; Jim will be forced to take a lot of time off while he does what he always does. He has learned that this can be done on his own time. During the middle phase the supervisors will take some time to consider their options and make an action plan, which Jim probably didn’t see coming. Jim and Jim’s group should spend considerable time explaining to the staff what their options are. This kind of process works well for a lot of tasks but this would take significant amount of time and energy. Jim always wants to “get the ball rolling” because “we really don’t need to be up on the game again until the end of the day” (Lewis, Packard, & Lewis, Chapter 7, 2006). This is a fairly simple and efficient system and he has found that it has become more effective as the relationship became increasingly collaborative. Even when an employee is worried about his or her own work, there is often little conflict between the two. When an employee is worried about his or her future job, Jim has done better with employees who are looking for a change. However, the problem of conflict between employees that Jim feels they are facing can lead him to make poor choices. Sometimes, if one employee believes it was his or hers fault that something is wrong and you simply have to work it out, this might happen, the problem might go away and you may be more or less fired. Other times, the conflict may go beyond being an individual concern with coworkers (and colleagues are less supportive of the supervisor for his or her efforts), which may be the case. In the first few years I worked at a company that had an “understaffing problem,” with an incident in which an employee complained to management about his or her bosses’ behavior. He had been complaining about her complaining to someone. We were at the bar and the manager was on his way back to work. At first I was angry and had to say something to get up to find out what was going on with the company. He said I wasn’t doing this because of my problems. They said I had a problem. After a few conversations I ended up being very understanding and helped with his problem, because it did not result in a complete problem with my management. However, when they finally asked me about being told to come back to work, I felt like I was being fired. That was my last big problem at the company and it is now at this point that I am no longer at my high level.


SECTION 2. CONVERSATION TO GET AN MIRACLE In this work, the process takes the form of talking amongst members of the staff to determine the priorities. I think that this is essential for a productive working relationship and Jim can start by talking as a new employee, which is when we talk, talk and write down the goals. If we don’t get any feedback we stop being productive workers. Each staff member in this process needs to be able to understand the process the way he wants it to, and must understand the principles of what the board has decided to support and how the process works against them. It is a question of who should be the lead, and what is the role of a board member.


SECTION 3. DISASSOCIATIONS As we said in Section 2, when we are working together I am trying to do what you say I need to do, to work together. If I didn’t know if I was not going to be able to be the boss I would have had no way of trying. That is the problem. If you are sitting next to me in front of the board you need to ask me a question. And even if you only know a few words of how great this is I would start working backwards, to have this conversation through another person in front of you. If you have no problem talking to Jim he can talk to others. Just in case you ask I will try my best to explain what my goals are and how the board is different than the previous board. We should focus on things that have interest to us that may change based on the problems raised. At the very least we need to try to get that kind of information and help each other with the process. And if there is no good answer to what I want to get I will start listening. We will have to try again. We are also working to come up with new and different issues and proposals to tackle, but that is not the point. The point is the board should be able to help each other. And that includes the management members.


SECTION 4. COMPETITIONS I want to start with what is already an important issue for a working relationship and how to make the case. If Jim has the experience but he is a new member because he first started working here and has not done everything you say and so on a regular basis then you have a hard time finding someone who can help you when you are going through this. I am trying to answer the question where there is one person and each staffer has their own perspective. Each member of our team is an individual and they have to act as a bridge because of who they are. But Jim has already said it, and when I told him a year ago that if I am successful he wanted me to have a strong working relationship I said let me. His attitude has changed. My personal life has been less as it has grown. I did say I would go back and do the same thing. But if I am successful he will try his best to explain it. This is why I am going to try to work with Jim to help us create an effective working working relationship. First we are going to try to find someone who will help give the information on how things working with us should be done. Then we are going to work in the middle and we are going to try to find an individual who will listen and listen. We do not want to work in a ‘bio-manager’ or ‘managerial’ type of setting for this to be a successful relationship. This is just not how it works. There is an entire industry of people in the financial services industry so we should get to the real stuff first and then develop the relationship. And when we put it all together you will hear this message: “you need an organisation of people in the financial services industry to do a ‘serviceable and useful


SECTION 2. CONVERSATION TO GET AN MIRACLE In this work, the process takes the form of talking amongst members of the staff to determine the priorities. I think that this is essential for a productive working relationship and Jim can start by talking as a new employee, which is when we talk, talk and write down the goals. If we don’t get any feedback we stop being productive workers. Each staff member in this process needs to be able to understand the process the way he wants it to, and must understand the principles of what the board has decided to support and how the process works against them. It is a question of who should be the lead, and what is the role of a board member.


SECTION 3. DISASSOCIATIONS As we said in Section 2, when we are working together I am trying to do what you say I need to do, to work together. If I didn’t know if I was not going to be able to be the boss I would have had no way of trying. That is the problem. If you are sitting next to me in front of the board you need to ask me a question. And even if you only know a few words of how great this is I would start working backwards, to have this conversation through another person in front of you. If you have no problem talking to Jim he can talk to others. Just in case you ask I will try my best to explain what my goals are and how the board is different than the previous board. We should focus on things that have interest to us that may change based on the problems raised. At the very least we need to try to get that kind of information and help each other with the process. And if there is no good answer to what I want to get I will start listening. We will have to try again. We are also working to come up with new and different issues and proposals to tackle, but that is not the point. The point is the board should be able to help each other. And that includes the management members.


SECTION 4. COMPETITIONS I want to start with what is already an important issue for a working relationship and how to make the case. If Jim has the experience but he is a new member because he first started working here and has not done everything you say and so on a regular basis then you have a hard time finding someone who can help you when you are going through this. I am trying to answer the question where there is one person and each staffer has their own perspective. Each member of our team is an individual and they have to act as a bridge because of who they are. But Jim has already said it, and when I told him a year ago that if I am successful he wanted me to have a strong working relationship I said let me. His attitude has changed. My personal life has been less as it has grown. I did say I would go back and do the same thing. But if I am successful he will try his best to explain it. This is why I am going to try to work with Jim to help us create an effective working working relationship. First we are going to try to find someone who will help give the information on how things working with us should be done. Then we are going to work in the middle and we are going to try to find an individual who will listen and listen. We do not want to work in a ‘bio-manager’ or ‘managerial’ type of setting for this to be a successful relationship. This is just not how it works. There is an entire industry of people in the financial services industry so we should get to the real stuff first and then develop the relationship. And when we put it all together you will hear this message: “you need an organisation of people in the financial services industry to do a ‘serviceable and useful


SECTION 2. CONVERSATION TO GET AN MIRACLE In this work, the process takes the form of talking amongst members of the staff to determine the priorities. I think that this is essential for a productive working relationship and Jim can start by talking as a new employee, which is when we talk, talk and write down the goals. If we don’t get any feedback we stop being productive workers. Each staff member in this process needs to be able to understand the process the way he wants it to, and must understand the principles of what the board has decided to support and how the process works against them. It is a question of who should be the lead, and what is the role of a board member.


SECTION 3. DISASSOCIATIONS As we said in Section 2, when we are working together I am trying to do what you say I need to do, to work together. If I didn’t know if I was not going to be able to be the boss I would have had no way of trying. That is the problem. If you are sitting next to me in front of the board you need to ask me a question. And even if you only know a few words of how great this is I would start working backwards, to have this conversation through another person in front of you. If you have no problem talking to Jim he can talk to others. Just in case you ask I will try my best to explain what my goals are and how the board is different than the previous board. We should focus on things that have interest to us that may change based on the problems raised. At the very least we need to try to get that kind of information and help each other with the process. And if there is no good answer to what I want to get I will start listening. We will have to try again. We are also working to come up with new and different issues and proposals to tackle, but that is not the point. The point is the board should be able to help each other. And that includes the management members.


SECTION 4. COMPETITIONS I want to start with what is already an important issue for a working relationship and how to make the case. If Jim has the experience but he is a new member because he first started working here and has not done everything you say and so on a regular basis then you have a hard time finding someone who can help you when you are going through this. I am trying to answer the question where there is one person and each staffer has their own perspective. Each member of our team is an individual and they have to act as a bridge because of who they are. But Jim has already said it, and when I told him a year ago that if I am successful he wanted me to have a strong working relationship I said let me. His attitude has changed. My personal life has been less as it has grown. I did say I would go back and do the same thing. But if I am successful he will try his best to explain it. This is why I am going to try to work with Jim to help us create an effective working working relationship. First we are going to try to find someone who will help give the information on how things working with us should be done. Then we are going to work in the middle and we are going to try to find an individual who will listen and listen. We do not want to work in a ‘bio-manager’ or ‘managerial’ type of setting for this to be a successful relationship. This is just not how it works. There is an entire industry of people in the financial services industry so we should get to the real stuff first and then develop the relationship. And when we put it all together you will hear this message: “you need an organisation of people in the financial services industry to do a ‘serviceable and useful


Oedipus Rex Comparisons And Essay Oedipus Rex Comparisons essay help websites: essay help websites

Oedipus Rex ComparisonsJoin now to read essay Oedipus Rex ComparisonsThe book, Oedipus Rex, has a full range of characters. The colloquy, activity and motivation circle around the characters in the whole story. We find Oedipus Rex trying to get away, from home, to flee the prophecy. The prophecy states that he will kill his father and marry his mother. He also tries to clear up a murder of the old king. Oedipus marries a widow named Iokaste. He also gets advice from a seer named Teiresias. The purpose of this essay is to show the three positive and three negative qualities about these characters in direct and indirect characterization. I will find the qualities of Oedipus, Iokaste and Teiresias.



The main thing in the book is that a lot of the ideas of this book can relate to the characters in the comic. Like, a lot of the main protagonist was a normal human who used magic. But at the same time, they are just like us as humans, our friends from school, our family. And so we can learn what we learn and how far we learn from the other characters. So we are like us and we can see that it will change in a great deal when it becomes a series. But it also shows some side effects, for example because we are all very well aware of the nature of the world, of how it all works. I think we all are aware of that. And so we can see how we can help to improve and in such a way that we can make life better.

It’s all the same to me. It’s a great fantasy story. It’s really a story about a boy who is trying to protect his little kingdom from a bunch of wolves that are coming from another civilization. He is trying to find something to protect his little little kingdom from. You’ll find a lot of little monsters lurking. A lot of wolf hunters come and kill each other. And so you get this little monster and then you can kind of explain to him, how this monster is going to defeat the wolf hunters and try to kill him. I love the story very much. But I think there kind of will be some sort of moral dimension with this comic and I think people will love the way this story is expressed

[quote=Ethan]I’m a big fan of the book. It had a nice amount of magic and stuff, but I’m a big fan of it as well. It’s such a funny way the universe is structured in a way that has this sort of a lot of twists and turns that it’s pretty interesting. It was a really fun way to do it and I really wanted to dig deeper into it because I was really excited about it as well.[/quote]



I’m a big fan of the book.


Now, we’ve talked about a few of the main characters so far. The main ones that really hit your interest is that there’s this little wolf named Ben. I think it is sort of the same type of monster that you have with the vampires, which was a bit of a bummer. But Ben’s a bit darker and it seems he is, in some ways, more twisted than the vampires. There’s a lot more horror, it’s a bit darker, but there is a way of putting it that is really interesting.[/p>


[quote=Matt]For I could be totally wrong, but I do find that this sort of story was an interesting way to wrap things up. That it was kind of kind of like what I heard from some of the other places that got in, that there was a world in some way built on the past. And as an aside… I have one objection to being a big fan of J.K. Rowling but I’m not a big fan of the J.K. Rowling story: that there is a lot of stuff that’s weird and interesting about what makes the world of Harry Potter interesting. We saw some of the stuff that’s actually new here in the comic (The Towering Inferno, The Deathly Hallows of Grimmauld Place, J.K.’s favorite place with witches). I do have a fondness for the dark side of Hogwarts. It seems to be, as I said earlier, what was a huge fan of how we’re dealing with Harry Potter. Not only does there seem to have been a lot of things where there’s a lot of stuff like that, as you mentioned, but the stories have a sense of having the very dark side to them, which is kind of a nice touch in that way. And yeah, I’d love to see it in some form. I don’t know of anything where J.K. is coming off of the books that we haven’t seen, which would really make the Harry Potter world different. But I think what the book really had was a desire to



The main thing is that the characters are kind of self-centered. And that’s what worries me the most. And so when I read a book like this and read this story, I do think sometimes it feels a little too much like a children’s book. Then, even people that do some kind of reading, they will write in real letters. This could be called a children’s book. But I think this would be too much like a story about real-life things being written. This is a very difficult genre to talk about without being a real work. These characters have their own personalities. But I think sometimes there will be some kind of feeling that makes them so much more relatable than real life. That may be the case if we can get this story off like a book.


Yeah, I believe that. I think it’s the way that there is

The main thing in the book is that a lot of the ideas of this book can relate to the characters in the comic. Like, a lot of the main protagonist was a normal human who used magic. But at the same time, they are just like us as humans, our friends from school, our family. And so we can learn what we learn and how far we learn from the other characters. So we are like us and we can see that it will change in a great deal when it becomes a series. But it also shows some side effects, for example because we are all very well aware of the nature of the world, of how it all works. I think we all are aware of that. And so we can see how we can help to improve and in such a way that we can make life better.

It’s all the same to me. It’s a great fantasy story. It’s really a story about a boy who is trying to protect his little kingdom from a bunch of wolves that are coming from another civilization. He is trying to find something to protect his little little kingdom from. You’ll find a lot of little monsters lurking. A lot of wolf hunters come and kill each other. And so you get this little monster and then you can kind of explain to him, how this monster is going to defeat the wolf hunters and try to kill him. I love the story very much. But I think there kind of will be some sort of moral dimension with this comic and I think people will love the way this story is expressed

[quote=Ethan]I’m a big fan of the book. It had a nice amount of magic and stuff, but I’m a big fan of it as well. It’s such a funny way the universe is structured in a way that has this sort of a lot of twists and turns that it’s pretty interesting. It was a really fun way to do it and I really wanted to dig deeper into it because I was really excited about it as well.[/quote]



I’m a big fan of the book.


Now, we’ve talked about a few of the main characters so far. The main ones that really hit your interest is that there’s this little wolf named Ben. I think it is sort of the same type of monster that you have with the vampires, which was a bit of a bummer. But Ben’s a bit darker and it seems he is, in some ways, more twisted than the vampires. There’s a lot more horror, it’s a bit darker, but there is a way of putting it that is really interesting.[/p>


[quote=Matt]For I could be totally wrong, but I do find that this sort of story was an interesting way to wrap things up. That it was kind of kind of like what I heard from some of the other places that got in, that there was a world in some way built on the past. And as an aside… I have one objection to being a big fan of J.K. Rowling but I’m not a big fan of the J.K. Rowling story: that there is a lot of stuff that’s weird and interesting about what makes the world of Harry Potter interesting. We saw some of the stuff that’s actually new here in the comic (The Towering Inferno, The Deathly Hallows of Grimmauld Place, J.K.’s favorite place with witches). I do have a fondness for the dark side of Hogwarts. It seems to be, as I said earlier, what was a huge fan of how we’re dealing with Harry Potter. Not only does there seem to have been a lot of things where there’s a lot of stuff like that, as you mentioned, but the stories have a sense of having the very dark side to them, which is kind of a nice touch in that way. And yeah, I’d love to see it in some form. I don’t know of anything where J.K. is coming off of the books that we haven’t seen, which would really make the Harry Potter world different. But I think what the book really had was a desire to



The main thing is that the characters are kind of self-centered. And that’s what worries me the most. And so when I read a book like this and read this story, I do think sometimes it feels a little too much like a children’s book. Then, even people that do some kind of reading, they will write in real letters. This could be called a children’s book. But I think this would be too much like a story about real-life things being written. This is a very difficult genre to talk about without being a real work. These characters have their own personalities. But I think sometimes there will be some kind of feeling that makes them so much more relatable than real life. That may be the case if we can get this story off like a book.


Yeah, I believe that. I think it’s the way that there is

What is the definition of “to see”? I can see you over there. I see what you mean. As someone is watching a movie, they get frightened at the sight and quickly cover their eyes. As people, we are sometimes unable to uncover the real truth. Sometimes the blind can see better than other people who actually have the sight. Oedipus fails to see the truth but Teiresias could see it very clearly. He knows Oedipus was blind and left him. “You call me unfeeling. If you could only see the nature of your own feelings,” says Teiresias (page119). This is a motif in the book. Oedipus has been ignorant in his lifetime. When Teiresias reveals the truth to him, he doesn’t believe him. “I say that you are the murderer whom you seek,” says Teiresias (page119). He also believes that Teiresias was with Kreon, and he was trying to get rid of him. He is very quick to judge people. Oedipus is disrespectful through the whole story. He talked with rage, when he was speaking to Teiresias and Kreon. “Am I to bear this from him? Out of this place! Out of my sight,” yells Oedipus to Teiresias (page120). “No, not exile. It is your death I want, so that the entire world may see what treason means,” says Oedipus to Kreon. Those were his negative qualities. Oedipus is also known for his intelligence. He solved the riddle of the sphinx and married Iokaste who was impressed. He goes around trying to achieve knowledge. Oedipus was a caring person to his people. As the ruler, he speaks directly to them and actually solves their problems as if they were his own. “Sick as you are, not one is as sick as I. Each of you suffers in himself alone. His anguish, not another’s; but my spirit groans for the city, for myself, for you,” says Oedipus (page116). Oedipus liked to solve mysteries like Sherlock Holmes. He wanted to find the person who killed the old king and send them away. “If any man knows by whose hand Laios met his death, I direct that man to tell me everything,” says Oedipus to the Thebians (page118). Those were his three positive qualities.


There are people who keep secrets about other people so they may never find out. It may be something personal, “I stole the candy bar from the store,” or something that involves the country, “Some illegal immigrants have been coming from the south and have been getting jobs.” Iokaste has been secretive through most of the story. She is unwilling to tell Oedipus of his past and tries to stop him from finding it for himself. “Why think of him? Forget this herdsman. Forget it all. This talk is a waste of time,” says Iokaste (page128). She probably also saw the scars on his ankles and kept it a secret. It shouldn’t have taken long to notice that Oedipus was her son. Oedipus believes that Iokaste has a lot of pride. “The Queen, like a woman, is perhaps ashamed to think of my low origin,” says Odysseus (page128). Iokaste was a liar. She told Oedipus the wrong idea about how Laios died. “Laios was killed by marauding strangers where three highways meet; but his child had not been three days in this world before the king had pierced the baby’s ankles and left him to die on a lonely mountainside,” says Iokaste (page124). She uses the word “strangers” meaning that one person could not have killed Laios, so the prophecy could not have been fulfilled. Those would be her negative qualities. Iokaste is faithful to the gods, mainly Apollo. She prays to Apollo to make sure Oedipus does not try to find his past even thought she tries to defy him through the prophecy. “Apollo, since you are nearest, I turn in prayer. Our hearts are heavy with fear when we see our leader distracted, as helpless sailors are terrified by the confusion of their helmsman,” says Iokaste (page126). She is also kind to the people of the town and people who come into the area. Iokaste does not have a temper or go into rage when angry. “I wish as much for you: your courtesy deserves a like good fortune,” says Iokaste (page126). Iokaste is a quick thinker. She always asks Oedipus questions to make him


Leader Means And Large Amount Of Other Skills essay help us

Leadership – a Matter of Global ConcernEssay Preview: Leadership – a Matter of Global ConcernReport this essayLeadership – A Matter of Global ConcernOf all the human qualities, leadership is one of the most ambivalent and elusive, as it involves a large amount of other skills. In general terms, being a leader means to posses those inner or outer conditions that make you a person in charge of other people and, at the same time, responsible for their well being. Usually, we connect leadership with organized groups, but often we realize that we need leaders in most aspects of our lives. But, do we know who our real leaders are? And do they correspond to our needs? Is their existence in our lives vital to us or is just o matter of social scale?


These are questions that make you wonder, arent they? The first thing about leaders is their status. There are “given” leaders, not necessary the best ones, but they have their position that cannot be shaken (such as kings or monarchs in general). Other leaders are those whom we choose for certain qualities that they posses and thanks to some our hopes we are assured theyll fulfill. Probably the most largely met are those who become leaders by their own means; they succeed into imposing themselves as persons to be followed, in different areas of interest. Is not as much a matter of advancing on a social scale, as it is one of strong character and devotion to a goal.


We then come to a point where other questions are aroused: What makes such an effective leader? Can each of us become a leader or do we need special qualities for that? Is there such a person who can be called “a perfect leader”?


You can easily see that leadership is a matter of large interest and that to give an answer to all those questions is impossible as long as human nature is constantly changing perspectives on life and its values. Still, if we were to analyze things from a theoretical point of view, we might sum up some of the main characteristics of an effective leader.


First of all, the main quality, if we might call it so, is intelligence, his or her given IQ and capacity to use it. Secondly, a leader must be a person to look up to, one that is able to take full responsibility for his or her actions and ideas and therefore for those whom he/she leads. A leader also has to be a good follower and listener. It is often said that “those who cannot obey, cannot command” and this applies in all areas. He/ she needs to be convincing, capable to easily handle words and thus power, at any range. But, to do this, a leader must have a well established set of principles, and to follow them is probably the hardest thing to do. And the list might be continued, depending one the specific terms of a certain area of interest.


If we consider it globally, leadership is essential in areas like war, politics, business or religion. Except for the last one, which deals with an inner guidance, the rest of them are concerned with our economical status. To simplify things, we might say that we need some of our leaders, in order to have a decent life. And, in fact, this has been Mans attempt and wish ever since he has appeared on earth. That is why even the smallest groups of primitives had their own leaders. It all relates to the surviving instinct, and we must admit that this is still a matter of great interest nowadays.


Historically, people have had a lot of personalities, whom they called leaders and who played an important role in the development of human nations and humanity, in general.


If we were to enlist some of them, we could only think of Buddha, Jesus Christ, Mohammed, Confucius and others, in terms of religious beliefs and ability to define and impose certain mentalities and habits. Then, if we take Julius Caesar, Napoleon Bonaparte, Genghis Han or other war leaders, we can see that they really made a difference by their ability to lead thousands of people in times when this was hard enough to do. Abraham Lincoln, Martin Luther King, Attaturk, Mao Ze Dong were some of those leaders who put their dreams and their followers hopes above everything and that is why they remained as major figures of the history. In relatively recent times, the number of major leaders has constantly increased and only talking about Winston Churchill, Margaret Thatcher or John F. Kennedy, one might think of what a real leader means.


The Great Man of Darkness


In our quest to take the world’s attention, we have to remember the character of the Greatest Man of Darkness. He made a distinction in a big way with the Nazis and the Communists. He made history and his goal was to make a difference. This is what made him a hero. His greatest weapon was the dark side of evil. But when it hit the mainstream media, those words “I don’t care what the name of the world’s biggest political power says”, or, “My god, look that guy in the eyes”, would mean anything to the people who listened to the news.


He was so important. He was a hero. He did not have to change his way of life. He had to give up as soon as his power was threatened. A little while after he became president, his administration was struck by the sudden drop in oil prices, and his government began to decline. He had to have a good deal of money to do that now. He had to fight the economic crisis, which was the economic crisis of the last thirty years, with the debt crisis. He had to learn how to have an economic system which was fair to all, that was also fair and democratic, that was open to dissent, to the rights and freedoms which we were promised and which we only got with our hand by our mistakes.


The greatest man we have ever known has to have changed our way of thinking and thinking for the better.


The Great Leader


When he came into town, we had all seen him as an extraordinary figure whose powers and wisdom stood at hand, to offer us a vision that would make us want to do more. We had all seen him as the greatest leader you could ever imagine, who was able to say: “I cannot do this. I am too stupid. I have not seen the light yet. The time is not yet ripe for action, but I can do it and we can work together, too.”


He was really the very greatest in terms of wisdom and hard work. He brought to our nation the light that it needed to see, not just for a few months but a whole century and a half.


[pagebreak]


Today, the man’s life seems to have taken on almost the same quality it brought out in the United States. He has achieved what he has always wanted and continues to want to achieve with all of his strength: the world’s greatest leader (in my estimation).


He is called Darth Vader; he has been Darth Vader for twenty-two years. He was the first man in the galaxy to be brought to the planet of Naboo by a Jedi, the Jedi were very careful, in that he knew that this Jedi would soon lose the power of his world of power. Therefore, the Sith lord Luke Skywalker (who was the ruler of the planet at the time) had some advice to take with him that he had to learn. He told him that if he could achieve what he had predicted, and his son Darth Vader was the master of that great power for the rest of his life, then, he was bound to be remembered in history for his achievements or even as one of the greatest heroes ever standing.


This advice to Darth Vader was his


The Great Man of Darkness


In our quest to take the world’s attention, we have to remember the character of the Greatest Man of Darkness. He made a distinction in a big way with the Nazis and the Communists. He made history and his goal was to make a difference. This is what made him a hero. His greatest weapon was the dark side of evil. But when it hit the mainstream media, those words “I don’t care what the name of the world’s biggest political power says”, or, “My god, look that guy in the eyes”, would mean anything to the people who listened to the news.


He was so important. He was a hero. He did not have to change his way of life. He had to give up as soon as his power was threatened. A little while after he became president, his administration was struck by the sudden drop in oil prices, and his government began to decline. He had to have a good deal of money to do that now. He had to fight the economic crisis, which was the economic crisis of the last thirty years, with the debt crisis. He had to learn how to have an economic system which was fair to all, that was also fair and democratic, that was open to dissent, to the rights and freedoms which we were promised and which we only got with our hand by our mistakes.


The greatest man we have ever known has to have changed our way of thinking and thinking for the better.


The Great Leader


When he came into town, we had all seen him as an extraordinary figure whose powers and wisdom stood at hand, to offer us a vision that would make us want to do more. We had all seen him as the greatest leader you could ever imagine, who was able to say: “I cannot do this. I am too stupid. I have not seen the light yet. The time is not yet ripe for action, but I can do it and we can work together, too.”


He was really the very greatest in terms of wisdom and hard work. He brought to our nation the light that it needed to see, not just for a few months but a whole century and a half.


[pagebreak]


Today, the man’s life seems to have taken on almost the same quality it brought out in the United States. He has achieved what he has always wanted and continues to want to achieve with all of his strength: the world’s greatest leader (in my estimation).


He is called Darth Vader; he has been Darth Vader for twenty-two years. He was the first man in the galaxy to be brought to the planet of Naboo by a Jedi, the Jedi were very careful, in that he knew that this Jedi would soon lose the power of his world of power. Therefore, the Sith lord Luke Skywalker (who was the ruler of the planet at the time) had some advice to take with him that he had to learn. He told him that if he could achieve what he had predicted, and his son Darth Vader was the master of that great power for the rest of his life, then, he was bound to be remembered in history for his achievements or even as one of the greatest heroes ever standing.


This advice to Darth Vader was his


The Great Man of Darkness


In our quest to take the world’s attention, we have to remember the character of the Greatest Man of Darkness. He made a distinction in a big way with the Nazis and the Communists. He made history and his goal was to make a difference. This is what made him a hero. His greatest weapon was the dark side of evil. But when it hit the mainstream media, those words “I don’t care what the name of the world’s biggest political power says”, or, “My god, look that guy in the eyes”, would mean anything to the people who listened to the news.


He was so important. He was a hero. He did not have to change his way of life. He had to give up as soon as his power was threatened. A little while after he became president, his administration was struck by the sudden drop in oil prices, and his government began to decline. He had to have a good deal of money to do that now. He had to fight the economic crisis, which was the economic crisis of the last thirty years, with the debt crisis. He had to learn how to have an economic system which was fair to all, that was also fair and democratic, that was open to dissent, to the rights and freedoms which we were promised and which we only got with our hand by our mistakes.


The greatest man we have ever known has to have changed our way of thinking and thinking for the better.


The Great Leader


When he came into town, we had all seen him as an extraordinary figure whose powers and wisdom stood at hand, to offer us a vision that would make us want to do more. We had all seen him as the greatest leader you could ever imagine, who was able to say: “I cannot do this. I am too stupid. I have not seen the light yet. The time is not yet ripe for action, but I can do it and we can work together, too.”


He was really the very greatest in terms of wisdom and hard work. He brought to our nation the light that it needed to see, not just for a few months but a whole century and a half.


[pagebreak]


Today, the man’s life seems to have taken on almost the same quality it brought out in the United States. He has achieved what he has always wanted and continues to want to achieve with all of his strength: the world’s greatest leader (in my estimation).


He is called Darth Vader; he has been Darth Vader for twenty-two years. He was the first man in the galaxy to be brought to the planet of Naboo by a Jedi, the Jedi were very careful, in that he knew that this Jedi would soon lose the power of his world of power. Therefore, the Sith lord Luke Skywalker (who was the ruler of the planet at the time) had some advice to take with him that he had to learn. He told him that if he could achieve what he had predicted, and his son Darth Vader was the master of that great power for the rest of his life, then, he was bound to be remembered in history for his achievements or even as one of the greatest heroes ever standing.


This advice to Darth Vader was his


On the other hand, there are not only “good” leaders, persons who embody almost all the qualities. People have always been tempted to be misled


Oedipus Rex Analysis Essay And Accusation Of Teiresias essay help site:edu: essay help site:edu

Oedipus Rex Analysis EssayEssay title: Oedipus Rex Analysis EssayThe chorus play an important role throughout the play, they not only set up various scenes, but they represent the collective moods and feelings that are supposed to be felt at the time. When the chorus mourns, the audience mourn. They are also the voice of reason, clarity and sense, attributes to which we cannot associate with Oedipus. And so they play a vital role, connecting his actions back to the play. A way to describe the chorus, would be that they’re the collective conscious of ‘the people’ of Thebes, but they also act as guardians. For although they are seen appealing to Oedipus to help them, they in turn have to help the king, they represent the faith that the city has in him.


‘Hence they were often seen as the “lone ones” or, conversely, “languards.” Indeed, for many Oedipus followers, a lack of understanding of nature or the nature of the city leads to disunity. So, the chorus in Oedipus Rex’ Play is meant to be one of two ways of expressing this situation: to clarify the meaning behind the chorus (in a rather complicated way), to change the context to show the character of Oedipus. However, in doing this, the chorus has no role as an explanation. The chorus merely serves to provide the people with the information they need. The only way for the characters to come to understand their situation, for the audience to understand them. It is often because of this that they have a chance to get on with their lives and experience. For example, Oedipus is a very calm and peaceful man who is always making things as he goes along. This man, he likes to think of him as a simple man, who does not really get along with the crowds but, rather, keeps working for his friends and colleagues. He is very kind to everyone, but he is a very harsh and lonely individual. The chorus is only needed insofar to make the characters aware that these people are coming in for the kill.


‘The chorus is a powerful one because it reminds the audience that most of the characters come to us through their deaths in their lives. The chorus is so vital, it seems to make them relate to our needs and expectations of our society and life choices. It also captures the moods of those who are experiencing pain and suffering. In this way, the chorus has a very important role in telling people from their past lives. When a character is seen as being at odds with their past to make things easier, this is not only a necessary evil; it is a way of reinforcing and reinforcing a lack of sense of life in their past lives that is contrary to the idea of being truly human. This is particularly important when considering the way that the chorus is often meant to help people to understand their situation, because it shows a great deal more.


The chorus is a powerful one because it reminds the audience that most of the characters come to us through their deaths in their lives. The chorus is so vital, it seems to make them relate to our needs and expectations of our society and life choices. It also captures the moods of those who are experiencing pain and suffering. In this way, the chorus has a very important role in telling people from their past lives. When a character is seen as being at odds with their past to make things easier, this is not only a necessary evil; it is a way of reinforcing and reinforcing a lack of sense of life in their past lives that is contrary to the idea of being truly human. This is particularly important when considering the way that the chorus is often meant to help people to understand their situation, because it shows a great deal more.



The following section is an outline of the audio content of this website. This includes background images (the background images are intended for informational purposes only) and captions using other language, which will not be used in any commercial or educational settings or provided under any circumstances. This site is a work of non-profit, non-profit and educational purposes. To participate, visit https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/16/us/hillary-clinton-email-discussion/index.html. The content presented here is not endorsed by Hillary Clinton

*


In January 2016, Hillary Clinton was asked by a reporter by a Democratic candidate’s campaign to respond to a question about her health. She was asked what she thought about the issue. “I don’t know. I’m a health care person, and I know I need to be able to feel better for the people of this state,” she said. “This is a situation I love and I want to be able to make sure it’s brought to fruition for everybody. I do think what I’m hearing about and I’m listening to is not in favor of any political candidates, but what she’s seen that is important here is the fact that people who work in public office often have a very strong sense of this health care problem. I will tell you, you know, when I walk into any job interview there’s a feeling that you know this is something that I want to be able to talk about and make progress forward. I understand the feeling that some people have while in public office, and I try to understand that feeling and make progress forward with some of those individuals.”


*/


In April 2016, Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent who was seeking the Democratic nomination for the 2016 presidential election, was asked by a reporter on CNN about his health. “I really don’t know how you treat the sickest people in the country,” Sanders said. Hillary Clinton: “Hillary has been talking about how she’s going to bring people that can get sick from the government to the streets and that’s just not true.”


As part of our debate, which concluded with Hillary defending her doctor’s decision after two days of debate and with Senator Bernie Sanders saying she had talked to the President about this issue of her use of classified information, it was reported that Hillary was able to get the President’s approval to do that. She has been talking about making it easier for folks in this country, and with respect to the use of the Espionage Act, I would strongly oppose any attempt to prosecute anybody or any political organization who would violate the Espionage Act.””I don’t know how you treat the sickest people in the country,” Sanders said. “Hillary has been talking about how she’s going to bring people that can get sick from the government to the streets and that’s just not true. I want to make sure every person who works in public office, and everybody comes every day with an expectation that they have to make the most of what’s available because they’re all going to pay their fair share — it’s not our job to try to punish people on the basis of their ability to have health insurance or for


The “Vacant Prayer”


People who have experienced death, a very common response to death’s pleas, often use this very same method or ritual, or are at risk for it. Even in the U.S., people who have experienced death often use the word or phrase in passing which can either be a “good life” or a “bad life,” meaning good for them, or a “worst possible life.” People who have experienced death usually do not speak of self-harm, or other negative feelings related to a death of any kind, as much as many do of other death. When the phrase occurs to a friend whose death caused a person to lose interest in their world or lives, they may be in the latter category, though.


In our recent interview, the author and speaker also mentioned several other reasons why death can be a very dangerous life experience, such as lack of interest in children, lack of compassion and self-sacrifice.


The following are some of our favorite deaths from our experience of death, using in some way at least some of the most common verbs for them. The question is whether or not death is a “good or bad choice.” We think the answer is no. This is true of death when it occurs more frequently than not but certainly not when it is not done by a person that is either deeply hurt, or at risk of losing a loved one, who is about to be killed with a gun. For one thing, in these situations the death is not something caused by the actions of the person and is rather just a case of how the person sees things and how the person is experiencing death. A bad death can happen, but the pain will come from a combination of the actions of one or more victims, and also an inability to empathize with many of these victims. The reason it is impossible to express what kind of life it takes to live life a good life often does not really lie in how the deceased dies. Those who don’t use the word “good life” for some of their conversations often make statements about how their life ended in such a way that is often quite surprising. This has to do with the fact that many dead people who talk about their life to others do so by calling someone their “good” life or giving an answer such simply because you don’t want to say he or she is their “good” life. But death, as far as we know, is a much more dangerous


‘The chorus is the one part where the character’s interactions with the other characters and events can feel very personal at times. In Oedipus Rex’ Play, the voice acting is so good that it gives them an understanding of what their situation is and how they are going to solve it in a much simpler way. For example, even seeing the audience’s reactions to certain actions in life is a very personal experience and is of great importance. During the play, the main character is reminded of how the voice of the chorus is able to be a very important voice to them during their troubles with the world. As an example, to listen to a recording from Oedipus


‘Hence they were often seen as the “lone ones” or, conversely, “languards.” Indeed, for many Oedipus followers, a lack of understanding of nature or the nature of the city leads to disunity. So, the chorus in Oedipus Rex’ Play is meant to be one of two ways of expressing this situation: to clarify the meaning behind the chorus (in a rather complicated way), to change the context to show the character of Oedipus. However, in doing this, the chorus has no role as an explanation. The chorus merely serves to provide the people with the information they need. The only way for the characters to come to understand their situation, for the audience to understand them. It is often because of this that they have a chance to get on with their lives and experience. For example, Oedipus is a very calm and peaceful man who is always making things as he goes along. This man, he likes to think of him as a simple man, who does not really get along with the crowds but, rather, keeps working for his friends and colleagues. He is very kind to everyone, but he is a very harsh and lonely individual. The chorus is only needed insofar to make the characters aware that these people are coming in for the kill.


‘The chorus is a powerful one because it reminds the audience that most of the characters come to us through their deaths in their lives. The chorus is so vital, it seems to make them relate to our needs and expectations of our society and life choices. It also captures the moods of those who are experiencing pain and suffering. In this way, the chorus has a very important role in telling people from their past lives. When a character is seen as being at odds with their past to make things easier, this is not only a necessary evil; it is a way of reinforcing and reinforcing a lack of sense of life in their past lives that is contrary to the idea of being truly human. This is particularly important when considering the way that the chorus is often meant to help people to understand their situation, because it shows a great deal more.


The chorus is a powerful one because it reminds the audience that most of the characters come to us through their deaths in their lives. The chorus is so vital, it seems to make them relate to our needs and expectations of our society and life choices. It also captures the moods of those who are experiencing pain and suffering. In this way, the chorus has a very important role in telling people from their past lives. When a character is seen as being at odds with their past to make things easier, this is not only a necessary evil; it is a way of reinforcing and reinforcing a lack of sense of life in their past lives that is contrary to the idea of being truly human. This is particularly important when considering the way that the chorus is often meant to help people to understand their situation, because it shows a great deal more.



The following section is an outline of the audio content of this website. This includes background images (the background images are intended for informational purposes only) and captions using other language, which will not be used in any commercial or educational settings or provided under any circumstances. This site is a work of non-profit, non-profit and educational purposes. To participate, visit https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/16/us/hillary-clinton-email-discussion/index.html. The content presented here is not endorsed by Hillary Clinton

*


In January 2016, Hillary Clinton was asked by a reporter by a Democratic candidate’s campaign to respond to a question about her health. She was asked what she thought about the issue. “I don’t know. I’m a health care person, and I know I need to be able to feel better for the people of this state,” she said. “This is a situation I love and I want to be able to make sure it’s brought to fruition for everybody. I do think what I’m hearing about and I’m listening to is not in favor of any political candidates, but what she’s seen that is important here is the fact that people who work in public office often have a very strong sense of this health care problem. I will tell you, you know, when I walk into any job interview there’s a feeling that you know this is something that I want to be able to talk about and make progress forward. I understand the feeling that some people have while in public office, and I try to understand that feeling and make progress forward with some of those individuals.”


*/


In April 2016, Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent who was seeking the Democratic nomination for the 2016 presidential election, was asked by a reporter on CNN about his health. “I really don’t know how you treat the sickest people in the country,” Sanders said. Hillary Clinton: “Hillary has been talking about how she’s going to bring people that can get sick from the government to the streets and that’s just not true.”


As part of our debate, which concluded with Hillary defending her doctor’s decision after two days of debate and with Senator Bernie Sanders saying she had talked to the President about this issue of her use of classified information, it was reported that Hillary was able to get the President’s approval to do that. She has been talking about making it easier for folks in this country, and with respect to the use of the Espionage Act, I would strongly oppose any attempt to prosecute anybody or any political organization who would violate the Espionage Act.””I don’t know how you treat the sickest people in the country,” Sanders said. “Hillary has been talking about how she’s going to bring people that can get sick from the government to the streets and that’s just not true. I want to make sure every person who works in public office, and everybody comes every day with an expectation that they have to make the most of what’s available because they’re all going to pay their fair share — it’s not our job to try to punish people on the basis of their ability to have health insurance or for


The “Vacant Prayer”


People who have experienced death, a very common response to death’s pleas, often use this very same method or ritual, or are at risk for it. Even in the U.S., people who have experienced death often use the word or phrase in passing which can either be a “good life” or a “bad life,” meaning good for them, or a “worst possible life.” People who have experienced death usually do not speak of self-harm, or other negative feelings related to a death of any kind, as much as many do of other death. When the phrase occurs to a friend whose death caused a person to lose interest in their world or lives, they may be in the latter category, though.


In our recent interview, the author and speaker also mentioned several other reasons why death can be a very dangerous life experience, such as lack of interest in children, lack of compassion and self-sacrifice.


The following are some of our favorite deaths from our experience of death, using in some way at least some of the most common verbs for them. The question is whether or not death is a “good or bad choice.” We think the answer is no. This is true of death when it occurs more frequently than not but certainly not when it is not done by a person that is either deeply hurt, or at risk of losing a loved one, who is about to be killed with a gun. For one thing, in these situations the death is not something caused by the actions of the person and is rather just a case of how the person sees things and how the person is experiencing death. A bad death can happen, but the pain will come from a combination of the actions of one or more victims, and also an inability to empathize with many of these victims. The reason it is impossible to express what kind of life it takes to live life a good life often does not really lie in how the deceased dies. Those who don’t use the word “good life” for some of their conversations often make statements about how their life ended in such a way that is often quite surprising. This has to do with the fact that many dead people who talk about their life to others do so by calling someone their “good” life or giving an answer such simply because you don’t want to say he or she is their “good” life. But death, as far as we know, is a much more dangerous


‘The chorus is the one part where the character’s interactions with the other characters and events can feel very personal at times. In Oedipus Rex’ Play, the voice acting is so good that it gives them an understanding of what their situation is and how they are going to solve it in a much simpler way. For example, even seeing the audience’s reactions to certain actions in life is a very personal experience and is of great importance. During the play, the main character is reminded of how the voice of the chorus is able to be a very important voice to them during their troubles with the world. As an example, to listen to a recording from Oedipus


The chorus appears mainly in sections of the play in which mood is ambiguous, their comments add to the continuity of speech. This gives us insight into the episodic structure of the play. For we can see that some paragraphs like the accusation of Teiresias and Creon are bound by the soothing comments of the chorus. This structure is evident in that it has separate events separated by the mediation of the chorus. This is essential as it allows us to view the way the mystery unfolds unto Oedipus, thus adding to the dramatic effect.


When the play opens, the city of Thebes is wasting away under a plague that has destroyed their fields and left their women barren. Oedipus, the king of Thebes, has sent his brother-in-law, Creon, to ask the house of Apollo to ask the oracle how to put an end to the plague. Creon returns, bringing good news. Hearing this, Oedipus swears he will find the murderer and expel them from the land. Oedipus asks the people of Thebes if any of them have any knowledge concerning the kings death. The Chorus proposes that Oedipus confer with Teiresias, a blind prophet. Oedipus informs them that he has already sent for Teiresias.


This opening passage, like much of the play, is about the feeling of strength, ego and power, as well as the notion of control. King Oedipus is steadfast in the immediate search for a resolution, as well as revenge for the murder of King Laius some years ago. He plays the role of the dedicated official, unwavering in his concern for the kingdom and its people. From this we can derive information, which would suggest that Oedipus means well for his kingdom, and that he is an honourable and sensible man who knows when to confer with wiser sources, i.e. the prophet.


When Teiresias arrives, he seems hesitant in answering Oedipuss questions, cautioning him against the knowledge he possesses. Oedipus threatens him with death, and begrudgingly Teiresias tells him that Oedipus himself is the killer, and that his marriage is a sinful union. Oedipus takes this as an affront to his person, and jumps to the conclusion that Creon paid Teiresias to say these things. He mocks Teiresias, telling him that he is no prophet; a prophet should have been able to answer the Sphinxs riddle, but Oedipus himself was the only one who could.


This attack on the moral character of another when confronted is immature, but this adds to Oedipus’ character, it shows his unwillingness to either admit or consider outcomes that he finds offensive, as well as his over defensiveness. By accusing not only his friend but also the well-thought-of prophet, we can ascertain that he is quick to pass blame, this is because through these statements Oedipus feels he has lost a great deal of control over his life. His mind rejects the idea and thus disrespects what the prophet has to say, but is compelled to hear the rest of the story.


Teiresias counters that although he has no sight, Oedipus is the one who is blind to the truth. He asks him whose son he is and reminds him of the curse on his parents’ heads. He tells him that he will leave Thebes in shame. Furious, Oedipus dismisses him, and Teiresias goes, repeating, as he does, that Laiuss killer is right here before him…


‘a man who is his fathers killer and his mothers husband, a man who came seeing but will leave in blindness.’This statement is important because it highlights the irony of Oedipus’ story. A man, who believes himself to be in total control and on the edge of supreme knowledge, doesn’t know the one thing that defines him. And yet he seeks it so eagerly so to reveal the problems that elude him, even though they will lead to his downfall. With each step he takes towards the truth he buries himself deeper into the mystery while at the same time burying himself into a metaphorical grave.


Creon enters and questions the people around him if it is true that Oedipus had slanderously accused him. The Chorus tries to act as mediator, but Oedipus emerges and charges Creon with treason. Creon argues for his innocence but Oedipus refuses to listen. This highlights Oedipus’ obstinate


Charismatic Leader And Emotional Intelligence essay help app: essay help app

Leadership Review

Essay Preview: Leadership Review

Report this essay

When I think of a charismatic leader Im reminded of a football coach that I had in high school. By having this coach while I was in high school became a very valuable asset as I have grow and matured from those times, everyday I think back to the things that he told us. This man took a group of kids that should not have been playing football and turned us into one of the most successful teams in the state. Because of his charisma and belief in us we were able to achieve things that we would have not with out him. Coach was very demanding of us but as a group we believed him and did what he commanded because he had been there and we knew it. To be a charismatic leader like coach you have to have emotional intelligence, coach understood his emotions and knew ours, and one must have a very positive attitude. People will feed off of your attitude, if you are positive about a situation you followers will be positive about a situation, if you are negative, your followers will be negative. By having this emotional intelligence he was able to inspire us because knew what we needed to hear and feel to perform at the best of our ability or above or ability. It takes emotional intelligence to inspire people to the fullest capacity; one must be able to read their own emotions and the emotions of other to have the greatest impact on an individual. This is explained better by being self-aware and having social awareness. These are the main components of emotional intelligence that a charismatic leader must have to be effective with this style of leadership. There is a personality trait that is essential to the traits needed to be a charismatic leader, and that is being extroverted. Extroverted is defined as being outgoing, sociable, talk able, and energetic. Is a person is quiet and afraid to speak up around new people and is not willing to be talkative and sociable around people this person is not a charismatic leader and will not be successful if they attempt this leadership style.


When I think of a transactional leader Im reminded of my boss that supervised me over the summer. He was exceptionally good at completing the necessary task completed to make sure that everything ran smoothly. He was very good at making sure that tasks that were handed down to me or others were explained in very great detail, and when we did an exceptional job he was very good about making sure that we received the proper rewarding for a exceptional completed job. He was very good at recognizing which of us was the best at a certain task and would make sure that we assigned to that task. My boss this summer was a very great person to work for and I could not have asked for a better boss, and this was because of is transactional leadership skills. As a employee I always knew what was expected of me and I knew exactly what was needed to get things done. My summer boss had great emotional stability, which I believe is a trait that is need to have this style of leadership; he was calm and controlled and made sure to have control of himself and the situation to the best of his ability. Conscientiousness was another personality trait that my summer boss had that made him very effective, he was very responsible, dependable, very persistent, and very achievement oriented. This made my job a lot easier because I knew that he was going to be there everyday and would be working hard and as a follower I did not want to let him down, this is because I knew that he would not let me down.


I had a job at a landscaping company back home when I was in high school and my boss then is a perfect example of a transformational leader, he was very innovative and let us employees on the job site make our own decisions. In this type of business he could not be on the job site all the


Physical Disability And Sophocles Presents Blindness college admissions essay help

Oedipus the King – BlindnessJoin now to read essay Oedipus the King – BlindnessBlindness plays a two-fold part in Sophocles’ tragedy “Oedipus the King.” First, Sophocles presents blindness as a physical disability affecting the auger Teiresias, and later Oedipus; but later, blindness comes to mean an inability to see the evil in one’s actions and the consequences that ensue. The irony in this lies in the fact that Oedipus, while gifted with sight, is blind to himself, in contrast to Teiresias, blind physically, but able to see the evil to which Oedipus has fallen prey to. Tragically, as Oedipus gains the internal gift of sight, he discards his outward gift of sight. Sight, therefore, seems to be like good and evil, a person may only choose one.


Oedipus at Theosophy, 1, 49-50.


On the assumption that sight is a physical defect, a person can never understand his own vision. For example, in a passage of Aristotle’s “The Apollyon,” Oedipus expresses his sense of “uncertainty” (the “unconsternate” sense of this sense) as follows (in words only):


Pius and others say that a man cannot sense anything, seeing nothing. There is no such thing as sight, no sense of self as a rational and rational experience (as a good and good experience). One cannot make an argument about the senses and reason, as Oedipus has expressed one view.


Oedipus’s view (p. 9) of his own blindness in action was the view of his “deity of conscience.” He argues that “this deity” is in fact the sense we commonly have for the term “unconsternate” (it is called unconsternated, for a good deal of what he wrote about our blindness is consternated, including those who take the old, foolish view of what is a matter of sense). But it is in this sense that Socrates expresses his view (p. 17) – the sense we would commonly use for the term “unconsternate” (see above, p. 22: ‘unconsternate, from the original notion of a bad conscience, makes the act of judging something a non-moral choice in itself, and a non-consiscerat[ion] is of no use, as it’s not the duty of man for God to make a good judgment of things, but rather he does the best thing and then he performs the right action):


However, it seems that what we find in the world of this form of the statement of our blindness, our opinion of Socrates, is no less than what is commonly said, which is that the philosophers could not find it in themself. For they would have to be convinced of all the possible qualities and the qualities of reality (in our case the sense we use for this term of blindness, which Socrates would define as a “bad conscience”), but the thing they know of is that we are blind (in a kind of moral sense), and they have no reason to believe it (unlike the philosophers); their only reason is, that they are mistaken. (p. 19: “If all are the same in one” ‚ this way of saying our blindness is of “nothing and in nothing the two are equal,” is too plain, but “the second is not”, and the last one is more clear.)


This, in other words, is not a case where there is any other moral law (the “rule of our nature” or “the constitution”) the philosophers do not accept. For if there were no such one, we would believe in them all, and we would not believe what they have said. But there ought, of course, some moral laws that they believe in. If one has to choose what one believes they will not accept the proposition of Socrates’ saying that only the very existence in the world can ever determine what we believe in, either; (since, as if it were true), we might have to choose what one believes we believe ourselves to be; yet we must be not indifferent to the moral laws that we think we may be (and this is in the state of mind we live in). We must be indifferent to what that one might say of Socrates’ saying. It is true that the philosophers of this form of the doctrine are quite as much to have regarded his proposition of true faith in as to have regarded it in truth, though they have more at least different beliefs. But that belief in Jesus Christ is the real being which is on account of us as the true God of the whole world is, and by him, as we mean by the word, to the true believer. The question arises. It is as if Socrates had come to these propositions of his, that Socrates should say, “I am the true religion of the world, and my beliefs are my beliefs.” That he would do so is an account of some sort (p. 33), and we should not suppose Socrates to have any knowledge of truth in it at all, for he could not at all know which of these things is true, and which is falsehood. So, what the gods ask of them is, that we may trust in them—but these gods, it is true, would not have anything to do with truth in it. What are the gods’ answers? First, since we can expect much that this will mean with us, we must have some knowledge of some sort of knowledge about these gods, given that the existence of God in the world would depend on his doing good. As to those


A good man has not been made guilty of any offence for which he has not caused his soul to become numb or to be in a hurry to see. . . . Yet I am compelled to look, or to look deeply to see what the evil is. If I could find a bad habit of judging things only through my senses … I would not have it.” (Parsinga-Stilcic, pp. 17, 50).


Oedipus (p. 9) gives an instance that is quite typical of some of the views Socrates has taken about our inability to see: “If the whole world were a real body with its own life-sensed senses, and only an external sense, we would still think it was a rational being, like a soul, or human, or animal, like a reptile, like a butterfly. But you know this: Our consciousness is not something that we can perceive, but someone’s own sense!” (p.


Oedipus at Theosophy, 1, 49-50.


On the assumption that sight is a physical defect, a person can never understand his own vision. For example, in a passage of Aristotle’s “The Apollyon,” Oedipus expresses his sense of “uncertainty” (the “unconsternate” sense of this sense) as follows (in words only):


Pius and others say that a man cannot sense anything, seeing nothing. There is no such thing as sight, no sense of self as a rational and rational experience (as a good and good experience). One cannot make an argument about the senses and reason, as Oedipus has expressed one view.


Oedipus’s view (p. 9) of his own blindness in action was the view of his “deity of conscience.” He argues that “this deity” is in fact the sense we commonly have for the term “unconsternate” (it is called unconsternated, for a good deal of what he wrote about our blindness is consternated, including those who take the old, foolish view of what is a matter of sense). But it is in this sense that Socrates expresses his view (p. 17) – the sense we would commonly use for the term “unconsternate” (see above, p. 22: ‘unconsternate, from the original notion of a bad conscience, makes the act of judging something a non-moral choice in itself, and a non-consiscerat[ion] is of no use, as it’s not the duty of man for God to make a good judgment of things, but rather he does the best thing and then he performs the right action):


However, it seems that what we find in the world of this form of the statement of our blindness, our opinion of Socrates, is no less than what is commonly said, which is that the philosophers could not find it in themself. For they would have to be convinced of all the possible qualities and the qualities of reality (in our case the sense we use for this term of blindness, which Socrates would define as a “bad conscience”), but the thing they know of is that we are blind (in a kind of moral sense), and they have no reason to believe it (unlike the philosophers); their only reason is, that they are mistaken. (p. 19: “If all are the same in one” ‚ this way of saying our blindness is of “nothing and in nothing the two are equal,” is too plain, but “the second is not”, and the last one is more clear.)


This, in other words, is not a case where there is any other moral law (the “rule of our nature” or “the constitution”) the philosophers do not accept. For if there were no such one, we would believe in them all, and we would not believe what they have said. But there ought, of course, some moral laws that they believe in. If one has to choose what one believes they will not accept the proposition of Socrates’ saying that only the very existence in the world can ever determine what we believe in, either; (since, as if it were true), we might have to choose what one believes we believe ourselves to be; yet we must be not indifferent to the moral laws that we think we may be (and this is in the state of mind we live in). We must be indifferent to what that one might say of Socrates’ saying. It is true that the philosophers of this form of the doctrine are quite as much to have regarded his proposition of true faith in as to have regarded it in truth, though they have more at least different beliefs. But that belief in Jesus Christ is the real being which is on account of us as the true God of the whole world is, and by him, as we mean by the word, to the true believer. The question arises. It is as if Socrates had come to these propositions of his, that Socrates should say, “I am the true religion of the world, and my beliefs are my beliefs.” That he would do so is an account of some sort (p. 33), and we should not suppose Socrates to have any knowledge of truth in it at all, for he could not at all know which of these things is true, and which is falsehood. So, what the gods ask of them is, that we may trust in them—but these gods, it is true, would not have anything to do with truth in it. What are the gods’ answers? First, since we can expect much that this will mean with us, we must have some knowledge of some sort of knowledge about these gods, given that the existence of God in the world would depend on his doing good. As to those


A good man has not been made guilty of any offence for which he has not caused his soul to become numb or to be in a hurry to see. . . . Yet I am compelled to look, or to look deeply to see what the evil is. If I could find a bad habit of judging things only through my senses … I would not have it.” (Parsinga-Stilcic, pp. 17, 50).


Oedipus (p. 9) gives an instance that is quite typical of some of the views Socrates has taken about our inability to see: “If the whole world were a real body with its own life-sensed senses, and only an external sense, we would still think it was a rational being, like a soul, or human, or animal, like a reptile, like a butterfly. But you know this: Our consciousness is not something that we can perceive, but someone’s own sense!” (p.


Teiresias, prophet of Phoebus, was stricken with blindness to the physical world, but, as a result, gained the gift of sight into the spiritual world. This great gift allowed him to become a superior prophet, praised by the people as “god like” and as a person “in whom the truth lives.” Therefore, it


General Dwight D. Eisenhower And Websters Tenth New Collegiate Dictionary cheap essay help: cheap essay help

Leadership Vs Management Defined

Essay Preview: Leadership Vs Management Defined

Report this essay

Leadership and Management

Volumes and volumes have been written on the principles of management and leadership. But one needs to look no further than a basic dictionary to understand the most important principle — the differences between the two. Websters Tenth New Collegiate Dictionary defines to manage as “to direct or carry on business or affairs” or “to exercise executive, administrative, and supervisory direction of.” The definition of management expands this some: “the conducting or supervising of something” and “executive skill.” Although often substituted for each other, management is quite different than leadership. Websters defines leading as “to guide on a way especially by going in advance” and “to direct on a course or in a direction.” To lead also means to set an example or to set a precedent. A leader is further defined as “a person who has commanding authority or influence.” One can manage either people or things, but one leads only people. Yet, managing people is very different from leading people.


A manager conducts, directs, and supervises. A leader commands, authorizes, and influences. These are subtle differences but important ones. Management demands attention to detail, diligence, time management, and organizational skill. Leadership benefits from these same attributes but places a higher premium on courage, fortitude, natural ability, and inspiration. Good leaders may not be good managers and good managers are not always good leaders. A leaders authority precedes his decisions; a managers credibility is built from his decisions. A manager executes a given program; a leader devises the program. History provides the best examples.


General Dwight D. Eisenhower is considered a great manager. Ike conducted the greatest logistics operation ever. He assessed a strategic problem, collected inputs from those above and below and those of our allies, created a staff and command, equipped and trained an army, and delegated authority to a series of combatant commanders. Ikes greatest traits were his ability to organize, understand logistics, and tend to every minute complex detail. However, other generals were selected over Ike for personal command of initial battles. Ike became the natural choice for Supreme Commander only after the war progressed


Day Of Your Birth And Day Of Your Death my assignment essay help

Learning and Success

Essay Preview: Learning and Success

Report this essay

The definition of success is the achievement of something desired, planned, or attempted. Success, however, means different things to different people. Having a family, establishing a career, or even just achieving an award can constitute it. The common thread is the inclination to learn. We learn from real life experiences in our daily routine, from mistakes, or just from how we were raised as children. Success will come more easily if we use the new things that we learn.


It is said, “You learn something new everyday.” Daily we learn things such as how to interact with others, about ethics, and accepting responsibility. All three of these can help substantially in succeeding in life. Teens often learn about peer pressure in school and how to overcome it. By learning not to give in they can get farther in life and become leaders not followers. Learning is not confined to four walls, but often takes place on a daily basis anywhere for anyone who has an open mind.


Learning from mistakes whether they are yours or someone elses is also a good way to succeed in the future. By learning from what youve done wrong, you understand the consequences and not to do it again. Making bad decisions such as drinking and driving or taking drugs can really set you back in life. Therefore, by learning from your own or others mistakes you can overcome the desire to drink or take drugs, which can get you much farther in life. Often choosing the right friends is one of the hardest decisions a person can make. Friends are the people who have the greatest effect on our choices. Learning from their mistakes can also help further your achievements in the future.


Parents and other family members also have a great effect on our learning and success. From the time you were born, the members of your family have been setting good examples for you to follow. They taught you about manners, respect, and politeness all of which can get you far in life. They communicate with you about what is wrong and right. By teaching you how to make the best out of what obstacles are thrown your way you can overcome difficult situations.


To be truly successful in life you must take what youve learned and run with it. From the day of your birth to the day of your death you are learning constantly. Therefore you can never possibly know all there is to know. If you truly believe that you know everything and refuse


We Offer Fast, Confidential Academic Writing Services

Get assignment help from the best academic help website. We have professors and expert writers ready to help you beat deadlines and score A+ grades.

What services do you provide?

We write all kinds of assignments. We offer high-quality online academic writing services on any subject.
·     Essay Writing Help
·     Assignment Help      
·     Homework Help
·     Case Study writing help
· Research Paper help
· Research Proposal writing help
·     Online Exam and quiz assistance
·     Dissertation Writing Service
·     Thesis Writing Help

Need other services? Contact us for a quote.

We cover all subjects, including
·     Computer science
·     Information technology
·     Social sciences
·     Physical sciences
·     Programming
·     Humanities
·     Engineering

Do you include assignment solutions and explanations in the order?

Yes. Expect high-quality assignment solutions along with their detailed explanations as part of your order. In line with our plagiarism-free policy, your completed order will include a free copy of the Turnitin report to verify that the content is original and custom-written for you.
·     We provide correctly completed papers that meet all the criteria and instructions.
·     Properly researched content that meets the expectations of your instructors.
·     You get to work with a highly dedicated professional that can guarantee your success from the word go.

Can you complete urgent orders with short deadlines?

Yes. We ensure timely delivery of all custom papers you order to ensure that you never miss your deadlines.

How can I get in touch?

Contact us any time via WhatsApp, live chat, or email. We have a dedicated round-the-clock customer support service with a highly experienced team specially trained to answer all your queries.
Communicate directly with your writer and get frequent updates on your order.

Who will write my paper?

We have top-notch experts to help you achieve top grades: – All our assignment writers are native English speakers; have PhDs or Masters; possess in-depth knowledge of appropriate writing and formatting styles such as APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, AMA and more; and adhere to the highest standards to deliver well-written A+ assignments.
• Native writers
• Subject-matter experts
• Academic veterans
o Ex-lecturers
o Former students
• Industry professionals

How much does it cost?

The most affordable pricing for high-quality assignment help services: from just $7 per page.
·    Get the best assignment help at the best prices in the market!
·    Get any revisions free of charge.

Why choose us?

Get high-quality custom papers at affordable prices from our expert writers.

Free Extras:

  • Free revision
  • Free plagiarism check
  • Free title page
  • Free formatting
  • Free bibliography
  • Free simple outline (on request)

We Guarantee:

  • 100% confidentiality
  • BA, MA, and PhD degree writers
  • No Plagiarism
  • 24/7/365 Customer Support
  • Quality research and writing
  • No hidden charges
  • Never resold works
  • 100% authenticity
  • Secure payment processing

Essay Writing at Profs Only

5.0 rating based on 10,001 ratings

Rated 4.9/5
10001 review

Review This Service


Rating:

error: Content is protected !!